This video from an Evangelical rally in Africa helps answer the question, "Where is the future of Christianity?" And, "What's the easiest way to make the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church shriek like Homer Simpson?"...
It's Reinhard Bonke, folks. He has been doing evangelistic crusades in Africa for decades and a bigger heart for the continent you will never see.
He is also a gifted healer and rumor has it when the call goes forth, the entire crowd moves forward!
A recent Google search reveals that the "entire" southern hemisphere now identifies themselves as Christian. (Google: "Third Church")
There are huge movements of God in the world that very few of us are privy to - unless we consciously seek it out. The government in China currently acknowledges 1,000,000 Christians - but non-official estimates are much higher.
Daniel
July 9, 2007 7:53 PM
"What's the easiest way to make the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church shriek like Homer Simpson"
One could same the same thing about the Europeans and Americans who advocate for the Latin Mass or the head of the Orthodox church. The future of religion isn't in the bells and smells and chanting, which is why those suspicious of the Tridentene Mass question the acquiesence to a small number of noisy orthodox. Do you think all those believers are going to run to a Latin Mass? How about a three hour long Orthdodox vigil?
Douglas Cramer
July 9, 2007 7:54 PM
Orthodox journalism professor and author Terry Mattingly has some interesting comments about this phenomenon in his interview in the new issue of AGAIN Magazine:
"We have much we can learn from Anglicans in the Third World about what a liturgical evangelism might look like. Even though much of what they’re doing is charismatic, in a very real sense of that word, I still think we can pay attention to what they’re doing and learn from it. It might be Calvinistic, but it is still going to have more of a liturgical form than, say, the Southern Baptist Convention would have over there. There are going to be some very alive, highly Catholic elements. For example, the African church—African culture itself—has a heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy. This means African bishops are going to be much more a kind of spiritual father model than you would experience in America, where bishops are thought of as super-theology professors who are appointed because of a combination of management skills and lecture skills. Instead of being primarily an intellectual or administrative leader, an African bishop is much more of a spiritual father or shepherd—even if that person has two degrees from Oxford.
"African Christians are also dealing with a situation in which some of their own children could be kidnapped by Moslems. Or if you’re the Anglican bishop in Singapore, you’re literally dealing with the occult in many, many cases. These are not people who doubt the reality of a pre-modern spiritual world. The lives of the saints speak to these people in ways that we just don’t have any understanding of.
Christ Bless,
Doug
(full disclosure...)
Douglas Cramer
Managing Editor, AGAIN Magazine
Anonymous
July 9, 2007 9:17 PM
Wealth + Health= converts
sacrifice + service= not so much
Irenaeus
July 9, 2007 9:41 PM
"The future of religion isn't in the bells and smells and chanting..."
Not necessarily true. First, many people (from whatever continent) who are originally enamored of charismatic/pentecostal worship find that it's difficult to maintain that level of enthusiasm over the long haul of a lifetime and wind up in liturgical churches. Second, charismata and liturgy/structure are not exclusive (as the very phenomenon of charismatic Anglicanism shows). Many of the spirit's movements in history have taken place in and indeed inauguarated monastic movements. Read Kyriacos Markides' Mountain of Silence, in which he relates many mystical experiences of the monks of Mount Athos and Panagia monastery; such things make your average pentecostal Christian look like a lightweight. Third, sociologists of religion have been finding recently that many young folks (admittedly in a North American context) want tradition and liturgy, smells and bells. Perhaps the baby boomers were an anomaly in the history of religious experience. Fourth, while the video Rod posted is impressive, I suspect you could find similar video from a World Youth Day or most Sundays at St Peter's Square.
Eric W
July 9, 2007 10:06 PM
Father Stephen Freeman (Orthodox, OCA) posted on his blog yesterday some thoughts about his Charismatic past: The Spirit of the Modern World, and followed that today with a post about a Charismatic Episcopal Church becoming Orthodox. The posts and the comments are worth reading.
godisaheretic
July 10, 2007 12:44 AM
"Where is the future of Christianity?"
I've read/heard estimates that within another generation or two, we Christians here in North America will be only about 4 percent of the population...
about the same as now in Europe...
it's not because we are smarter than those in the third world...
but we do have access to much more knowledge of the world...
it's no surprise that Christianity is accepted by such a large amount of third world persons...
since they lack access to information about the mythological basis of all religion...
the huge movements fueled by the God Myths will surely shrink in the third world as more of the people aquire access to the counter arguments that bring reasonable doubt to the validity of the Myths of the world...
faith hope love joy peace to all...
