PBS's political correctness
It's not just suppressing the anti-Islamist Muslim documentary. In today's Dallas Morning News, I write to criticize PBS for knuckling under to Latino interest groups and members of Congress, and forcing Ken Burns to alter his WW2 documentary presentation. (The...
Your overall point has merit Rod, but no Hispanics in Sacramento?
"That pro-atheism documentary PBS is set to air soon -- on what grounds would PBS reject the demand by Catholics and Evangelicals that they be given air time to rebut that film's viewpoint?" Because religious people are a majority group. Duh. God bless.
"That pro-atheism documentary PBS is set to air soon -- on what grounds would PBS reject the demand by Catholics and Evangelicals that they be given air time to rebut that film's viewpoint?" They probably wouldn't, for fear of religious conservatives in Congress and Bill Donohue trying to cut off their funds. Or organize one of the religious right's infamous boycotts when they don't get their way.
Burns should have stood firm, even if it meant that his film wouldn't air.
I agree.
This is why the public should never fund the media. Dangerous mixing. Hey, Fox doesn't get public funding. Why should Liberal Broadcasting Service? What a waste of money.
I disagree.
Rod's original snot slinging fit, er, uh, commentary seems to have found belief.net's netherworld. But as I recal wasn't Ken Burns unfased about all this? It seems he had no complaints about it, right? It seems the usual suspects, foes of PBS, are the ones with the knots in their skirts. If Ken Burns found a way to accomodate the concerns of the latino community then why can't those who support the artist, Ken Burns?
Just think about Rod's outrage if PBS and the Latino community did an even more the politically incorrect thing such as utilize public funds and to do their own documentary featuring Hispanic vets for any reason, any war. He would then be upset that they were using public funding for some "special interest or entitlement." It was probably safer to piggy back on somebody else's re"whiting" of history. Also, the Hispanics were not alone in this venture. The Native Americans were also upset at their exclusion from the movie.
Two things. PBS airing pro-atheism?
PBS is atheism. Secular Humnaists take no prisoners. They allow no dissent. It's part of their tolerance and diversity practices. You can be whatever you want to be, as long as you are a Darwinian atheist.
Second, if a hyphen is used to describe an American, then the person using it is only half American at best or no American at all.
Donny. An American.
Latinos, per capita, have won more medals of honor than any other ethnic group. It was the heavly Spanish speaking national guardsmen of Texas, New Mexico and California who were sent to train the Spanish speaking Philipinos that suffered the intitial Japaneese assult and eventual Bataan Death March. Whole male populations of military age Latino and Native American men were wiped out from pueblos across the Southwest because of this. Ken Burns is an artist of unquestioned ability and genious but in this particular time in history we want our surviving Brown Americans to be recognized for their heroic deeds. Had this special excluded white veterans what would have been the reaction? We have earned our rightful place to be recognize and don't want to be dismissed for what ever reason.
Donny are you native-american?
So, now, what, left-handed, one-legged, red-headed Jewish Lesbians are entitled to their own PBS special, too?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.