Crunchy Con

Team Jindal fights back

Wednesday August 22, 2007

Categories: Republicans

The Louisiana GOP has a magnificent fisking of the Louisiana Democrats' scurrilous attack on Bobby Jindal's religious beliefs and writings. Well done! Excerpt:

First, to the lies. Based on an article called “How Catholicism is Different” – note the sensitivity of that word different – that Bobby Jindal wrote as a young man explaining the importance of his faith’s traditions, the ad accuses him of referring to Protestant religions as “scandalous,” “depraved,” “selfish,” and “heretical.” Each claim is a lie, so let’s take them one at a time.

The article does not refer to Protestant religions as “scandalous.” The exact phrase used mentions a “scandalous series of divisions and new denominations” in the history of Christianity. Perhaps the Louisiana Democratic Party attack artists don’t understand how adjectives work, but lack of grammar would be a better failing than the lack of honesty this mischaracterization represents. Clearly the author was expressing a sentiment shared by Christians of every denomination the world over: regret over the worsening fracture and division of the world’s faith community through the centuries.

Next, it is Calvin himself – a founder of a Protestant denomination – who Jindal quoted as saying all Christians have “utterly depraved” minds and “selfish desires.” For the Louisiana Democratic Party to depict this as a direct quote by Jindal, and as one directed at Protestants as opposed to describing the fallen condition of all “individual Christians” (the exact quote), shows that maybe some minds are purposefully more “utterly depraved” than others.

Advertisement
Comments
R
August 22, 2007 6:38 PM

Yes, I too used to find it difficult to see the disctinction between "utter" and "total" but I read somewhere that it was all a translation issue--it's actually "udder", not "utter", and Calvin here was talking about the depravity of cows that don't give milk, and that's something I think we *all* can agree on, Catholic, Orthodox or Protestant.

Irenaeus
August 22, 2007 7:35 PM

I *think*, technically, that we Protestants are schismatics, not necessarily heretics...

fbc
August 22, 2007 7:44 PM

I can say the Apostle's creed in good conscience standing next to a Catholic or an Eastern Orthodox. Again,acc I disagree fervently on some points with other Christians-- but I'm hesitant to use the "Heretic" label.

As are we Catholics. When's the last time you heard a Catholic pronounce someone a heretic? I can't say but I've heard it more than once in twice in my adult life.

But that doesn't mean the word is without worth. A heretic is someone who dissents from the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church. Perfectly valid distinction, it would seem to me.

As a Catholic convert from an overwhelmingly Protestant area of the US, I suppose I'm surrounded by heretics. But I don't make it a point of leaping out with pointed finger to accuse them of being so. No doubt they think I'm one too. We agree to live and let live, and let our actions speak instead.

fbc
August 22, 2007 7:53 PM

I *think*, technically, that we Protestants are schismatics, not necessarily heretics...

Hmm. Could be so, I guess, if you held to Catholic dogma completely, but still yet remained somehow outside the Catholic Church. That's a fine distinction, but I think that's correct, technically speaking.

It is possible of course, to be both.

(Not that I'm pointing any fingers here, ya unnerstand. :^))

aaron
August 23, 2007 10:24 AM

Does this qualify as "Prissy Hair-Splitting?"

No of course not, no scared cows here.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.