Brooke Astor and Leona Helmsley were two iconic New York women who died within a week of each other. Both were rich, famous and influential. But they used their wealth and position for very different ends, and as a result,...
The AP obituary in our local paper has the well-known anecdotes about Leona Helmsley (such as her famous comment "only the little people pay taxes"), but it also had this to say:
"...The Helmsleys' financial excesses overshadowed millions in contributions for medical research and other causes. In recent years, she contributed $25 million to New York Presbyterian Hospital, $5 million to Katrina relief and $5 million after Sept. 11 to help the families of firefighters...."
So...a queen, but maybe not completely mean.
Eric W
August 22, 2007 10:08 AM
I wonder if someone would have the guts to write such a story BEFORE the subjects leave this life? E.g. (slight wording changes to the original story):
A Lesson of Legacy
06:21 AM CDT on Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Two iconic New York women will likely pass away within the next few years, if not this year. Brooke Astor, the doyenne of high society and philanthropy, is 105, and Leona Helmsley, the real estate magnate infamous for her title "The Queen of Mean," is 87. The difference between the two is a life lesson to us all.
Mrs. Astor married into the famed New York family and its immense fortune. She is a Fifth Avenue aristocrat who has given vast sums to museums, libraries, churches and programs to help the needy. As gracious as she is generous, Mrs. Astor would have her chauffeur drive her to ghettos to consider requests for grants. She would cheerfully eat from paper plates whatever her modest hosts served, though dressed to the nines. "People expect to see Mrs. Astor, not some dowdy old lady, and I don't intend to disappoint them," she once said.
Mrs. Helmsley established herself as a player in New York's cutthroat real estate business and then hit the jackpot when property mogul Harry Helmsley left his wife of 33 years to marry her. In the 1980s, she became the public face of Helmsley Hotels, trading off her finicky reputation. She also became a public face of the era's vulgar new rich, her vicious treatment of anyone she thought beneath her a tabloid staple.
When she was tried for federal tax evasion, her lawyer was reduced to pleading, "I don't believe Mrs. Helmsley is charged in the indictment with being a bitch." The Queen of Mean was convicted and sent to prison.
We cannot know the hearts of either woman; we can only judge their public lives. By that standard, the warmth and gratitude so many have and have expressed for Mrs. Astor constitutes a verdict; for Mrs. Helmsley, there is mostly silence and, among the charitably inclined, pity.
To whom much is given, much is expected. What these remarkable women have made of their good fortune is the lesson of their lives and the true measure of their worth. Mrs. Astor will enter into history and eternity rich beyond measure. Mrs. Helmsley, a pauper.
Eric W
August 22, 2007 10:09 AM
Re: my previous post - This, of course, is the reason that such a story would only be written AFTER the person(s) have died:
I can just hear her now: "Hey, I can't die! Only little people die!"
sd
August 22, 2007 12:34 PM
Wow. Did you just close a post with the suggestion that physical attractivenness is a reflection of spiritual and moral health? Wow. An ugly thought about ugliness indeed.
astorian
August 22, 2007 12:39 PM
I never met either Leona Helmsley or Brooke Astor, so (like most people) I am completely unquaified to judge what kind of person either was. To use a cliche, all I know about either woman is what I read in the papers.
I never hated Leona as much as I gather I was supposed to, because I felt sorry for her. I think that, like Martha Stewart, she spent time in prison NOT because of real crimes she may/may not have committed, but simply because she was perceived as a rich bitch. People hated her NOT because of anything she did, but because of who they perceived her to be. People look at Leona or Martha and immediately say to themselves, "That bitch thinks she's better than me. She deserves to get some kind of comeuppance."
Look, Leona Helmsley and others in her tax bracket may very well THINK they're better than "the little people," but I find it extremely hard to believe she ever actually SAID it. Assume for a moment that she never actually said it (or that her servants never heard her say it). Without that quote, Leona Helmseley would ahve been just one of many rich people hit with a tax audit. She'd have paid a hefty fine and no one would have heard about it or thought twice about it.
Instead, she did jail time, purely because a lot of people resent wealth. And last time I looked, envy was a deadly sin, just like avarice.
ossicle
August 22, 2007 12:39 PM
sd,
You're reading Rod's allusion to a famous quotation (Orwell: "At 50, everyone has the face he deserves") too simplistically. It's not about being ugly or pretty in the fashion magazine sense. A person with classically "ugly" features can still radiate love or peace or calm or health or whatnot, if any or all those are things they possess.
Rod Dreher
August 22, 2007 3:36 PM
Thanks Ossicle. Brooke Astor, at 105, was not beautiful in the Vogue magazine sense. But her weathered old face radiated what was in her heart. All the more so with Mother Teresa.
