The Louisiana GOP has a magnificent fisking of the Louisiana Democrats' scurrilous attack on Bobby Jindal's religious beliefs and writings. Well done! Excerpt:
First, to the lies. Based on an article called “How Catholicism is Different” – note the sensitivity of that word different – that Bobby Jindal wrote as a young man explaining the importance of his faith’s traditions, the ad accuses him of referring to Protestant religions as “scandalous,” “depraved,” “selfish,” and “heretical.” Each claim is a lie, so let’s take them one at a time.The article does not refer to Protestant religions as “scandalous.” The exact phrase used mentions a “scandalous series of divisions and new denominations” in the history of Christianity. Perhaps the Louisiana Democratic Party attack artists don’t understand how adjectives work, but lack of grammar would be a better failing than the lack of honesty this mischaracterization represents. Clearly the author was expressing a sentiment shared by Christians of every denomination the world over: regret over the worsening fracture and division of the world’s faith community through the centuries.
Next, it is Calvin himself – a founder of a Protestant denomination – who Jindal quoted as saying all Christians have “utterly depraved” minds and “selfish desires.” For the Louisiana Democratic Party to depict this as a direct quote by Jindal, and as one directed at Protestants as opposed to describing the fallen condition of all “individual Christians” (the exact quote), shows that maybe some minds are purposefully more “utterly depraved” than others.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Yes, I too used to find it difficult to see the disctinction between "utter" and "total" but I read somewhere that it was all a translation issue--it's actually "udder", not "utter", and Calvin here was talking about the depravity of cows that don't give milk, and that's something I think we *all* can agree on, Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant.
I *think*, technically, that we Protestants are schismatics, not necessarily heretics...
I can say the Apostle's creed in good conscience standing next to a Catholic or an Eastern Orthodox. Again,acc I disagree fervently on some points with other Christians-- but I'm hesitant to use the "Heretic" label.
As are we Catholics. When's the last time you heard a Catholic pronounce someone a heretic? I can't say but I've heard it more than once in twice in my adult life.
But that doesn't mean the word is without worth. A heretic is someone who dissents from the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church. Perfectly valid distinction, it would seem to me.
As a Catholic convert from an overwhelmingly Protestant area of the US, I suppose I'm surrounded by heretics. But I don't make it a point of leaping out with pointed finger to accuse them of being so. No doubt they think I'm one too. We agree to live and let live, and let our actions speak instead.
I *think*, technically, that we Protestants are schismatics, not necessarily heretics...
Hmm. Could be so, I guess, if you held to Catholic dogma completely, but still yet remained somehow outside the Catholic Church. That's a fine distinction, but I think that's correct, technically speaking.
It is possible of course, to be both.
(Not that I'm pointing any fingers here, ya unnerstand. :^))
Does this qualify as "Prissy Hair-Splitting?"
No of course not, no scared cows here.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.