Irenaeus
July 10, 2007 1:47 AM
Someone should ban GIAH, not for his rambling musings, but for the annoying use of ellipsis dots...
Or maybe for his paternalistic attitude to the benighted millions of the Dark Continent...
Of course, the Enlightenment for which he hopes is dying in the West...as counter arguments to the counter arguments of the 'God Myths' spread...
In fact, the 'third world' (try 'majority world') will probably not accept the Enlightenment worldview, even while incorporating the blessings brought by modern science...
lah dee da...
mindless rambling followed by dots...
faith hope love joy peace which can have no meaning in my system to all...
Jeremy
July 10, 2007 8:01 AM
I'm a historian presenting working this summer in Gabon, a small country in Central Africa, where I joined briefly a Pentecostal church some years ago before becoming a Catholic based on my experiences here.
The kind of fervor one sees at evangelical and pentecostal revivals here certainly can be inspiring, no doubt. However, African churches here have their own problems, just like Christians everywhere else. Many people (at least here) live together outside of marriage, and
at times the search for mystical power and protection can skew things quite a bit. Some people - Catholic, Protestant, and those outside of the Christian tradition (Muslims and believers in local religious traditions) tend to view a lot of the commotion at rallies as exaggerated and/or a scam for money. The prosperity gospel is a pretty strong current within many Protestant circles here (and to a lesser extent Catholic), esp. since the vast majority of people are dirt poor. This shouldn't be seen as an attempt to belittle anyone's faith, or to suggest all African Christians are superstituous and ignorant. Far from it - the evangelicals in particular know their Bibles extremely well.
What is striking here is how seriously most people take the reality of spiritual warfare and supernatural evil. Unless churches here speak to those concerns, they wont go anywhere. One striking difference between the Catholic priests and laity here as opposed to Catholics I have met in the US for the most part (with a few exceptions) is that spiritual warfare is part of the daily vocabulary people use here.
I think this divide is as big as other issues that have received more attention (homosexuality, for example). What I am interested to see is how the seemingly growing opposition to religious beliefs in general in North America and Europe will cope with the concerns and practices of African Christianity. GIAH's hope in the decline of organized religion is going to be shared by many people, once the determined secularists realize more clearly how out of place their views will be among African Christians.
As far as traditional Catholicism goes, there is some support for the Tridentine mass here - the SSPX has a big church in the capital of Libreville that is popular, and a lot of its support comes from those who feel the post-Vatican II church made too many concessions to local beliefs as well as the fact that Catholic missions in the colonial era (to 1960) had a lot more power and wealth than most parishes do generally. At the Catholic church I attend, daily mass is preceded by morning prayer from the Office and Adoration of the Eucharist with "Tantum Ergo" sung in Latin, and this is pretty typical for most Catholic churches here.
If anyone wants to get a more detailed sense of these issues, read David Maxwell's recent book (Ohio University Press 2007) "Gifts of the Spirit" (I think that's the title! look up the ou press website to find it for sure) on the Assemblies of God of Zimbabwe - it really lays out a lot of issues regarding the growth of Pentecostal churches well in an even-handed way, I think.
~tv
July 10, 2007 9:23 AM
For example, the African church—African culture itself—has a heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy. This means African bishops are going to be much more a kind of spiritual father model than you would experience in America, where bishops are thought of as super-theology professors who are appointed because of a combination of management skills and lecture skills.
Fabulous - maybe they can go through a few hundred years of patriarchal wars, followed by a few centuries of political oppression under the Holy Zimbabwean Empire - then when another reformation happens in a thousand years another round of wars can start before science and reason get a foothold in the region.
Finally, after long last, that heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy will be the movement's downfall as the populace wakes up to the corruption and abuse it engenders.
jaybird
July 10, 2007 10:26 AM
A recent Google search reveals that the "entire" southern hemisphere now identifies themselves as Christian.