Astorian, you're wrong about Leona. She went to jail because she evaded taxes.
Jn
August 22, 2007 4:21 PM
I understand that it is very fashionable to pile on Mrs. H. at the moment. However, I have personal knowledge of her outstanding generosity to the agency I work at. She gave not only her money, that would be too easy, but took time to find out who was giving money to. She was never anyhing but a warm, generous and perhaps most surprising, very comfortable with people who face challenges most of us never even imagine.
I hope she can rest in peace.
ossicle
August 22, 2007 4:36 PM
Jn,
Your own generosity is lacking here and making you an ineffective champion. People are not criticizing Helmsley because it is very fashionable, they are doing so because of the decades-long trail of verified reports of vile and illegal things she did.
If your report is true, then it provides readers with a reason to wonder whether there was more good to her than has been widely reported. I can't think of much else to say about it.
-O
CV
August 22, 2007 9:01 PM
ossicle:
People here may indeed be criticizing Leona Helmsley because, in her lifetime, she did vile and illegal things. Rod Dreher also apparently thinks it appropriate to post a particularly unflattering picture of her, as proof of sorts that she did vile and illegal things (the remark about people having the face they "deserve.")
Others, like Jn, have personal knowledge of her generosity with others. While it's true she did time for tax evasion, it's also true that she gave more than $30 million away to charity in recent years. Does this fact reflect a change of heart in some areas of her life. Only the people who REALLY know her could say for sure.
So what is the true "picture" of Leona Helmsley? Probably somewhere in the middle, like the rest of us.
I just hope Rod isn't in charge of choosing my obituary picture.
Rod Dreher
August 22, 2007 10:29 PM
I am, unfortunately. Try to smile.
ossicle
August 22, 2007 11:56 PM
CV,
I respect your desire to give a fair hearing (or rather a fair sighting) to the deceased. I really do. But it seems to me that if you're advocating a bar so high, in terms of not showing ill of the dead (my phrase for the purposes of this post), that one can't simply post a photo of a person with LH's track record as she actually appeared*, then IMO you're advocating a sort of moral and intellectual quiescence under which we would be unable to render a judgment about almost any person.
Frankly, I'm certain that Qaddafi and Castro (etc.) have given millions to good causes, alongside their awful crimes, but when they die do we really want to have shuttered ourselves off from the ability to comment negatively on their other actions?
-Oss
* If you think you can find a more flattering photo of LH in her later years, then please do so.
ossicle
August 22, 2007 11:59 PM
Stilted prose, anyone? Cliff Notes are available in the lobby!
astorian
August 23, 2007 12:46 AM
Rod: yes, technically Leona went to jail for evading taxes. Technically, so did Pete Rose. And technically, Martha Stewart went to jail for getting insider information on a stock deal. I've never tried to claim Leona was innocent. I merely note that the treatment she received was EXTREMELY unusual, given her offense.
Realistically, rich people who AREN'T famous commit similar offenses all the time, and they don't go to jail (maybe they SHOULD; that's a separate issue). Nobody even TRIES to prosecute them. They cut deals behind closed doors, they pay hefty fines, and that's the end of it. Newspaper readers never hear about it.
Leona was treated differently, as was Martha Stewart. And I think they received harsher treatment because of the way they were perceived by the public and portrayed in the media.
ScurvyOaks
August 23, 2007 12:37 PM
The IRS and Department of Justice have a long-standing policy of going after rich and/or famous tax cheats in order to encourage voluntary compliance by the public at large. The theory is that some people think the rich get away with not paying taxes, justifying an "ordinary" person's decision to do likewise. Making an example of someone like Leona Helmsley is designed to counter any impression that the rich get away without paying their taxes. Her treatment was not in the least unusual, IMO. I've been a tax lawyer for 20 years, so I'm not just blowing smoke, btw.
ScurvyOaks
August 23, 2007 12:43 PM
Let me clarify. When I say "not unusual," I mean "not unusual for a high-profile tax cheat." I agree it's different from the treatment of Joe Non-Filer.
Also, her result was harsh because she didn't know when to fold her cards. Well-advised defendants ordinarily plead in this kind of case. She was so arrogant that she fought when she shouldn't have, and that strategic blunder cost her additional jail time.
Jn
August 24, 2007 9:39 AM
O,
My generosity, as you call it is not generoisty at at all. Rather it merely is stating an objective truth about a woman whom all too many want to view in a particualr way. Was she the warm and cuddly type? Appernetly not so in business. However, I think she was what we all really are. Human. Warts and all. Mrs. H. did not have the opportunity (and perhaps did not want it) to commit her sins in private like most of us do. I am not nominating her for cannoization here.
