Let me stipulate right up front: what happened to the Jena 6 was unjust. No question about it. I am grateful for the national attention to this story, and am grateful too that justice is finally being served.
But the sight of Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton leading the march there today makes me sick. These guys are both dirtbags who thrive off of exploiting racial discord.
Jackson had the gall to say that Barack Obama was "acting white" by not rushing to Jena, and likened Jena to Selma. Jena as Selma? Shoot, if Jesse got sugar instead of Sweet 'n Low in his coffee at his neighborhood Starbucks, he'd call it a new Selma. It's forever Selma with shakedown artist Jesse Jackson, who has milked poor Selma to the point of self-parody. Here is a short rundown of Jesse's shakedown m.o. -- and let me tell you, as someone who spent a lot of time going through the federal tax filings of Jesse's various groups (see here for one of the pieces I wrote) -- stories that didn't find their way into the mainstream media, but which I had solid documentation -- I concluded that Jackson is a thorough fraud. His presence brings discredit to the Jena 6's cause.
And as for Sharpton, the only thing that differentiates him from Jackson is that he's not nearly as slick. He is every bit the exploiter of racial discord, and an effective exponent of racist thuggery, that Jackson is. I say that as someone who literally had to hide out in my apartment for a week after receiving multiple death threats from black hoods, and veiled threats from Sharpton in a public speech, over a column I wrote tangentially criticizing a lavish funeral of a black celebrity. Before all that, though, Rev. Al had invited me to accompany him on a trip to southern Sudan to free some slaves. I'd been writing for the New York Post about the Sudanese Arab Muslim militias taking black Christians as slaves. Ever cynical about Sharpton, I thought at least his presence there would draw attention to the plight of these black Christians. I agreed to go, but in the end couldn't make it, so a Post colleague went in my stead.
True to form, Sharpton got there, visited the slave areas, and emerged to announce his epiphany: he realized while sitting under a tree in that haunted land that he needed to run for president of the United States. He got home, and forgot all about the slave's cause of freedom. He dropped their case. He used those suffering black African Christians as a prop for his own political ambitions.
And he's doing it again today in Jena. So is Jesse Jackson.
None of this adds or takes away from the justice of those six young men's cause. But it will now be difficult to see that, because to stand with them means standing with the race hustlers Jackson and Sharpton. It is a tragedy, in the end, that a bona fide case of racial injustice that might have led to real healing and an increase in understanding will now be nothing more in the minds of many than one more example of Jackson-Sharpton race baiting.
I wish Obama could find some way to turn this into a Sister Souljah moment. I don't agree with Obama's politics, but I've liked him ever since I saw him give his speech at the 2004 Democratic convention. What a hopeful contrast it was to Sharpton's self-righteous boilerplate. Barack Obama represents the future of racial healing and understanding in America. Jesse and Al are yesterday's news, and they personally profit not from achieving authentic racial justice and reconciliation, but by pretending that every racial conflict is Selma. Who benefits from this? No one but these cretins. If Barack Obama could find a way of standing with the Jena guys while repudiating the vulturous Sharpton and Jackson, he'd do himself a world of good.
UPDATE: You must read John McWhorter today on the Jena case. He is one of the most reliable commentators on race in America, and he shows why the involvement of Jackson and Sharpton shouldn't blind the rest of us to the fact that a serious injustice was attempted in Jena, and that it's important to speak out against it. I agree. Now that you've read me rant about the Jesse 'n Al sideshow, read McWhorter to refocus.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
It's my understanding that white kids assaulted African-American kids -- physically, not just with the nooses symbolically -- in the days and weeks before the actual incident between the six African-American kids and the one white kid.
I don't look at one case and jump to the 'racism' conclusion. What I am saying is that there is, indeed, a visible pattern here of misconduct on the part of the prosecutor, probably motivated by racism. I say I think you *don't* want to see racism because you seem to be ignoring the fact that previous to the incident that got all the attention there were *several* assaults on black students by white students, off campus, that got absolutely bizarre prosecutorial response.
And I'm post gen-X, just for the record. *grin*
I'm getting a feeling of deja vu.
This is starting to remind me of the Duke Lacrosse Case: As more comes to light, it looks like the media is getting it all wrong again. I don't think we'll recognize the official record of this case in two months from the official record of two days ago.
Nicely done, folks. "Mitigating circumstnaces", "history", "environment", blah blah blah. Black kids beat the crap out of a white kid and they were caught, and are now being punished. What is wrong with that? Paying for a crime is now racist as well? If this whole thing is about the white kids beating up black kids at a party store or whatever and "getting away with it", why isn;t that what Jesse and Al, and the whole protesting crowd chanting about that? Why isn't THAT bigger news? Huffington Post? Why not on CNN or MSNBC or any other big news outlet? Might there be a little "bending" the truth here? Might the black kids have reacted improperly to a non-physical act done by someone ELSE when they beat up this one white kid?
I've had gang symbols (I live in a predominantly black neighborhood)painted on my property before. Do I now have the right to claim "mitigating circumstances" and beat the crap out of a black kid as he walks down the street? After all, the gang symbol is claiming my space as the gang's space. My kids can;t play in the front yard due to shootings and cars driving across peoples' lawns as they chase after one another. So, am I fair and balanced in applying the same line of thinking being granted to the Jena Six if I were to beat until unconscious the next black kid who looks at me as I clean the marks off the wall, says something to his buddy and then has a laugh? Please let me know if this is OK. if it isn't then all of this is hypocritical bull-crap laid out by politically correct guilty-feeling whites who are flailing themselves for things from the past. Want to "move forward" and "get beyond the past"? Then stop bringing it up at EVERY POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY.
Well, Whatthe..., you are discovering that:
There is a powerful hunger in modern America for tales of white violence against innocent blacks.
And this hunger must be fed, regardless of the facts. Liberals and the MSM need scapegoats. Southerners - Jena and Duke - work great for this.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.