Indonesia - most of which lies below the equator - is the most populous Muslim country in the world, with more than 200 million people. New Zealand and Australia are probably about as "Christian" as Western Europe - i.e. nominally. So that leaves Antarctica (empty) South America and a chunk of Africa. So if countries like Brazil (land of topless beaches, thongs and bikini waxing) and Rwanda and Zimbabwe (machete rampages and kleptocracies) are the future of Christianity, then Christianity has its work cut out for it.
rr
July 10, 2007 10:26 AM
quote: "then when another reformation happens in a thousand years another round of wars can start before science and reason get a foothold in the region."
Yes, and then Africa will be as peaceful as 20th Europe. Yeah, whatever.
Put down the secularist koolaide tv. A lot more people have been killed in the name of secularism's "science" and "reason" (and I don't accept that secularism is "scientific" or "reasonable" BTW) in the last century than all the religious wars put together. Hell, the Communists claimed their ideology was "scientific" and Nazism's connection to the cutting-edge "science" of its day, eugenics, is well known. And let's not forget that while science can benefit mankind, "science" isn't the necessarily some force for morality or "progress." After all, the atomic bomb is probably the most amazing invention of modern science.
Finally, Europe today is largely secular and at peace. But its demographic problems will likely cause serious problems with European welfare systems and Europe's economic and population decline will make it increasingly irrelevant to world affairs. The main thing that secularism has brought Europe has been war, totalitarian ideologies and finally decline. Let's hope American and then Africa don't follow Europe's path.
rr
~tv
July 10, 2007 10:33 AM
Put down the secularist koolaide tv.
I will when you stop wishing the sky-daddy would make it all better for you.
Daniel
July 10, 2007 10:57 AM
"Europe today is largely secular and at peace. But its demographic problems will likely cause serious problems with European welfare systems and Europe's economic and population decline will make it increasingly irrelevant to world affairs."
Now, if only someone could show an actual link between religiosity and demographic growth. In a contraceptive age, there is little evidence that religiosity equates with baby-making. The best predictor of baby-making is poorly educated women with few economic choices. The more women are empowered and educated, the fewer babies they have.
That's not to disaparage those few First World religious folks who actually have lots of children out a religious commitment, but acts as a reminder that we need to rethink the faithful=baby making equation.
Simon
July 10, 2007 11:06 AM
Jeremy, wonderful, insightful post.
Having spent a fair amount of time in Africa, I agree that the exuberance of African Christianity differs in significant ways from American Pentecostalism or evangelicalism. Also, for all its well-documented problems, the Catholic Church is growing by leaps and bounds across the continent. Catholicism is now close to the majority in several English-speaking countries, having left in the dust everything (including Anglicanism) other than Pentecostalism.
Also, a striking characteristic of the "charismatic" worship style of African Catholics is its reverence, which is simply expressed in a way consonant with local custom. They may bang on drums at Mass, but the effect is nothing like the happy-clappy affirm-our-community junk you get in so many American suburbs.
rr
July 10, 2007 11:10 AM
Daniel,
Actually, recent research argues that fertility decline causes religious decline.
I'm not entirely sure what to think of it myself and the issue of fertility decline is a complicated one. Needless to say, things don't look good for secular Europe.
Oh, and tv, abandoning my heavenly Father would be drinking the koolaide. So no thanks, you can keep your poison.
rr
Simon
July 10, 2007 11:12 AM
we need to rethink the faithful=baby making equation.
Such rethinking is being done. Check out the work of Mary Eberstadt:
who makes a very persuasive argument that secularism is the result rather than the cause of low fertility rates.
Daniel
July 10, 2007 11:22 AM
The flaw in Eberstadt's theory is that her only examples involve a time when secularism and fertility decline was occurring simultaneously.
She doesn't account for the fact that in highly religious countries--India, Mexico and U.S., to some extent--fertility rates have decreased despite high levels of faithfulness. The fertility uptick in the U.S. is likely more attributed to an influx of poor Hispanics and a good economy, not increased religiosity.
As women become better educated and economically independent in places like Mexico and India, fertility has plummeted even when religiosity remains high. Eberstadt has long shared the conservative obsession with European secularism and it may now be completely blinding her.
TheisticAgnostic
July 10, 2007 11:29 AM
From Douglas Cramer:
"It might be Calvinistic...
Lord have mercy on use all.
Ross
July 10, 2007 11:49 AM
That video is impressive, regardless of what the crowd is cheering. I have no basis to know what it is these Christians believe or how they would fit into an American church. From the limited experience I've had with African Christians here in the U.S., their fire and passion for Christ has inspired many American Christians (more conservative ones) and scared some others (more liberal ones).
