Crunchy Con

Reconsidering Europe

Friday August 24, 2007

Categories: Culture, International

If you read nothing else on this blog today, read the post to which I'm linking here.

For many American conservatives, Europe is a spiritual wasteland filled with materialistic pleasure-seekers who have given up on stewarding Western civilization, and who are living it up while waiting for their homelands to turn into Eurabia. For many American liberals, Europe is a progressive paradise of welfare statism, a less uptight approach to sex, and a blessed freedom from religion.

The Georgetown professor and conservative Patrick Deneen returns from a sojourn in Germany and Austria, and sees something different. And better. And crunchier. Excerpt:

In these parts of central Europe (all German speaking), I have been mightily impressed - as ever - by the strength of communal bonds, the presence of local cultures and distinctions, the persistence of tradition and memory, a culture that saves (in every sense), and a strong ethic of work aimed at preserving a high degree of independence. [snip] A question without easy answer is how these Europeans - apparently so willing to throw off their traditional allegiance to nationalities and religion - are otherwise so willing to make these sacrifices for the common weal of their communities and fellow citizens? Are the two phenomena connected, or do they persist in spite of, and in ultimate tension with, one another? And why Americans, otherwise so devoted to nation and exceptional in the developed West for their religiosity, have become otherwise so unwilling to make the individual sacrifices that might result in actual forms of liberty - liberty, that is, as self-governance, a form of liberty that would seem otherwise to comport well with self-declared love for patrie and religious faith grounded in stewardship and self-sacrifice? What otherwise ought to go together in each case seems to have been put asunder. Is there a tendency in each way of life that will eventually prevail, or will each continent continue a kind of schizophrenic combination of forms? Or maybe, and most simply, one sees in the South of each of our respective countries a way of life that is passing out of being, but which here in Germany, at least, seems to have maintained a strong and vital foothold.

I am not finally persuaded that THESE Europeans with whom I have visited and lived for the past few weeks are actually as libertarian as an emphasis on Amsterdam would have us believe. Church attendance IS low - that I did note, and I do lament. But, that may not be the most fundamental indicator of the ultimate sources of faith in the lives that are lived here in this way, and I would be unsurprised if Church attendance were to rise in coming years (the current Pope may contribute mightily to that end. There can be no coincidence that he is Bavarian, a southern German).

In between those passages, Deneen chronicles in detail the kind of daily lives he's observed in Germany, and how much more sensible, and serious, and stewardly it is than our own in throwaway America. I'd quote at more length, but really and truly, you need to read his entire post. It could have been written by a Dallas friend of mine who is living for a couple of years with his family in southern Germany, on business. He's a political and religious conservative, and has been surprised, as well as pleased, by how practically conservative and humane daily life in his part of the world is. Living there has opened his eyes to how we Americans -- even we political and religious conservatives -- are falling far short of a truly conservative way of life. One in which the relatively godless and statist Germans have managed to achieve.

Explain.

UPDATE: I just got an e-mail from a culturally conservative friend who is passionately pro-European, and who lived in Europe for many years. In his view, Deneen's analysis is superficial. He says Europe, to his deep and abiding sorrow, is spiritually dead, and just going through the motions. Which is the standard conservative line about Europe, but the practical experience and insightfulness of this particular source -- who is very far from enamored with American popular culture -- gives it resonance.

Advertisement
Comments
Franklin Evans
August 28, 2007 8:45 AM

Modern Irish (last 200 years) have seen discrimination mostly for being Catholic. They have (if you care to compare such things) the most benign racial stereotype of any I can think of.

The ancient Celts were violent, pagan, and if they weren't defending their lands from invasion they were killing each other over local concerns. They were, nonetheless, the epitome of civilization in northwestern Europe and on the islands.

An assimilation of note gave rise to what is called Celtic Christianity. It was held in great disfavor by Mother Church because it illustrated what I wrote above about the Celts: adaptive, ready to see value in something for its own sake regardless of its source, and quite adamant about assimilating only what they really wanted. Of (nearly) all the pagan tribes and cultures that converted, the Celts were the only one to do so willingly, gladly, and with more enthusiasm than the missionaries were comfortable with.

You are superficially right about modern Celts. The Irish and their colony Scotland are the only cohesive remnants. The Welsh and Bretons are fading away into their local cultures. I like to think, though, that their adaptive strength remains. Part of being an overboard romantic, methinks. ;-)

Peter
August 28, 2007 10:55 AM

How widespread is anti Catholic feeling in America these days? We had a HR inspired team meeting about discrimination and such in my previous job once. 3 of the 5 people who felt discriminated against (and were willing to talk about it) mentioned being Irish Catholics in America.

Franklin Evans
August 28, 2007 4:49 PM

I do not, personally, believe that American Catholics can claim any level of discrimination. Other explanations, especially political (the IRA for those Irish Catholics, for example) are more likely any more.

sigaliris
August 28, 2007 9:46 PM

I don't know about prejudice against Catholics in the here and now, either, Franklin. But I know that my father believed he had been treated prejudicially in his career because of his Catholicism. Of course, he was also well-known for views that were considerably right of center, in a major university that tended toward liberalism, and he also had a really bad temper, so it's hard to sort out the variables. There are quite a few epithets current from the fifties and sixties--"mackerel-snapper" and the like--that indicate some degree of prejudice against Catholics. If you read the kinds of things that were said about Catholics during the JFK candidacy, you'll see lots of prejudice. In my own generation, though, I can't say I've seen much anti-Catholic bias with my own eyes. People may be against some of the political positions taken by Church leaders, but they don't hate individual Catholics, as far as I can see.

Franklin Evans
August 29, 2007 9:02 AM

It's damn hard to "sort out the variables" as you nicely put it, Sig, and regardless of the target under discussion it is a grief to those who want to validate their experiences, but can't find the evidence to support it.

I wish, at any such point, that we could make it easier to sort out the retail, local, because-they-can prejudices that IMO will never go away, and the wholesale, prevalent and currently illegal discrimination that can and does still happen. It starts with the targets of the retail type to take a deep breath and/or a step back, and refrain from using the wholesale type of rhetoric. If nothing else, they may tend to get better sympathy (and a more likely change in the weather) from other locals who are in fact discriminated against, or have come to better terms with the retail idiots.

[I dunno why, but I seem to be stuck in merchandise metaphors lately.]

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.