Reader ScurvyOaks draws out attention to the New York Observer's trendspotting piece on -- wait for it -- the New Victorians. Sounds semi-crunchy to me, to wit: Then she opened her mouth, and it was if one had been transported...
Rod, I *think* Kinder, Kueche, Kirche was Nazi phrase, whether it originated with them or not..just a heads up.
ossicle
July 13, 2007 4:13 PM
Rod,
You cover this yourself in your third-to-last paragraph, but it does seem like these NVs are in large part merely typical rampant consumers, of more tasteful goods than the norm, rather than people who embrace many of the virtues outlined in your book.
I have the feeling that, as much as these folks may incidentally do good things like get their produce from local farms and their meat from small, ethical farmers, those bathroom renovations of theirs involve an awful lot of $800 bathtub faucets, custom tile, etc.
(And Williams-Sonoma is a terrible red flag, that company is a trawl for people who aspire to quality without the knowledge to back it up or the energy to seek it out.)
I certainly agree, though, that one can't let the great be the enemy of the good. These people are doing a lot better than they could be.
-o
ossicle
July 13, 2007 4:15 PM
Irenaeus,
According to Wikpedia the answer is "in part, but not enough to worry about":
"The endearing charm of the gentle, romantic life captured so vividly in Victoria magazine returns, following the announcement that Hoffman Media will relaunch the much beloved magazine in November, 2007.
"Victoria offers a respite from the hurried pace of life, an opportunity to nourish the feminine soul. Created for all who love the timeless appeal of romantic fashions, heritage linens, charming homes, gracious gardens, unique decorative touches, and all that is beautiful in life, Victoria promises a return to loveliness.
"The charm of yesteryear, updated for today’s reader, comes alive in each issue. Be transported to gracious days of genteel charm and enduring elegance. Connect with the sentiment and elegance of times gone by and be pampered with topics close to your heart, as you take Victoria into the reading room of your soul."
Marian Neudel
July 13, 2007 4:30 PM
Actually, what I get nostalgic about from the Victorian era (aside from Dickens, for whom I have an abiding love) is the fact that back then, a woman over 40 could get a reputation as a raving beauty by virtue of having all her own teeth, a concave waistline, and no visible marks or scars.
Alicia
July 13, 2007 4:40 PM
When I think of Victorian virtues (or perhaps I really mean Edwardian virtues) I think of the degree of personal accomplishment of people of that generation. Beatrix Potter, for instance, or Agatha Christie.
I read Christie's autobiography a few years back, and it seems during WWI, she volunteered as a pharmacist and learned all about poisons, which came in very handy for her career as a writer of murder mysteries.
Later she married and archeologist, which also helped to provide the background for many of her mysteries.
I truly believe that people were far more cultivated back then, and agree with those who say that "the New Victorians" sound like a rather shallow trend.
Ralph McGee
July 13, 2007 5:09 PM
That description sounds like the Yuppies (Young Urban Professional) from the 80s.
ScurvyOaks
July 13, 2007 5:10 PM
>You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
A-MEN! I'm a paleo-Vic married to a neo-Vic. (She might recoil at that label, but not the substance of it.) We'd rather be boiled in oil than go out to the latest hot Dallas bars and restaurants, where the beautiful and vapid congregate.
And yes, we're in the middle of having two bathrooms redone . . .
gabriel
July 13, 2007 5:25 PM
In fact, domesticity itself can be a drudge, but we've never stopped seeing it as an adventure.
I rather think that most adventures involve alot of drudgery. I'm sure that travelling weeks on end across tundra has it's boring aspects. Likewise for sailing- it's a lot of work, and not particularly interesting work, especially for deckhands. But of course, the rewards are obvious- and the adventure. And so ought they to be for domesticity.
Ben
July 13, 2007 5:29 PM
This article sort of describes my wife and I, though we're more like Rod's friends. I'm 30, she's 27, we got married a year ago and just bought our first house in intown Atlanta. But I'm a grad student, she's a high school teacher, and we don't have the money these people apparently have. .
