Crunchy Con

Me and the "Mississippi Sissy"

Friday July 20, 2007

Categories: Culture
Back when I was a New York Post columnist, I got an angry e-mail from a Vanity Fair writer named Kevin Sessums. He was mad at me for something I'd written, can't remember what. I wrote him back and told...
Advertisement
Comments
Boko Fittleworth
July 20, 2007 3:39 PM

Yeah.

"...go naked with him." Alarm bells! May God bless and heal Sessums.

ScurvyOaks
July 20, 2007 3:50 PM

>"How much good did Dr. Gallman do? How is it to be weighed against the serious evil he did in Kevin's life? . . . I am glad I'm not God, having to decide these things."

Please, please tell me that this isn't your understanding of soteriology, Rod.

Rod Dreher
July 20, 2007 4:04 PM

Relax, it's not. I know what the mechanics of salvation are. I guess I was more interested in how we men evaluate the legacy of a man like this. God knows the state of his soul, and how sincere his repentance was, if indeed he did repent. What I'm saying is that if I were God, I would find it hard to forgive this man. Thank God I'm not God.

ScurvyOaks
July 20, 2007 4:24 PM

>"Thank God I'm not God."

Boy, do I second that -- meaning, of course, thank God that I'm not God. But also, btw, I'm pretty happy you're not God either, and I mean that in a good way, brother. :)

Don Altabello
July 20, 2007 4:32 PM

"How is it to be weighed against the serious evil he did in Kevin's life? Is there ever enough good that a man can do to compensate for killing a child's soul like that? Are there other boys that he preyed on, trading on his reputation as a respected servant of the Lord to pry them away from their parents, and into his bed?"

Rod,

To answer your question--no. Only true remorse and God's mercy can ever salvage this man.

Perhaps this is just the "wanna be" lawyer and prosecutor intern talking, but I really scrutinize high profile religious figures, and it sounds like his sexual deviancy was probably caught up and tainted his motivations for being a minister and indeed his entire view of life.

I think individuals who pawn themselves off to be highly charismatic (in the generic sense) leaders and who develop a sort of cult following sometimes are hiding something (Fr. Maciel comes to mind). To be clear, I think that pastors/priests should be respected as spiritual leaders and I can certainly trust them more than your average person. Nonetheless, a healthy dose of skepticism and common sense should be used when sizing people up, including religious leaders. For a moment, take a person out of the context of a someone in your particular faith community and out of the leadership position--ask yourself, is there something off about this individual? If this is done (by parents and bishops/elders)--I think that a lot of abuse can be prevented. Any grown man who wants to go on a trip with a young boy (and I realize this was a more innocent time) should register about a 10 on your wierd s*(% o meter.

Kate Marie
July 20, 2007 4:39 PM

An interesting post, Rod, and I must say I share your anger at the men who can commit such evil. I'm even tempted, every now and then, to consider Ivan Karamazov's rebellion (i.e., "if my ticket of admission to paradise is accepting that people like Dr. Gallman will be forgiven by God and embraced by his victims, I must respectfully return my ticket.") I'm finding it takes a lot of courage to maintain one's faith in the face of so much evil in the world -- partly because evil is always a temptation in itself, and partly because the existence of such evil is a constant trial of my faith.

P.S. I don't want to appear to be treating this subject too flippantly, but was your last sentence a deliberate allusion to one of Lyle Lovett's best songs?

"Who keeps on trusting you
When you've been cheating
And spending your nights on the town
And who keeps on saying that he still wants you
When you're through running around
And who keeps on loving you
When you've been lying
Saying things ain't what they seem
God does
But I don't
God will
But I won't
And that's the difference
Between God and me

So who says he'll forgive you
And says that he'll miss you
And dream of your sweet memory
God does
But I don't
God will
But I won't
And that's the difference
Between God and me."

Rod Dreher
July 20, 2007 5:07 PM

Kate Marie, I love me some Lyle Lovett. So yes, you got it.

I agree with you on Ivan K. Let me say why.

When I was in fourth grade, a new kid moved into our town. He was hyperactive. He talked funny (he was a YANKEE!). He was hard to like. I made it my business to gang up on him with the other boys in my class and to make his life miserable. When my dad found out what I'd been up to, he chastised me harshly. Made me apologize to the kid. Made me cry. He did the right thing.

I've wondered from time to time over the years whatever happened to that kid, Johnny. His family moved away after that year. Does he even remember how I treated him? How did it affect him?

Another story: I once dated a woman for only about six weeks. It wasn't working out, and I broke up with her. She was devastated, and because I was unnerved by the depth of her emotion, I tried to do the stupid guy thing, and put her down to my friends. Word got back to her. I found out later that she was terribly hurt by me. I couldn't work up the courage to apologize to her before I moved, and then she moved. I don't know where she is. I heard she got married a while back. I think about her every now and then, and feel ashamed of my casual cruelty.

These are small things compared to something like molestation. But I have no way of knowing how big was the damage of my cruelty in the lives of these other people. I may require far more mercy from God than I can even fathom. It sounds crazy, but if I am to be forgiven, I have to be able to count on a God who can forgive even Hitler, if he repented.

