Same old same old
[Retraction: Previously in this site, I linked to an account reporting on alleged sexual misconduct and abuse among senior clerics of the Orthodox Church in America's Alaska diocese, and the apparent subsequent punishment of the whistleblower. A reader in the...
What exactly are the accusations--that the priest is an alcoholic and that the bishop has not mandated treatment for him? I think he should--but I kind of think this is something to handle internally. Why should a priest's alcoholism be placed on a website?
Let me know if I'm missing something.
Well, for one thing the drunken priest allegedly claimed that the bishop beats him. For another, there appears to be serious dysfunction among the administration of that diocese, and, if facts are as alleged, a mentality of cover-up and denial among the hierarchy whose job it is to govern the church with integrity and accountability. Note well that, if facts are as alleged, the missionary who brought this to light, privately with church officials, was removed from his job -- the bringer of bad news is punished, you see.
What bothers me about this revelation is that a lot of the material in this letter need not have been revealed on a website that, regardless of the good intentions of its owner, frequently descends into gossip, innuendo, and very unChristian and unOrthodox attacks. It is irrelevent if Fr Isidore, for instance, [deleted]. The extent of his alleged alcoholism is irrelevant. The letter ends up, for me, as more of an expose meant to embarrass the OCA hierarchy into doing something, than providing true Christian witness against the abuse and un-priestly like actions alledged by Sidebottom. The sordid details just distract from the true problem and aid the anti-clericalism rampant on Stokoe's website and the Orthodox Forum.
You need open threads! I'll seize on this as tangentially relevant enough, though:
http://www-news.uchicago.edu/releases/07/070730.curlin.shtml
-Oss
In the spirit of Oss, this is off topic but on-Crunchy: Jason Steorts at NRO --
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZTFlMmIzMWM2MWY4ZGE5ZGMwY2YzZjIxMzllZDUwODI=
Every time I visit China, I find myself thinking that, in its modern guise, it is a marriage of the worst in Western and Eastern cultures. From the East, it retains structures of political and moral thought in which the individual plays no part, his welfare being entirely subordinated to that of society. The concept of a right has no place in Chinese history, and little place in China today. Moreover, the agnosticism of Chinese philosophy (including Confucianism, which is called a religion only by abusing that word) has left a great many modern Chinese with no belief in, or even longing for, transcendent meaning.
At the same time, China has partaken of the West’s most bitter fruits. Marxism is Exhibit A, but today the West manifests itself mainly in capitalistic flavor. Though I am a devoted free-marketeer, it seems obvious to me that the highest ends in life are not material. I do not even mean this claim religiously: I say only that such things as love, beauty, intellectual inquiry, and breadth of experience matter more to me (and to most people I know) than does wealth. I suspect most young, urban Chinese would say they agree; and yet such ends seem to exert little influence on their actions. I have probably never encountered a more materialistic group of people than Chinese middle-class youths; and I have never seen a place where the pursuit of wealth was less mitigated by nonmaterial values than in urban China.
You have, in short, the moneychangers but no temple.
In response to the matter of religious doctors, I will confess that the last thing I want is a doctor who spends so much time praying that he forgets the nuts and bolts of medicine. Give me a doctor who is an atheist any day because I'll know that he is devoting his time to the science of medicine and thus I'm more likely to walk away from the experience.
I agree with your basic point, Anon, but there was that one thing about Fr. Isidore that, on reflection, I regretted helping to disseminate, because it was humiliating and had no real bearing on the whole scandalous situation.
My hope for Mr. Dreher:
Since your conversion from Catholicism was (partly) related to the corruption of the bishops, I hope and pray that you will not loose your Christian faith as this scandal unfolds in the Orthodox Church in America. I don't know if it is Orthodox doctrine, but I've always taken great hope from the Calvinist maxim that: "the worthiness of the minister diminishes not the efficacy of the sacrament." Despite the bishops, I pray you keep the faith. At some point you will probably have to forgive the OCA bishops for the scandals now facing the Church. I also hope that you will also come, in time, to forgive the Catholic bishops that drove you from that faith.
-nj
I agree Chuck, though that is not the point of the story.
I have never understood why it is "pious-schmious" to keep private those things which should be kept private. Of course, the allegations of abuse, cronyism, etc., against the Bishop of Alaska should be made public and investigated. What is Fr Isidore's crime, if we accept that his addictions are a disease? Is there a need to drag his dirty laundry through cyberspace? It is not head-in-the-sand to behave with Christian charity towards those who need it, and it appears Fr Isidore needs it. That doesn't negate the allegations against the Bishop. That was the point. But the OCAnews website, as well as the Orthodox Forum discussion group, feeds on these stories, promoting, in many cases, unsubstaniated rumors and general disrespect towards all clergy. In the Orthodox Church as in the Roman Catholic Church, the abuse of a few priests do not negate the sacrement of ordination, a holy sacrament that we, as laity, should not treat lightly or out of hand, by holding up all priests and bishops as charlatans.