Incidentally, we both met in a liberal Catholic organization, the Jesuit Volunteer Corps. The organization's belief in social justice is liberal, by American standards. But JVC's other values of commmunity, spirituality and simplicity are up Rod's alley.
I wonder how "crunchy libs" like us might fruitfully interact with "crunchy cons."
But there IS an implicit comfort and bland consumerism to some of this NV thing. It comes off as a bit more of a style than a result of conviction.
Chas S. Clifton
July 13, 2007 6:03 PM
This is one of those pseudo-trends, like "cocooning" a few years ago.
People are always living that way; it's just that the New York media only deign to notice it occasionally and pronounce it to be this year's hot trend.
;-)
PS: My wife and I have farm shares too.
Mike
July 13, 2007 6:28 PM
>>“And because the world has changed, we’ve tried to leap to our parents’ level of success right after school, rather than trying to figure out who we are and make mistakes.”
This quote doesn't strike me as either traditional or crunchy. Sounds to me like these folks are setting themselves up for disapointment. Simply posessing a spouse, a child and a mortgage does not a success make. If these people stick with their marriages/families when the going inevitably gets rough, then they might be on to something.
Irenaeus
July 13, 2007 6:44 PM
Thanks, Ossicle. I remember reading that in some piece by Gloria Steinhem back in the day.
ossicle
July 13, 2007 6:56 PM
I could see her deliberately eliding the two.
Rod Dreher
July 13, 2007 7:14 PM
I wonder how "crunchy libs" like us might fruitfully interact with "crunchy cons."
Invite 'em over to dinner.
sigaliris
July 13, 2007 10:01 PM
And serve them with fava beans and a nice Chianti.
"Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup."
sigaliris
July 13, 2007 10:02 PM
Sorry, but I couldn't resist. All that genteel charm and enduring elegance whets my appetite.
Chas S. Clifton
July 13, 2007 11:03 PM
The next step up from being a New Victorian is being a YAWN.
~tv
July 14, 2007 8:54 AM
It really does seem to be an affectation of the moneyed class coupled with some crunch-like shopping habits.
I_Like_Dragyn
July 14, 2007 10:28 AM
So there really is such a group called "crunchy libs", or is it only for the purposes of the blog?
Barry Goub!er
July 14, 2007 3:08 PM
The "New Victorian" tag is condesending...the Leftists who pick up on it will refuse to admit that the original Victorians were liberals breaking away with what they saw as the infulence of the values of the aristocratic overclass: all the prudish smoking/trans-fat bans that the left loves are victorian to the core.
AnotherBeliever
July 14, 2007 3:18 PM
Heh, I guess I'm rather New Victorian myself. More than ready to settle down, but a tour in Iraq is in my orders. Again. Pray that it won't be the threatened 15 months, I am not getting any younger and I have many things to accomplish in life. Like a home, and a husband, and children. As the Beatles said, "Who could ask for more?"
David J. White
July 14, 2007 3:27 PM
I was ready to get married and settle down and live, um, respectably long before it happened. You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
I'll take your word for it, Rod. I'm 45, never married, never wanted a family. I don't really like having people over (for one thing, I'd have to clean my apartment), I eat out more often than not (alone, more often than not -- it's when I get a lot of reading done), and my idea of a fun Saturday night is watching Lawrence Welk reruns on PBS. (Most nights I'm in bed by 10:30 or so.)
I think the key for me is that I really *like* being alone. aybe I'll feel differently at some point, but it hasn't happened yet. I've never met a woman who made me think, "I'd like to spend my life with her" (and at age 45, I think the moment has passed). I have to deal with people (students, mainly) all day, and so when I'm on my own time, I want to deal with as few people as I can. Most of my best friends live far away, but we stay in touch enough for me.
I think you put it perfectly: you were *ready* to settle down. I've just never felt "ready" to take that step. I think that, for whatever reason, the people profiled in this article just reached the point where they felt "ready", and more power to them.
Russ
July 14, 2007 8:35 PM
I thought it was striking that the first couple mentioned, profiled as being so quaint and Victorian are, to use Victorian terminology, living in sin.