Kate Marie
July 20, 2007 6:02 PM

Rod, I feel the same way about all the damage I have caused (or might have caused) in my life.

I guess it's human to expect some sort of commensurability in God's grace, but it doesn't seem to work that way.

I like this passage from Marilynne Robinson's Gilead:

"As I have told you, I myself was the good son, so to speak, the one who never left his father's house -- even when his father did, a fact which surely puts my credentials beyond all challenge. I am one of those righteous for whom the rejoicing in heaven will be comparatively restrained. And that's all right. There is no justice in love, no proportion in it, and there need not be, because in any specific instance it is only a glimpse or a parable of an embracing, incomprehensible reality. It makes no sense at all because it is the eternal breaking in on the temporal. So how could it subordinate itself to cause and consequence?"

I'm still not sure whether it smacks a bit of the irrationalist (or anti-rationalist) strain of Christianity that Pope Benedict warned about, but it's a nice passage nonetheless.

Susan
July 20, 2007 6:58 PM

To be clear, I think that pastors/priests should be respected as spiritual leaders and I can certainly trust them more than your average person.

Why? Can you trust them more than your average person?

Don Altabello
July 20, 2007 7:40 PM

"Why? Can you trust them more than your average person?

Posted by: Susan | July 20, 2007 6:58 PM"

Why wouldn't I--I trust people I know more than someone I barely know. I trust my doctor with information I would not entrust to the average person. I trust the people I work with to a certain extent--I don't go around paranoid that someone around me is going to screw up my work.

Beyond that--my experience with priests has been more or less positive. And they are trained to guide an individual in their spiritual life, so there are personal aspects of my life I would entrust to a priest's confidence that I would not go around telling even good friends. I don't idolize them--but my experiences have taught me to trust them more than most people.

That said, common sense should be used and a little bit of healthy skepticism, especially as I read the facts of this case. Signs of a troubled personality, or an "it's too good to be real" type of personality always perks up my ear.

I'm not sure why you chose one, mostly insignificant point in my post. My hopes were that the totality of my comments would generate an interesting discussion. Bad apples in the priesthood is not going to engender some sort of paranoia in me about priests (or, for that matter, rail on about some oppressive structure).

M_David
July 20, 2007 9:52 PM

Ivan Karamazov..."if my ticket of admission to paradise is accepting that people like Dr. Gallman will be forgiven by God and embraced by his victims, I must respectfully return my ticket."

Wow. I've never read Karamazov, but I don't think I've seen anything so terrible in my life. Every man is a sinner; Karamazov would desire to destroy hope itself with a wholesale rejection of everything Jesus stands for: forgive us our sins, as we fogive those who trespass against us. Karamozov would condemn us all to hell.

I much prefer St. Faustina: All of the sins that have ever been or ever will be committed are no more than a grain of sand in the ocean of God's mercy.

Kate Marie
July 20, 2007 10:33 PM

M_David,

"Karamazov would desire to destroy hope itself with a wholesale rejection of everything Jesus stands for."

-- Exactly, and that's precisely the premise of Ivan K.'s tale of the Grand Inquisitor, though he would probably call it "giving people what they need" rather than destroying hope. And Dostoyevsky *means* it to be terrible, I think. But Christ has an answer for the Grand Inquisitor, just as Ivan's brother, Alyosha, has an answer for Ivan's rebellion.

Anyway, The Brothers Karamazov is, IMHO, one of the greatest novels ever written. If you read it, you'll see that it's possible to have great sympathy with Ivan even while you reject his terrible worldview.

Anonymous
July 21, 2007 10:32 AM

"To be clear, I think that pastors/priests should be respected as spiritual leaders and I can certainly trust them more than your average person."

And that is why it is all the more egregious when that particular trust of that respected person ends up as betrayal.

M_David
July 21, 2007 1:30 PM

Kate Marie,

B Karamazov has been on my list for a long time...need more time! Funny enough, an Orthdodox fellow once had me read a short selection from the Grand Inquisitor part of BK as part of a conversion attempt...I guess I was unimpressed, and this slowed me down on reading the rest of it.

But boy you've got me scared now! I'll need a dark day...I'll have to read Les Miserables to recover :-).

And oh, and while I have great sympathy for Karamazov the man, I have zero, zilch, nada for his worldview. Error deserves no sympathy (even as men in error do).

This world divides neatly into those who love their fellow sinner and greatly desire to forgive him, and those who do not. Those who cannot forgive in the end hate themselves, as their own sins condemn them. America certainly seems to be headed the wrong way here.