The claim that the entire southern hemisphere identifies itself as Christian is as silly as TV blaming patriarchy for wars and oppression in Europe or jaybird's idiotic generalizations about the southern hemisphere. Do you folks think before you write?
~tv
July 10, 2007 11:58 AM
Right - because patriarchy has *absolutely nothing* to do with War.
Funny how you so rarely see women settling diputes by razing entire cities.
jaybird
July 10, 2007 12:00 PM
Please inform me as to which of my generalizations is the most idiotic, Ross: Indonesia is not the most populous Muslim country in the world? Antarctica is not empty? There are no topless beaches in Brazil? Rwanda and Zimbabwe are not economic and cultural basket-case nations?
Thanks in advance!
Demetrio
July 10, 2007 12:08 PM
Aren't people in this discussion making the assumption that bigger churches are better? That the bigger the church means the closer to God? And isn't that obviously not true?
If you want to bring people to Christ, you first have to reach them where they are. Worshipping at a Catholic Church doesn't necessarily mean that one is close to God. Neither does believing in the Prosperity Gospel mean that one isn't moving closer to Christ.
mm
July 10, 2007 12:21 PM
Ross,
I used "entire" in scare quotes to indicate an overgeneralization - but a global trend, nonetheless.
TV - I didn't say patriarchy has nothing to do with war. I said it was silly of you to blame patriarchy for wars and oppression. There are much larger causes for wars in Europe than patriarchy. How about greed? Desire for power? There are many areas of the globe that have patriarchal societies that don't fight each other. In addition, most societies in Africa have been patriarchal for centuries so it's not like this is some big change for them. Your comment implied a big change, as if Africans are moving away from a peaceful history towards one of war and oppression now that they've supposedly developed a patriarchy.
jaybird - It's tough to chose but I'd have to say either your generalization that Brazil can be reduced to topless beaches (is bikini waxing unchristian?) or that sub-Saharan Africa can be reduced to fanatics with machetes.
MM - I'd agree it is a trend in certain areas of the global south, but also a lazy generalization.
jaybird
July 10, 2007 1:12 PM
Ross: is bikini waxing unchristian?
I don't know, but I'm willing to conduct a survey of Christian women in Brazil to find out. Purely for scientific reasons.
On the other hand, you couldn't pay me enough money to find out first-hand if Sub-Saharan Africa is as awful as the news media makes it out to be, so you may have a point.
M_David
July 10, 2007 1:25 PM
Neither does believing in the Prosperity Gospel mean that one isn't moving closer to Christ
This is like saying just 'cause you sleep around you aren't moving closer to Christ. Sure you might be, but the sleeping around part is moving you away from Christ.
What I'm saying is the teachings of Christ are in direct opposition to the Prosperity Gospel. Just read the Gospels.
Anonymous
July 10, 2007 1:26 PM
"Actually, recent research argues that fertility decline causes religious decline."
Becuase as long as those who call themselves "religious" try to dictate over other people's reproduction, they will find that people will turn away from those religious dictums.
Chuck
July 10, 2007 1:37 PM
Women don't raze cities to settle disputes?
Two words, "Indira Ghandi!"
~tv
July 10, 2007 2:00 PM
There ya go Chuck. That one name wipes out millenia of patriarchal genocides.
Nice work.
(sheesh)
Ross
July 10, 2007 3:38 PM
TV - There's also Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher, who both lead their respective countries at the time of war. In addition, there are many women from older time periods who lead their nations to war - Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, and Queens Anne, Mary, and Elizabeth of England, come to mind. And there were female leaders of ancient Egypt as well as female leaders in the Bible who had no qualms about wars and using violence to solve a dispute. Now you can make the point that all these women led patriarchal societies, but then you really don't have any evidence that women can lead nations and resist war any more than men can.
~tv
July 10, 2007 7:52 PM
Now you can make the point that all these women led patriarchal societies,
Don't need to, when you made it for me ;)
but then you really don't have any evidence that women can lead nations and resist war any more than men can.
Of course I don't - it's never been tried under any other model. Of course, a matriarchal society couldn't be any *worse* than the patriarchal one, so I'm game.
Ross
July 11, 2007 1:32 PM
TV - So your point that patriarchal societies are the cause of war is unfounded. There's no evidence to prove that a matriachal society would be any worse or better. So there's nothing on which to base your silly theory. Think before you write next time. Just admit it was a poor attempt at humor and move on.
