Five years ago today, the populist politician Pim Fortuyn was murdered on the verge of being elected leader of the Netherlands. His killer was an animal-rights fanatic claiming to be acting on behalf of immigrants supposedly threatened by Fortuyn. Fortuyn was a left-libertarian (by American standards) candidate who was maliciously caricatured by the Dutch media and establishment as a far-right menace. Fortuyn was in fact openly gay and indeed a libertine -- but he was called "far right" because he spoke out loudly and effectively against Holland's suicidal tolerance policy, which was bringing more and more fanatical Muslims into the country. Fortuyn feared that the democratic liberties he loved as a gay man and a secularist were under threat by the rise of Islamofascism in his country.
How spectacularly dishonest was the left-wing Dutch establishment's smear of Fortuyn? Here's a piece I did for NRO explaining his party platform. Does that sound like "far-right" to you? To any honest person?
Since his death, we've seen Theo van Gogh murdered on the streets of Amsterdam by a fanatical Islamist, and we've seen Ayaan Hirsi Ali leave Holland for exile in the United States. Geert Wilders, to my knowledge the only major Dutch politician who continues to speak out for Fortuyn's cause, lives under constant police protection because of Islamist death threats against him.
Here is a cover story I wrote for National Review after Fortuyn's death. It should be said that from a conservative point of view, Fortuyn was no savior. To oversimplify, he wanted to save Holland for hedonism -- which, as conservatives I talked to in Holland at the time pointed out, is a big part of the problem. But at least Fortuyn was brave enough to see that Holland's traditions of liberty were at stake, and he risked his life to defy the complacent Dutch establishment, and to attack the Islamist mafia within his country. Though he was not killed by an Islamist, as Theo van Gogh was, he died for the cause of liberty besieged by fanatical Islam. Say a prayer for him, and for the wonderful country he served -- which, as Bruce Bawer sadly notes, seems to have slipped back into complacency.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Wait, since he wrote one book with a title that evidences concern about Islamicization, he's anti-Muslim? Go back and read why and in response to what that claim was made.
Who's playing grammatical garble? Do you know what a "garble" is (hint, it's not something you play)? The bold-faced claim of Susan's that you highlighted and I called a "grammatical garble" plainly was that.
Then where do you get off comparing Falwell and Neuhaus to this imam since you have no idea what the imam said? Yes- the same way you lump Fortuyn in with van Gogh and Ali, she lumped Falwell and Neuhaus in with the imam. Just as you say those guys aren't from the same cloth, Susan is asserting that Fortuyn isn't cut from the same cloth as van Gogh and Ali. It's useful for you to lump them in together because it supports your "ph34r teh Muslimz!!11eleven" paradigm. That it is divorced from reality isn't relevant when it wins you debate points, right?
tv, while there may be some truth to your point, and victor may have un-chivalrouly hammered the stuffing out of susan, I think you're rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. It is a fundamental fallacy to think that just because two things share a common trait they must be the same or interchangeable.
tv, while there may be some truth to your point, and victor may have un-chivalrouly hammered the stuffing out of susan, I think you're rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic
My opinion, and this coming from a woman, I think Susan S.'s hammering was way overdue. Her arguments are so steeped in ignorance combined with insufferability that I generally scroll past her posts.I'm grateful to Victor Morton for the patience and the fortitude to read, digest, and rebut her nonsense.
Right back atcha, elmo.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.