Consequences, and truth
My friend Jeff Jacoby warns we who want the US to withdraw from Iraq: If US troops leave prematurely, the Iraqi government is likely to collapse, which could trigger violence on a far deadlier scale than Iraq is experiencing now....
Help the people who want out to get out, then follow them out the door. I don't appreciate the idea that we have to be the referee and stand between two groups that want to kill each other. If we are the paternalistic daddy-figure of the world, daddy doesn't stand there and physically restrain the kids from beating the crap out of each other if they can't play nice. He sends them to separate rooms.
We understand those things. And simply whether we leave now or 10 or50 years from now, these loons wills till be killing each other. Why should American fighting men and women be involved?We got rid of the bad guy. the rest is up to them.
As to Iran, we will deal with them, wigh airstrikes if necessary. But noboy today is giving Bush the green light for another war, so there's no point to talking about it until 2009. But again, if we really are worried about the bad guys follwoing us home, crazy idea-put the troops on the borders; toughen up out ports,airports and borders; tighten our immigration rules; and monItor those who are sympathetiC to Al Qeada and the like here. And throw some people out. Why are there ANY Arab student here after 9/11? Why are Arab neighborhoods now burgeoning with new arrivals? Gee, who has been in charge since 9/11?
And Bush and his stupidity made us the weaker horse. He came in light. He didn't give the troops the men and materiel they needed. He still has moronic ROE that continue to cost AMericans lives.Marines are in the brig for doing their jobs. When he didn't obliterate Falujah and kill Sadr, Bush told eveyrone that he wasn't serious, that he was the weak horse. So put the blame where it belongs, on the CIC.
The predictable consequences have already begun apart from Iraq. Commenters favoring withdrawal seem not to notice the dramatic uptick in suicide bombing and IEDs in Afghanistan in the past three months. That's a logical change in Taliban/AQ strategy: they are seeing that it works--the Harrys and Nancys and Rods of American public opinion can be spooked into quitting a fight.
Meanwhile, although Rod prays that the sleeping cherubs under his roof never know war when they come of age (although his actions are, in my opinion, helping ensure that they will), we will not have to wait that long. Pakistan is slipping to AQ as we speak, with Musharref hanging on by his fingernails. And Pakistan does have nukes, so no need to throw "they lied about the WMDs" or "Bush is plotting to attack Iran for political gain" accusations around. Zawahiri & Co. with the bomb. This isn't something that we face in a "few years", or in the early Obama Administration. Try "in a month or so".
I spent 15 months in Iraq, so I know what kind of commitment is being asked of soldiers, marines, sailors, airmen, and their families. They want to win. They think they can. They want the same kind of commitment to be asked of the citizens at home. Support the surge. Fund it and man it 110% Call it a cynical use of terminology by war supporters, but it is true nonetheless: Iraq is the central front, and if it is given up as lost...we will be in retreat in every other place on earth.
The current policy is about a month old. Bush held on to the old one for way too long, but the new one started soon after the elections and only in the last weeks has it fully taken effect. And, it looks like it's working.
"Call it a cynical use of terminology by war supporters, but it is true nonetheless: Iraq is the central front"
I didn't buy it in 2003, I don't buy it now.
To paraphrase the late Richard J Daley, the coalition forces aren't there to create disorder, they are there to preserve disorder.
Kim M
Most of us don't like war but if we left now we'd be like the neighbor kid who comes over to your house, trashes your room, and then leaves you to clean up the mess.
"When our most basic assumptions are false, we are not motivated to change them, but instead to continue down the path we're on in order to justify having taken that path in the first place."
Rod,
Can you just support our troops and their mission until we see how the surge works. Please, just wait until September and then re-evaluate. It's not that far away, just pause and let's see. If there is no progress, I will re-evaluate my support. The surge is not that old, give it a chance.
Anyone who uses the phrase "surrender lobby" just deserves a punch in the nose.
Oh good grief, it's painful to run the clock back and see what jewels guys like Jacoby produced in the past, but let's try and gauge his accuracy on Iraq.
"WMD Headlines Miss the Real Story
by Jeff Jacoby (October 25, 2003)
"But Kay's report was only one summary of WMD findings in Iraq to be released in Washington last week. At about the same time that Kay was on Capitol Hill, an international organization called the Iraq Survey Group, or ISG, was disclosing what its highly-regarded scientists -- many of them former UN inspectors -- had discovered about Saddam's chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons programs. Far from undermining the administration's rationale for war, many of the ISG's findings strengthened it -- decisively."
Ahhh, that decisively strengthened rationale for war.
"Dealing with Terror Regimes
"by Jeff Jacoby (February 19, 2003)
"It will not end with Iraq. The toppling of Saddam Hussein will make the Middle East a better place, free a nation that has suffered unspeakable cruelty, and shame the illiberal "peace movement" that even now counsels appeasement and willful blindness in the face of evil. Iraq should have been liberated during the first Gulf War; it cannot happen soon enough. "
How's that "better place" going these days?
Having been wrong about the war is forgivable. A lot of people were.
Still being not just wrong but so viciously so reveals a decisive lack of self-awareness.
Nothing against your friend, Mr. Dreher. I'm sure he's a great dinner companion.
"Most of us don't like war but if we left now we'd be like the neighbor kid who comes over to your house, trashes your room, and then leaves you to clean up the mess."
Except that *we* didn't do anything to Iraq. It was the national government of the U.S.
I believe that the Bush strategy forced them to miss an golden opportunity: when the Sunnis announced their boycott of the elections, Bush should have publicly told them the simple truth: if you think you have the luxury of playing around, then just wait until a few days after the US pulls out and watch your people being massacred by revenge-minded Shiites. You had it good for decades as Hussein's cronies. You are being offered a proportional role in a pluralistic government. Don't for a moment think you can regain past glory by playing a political game that you have no chance of winning.
The thing about the bloodbath gloom and doom sayers makes me laugh derisively while crying: WTF is happening there right now, and why is that "better"?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.