Crunchy Con

War and meaning

Friday August 17, 2007

Categories: War

Ross Douthat relates a fascinating quote from Christopher Hitchens, about 9/11:

In order to get my own emotions out of the way, I should say briefly that on that day I shared the general register of feeling, from disgust to rage, but was also aware of something that would not quite disclose itself. It only became fully evident quite late that evening. And to my surprise (and pleasure), it was exhilaration. I am not particularly a war lover, and on the occasions when I have seen warfare as a traveling writer, I have tended to shudder. But here was a direct, unmistakable confrontation between everything I loved and everything I hated. On one side, the ethics of the multicultural, the secular, the skeptical, and the cosmopolitan. (Those are the ones I love, by the way.) On the other, the arid monochrome of dull and vicious theocratic fascism. I am prepared for this war to go on for a very long time. I will never become tired of waging it, because it is a fight over essentials. And because it is so interesting.

I didn't, and don't, ultimately value the same things as Hitchens, but in reading this passage, I recognize his sentiment. To walk around New York City on that day and on the days that followed -- and probably to walk around where you live too -- was to see things with crystal clarity. As I've written elsewhere, that clarity, or perception of clarity, was more of an illusion than we could have recognized, and it led many of us to make bad decisions. Nevertheless, whatever one's view of the Iraq War, the feeling all, or nearly all, of us had on 9/11 and in its immediate aftermath was one of ultimate meaning returned to the world. Irony was suspended, and it was possible to feel not only real love for your neighbor, but love for your country, and a recognition of what you really did love, but took for granted -- until it was threatened. It couldn't last, but it was -- I have to confess -- a great feeling. All the usual bitching and moaning we do as part of our everyday lives ceased. We saw pure, uncut evil, and we knew it wanted to kill us, and we didn't know what we were going to do in response, but we knew we'd do something. And we were clear that Everything Mattered. Whatever else life was, it was no longer boring. We lived in interesting times.

Ross writes that the Hitchens passage reminded him of one from Evelyn Waugh's "Sword of Honour" trilogy. But along the "no longer boring" lines, it reminded me of this from Walker Percy's 1983 nonfiction title "Lost in the Cosmos":

Imagine that you are a member of a tour visiting Greece. The group goes to the Parthenon. It is a bore. Few people even bother to look—it looked better in the brochure. So people take half a look, mostly take pictures, remark on the serious erosion by acid rain. You are puzzled. Why should one of the glories and fonts of Western civilization, viewed under pleasant conditions—good weather, good hotel room, good food, good guide—be a bore?

Now imagine under what set of circumstances a viewing of the Parthenon would not be a bore. For example, you are a NATO colonel defending Greece against a Soviet assault. You are in a bunker in downtown Athens, binoculars propped on sandbags. It is dawn. A medium-range missile attack is under way. Half a million Greeks are dead. Two missiles bracket the Parthenon. The next will surely be a hit. Between columns of smoke, a ray of golden light catches the portico.

Are you bored? Can you see the Parthenon?

Explain.

Substitute "the World Trade Center" for "the Parthenon," and you see my point.

Well, are you bored? Can you see the Parthenon/World Trade Center?

Explain.

Advertisement
Comments
Norris Harrington
August 20, 2007 2:22 PM

"I see your point. I'd be insulted too if some suggested I would be a good fit in the Bush administration."

Mr. Bottoms,

While I suspect you are just being snarky again, I do think this illustrates an important point.

It does not follow that just because you disagree with someone on a given issue that they will agree with someone else with whom you also disagree.

For the record, I think the very concept (and etymology) of a "War on Terror" is moronic. We are not at war with terror. We are at war with people who want to destroy us. Who cares HOW they wish to destroy us?

Also, the situation is Iraq was bungled from the beginning.

Might I suggest, respectfully, that if you can put aside your snarkiness you may find something upon which you and I agree.

In the immortal words of Kelly LeBrock: Don't hate me because I'm beautiful.

Richard Bottoms
August 20, 2007 3:25 PM
Are there any Dairy Queens in San Francisco?

BART doesn't just go to San Francisco.

My first job was in a Dairy Queen in Indianapolis, Indiana.

Norris Harrington
August 20, 2007 6:00 PM

Mr. Bottoms,

So, do I understand correctly that you don't own or drive a private vehicle (i.e., car, truck, SUV)?

Richard Bottoms
August 20, 2007 9:30 PM
So, do I understand correctly that you don't own or drive a private vehicle (i.e., car, truck, SUV)?

I share a 1999 Nissan Altima with my wife. I work from home writing software and most of my travel is by public transportation. The Bay Area has one of the best transportation systems in the world, certainly cleaner and more efficient than New York.

Anyway, it's one of the reasons I have some much time to annoy you gents since it's obvious I am online many hours our of every day.

SocraticGadfly
November 8, 2007 10:44 PM

Rod, too bad you didn't include more of Hitch's quote, like the parts warning us away from our own lockstep belief in how right our government is, let alone Hitch warning us away from Iran.

Otherwise, I thinkk "crunchy conservative" is schtick, and pretty week, too, because I'll bet Dreher will ultimately butter his bread on the side of unregulated big business conservativism vs. real environmentalism.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.