Sarahndipity
July 16, 2007 1:25 PM
You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
Perhaps - or you might find yourself married with a child at age 24, going nuts from being cooped up at home, longing to be going out with all your friends who are still living with their parents and have boatloads of disposable income. I'm just sayin'...
My point is that the grass is always greener. I married and had a child at a young age. There are advantages and disadvantages to doing it both ways. We don’t have as much freedom at the moment as our friends, but on the other hand, we’ll be empty-nesters earlier. And as I and my daughter get older, I do find that going out is less appealing, and motherhood is easier. I still pine for a carefree life on occasion, but if I were still single, I’d probably be pining for marriage and children. There are trade-offs no matter when you settle down.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
Rod, I *think* Kinder, Kueche, Kirche was Nazi phrase, whether it originated with them or not..just a heads up.
Rod,
You cover this yourself in your third-to-last paragraph, but it does seem like these NVs are in large part merely typical rampant consumers, of more tasteful goods than the norm, rather than people who embrace many of the virtues outlined in your book.
I have the feeling that, as much as these folks may incidentally do good things like get their produce from local farms and their meat from small, ethical farmers, those bathroom renovations of theirs involve an awful lot of $800 bathtub faucets, custom tile, etc.
(And Williams-Sonoma is a terrible red flag, that company is a trawl for people who aspire to quality without the knowledge to back it up or the energy to seek it out.)
I certainly agree, though, that one can't let the great be the enemy of the good. These people are doing a lot better than they could be.
-o
Irenaeus,
According to Wikpedia the answer is "in part, but not enough to worry about":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinder%2C_K%C3%BCche%2C_Kirche
Kinda in sync with the return of Victoria Magazine, maybe?
"The endearing charm of the gentle, romantic life captured so vividly in Victoria magazine returns, following the announcement that Hoffman Media will relaunch the much beloved magazine in November, 2007.
"Victoria offers a respite from the hurried pace of life, an opportunity to nourish the feminine soul. Created for all who love the timeless appeal of romantic fashions, heritage linens, charming homes, gracious gardens, unique decorative touches, and all that is beautiful in life, Victoria promises a return to loveliness.
"The charm of yesteryear, updated for today’s reader, comes alive in each issue. Be transported to gracious days of genteel charm and enduring elegance. Connect with the sentiment and elegance of times gone by and be pampered with topics close to your heart, as you take Victoria into the reading room of your soul."
Actually, what I get nostalgic about from the Victorian era (aside from Dickens, for whom I have an abiding love) is the fact that back then, a woman over 40 could get a reputation as a raving beauty by virtue of having all her own teeth, a concave waistline, and no visible marks or scars.
When I think of Victorian virtues (or perhaps I really mean Edwardian virtues) I think of the degree of personal accomplishment of people of that generation. Beatrix Potter, for instance, or Agatha Christie.
I read Christie's autobiography a few years back, and it seems during WWI, she volunteered as a pharmacist and learned all about poisons, which came in very handy for her career as a writer of murder mysteries.
Later she married and archeologist, which also helped to provide the background for many of her mysteries.
I truly believe that people were far more cultivated back then, and agree with those who say that "the New Victorians" sound like a rather shallow trend.
That description sounds like the Yuppies (Young Urban Professional) from the 80s.
>You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
A-MEN! I'm a paleo-Vic married to a neo-Vic. (She might recoil at that label, but not the substance of it.) We'd rather be boiled in oil than go out to the latest hot Dallas bars and restaurants, where the beautiful and vapid congregate.
And yes, we're in the middle of having two bathrooms redone . . .
In fact, domesticity itself can be a drudge, but we've never stopped seeing it as an adventure.
I rather think that most adventures involve alot of drudgery. I'm sure that travelling weeks on end across tundra has it's boring aspects. Likewise for sailing- it's a lot of work, and not particularly interesting work, especially for deckhands. But of course, the rewards are obvious- and the adventure. And so ought they to be for domesticity.
This article sort of describes my wife and I, though we're more like Rod's friends. I'm 30, she's 27, we got married a year ago and just bought our first house in intown Atlanta. But I'm a grad student, she's a high school teacher, and we don't have the money these people apparently have. .