Anonymous
July 11, 2007 5:26 PM
Yeah, right, all those bomb wielding moms.
~tv
July 16, 2007 9:47 AM
Ross,
Sorry - I certainly cannot be held responsible for your patriarchal insistence that "evidence" of the success of something that has never been tried is required before it is attempted.
Women simply don't shoot first and ask questions later as men do. Women's organizations are less concerned with winning than they are with consensus, and I have sincere belief that *nothing* could be worse than the way men have run the world for the past 100 centuries.
But please, feel free to keep supporting a way of looking at the world that makes everyone an enemy if that gets you through the night.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
It's Reinhard Bonke, folks. He has been doing evangelistic crusades in Africa for decades and a bigger heart for the continent you will never see.
He is also a gifted healer and rumor has it when the call goes forth, the entire crowd moves forward!
A recent Google search reveals that the "entire" southern hemisphere now identifies themselves as Christian. (Google: "Third Church")
There are huge movements of God in the world that very few of us are privy to - unless we consciously seek it out. The government in China currently acknowledges 1,000,000 Christians - but non-official estimates are much higher.
"What's the easiest way to make the Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church shriek like Homer Simpson"
One could same the same thing about the Europeans and Americans who advocate for the Latin Mass or the head of the Orthodox church. The future of religion isn't in the bells and smells and chanting, which is why those suspicious of the Tridentene Mass question the acquiesence to a small number of noisy orthodox. Do you think all those believers are going to run to a Latin Mass? How about a three hour long Orthdodox vigil?
Orthodox journalism professor and author Terry Mattingly has some interesting comments about this phenomenon in his interview in the new issue of AGAIN Magazine:
http://conciliarpress.pinnaclecart.com/index.php?p=page&page_id=again_mattingly_interview
"We have much we can learn from Anglicans in the Third World about what a liturgical evangelism might look like. Even though much of what they’re doing is charismatic, in a very real sense of that word, I still think we can pay attention to what they’re doing and learn from it. It might be Calvinistic, but it is still going to have more of a liturgical form than, say, the Southern Baptist Convention would have over there. There are going to be some very alive, highly Catholic elements. For example, the African church—African culture itself—has a heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy. This means African bishops are going to be much more a kind of spiritual father model than you would experience in America, where bishops are thought of as super-theology professors who are appointed because of a combination of management skills and lecture skills. Instead of being primarily an intellectual or administrative leader, an African bishop is much more of a spiritual father or shepherd—even if that person has two degrees from Oxford.
"African Christians are also dealing with a situation in which some of their own children could be kidnapped by Moslems. Or if you’re the Anglican bishop in Singapore, you’re literally dealing with the occult in many, many cases. These are not people who doubt the reality of a pre-modern spiritual world. The lives of the saints speak to these people in ways that we just don’t have any understanding of.
Christ Bless,
Doug
(full disclosure...)
Douglas Cramer
Managing Editor, AGAIN Magazine
Wealth + Health= converts
sacrifice + service= not so much
"The future of religion isn't in the bells and smells and chanting..."
Not necessarily true. First, many people (from whatever continent) who are originally enamored of charismatic/pentecostal worship find that it's difficult to maintain that level of enthusiasm over the long haul of a lifetime and wind up in liturgical churches. Second, charismata and liturgy/structure are not exclusive (as the very phenomenon of charismatic Anglicanism shows). Many of the spirit's movements in history have taken place in and indeed inauguarated monastic movements. Read Kyriacos Markides' Mountain of Silence, in which he relates many mystical experiences of the monks of Mount Athos and Panagia monastery; such things make your average pentecostal Christian look like a lightweight. Third, sociologists of religion have been finding recently that many young folks (admittedly in a North American context) want tradition and liturgy, smells and bells. Perhaps the baby boomers were an anomaly in the history of religious experience. Fourth, while the video Rod posted is impressive, I suspect you could find similar video from a World Youth Day or most Sundays at St Peter's Square.
Father Stephen Freeman (Orthodox, OCA) posted on his blog yesterday some thoughts about his Charismatic past: The Spirit of the Modern World, and followed that today with a post about a Charismatic Episcopal Church becoming Orthodox. The posts and the comments are worth reading.
"Where is the future of Christianity?"