Hell must exist, therefore, for those of us who will not forgive and must have somewhere to go. And what a terrible place this hell is.

masha
July 23, 2007 2:37 AM

Maybe it is too late to write in this thread, but...
I would like to second my namesake Marie that B.Karamazovs is one of the greatest novels ever written.
M_David, please, don't put off reading it, it is very very interesting!
Just read several chapters and you see. Don't start from great Inquisitor. Better to start from Book VI-The russian Monk. Or book X- 'The boys' + chapte3 3 from the Epilogue, it goes well as separate stories. (warning: don't read it to children, it will make them weep for the boy)

As for the Legend about the Great Inquisitor, imho it is better to read it together with 2 previous chapters ('Brothers make friends' and 'Rebellion')(Larissa Volokhonsky seems to be a trustworthy translator of russian classics, don't know about the others)

Jack Sullivan
October 2, 2007 3:47 PM

I do not see how anything in that quote of, and about, Dr. Gallman is a reason to think he was a molester. If a person is already under the assumption that he was, then yes, that quote will suddenly come alive with such connotations. Has anyone other than Kevin Sessums made accusations?

Jim Waddell
November 6, 2007 1:37 AM

Andrew Gallman was my pastor in Meridian, MS when I was in high school. He gave me much personal encouragement in my faith and was a pivotal influence in my journey towards Christ. He mentored a handful of youths in my church who went on to become ordained ministers. I could name them... they still serve productively. There was never a hint of impropiety in Dr. Gallman's conduct towards me or any of the men above. I attended Dr. Gallman's funeral. When the presiding minister asked anyone to stand who had entered the ministry because of Andrew Gallman's influence, an unbelievable number rose throughout the huge sanctuary.

You are right. Dr. Gallman is dead and cannot defend himself against the popular trend of pinning one's personal perversion on a religious leader and therefore on the Church. Dr. Gallman cannot defend himself from lies, but those whose lives he touched can and should.

David
May 18, 2008 12:44 AM

To Jim Waddell - if you read Kevin Sessums' book you'll see he in no way tries to pin his homosexuality on Dr. Gallman. You obviously don't know much about sexual orientation if you think a molestor can turn someone gay.

Gill
February 5, 2009 3:11 PM

I am heartbroken for both Kevin, because he was victimized; and I am heartbroken for Dr. Gallman, who obviously repressed his homosexual orientation because of the day and age, as well as conservative religious paradigm, in which he grew up and lived. This situation is also an indictment upon religious belief systems which, like the medieval Catholic Church, refuse to believe the world is flat even in the light of incontestable scientific proof.

I have to say that upon reading Kevin's writings over the past two years, I have had mixed feelings in seeing the need to have specifically exposed Dr. Gallman, seeing that his children are still living and that they are decent Christian leaders. Perhaps this is a case of TMI. Why should the Gallman family be hurt and harrassed by public information about a situation they could not control, especially in the light of Dr. Gallman's posthumous status?

I know for a fact that many, many people were spiritually edified, transformed and physically healed under Andrew Gallman's ministry. I also know that he had an enormous love for God and was a Southern gentleman who was genteel and charming. It is my understanding that Dr. Gallman lost his father at an early age and was raised by his mother. Who is to say that he himself was not victimized sexually by older men in his early formative years. We all know today that children who are violated very frequently grow up to commit the same abuses that they have suffered. It is a devastating thing.

It is certain that Dr. Gallman, similar to individuals like evangelical leader, Ted Haggard and even prominent political leaders such as the former governor of New Jersey, find themselves in enormous inner conflict with a secret sexual orientation that, if it were known, would destroy their personal and professional lives. THIS DOES NOT EXCUSE or endorse their acting out their personal demons in illicit and twisted ways. It is also not necessarily an indicator that Dr. Gallman was a homosexual, but that he was a sexual offender, which is different.

This is nothing isolated. Look at the past decade and the heinous exposure of priest abuse in the Roman Catholic Church! Forced celebacy (which is not even remotely Biblical) has resulted in the aberrations which have only in the last decade been made public. To emasculate or, in a truer sense, mutilate a person's sexuality in order for that person to serve a higher cause, in this case, Christ, indicates a perversion of truth which unfortunately, the Roman Catholic Church will deny until the cows come home.

Kevin Sessums has been a victim, and has a journey of recovery and healing to complete that hopefully will help others with similar stories. As long as Kevin does not fixate on his bitterness and anger but will move on to forgiveness and healing, he will be a whole human being. It would be useless for him to have exposed Andrew Gallman in this way if Mr. Sessums does not bring redemption to others.

Brooks
May 4, 2009 5:16 PM

Dr. Andrew Gallman was not only an amazing pastor, missionary, evangelist, and man; he was an amazing grandfather. I am sure people advise against posting on sites that defile a member of their family, however, it is hard to sit back and see it done. I haven't read nor do I plan on reading this book mentioned, but these comments that refer to my grandfather as a molester, closet homosexual, and/or other things are appalling. It is quite difficult to see information like this about a man that had only genuine love for Christ and always showed that love in the most proper ways. As his grandson, he never once attempted any type of improper thing toward me or any of the other children around. I, like others, was at the funeral and also witnessed the multitude of people stand because of his influence in their life. He was one of the most humble men and his relationship with his wife and family was remarkable and one that should be patterned after. Dr. Andrew Gallman was a remarkable man and shouldn't have this type of information defiling him. He doesn't deserve this.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.