Crunchy Con

This Republican war

Thursday September 20, 2007

Categories: Iraq

Not even a relatively mild proposal to give our troops more rest at home before recycling them into this futile war in Iraq could break the GOP roadblock in the US Senate. WaPo reports:

The vote offered the most vivid evidence yet that the Bush administration still controls Iraq war policy, despite months of congressional debate, the war's persistent unpopularity and a summer-long effort by activists to pressure Republicans. Unless other options with broad appeal emerge soon -- a prospect both parties now say is unlikely -- Bush's plan to keep most troops in Iraq through next summer will remain intact.

"Our Republican colleagues are more interested in protecting our president than our troops," Senate Majority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) said moments before the vote, when defeat appeared certain. "This is Bush's war. Don't make it also the Republican senators' war."

From the NYT report:

“It means that Congress will not intervene in the foreseeable future,” said Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, the Independent who has voted with the Republicans on war issues. “The fact that it didn’t get enough votes says that Congress doesn’t have the votes to stop this strategy of success from going forward.”

And:

After the vote, a dejected Mr. Webb said: “You are seeing, as of a week ago, the administration and some of the leading Republicans in here talking about, ‘Hey it’s O.K. that we’re going to be in Iraq for the next 50 years.’ I don’t think it is O.K.”

He continued: “And so we are going to have this debate. It is going to be a long and emotional debate, long meaning in months and perhaps years.”

You know, I'm hopeful that it won't be. And I'm hopeful because USA Today/Gallup finds that more than half the country believes our troops should be withdrawn, and two-thirds believe we can't win there. The new Pew Center poll released yesterday finds that the Petraeus testimony did not move public opinion, and that just over half of Americans want our troops out now -- a significant increase over the Gallup numbers. I'm not sure how to explain the discrepancy, but nevertheless, it's clear where a majority of the American people are on this war. And it is crystal clear that the problem is the president and Congressional Republicans.

The answer is Election Day, 2008. The Republicans are taking their stand around Bush and this failed war, and they're not going to give an inch. You can call that noble if you like, and I suppose if you support the war, still, you will. But I think we can all agree that next fall is going to be a mighty reckoning for the Republican Party, for its president and its legislators own this war.

Advertisement
Comments
Nell
September 20, 2007 12:03 PM

Do you really think the new Democratic president in 2009 is going to abruptly withdraw our troops? Not a chance. It's not, as you say, just the Republican president and legislators who own this war, America owns this war, and the Democrats will not want the shame (and worse) of withdrawal to have "Democratic Party" written all over it.

Marian Neudel
September 20, 2007 12:10 PM

Maybe this means the GOP has lost the military vote?

Brent
September 20, 2007 12:46 PM

Maybe this means the GOP has lost the military vote?

I don't think so. Our military is, after all, an all-volunteer force. As much as I and my colleagues would love more time home between deployments, we also understand what all that service entails. Those that don't want to stay in the military, for any reason (and chief among them is the number and frequency of deployments), can get out at the end of their contract.

Simon
September 20, 2007 2:14 PM

Do you really think the new Democratic president in 2009 is going to abruptly withdraw our troops? Not a chance.

Abruptly withdraw, no.

But the next President, Democrat or Republican, is surely going to have at the top of his or her agenda figuring out the most respectable exit strategy from Iraq.

No one -- not even John McCain -- is going to keep huge numbers of U.S. troops over there indefinitely in pursuit of Bush's chimera of a stable "Democracy".

AnotherBeliever
September 26, 2007 11:54 AM

I agree with the last poster. A Democrat will not pull troops out immediately. And a Republican will not be able to keep the number we currently have, or even the pre-surge numbers, up for long. In the end, it only a difference of degree.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.