BTW the comparison to Castro and Quaddafi is simply uncalled for.
Tom
August 28, 2007 10:52 PM
"They say we end up with the face we deserve."
What a terrible thing to say.
Tom
August 28, 2007 11:03 PM
FWIW, columnist Paul Craig Roberts investigated the case and decided that Leona Helmsley was not guilty, and was in fact a victim of prosecutorial abuse.
Interestingly, the prosecuting attorney was Rudy Giuliani.
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
The AP obituary in our local paper has the well-known anecdotes about Leona Helmsley (such as her famous comment "only the little people pay taxes"), but it also had this to say:
"...The Helmsleys' financial excesses overshadowed millions in contributions for medical research and other causes. In recent years, she contributed $25 million to New York Presbyterian Hospital, $5 million to Katrina relief and $5 million after Sept. 11 to help the families of firefighters...."
So...a queen, but maybe not completely mean.
I wonder if someone would have the guts to write such a story BEFORE the subjects leave this life? E.g. (slight wording changes to the original story):
A Lesson of Legacy
06:21 AM CDT on Wednesday, August 22, 2007
Two iconic New York women will likely pass away within the next few years, if not this year. Brooke Astor, the doyenne of high society and philanthropy, is 105, and Leona Helmsley, the real estate magnate infamous for her title "The Queen of Mean," is 87. The difference between the two is a life lesson to us all.
Mrs. Astor married into the famed New York family and its immense fortune. She is a Fifth Avenue aristocrat who has given vast sums to museums, libraries, churches and programs to help the needy. As gracious as she is generous, Mrs. Astor would have her chauffeur drive her to ghettos to consider requests for grants. She would cheerfully eat from paper plates whatever her modest hosts served, though dressed to the nines. "People expect to see Mrs. Astor, not some dowdy old lady, and I don't intend to disappoint them," she once said.
Mrs. Helmsley established herself as a player in New York's cutthroat real estate business and then hit the jackpot when property mogul Harry Helmsley left his wife of 33 years to marry her. In the 1980s, she became the public face of Helmsley Hotels, trading off her finicky reputation. She also became a public face of the era's vulgar new rich, her vicious treatment of anyone she thought beneath her a tabloid staple.
When she was tried for federal tax evasion, her lawyer was reduced to pleading, "I don't believe Mrs. Helmsley is charged in the indictment with being a bitch." The Queen of Mean was convicted and sent to prison.
We cannot know the hearts of either woman; we can only judge their public lives. By that standard, the warmth and gratitude so many have and have expressed for Mrs. Astor constitutes a verdict; for Mrs. Helmsley, there is mostly silence and, among the charitably inclined, pity.
To whom much is given, much is expected. What these remarkable women have made of their good fortune is the lesson of their lives and the true measure of their worth. Mrs. Astor will enter into history and eternity rich beyond measure. Mrs. Helmsley, a pauper.
Re: my previous post - This, of course, is the reason that such a story would only be written AFTER the person(s) have died:
What happens if someone slanders or libels someone who is dead?
I can just hear her now: "Hey, I can't die! Only little people die!"
Wow. Did you just close a post with the suggestion that physical attractivenness is a reflection of spiritual and moral health? Wow. An ugly thought about ugliness indeed.
I never met either Leona Helmsley or Brooke Astor, so (like most people) I am completely unquaified to judge what kind of person either was. To use a cliche, all I know about either woman is what I read in the papers.
I never hated Leona as much as I gather I was supposed to, because I felt sorry for her. I think that, like Martha Stewart, she spent time in prison NOT because of real crimes she may/may not have committed, but simply because she was perceived as a rich bitch. People hated her NOT because of anything she did, but because of who they perceived her to be. People look at Leona or Martha and immediately say to themselves, "That bitch thinks she's better than me. She deserves to get some kind of comeuppance."
Look, Leona Helmsley and others in her tax bracket may very well THINK they're better than "the little people," but I find it extremely hard to believe she ever actually SAID it. Assume for a moment that she never actually said it (or that her servants never heard her say it). Without that quote, Leona Helmseley would ahve been just one of many rich people hit with a tax audit. She'd have paid a hefty fine and no one would have heard about it or thought twice about it.
Instead, she did jail time, purely because a lot of people resent wealth. And last time I looked, envy was a deadly sin, just like avarice.
sd,
You're reading Rod's allusion to a famous quotation (Orwell: "At 50, everyone has the face he deserves") too simplistically. It's not about being ugly or pretty in the fashion magazine sense. A person with classically "ugly" features can still radiate love or peace or calm or health or whatnot, if any or all those are things they possess.
Thanks Ossicle. Brooke Astor, at 105, was not beautiful in the Vogue magazine sense. But her weathered old face radiated what was in her heart. All the more so with Mother Teresa.