Incidentally, we both met in a liberal Catholic organization, the Jesuit Volunteer Corps. The organization's belief in social justice is liberal, by American standards. But JVC's other values of commmunity, spirituality and simplicity are up Rod's alley.
I wonder how "crunchy libs" like us might fruitfully interact with "crunchy cons."
But there IS an implicit comfort and bland consumerism to some of this NV thing. It comes off as a bit more of a style than a result of conviction.
This is one of those pseudo-trends, like "cocooning" a few years ago.
People are always living that way; it's just that the New York media only deign to notice it occasionally and pronounce it to be this year's hot trend.
;-)
PS: My wife and I have farm shares too.
>>“And because the world has changed, we’ve tried to leap to our parents’ level of success right after school, rather than trying to figure out who we are and make mistakes.”
This quote doesn't strike me as either traditional or crunchy. Sounds to me like these folks are setting themselves up for disapointment. Simply posessing a spouse, a child and a mortgage does not a success make. If these people stick with their marriages/families when the going inevitably gets rough, then they might be on to something.
Thanks, Ossicle. I remember reading that in some piece by Gloria Steinhem back in the day.
I could see her deliberately eliding the two.
I wonder how "crunchy libs" like us might fruitfully interact with "crunchy cons."
Invite 'em over to dinner.
And serve them with fava beans and a nice Chianti.
"Meddle not in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and good with ketchup."
Sorry, but I couldn't resist. All that genteel charm and enduring elegance whets my appetite.
The next step up from being a New Victorian is being a YAWN.
It really does seem to be an affectation of the moneyed class coupled with some crunch-like shopping habits.
So there really is such a group called "crunchy libs", or is it only for the purposes of the blog?
The "New Victorian" tag is condesending...the Leftists who pick up on it will refuse to admit that the original Victorians were liberals breaking away with what they saw as the infulence of the values of the aristocratic overclass: all the prudish smoking/trans-fat bans that the left loves are victorian to the core.
Heh, I guess I'm rather New Victorian myself. More than ready to settle down, but a tour in Iraq is in my orders. Again. Pray that it won't be the threatened 15 months, I am not getting any younger and I have many things to accomplish in life. Like a home, and a husband, and children. As the Beatles said, "Who could ask for more?"
I was ready to get married and settle down and live, um, respectably long before it happened. You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
I'll take your word for it, Rod. I'm 45, never married, never wanted a family. I don't really like having people over (for one thing, I'd have to clean my apartment), I eat out more often than not (alone, more often than not -- it's when I get a lot of reading done), and my idea of a fun Saturday night is watching Lawrence Welk reruns on PBS. (Most nights I'm in bed by 10:30 or so.)
I think the key for me is that I really *like* being alone. aybe I'll feel differently at some point, but it hasn't happened yet. I've never met a woman who made me think, "I'd like to spend my life with her" (and at age 45, I think the moment has passed). I have to deal with people (students, mainly) all day, and so when I'm on my own time, I want to deal with as few people as I can. Most of my best friends live far away, but we stay in touch enough for me.
I think you put it perfectly: you were *ready* to settle down. I've just never felt "ready" to take that step. I think that, for whatever reason, the people profiled in this article just reached the point where they felt "ready", and more power to them.
I thought it was striking that the first couple mentioned, profiled as being so quaint and Victorian are, to use Victorian terminology, living in sin.
You get to the point where you just are bored out of your mind with going out. Making dinner at home, having friends over, nesting, cocooning -- it becomes a lot more interesting. You know?
Perhaps - or you might find yourself married with a child at age 24, going nuts from being cooped up at home, longing to be going out with all your friends who are still living with their parents and have boatloads of disposable income. I'm just sayin'...
My point is that the grass is always greener. I married and had a child at a young age. There are advantages and disadvantages to doing it both ways. We don’t have as much freedom at the moment as our friends, but on the other hand, we’ll be empty-nesters earlier. And as I and my daughter get older, I do find that going out is less appealing, and motherhood is easier. I still pine for a carefree life on occasion, but if I were still single, I’d probably be pining for marriage and children. There are trade-offs no matter when you settle down.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.