As a member of the OCA, I am in full support of the clergy and laity taking control of the agenda at the next All-Americna Council, to deal with the problems of some our bishops and priests, as well as the financial difficulties. But surely this can be done in a manner where the victims are not re-victimized in the public sphere.
Was it true sexual harrassment, or just the stumbling actions of someone inebriated? To make the jump to children being endangered is a bit of a stretch for me. Always a rush to judgment for the commentators at ocanews.org.
As for who is being protected, sometimes it is just to protect the accused until the truth is sorted out. Perhaps Sidebottom has an axe to grind against Fr Isidore? Perhaps the roles were reversed? Who knows?
Note to readers: I have removed, at least temporarily, four recent comments on this thread. All were anonymous, and one was written by "yes, but..." -- yet all of them came from the same person. I am pretty certain that this person has been previously banned from this blog for conduct. I am willing to repost those comments if that person will write to me privately -- rdreher(at)dallasnews.com -- and identify himself or herself, and can offer me assurance that he or she is not who I think she is.
A dog is better than I am, for he has love and does not judge.
Abba Xanthias, from The Sayings of the Desert Fathers
Ah, given the subsequent posts from that person, which I've just deleted, I think I have my answer. That sweet old someone just can't stay away.
Anyway, back to the topic: Grumpy, now that really is the kind of pious-schmious thinking that allows malefactors in clerical robes to get away with serious harm. Those who are given authority to run a church are also expected to exercise it judiciously, for the good of all. It is one thing to refrain from consigning one's soul to hell; it is quite another to let real harm come to souls and bodies out of a misplaced sense of nonjudgmentalism.
I agree that there are things that should not be countenanced (money-chngers in the Temple!), but in some of the stuff I've seen on this subject and the financial scandal, people come on understandably riled up.
If a priest is drunk during liturgy and a bishop beats a priest whom he has promoted somewhat meteorically, action should be taken. Hard to do without a spirit of discord, I'll admit.
After all, we are not dogs, but "rational sheep."
I have a question which may or may not be off the subjct at hand, but were the desert fathers Catholics or East Orthodox??
The Desert Fathers predated the formal split between Rome and the Orthodox. They are revered in both traditions.
She's back....... ;^)
I met Fr. Isidore a couple of years ago. I was born in Anchorage, and it was my first time back up there since becoming Orthodox. I found him to be nice, if maybe a bit young for the meteoric rise that he was clearly enjoying, and I enjoyed talking to him. The one thing that stuck out a bit for me was this: I had also met the priest at the Greek parish in Anchorage, and Fr. Isidore made a bit of a snarky comment about running into the priest at Greek restaurants asking for money. (Between that and a couple of other comments from various folks, it was clear there was no love lost between the Russians and the Greeks in Alaska, one way or the other. and that neither of them were happy that the Antiochians had a big cathedral in Eagle River.)
Anyway, I'm deeply grieved that this is happening, but the OCA has major problems in Alaska--there are 90 or so parishes/missions throughout the state and perhaps 30-35 priests. Few are paid, and few of those who are paid receive a fulltime income. St. Herman's Seminary seems to have a lot of trouble thriving. A vague impression I have is that the Diocese of Alaska tries to evangelize by making Orthodoxy a tourist trap--between the Museum in downtown Anchorage and Ekutna... well, I just don't get it. Bp. Nikolai is not somebody I've ever met, but it comes across as a situation where he was brought in because it was believed that his toughness would address certain problems, and the problems seem to have just been made worse. I'd hate to believe that he has been beating Fr. Isidore, but in context of everything else, it seems likely that there is some kind of inappropriate relationship there (and I don't use that terminology to imply more than I know; I just don't know any other terminology to use).
Of course, the Antiochians have their own problems up there, too--the cathedral's mission-planting desires have backfired on them at least once, and badly. I met a former member of one of these missions who said, very bluntly, "We were Ben Lomond, just without all the money and property."
It's too bad. Pray for Fr. Isidore, pray for Bp. Nikolai, pray for Alaska, pray for the OCA.
Richard
She's back.
She was, but she's been deleted, and she will continue to be deleted as long as this blog exists. It's kind of weirdly fascinating to me, to observe someone so driven by her angry personal fixation that she can't just move on, and do something more constructive with what talents she possesses. But there is one favor she does me by continuing to come around here: each time she visits this site, she drives up my page views, which ultimately puts money in my pocket.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.