Astorian, you're wrong about Leona. She went to jail because she evaded taxes.
I understand that it is very fashionable to pile on Mrs. H. at the moment. However, I have personal knowledge of her outstanding generosity to the agency I work at. She gave not only her money, that would be too easy, but took time to find out who was giving money to. She was never anyhing but a warm, generous and perhaps most surprising, very comfortable with people who face challenges most of us never even imagine.
I hope she can rest in peace.
Jn,
Your own generosity is lacking here and making you an ineffective champion. People are not criticizing Helmsley because it is very fashionable, they are doing so because of the decades-long trail of verified reports of vile and illegal things she did.
If your report is true, then it provides readers with a reason to wonder whether there was more good to her than has been widely reported. I can't think of much else to say about it.
-O
ossicle:
People here may indeed be criticizing Leona Helmsley because, in her lifetime, she did vile and illegal things. Rod Dreher also apparently thinks it appropriate to post a particularly unflattering picture of her, as proof of sorts that she did vile and illegal things (the remark about people having the face they "deserve.")
Others, like Jn, have personal knowledge of her generosity with others. While it's true she did time for tax evasion, it's also true that she gave more than $30 million away to charity in recent years. Does this fact reflect a change of heart in some areas of her life. Only the people who REALLY know her could say for sure.
So what is the true "picture" of Leona Helmsley? Probably somewhere in the middle, like the rest of us.
I just hope Rod isn't in charge of choosing my obituary picture.
I am, unfortunately. Try to smile.
CV,
I respect your desire to give a fair hearing (or rather a fair sighting) to the deceased. I really do. But it seems to me that if you're advocating a bar so high, in terms of not showing ill of the dead (my phrase for the purposes of this post), that one can't simply post a photo of a person with LH's track record as she actually appeared*, then IMO you're advocating a sort of moral and intellectual quiescence under which we would be unable to render a judgment about almost any person.
Frankly, I'm certain that Qaddafi and Castro (etc.) have given millions to good causes, alongside their awful crimes, but when they die do we really want to have shuttered ourselves off from the ability to comment negatively on their other actions?
-Oss
* If you think you can find a more flattering photo of LH in her later years, then please do so.
Stilted prose, anyone? Cliff Notes are available in the lobby!
Rod: yes, technically Leona went to jail for evading taxes. Technically, so did Pete Rose. And technically, Martha Stewart went to jail for getting insider information on a stock deal. I've never tried to claim Leona was innocent. I merely note that the treatment she received was EXTREMELY unusual, given her offense.
Realistically, rich people who AREN'T famous commit similar offenses all the time, and they don't go to jail (maybe they SHOULD; that's a separate issue). Nobody even TRIES to prosecute them. They cut deals behind closed doors, they pay hefty fines, and that's the end of it. Newspaper readers never hear about it.
Leona was treated differently, as was Martha Stewart. And I think they received harsher treatment because of the way they were perceived by the public and portrayed in the media.
The IRS and Department of Justice have a long-standing policy of going after rich and/or famous tax cheats in order to encourage voluntary compliance by the public at large. The theory is that some people think the rich get away with not paying taxes, justifying an "ordinary" person's decision to do likewise. Making an example of someone like Leona Helmsley is designed to counter any impression that the rich get away without paying their taxes. Her treatment was not in the least unusual, IMO. I've been a tax lawyer for 20 years, so I'm not just blowing smoke, btw.
Let me clarify. When I say "not unusual," I mean "not unusual for a high-profile tax cheat." I agree it's different from the treatment of Joe Non-Filer.
Also, her result was harsh because she didn't know when to fold her cards. Well-advised defendants ordinarily plead in this kind of case. She was so arrogant that she fought when she shouldn't have, and that strategic blunder cost her additional jail time.
O,
My generosity, as you call it is not generoisty at at all. Rather it merely is stating an objective truth about a woman whom all too many want to view in a particualr way. Was she the warm and cuddly type? Appernetly not so in business. However, I think she was what we all really are. Human. Warts and all. Mrs. H. did not have the opportunity (and perhaps did not want it) to commit her sins in private like most of us do. I am not nominating her for cannoization here.
BTW the comparison to Castro and Quaddafi is simply uncalled for.
"They say we end up with the face we deserve."
What a terrible thing to say.
FWIW, columnist Paul Craig Roberts investigated the case and decided that Leona Helmsley was not guilty, and was in fact a victim of prosecutorial abuse.
Interestingly, the prosecuting attorney was Rudy Giuliani.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1282/is_n22_v45/ai_14667462/print
http://www.lewrockwell.com/roberts/roberts208.html
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.