Iran, here we Qom?

How are Iran's relations with China and Russia these days?

Todd, you are lacking common sense. You seem to have some unrealistic sense of 'faith' in Bush totally inconsistent with his words, deeds, actions, and responsibilities.
The facts are all in. America has a string of military bases and installations surrounding Iran. There have been numerous reports of both American military aircraft incursions into Iranian space and suspected spec ops collecting intel, as well as Mossad and CIA training of Baluchistani and Kurdish rebels trained to infiltrate and destabilize Iran. Not to mention massive naval build ups in the Persian Gulf.
All of this follows in line with Bush's reliance on the DOD, ecspecially during the Rumsfeld era, as the institution best suited to shape America's foreign relations.
But everything mentioned here must be placed in context of the doctrines and ideas behind the Bush administration, namely Neo conservatism defined by the PNAC.

The Bush administration has been dominated by the Neo Con movement of the Project for a New American Century (PNAC). The name says it all. It is a militaristic call for advancing American interests globally to secure America's global primacy, aka global hegemonic empire. AEI and the myriad of presidential councils have all conceded in the nee for American empire. Its all there at the PNAC website. Those are the ideas behind the Bush worldview. And given that Iran is rich in oil and resources, including human, that could further serve as an incentive and bounty for American corporations now full of bloodlust and imagining new trillions flowing into their hands.

The difference is: Iran will take several years to deconstruct. Iraq took 12 years and a major first war before it was ready for the 2003 invasion. Bush planners and the Pentagon warmongers may be less patient and seek a 2 year plan for initial conflict: bombing, airstrikes, some naval scenerios. But Iran is likely the future for American militarism.