I've read/heard estimates that within another generation or two, we Christians here in North America will be only about 4 percent of the population...
about the same as now in Europe...
it's not because we are smarter than those in the third world...
but we do have access to much more knowledge of the world...
it's no surprise that Christianity is accepted by such a large amount of third world persons...
since they lack access to information about the mythological basis of all religion...
the huge movements fueled by the God Myths will surely shrink in the third world as more of the people aquire access to the counter arguments that bring reasonable doubt to the validity of the Myths of the world...
faith hope love joy peace to all...
Someone should ban GIAH, not for his rambling musings, but for the annoying use of ellipsis dots...
Or maybe for his paternalistic attitude to the benighted millions of the Dark Continent...
Of course, the Enlightenment for which he hopes is dying in the West...as counter arguments to the counter arguments of the 'God Myths' spread...
In fact, the 'third world' (try 'majority world') will probably not accept the Enlightenment worldview, even while incorporating the blessings brought by modern science...
lah dee da...
mindless rambling followed by dots...
faith hope love joy peace which can have no meaning in my system to all...
I'm a historian presenting working this summer in Gabon, a small country in Central Africa, where I joined briefly a Pentecostal church some years ago before becoming a Catholic based on my experiences here.
The kind of fervor one sees at evangelical and pentecostal revivals here certainly can be inspiring, no doubt. However, African churches here have their own problems, just like Christians everywhere else. Many people (at least here) live together outside of marriage, and
at times the search for mystical power and protection can skew things quite a bit. Some people - Catholic, Protestant, and those outside of the Christian tradition (Muslims and believers in local religious traditions) tend to view a lot of the commotion at rallies as exaggerated and/or a scam for money. The prosperity gospel is a pretty strong current within many Protestant circles here (and to a lesser extent Catholic), esp. since the vast majority of people are dirt poor. This shouldn't be seen as an attempt to belittle anyone's faith, or to suggest all African Christians are superstituous and ignorant. Far from it - the evangelicals in particular know their Bibles extremely well.
What is striking here is how seriously most people take the reality of spiritual warfare and supernatural evil. Unless churches here speak to those concerns, they wont go anywhere. One striking difference between the Catholic priests and laity here as opposed to Catholics I have met in the US for the most part (with a few exceptions) is that spiritual warfare is part of the daily vocabulary people use here.
I think this divide is as big as other issues that have received more attention (homosexuality, for example). What I am interested to see is how the seemingly growing opposition to religious beliefs in general in North America and Europe will cope with the concerns and practices of African Christianity. GIAH's hope in the decline of organized religion is going to be shared by many people, once the determined secularists realize more clearly how out of place their views will be among African Christians.
As far as traditional Catholicism goes, there is some support for the Tridentine mass here - the SSPX has a big church in the capital of Libreville that is popular, and a lot of its support comes from those who feel the post-Vatican II church made too many concessions to local beliefs as well as the fact that Catholic missions in the colonial era (to 1960) had a lot more power and wealth than most parishes do generally. At the Catholic church I attend, daily mass is preceded by morning prayer from the Office and Adoration of the Eucharist with "Tantum Ergo" sung in Latin, and this is pretty typical for most Catholic churches here.
If anyone wants to get a more detailed sense of these issues, read David Maxwell's recent book (Ohio University Press 2007) "Gifts of the Spirit" (I think that's the title! look up the ou press website to find it for sure) on the Assemblies of God of Zimbabwe - it really lays out a lot of issues regarding the growth of Pentecostal churches well in an even-handed way, I think.
For example, the African church—African culture itself—has a heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy. This means African bishops are going to be much more a kind of spiritual father model than you would experience in America, where bishops are thought of as super-theology professors who are appointed because of a combination of management skills and lecture skills.
Fabulous - maybe they can go through a few hundred years of patriarchal wars, followed by a few centuries of political oppression under the Holy Zimbabwean Empire - then when another reformation happens in a thousand years another round of wars can start before science and reason get a foothold in the region.
Finally, after long last, that heavy emphasis on authority and patriarchy will be the movement's downfall as the populace wakes up to the corruption and abuse it engenders.
A recent Google search reveals that the "entire" southern hemisphere now identifies themselves as Christian.
