(Finally, a non-immigration post).
The Pew Center has produced the first truly independent, comprehensive survey of American Muslims and their beliefs. The results are surprising, and mostly encouraging. It finds that most US Muslims are middle-class, assimilated or assimilating, and far less alienated than their co-religionists in Europe or elsewhere. The social mobility offered by America really is working, it seems. I was startled to read that just over half of US Muslims report little or no participation in mosque activities. Zuhdi Jasser says (in the "Islam vs. Islamists" film that PBS suppressed) that there are large numbers of US Muslims who want nothing to do with mosques because so many mosques are controlled by Islamists who politicize the faith. This survey suggests in several ways that he's right.
On a more troubling note, the survey finds that young Muslim adults (aged 18 to 29) are more religiously involved, and more sympathetic to radicalism, than older Muslims. Still, the numbers are fairly small, but worrying nonetheless. I was relieved to find that only five percent of Muslims surveyed expressed sympathy for al-Qaeda -- until I realized that that number corresponded to about 125,000 people! (But a significant number of Muslims -- 19 percent of 18-29s, 29 percent of over 30s -- declined to answer that question one way or the other; if you held an unfavorable opinion of al-Qaeda, why wouldn't you say so?)
Still, the survey is mostly good news. It does suggest to me, though, that American mosques -- which Muslims like Dr. Jasser and Sheikh Hisham Kabbani have been warning are largely under the control of Islamists -- ought to be viewed much more skeptically. Similarly with Islamist-run organizations like CAIR and ISNA. These groups claim to be the spokesmen for American Muslims, but the Pew survey would appear to indicate that they are the spokesmen only for a portion of the Islamic community. The moderate silent majority needs to find its public voice.
For what it's worth, the survey found that most Muslims heavily identify with the Democratic Party, and are big-government social conservatives. Also, four in 10 believe that someone other than Arabs carried out 9/11. That's wack.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
When you consider that a majority of those polled in the beginning months of this war believed that Saddam Hussein was behind 9/11, and that the hijackers were Iraqi nationals, I do not find it surprising that American Muslims believe that Arabs were not behind 9/11. Dis/misinformation does not discriminate on the basis of religion.
Good point about moral conflicts. However, I don't believe in conspiracy theories. That was one of the statements in the recent profile of Barack Obama in the New Yorker that most impressed me, because I think human nature runs against the existence of successful conspiracies.
ds0490 Good point. :) Scott in PA, to end Muslim immigration would be against our Constitution. I'm no Constitutional scholar, but I'm calling that.
It IS a risk that some Muslims in America think suicide bombings are justified. But can you control thought? I'm not trying to minimize your point of view at all, but that question still stands. Maybe the numbers would come out differently if the question were worded, "Are suicide operations which kill women and children acceptable?" That is against most moral teaching of Western and Muslim traditions, and it has taken a great effort for Islamicists to twist Jihad around to mean purposely killing innocents (innocents are ACCIDENTALLY killed in all wars, "holy" or not.)
Just a couple of points.
My understanding of Al Qaeda's public pronouncements is that adult Americans, by virtue of electing governments that pursue policies that are (in Al Qaeda's belief system) anti-Muslim, are not innocent civilians, but rather legitimate targets of suicide attacks.
Rod, remember that the Nazis (whom the Islamists imitate in their desire for totalitarian control and genocide) were never the electoral majority during the Weimar Republic. Yes, they received large pluralities in Reichstag elections but they always had to find a partner to hold an effective majority in the Reichstag (that is, until Hitler became chancellor; the rest, as they say...). What's the point? Raw numbers, in and of themselves, mean nothing because they can change fairly quickly. At best, they represent a snapshot at any given moment. What truly matters not only is the influence that a vocal minority has but also its ability to intimidate potential opponents into silence. Combined, those factors can turn a vocal minority into an effective majority -- and, for all intents and purposes, the radical "minority" in Islam today *is* the effective majority.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.