Crunchy Con

Mahony to nuns: Move on, sisters

Monday September 10, 2007

Categories: Catholicism
Los Angeles Cardinal Roger Mahony continues to impress with his pastoral sensitivity: For 43 years, Sister Angela Escalera has lived and often worked out of her order's small convent on this city's east side, helping the area's many poor and...
Advertisement
Comments
M.Z. Forrest
September 10, 2007 5:03 PM

There are presently over 2500 male and female religious. There are an additional 1200 priests in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. And you are telling all of us that 3 sisters need a call from the cardinal-archbishop before the archdiocese sells a building that they are using.

I condemned the settlement that this sale will provide funds. If anything, I could stand for holy pictures over this. Do you think money grows on trees?

Don Altabello
September 10, 2007 5:04 PM

Looks like Mahony actually benefitted from the sex abuse problems in his archdiocese--got to wipe out a few traditionalist enclaves in the process!

Ain't that grand.

Susan
September 10, 2007 5:05 PM

Mahony is a creep, but this is a common observation. The prosecutor in LA has threatened to bring him to law, and I hope he follows through.

Who will have these three old women, and the blessings they bring with them? I'm tempted myself.

M.Z. Forrest
September 10, 2007 5:09 PM

Who will have these three old women, and the blessings they bring with them? I'm tempted myself.

The convent located in the same diocese that is owned by these women religious.

Susan
September 10, 2007 5:14 PM

MZF, please clarify your post. The diocese of LA is owned by these old women?

M.Z. Forrest
September 10, 2007 5:23 PM

Unable to afford a rental in Santa Barbara, the sisters will move to their congregation’s house in Los Angeles.

http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/new.php?n=10339

They have other properties in the Archdiocese of Los Angeles.

Susan
September 10, 2007 5:51 PM

Got it, MZF.

Susan
September 10, 2007 5:53 PM

This makes it all OK. Not to worry.

I hope the LA District Attorney indicts this guy (Mahony) as he has threatened to do.

Anonymous
September 10, 2007 5:58 PM

Lie down with dogs, wake up with fleas.

M.Z. Forrest
September 10, 2007 6:21 PM

One of the more disturbing things is the assumption, always constant, that Cardinal Mahony personally decides every matter. There is no criticism for Bishop Curry who actually administers this region of the diocese. There is no criticism of the vicar general Msgr. Royale M. Vadakin, who actually wrote the letter. Considering that the settlement was $600,000,000 and this house is worth about $700,000, I'm not sure Cardinal Mahony had anything to do with it.

Daniel
September 10, 2007 6:25 PM

Mahony is always the boogeyman because of his handling of the case and because he remains popular because of his progressive beliefs. That drives conservative Catholics crazy since they would hate Mahony scandal or not.

Susan
September 10, 2007 6:30 PM

If Cardinal Mahony didn't have "anything to do with it," MZF, well, then, he's derelict in his duty. Remember Truman and "The buck stops here"? The guy at the top isn't authorized to say, "Well, I didn't know about it, it's the fault of some Lower Down." If being Archbishop of Los Angeles means anything besides living in a fancy house, it means being responsible for what happens down the chain of command.

Reference the standards to which CEO's of secular organizations are held.

What creeps. And how creepy your attempt to justify this kind of behavior.

Don Altabello
September 10, 2007 6:55 PM

Daniel--if he were a Cardinal Law they would have run his ass out or town. That's what infuriates conservative Catholics--given the L.A. Times's treatment of him with kit gloves because he is one of their own, is that the coverage oftentimes seems hypocritical in that it has more to do with politics rather than children. And by the way, that same accusation could be leveled against some of the conservative commentary on this issue (but that is not reaching a mainstream audience).

MZ--it's in large part Mahony's mess. He is responsible for those under him and their actions. He can't just never be held accountable because he is a bishop.

Max Schadenfreude
September 10, 2007 7:09 PM

Yeah, Mahoney, what a piece of work.

I heard him give a homily at the Borg Cathedral once. He related a story of him talking to children playing in the Cathedra...

"They didn't know who I was. I was only wearing a sport shirt. So I asked them...I mean, I WAS wearing pants! HA HA!"

During Mass making a joke containing children and doubt about wearing pants.

If that ain't class, I don't know what is.

Joe
September 10, 2007 7:47 PM

Any change the Roman Catholic Church could get investigated for federal racketeering charges? The archdiocese of L.A. seems like a Mafia outfit to me. And Mahoney and his cohorts are the crime bosses.

BK
September 10, 2007 8:15 PM

Mahoney forgot to bring oil for his lamp, and he will be locked out.

M.Z. Forrest
September 10, 2007 9:28 PM

Not to allow the facts to get in the way of a good argument, but the $600 MM settlement deals with allegations prior to Cardinal Mahony's leadership.

fbc
September 10, 2007 9:29 PM

Kim,

If we're taking up donations to buy Mahoney's golden parachute, I'd be willing to kick in if there's a guarantee he'd leave.

fbc

Robert Badger
September 10, 2007 11:46 PM

In the weeks following the opening of the Rog Mahal, I attended a few Masses at the Cathedral celebrated by His Eminence. I was impressed that the Cardinal would celebrate Mass in his Cathedral often, having come from a diocese where the bishop was rarely seen except for confirmations, Holy Week, and other official functions. The bishop of my home diocese generally said Mass privately in house by himself.

Mahony does have, however, an appalling lack of tact. During one Mass, owing to the amounts of copious smoke issuing forth from the censer, the fire alarms kept going off. Cardinal Mahony said that they were going off because there were, in his works, "too many one dollar bills in the collection baskets". He made similar statements about "too many one dollar bills" in the collection plate at subsequent Masses. I think someone finally told him that his jokes were going over like a lead balloon and he finally stopped them. He came off quite badly. It is not for nothing that the LA Times, in an editorial cartoon, featured Mahony saying Mass while stating, "wherever two or three hundred million dollars are gathered together in my name, there am I". He came off as a sort of money-grubber.

There were some very worthy initiatives that I supported during my time in the Archdiocese, especially the Together in Mission collection. This collection is supposed to raise funds to share with poor parishes and schools. It is a worthy project and one which I was happy to participate in. But making jokes about "too many one dollar bills" doesn't do much to endear the faithful and encourage them to give.

Goodguyex
September 10, 2007 11:50 PM

Well, there is injustice on every side of this issue. The trial lawyers are unjust and corrupt, some of the victims are bogus, many victims are unreasonable and vengeful, the selective lifting of the statues of limitation but exempting public institutions smacks of covert state totalitarianism and this is unjust, Mahoney is corrupt, most if not all of the perp priests are corrupt, and the perp priests and Mahoney will get their retirement which is unjust.

Many tens and thousands of new victims are the here-and-now Catholics of Los Angeles who will fund the mess, partly brought on by the brain dead bishops and partly by the new wave Anti-Catholicism.

Mahoney is 71 if I am correct. Yes, much of this goes back a long time before Mohoney's time. Some cases are all the way to the 1950's which is ridiculas, but that is another thing. I say Pope Benedict should not wait 4 years but should pull him now, and make him the keeper of the foot stool in Rome or something like that.

Anonymous
September 11, 2007 12:23 PM

"make him the keeper of the foot stool in Rome or something like that." Alongside Law for good measure.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.