Indonesia - most of which lies below the equator - is the most populous Muslim country in the world, with more than 200 million people. New Zealand and Australia are probably about as "Christian" as Western Europe - i.e. nominally. So that leaves Antarctica (empty) South America and a chunk of Africa. So if countries like Brazil (land of topless beaches, thongs and bikini waxing) and Rwanda and Zimbabwe (machete rampages and kleptocracies) are the future of Christianity, then Christianity has its work cut out for it.
quote: "then when another reformation happens in a thousand years another round of wars can start before science and reason get a foothold in the region."
Yes, and then Africa will be as peaceful as 20th Europe. Yeah, whatever.
Put down the secularist koolaide tv. A lot more people have been killed in the name of secularism's "science" and "reason" (and I don't accept that secularism is "scientific" or "reasonable" BTW) in the last century than all the religious wars put together. Hell, the Communists claimed their ideology was "scientific" and Nazism's connection to the cutting-edge "science" of its day, eugenics, is well known. And let's not forget that while science can benefit mankind, "science" isn't the necessarily some force for morality or "progress." After all, the atomic bomb is probably the most amazing invention of modern science.
Finally, Europe today is largely secular and at peace. But its demographic problems will likely cause serious problems with European welfare systems and Europe's economic and population decline will make it increasingly irrelevant to world affairs. The main thing that secularism has brought Europe has been war, totalitarian ideologies and finally decline. Let's hope American and then Africa don't follow Europe's path.
rr
Put down the secularist koolaide tv.
I will when you stop wishing the sky-daddy would make it all better for you.
"Europe today is largely secular and at peace. But its demographic problems will likely cause serious problems with European welfare systems and Europe's economic and population decline will make it increasingly irrelevant to world affairs."
Now, if only someone could show an actual link between religiosity and demographic growth. In a contraceptive age, there is little evidence that religiosity equates with baby-making. The best predictor of baby-making is poorly educated women with few economic choices. The more women are empowered and educated, the fewer babies they have.
That's not to disaparage those few First World religious folks who actually have lots of children out a religious commitment, but acts as a reminder that we need to rethink the faithful=baby making equation.
Jeremy, wonderful, insightful post.
Having spent a fair amount of time in Africa, I agree that the exuberance of African Christianity differs in significant ways from American Pentecostalism or evangelicalism. Also, for all its well-documented problems, the Catholic Church is growing by leaps and bounds across the continent. Catholicism is now close to the majority in several English-speaking countries, having left in the dust everything (including Anglicanism) other than Pentecostalism.
Also, a striking characteristic of the "charismatic" worship style of African Catholics is its reverence, which is simply expressed in a way consonant with local custom. They may bang on drums at Mass, but the effect is nothing like the happy-clappy affirm-our-community junk you get in so many American suburbs.
Daniel,
Actually, recent research argues that fertility decline causes religious decline.
http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/7827212.html
I'm not entirely sure what to think of it myself and the issue of fertility decline is a complicated one. Needless to say, things don't look good for secular Europe.
Oh, and tv, abandoning my heavenly Father would be drinking the koolaide. So no thanks, you can keep your poison.
rr
we need to rethink the faithful=baby making equation.
Such rethinking is being done. Check out the work of Mary Eberstadt:
http://www.hoover.org/publications/policyreview/7827212.html
who makes a very persuasive argument that secularism is the result rather than the cause of low fertility rates.
The flaw in Eberstadt's theory is that her only examples involve a time when secularism and fertility decline was occurring simultaneously.
She doesn't account for the fact that in highly religious countries--India, Mexico and U.S., to some extent--fertility rates have decreased despite high levels of faithfulness. The fertility uptick in the U.S. is likely more attributed to an influx of poor Hispanics and a good economy, not increased religiosity.
As women become better educated and economically independent in places like Mexico and India, fertility has plummeted even when religiosity remains high. Eberstadt has long shared the conservative obsession with European secularism and it may now be completely blinding her.
From Douglas Cramer:
"It might be Calvinistic...
Lord have mercy on use all.
That video is impressive, regardless of what the crowd is cheering. I have no basis to know what it is these Christians believe or how they would fit into an American church. From the limited experience I've had with African Christians here in the U.S., their fire and passion for Christ has inspired many American Christians (more conservative ones) and scared some others (more liberal ones).
The claim that the entire southern hemisphere identifies itself as Christian is as silly as TV blaming patriarchy for wars and oppression in Europe or jaybird's idiotic generalizations about the southern hemisphere. Do you folks think before you write?
