Crunchy Con

Knows whereof he speaks

Tuesday May 22, 2007

A reader in the Texas capital who's a friend of mine has been telling me from some time now about no end of problems from a day labor site in his neighborhood, established by the People's Republic of Austin. It has become very difficult to talk about the very real difficulties around this site because ... well, here's what the reader says:

Here's what happens when you stick your head up . . .

What are you if you complain about your city putting a day labor site in your neighborhood? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the rise in violent crime in the neighborhood because of the day labor site? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the local elementary school being overwhelmed with non-English speaking students who are the children of illegals using the day labor site? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the squalid apartment complexes near the day labor site that now house illegals using the day labor site? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the increase in public drunkeness and drug dealing around the apartment complexes near the day labor site? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the lowering of your property values because of the day labor site? A racist.

What are you if you complain about the illegal bus station next to the day labor site that brings people from Mexico? A racist.

What are you if you complain about all of the above, give up, sell your home for a loss, and move to the suburbs? A racist.
Advertisement
Comments
jb
May 24, 2007 10:51 PM
fraterslibertas.com

Rod, Do you ever ask yourself why you have more pagans and various flavors of lefties on your site than conservs? A little...ah...food for thought there.

~tv
May 24, 2007 10:55 PM
HASH(0xb22e0b8)

Do you ever ask yourself why you have more pagans and various flavors of lefties on your site than conservs? While I would question your deep and meaningful statistical analysis of the circumstance (heh), I'd say it's because Rod welcomes people of all stripes to discuss the ideas he puts forward. I'm sure that appears to be some variety of appeasement to those more familiar with the Teutonic flavor of most conservative blogs, but if you're implying that Rod is some sort of closet lib, you obviously haven't hung around here much.

AnotherBeliever
May 24, 2007 11:47 PM
HASH(0xb230688)

You don't get the kids to put their lives on the line for oil, trade and treaties. The kids who wise up about the practical reasons either buy those with eyes wide open, or they follow orders, retire, and publish scathing criticisms of their former commander-in-chief. Franklin Evans | Homepage | 05.23.07 - 8:39 pm | #
That's not why we fight. We fight to keep one another alive. Forget the politics and the patriotism and the power plays. None of it matters in the least when you know one of your guys is currently being fired on.

Franklin Evans
May 25, 2007 1:51 AM
http://madfedor.blogspot.com/

AB, I certainly do not mean to argue your rebuttal, but I think we are talking about different things here. What keeps you sane in a combat theater? I think that is the question you just answered. It's a damn important question, and the better your answer, the better your chances of staying alive. But my statement implies a different question. What makes you decide to stay in a combat theater, go out on daily patrol or saddle up when called to join an active fire fight? I think "I'm following orders" is a good answer, but it's not all of it. You volunteered to do a job. You went through rigorous training. You passed tests of endurance, but also of commitment and responsibility. You are not just a soldier... The part that comes next, your personal statement of who you are and why you are there, that's the part that tells you and us what ideals you hold to in the face of death and pain. It's not, ever, oil or politics or any of that. It's something in your heart. So, all of that is in part my confession of cynicism in my initial statement about practical motivations and "selling" high ideals. Not that it wasn't obvious to you, but another part that you may not have considered is this: if you and I didn't share at least some of those ideals, you wouldn't have volunteered, and I wouldn't care if you did. Your expression of patriotism is being a soldier; mine is fulfilling my responsibility to make sure the practical reasons match the ideals, at least a little bit. You are not the target of that cynicism; I am, and our leaders are. We have both, to some extent, failed you.

HASH(0xb23154c)
May 26, 2007 2:38 PM
HASH(0xb23145c)

"I'll bite, Franklin, by saying that such an ideal may have worked when we all had separate interests .." I believe this points out that the sanctity of sovereignty is truly relative (actually borders are too) and especially in the "conservative" mind. Iraq comes to mind, Indian reservations come to mind (how many supported Indian gaming?) Vietnam? Venezuela?
US Sovereignty is the only sovereignty that should never be relative, of course. Then, if the US sovereignty alone is front and center, should there be included in all this US sovereignty the sovereign right to decide to treat migrants and refugees with some humanity?

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.