Right - because patriarchy has *absolutely nothing* to do with War.
Funny how you so rarely see women settling diputes by razing entire cities.
Please inform me as to which of my generalizations is the most idiotic, Ross: Indonesia is not the most populous Muslim country in the world? Antarctica is not empty? There are no topless beaches in Brazil? Rwanda and Zimbabwe are not economic and cultural basket-case nations?
Thanks in advance!
Aren't people in this discussion making the assumption that bigger churches are better? That the bigger the church means the closer to God? And isn't that obviously not true?
If you want to bring people to Christ, you first have to reach them where they are. Worshipping at a Catholic Church doesn't necessarily mean that one is close to God. Neither does believing in the Prosperity Gospel mean that one isn't moving closer to Christ.
Ross,
I used "entire" in scare quotes to indicate an overgeneralization - but a global trend, nonetheless.
Here's professor Philip Jenkins, an expert on the rise of global Christianity, from whom I got my information:
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200210/jenkins
TV - I didn't say patriarchy has nothing to do with war. I said it was silly of you to blame patriarchy for wars and oppression. There are much larger causes for wars in Europe than patriarchy. How about greed? Desire for power? There are many areas of the globe that have patriarchal societies that don't fight each other. In addition, most societies in Africa have been patriarchal for centuries so it's not like this is some big change for them. Your comment implied a big change, as if Africans are moving away from a peaceful history towards one of war and oppression now that they've supposedly developed a patriarchy.
jaybird - It's tough to chose but I'd have to say either your generalization that Brazil can be reduced to topless beaches (is bikini waxing unchristian?) or that sub-Saharan Africa can be reduced to fanatics with machetes.
MM - I'd agree it is a trend in certain areas of the global south, but also a lazy generalization.
Ross: is bikini waxing unchristian?
I don't know, but I'm willing to conduct a survey of Christian women in Brazil to find out. Purely for scientific reasons.
On the other hand, you couldn't pay me enough money to find out first-hand if Sub-Saharan Africa is as awful as the news media makes it out to be, so you may have a point.
Neither does believing in the Prosperity Gospel mean that one isn't moving closer to Christ
This is like saying just 'cause you sleep around you aren't moving closer to Christ. Sure you might be, but the sleeping around part is moving you away from Christ.
What I'm saying is the teachings of Christ are in direct opposition to the Prosperity Gospel. Just read the Gospels.
"Actually, recent research argues that fertility decline causes religious decline."
Becuase as long as those who call themselves "religious" try to dictate over other people's reproduction, they will find that people will turn away from those religious dictums.
Women don't raze cities to settle disputes?
Two words, "Indira Ghandi!"
There ya go Chuck. That one name wipes out millenia of patriarchal genocides.
Nice work.
(sheesh)
TV - There's also Golda Meir and Margaret Thatcher, who both lead their respective countries at the time of war. In addition, there are many women from older time periods who lead their nations to war - Queen Victoria, Catherine the Great, and Queens Anne, Mary, and Elizabeth of England, come to mind. And there were female leaders of ancient Egypt as well as female leaders in the Bible who had no qualms about wars and using violence to solve a dispute. Now you can make the point that all these women led patriarchal societies, but then you really don't have any evidence that women can lead nations and resist war any more than men can.
Now you can make the point that all these women led patriarchal societies,
Don't need to, when you made it for me ;)
but then you really don't have any evidence that women can lead nations and resist war any more than men can.
Of course I don't - it's never been tried under any other model. Of course, a matriarchal society couldn't be any *worse* than the patriarchal one, so I'm game.
TV - So your point that patriarchal societies are the cause of war is unfounded. There's no evidence to prove that a matriachal society would be any worse or better. So there's nothing on which to base your silly theory. Think before you write next time. Just admit it was a poor attempt at humor and move on.
Yeah, right, all those bomb wielding moms.
Ross,
Sorry - I certainly cannot be held responsible for your patriarchal insistence that "evidence" of the success of something that has never been tried is required before it is attempted.
Women simply don't shoot first and ask questions later as men do. Women's organizations are less concerned with winning than they are with consensus, and I have sincere belief that *nothing* could be worse than the way men have run the world for the past 100 centuries.
But please, feel free to keep supporting a way of looking at the world that makes everyone an enemy if that gets you through the night.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.