Crunchy Con

Put up or shut up

Thursday October 18, 2007

Categories: Consumerism

Perusing Patrick Deneen's back catalogue, I came upon an entry in which he discusses one of my pet peeves: conservatives who (like me) get bent out of shape over illegal immigration, but who hypocritically don't acknowledge the connection between the cheap consumer goods and services they expect, and the outlaw immigration they abhor. Patrick makes a challenging proposal. Emphasis mine:


Opponents of illegal immigration demand that we secure our borders in order to ensure our "sovereignty," but will doing this meaningfully ensure our sovereignty in an age of outsourcing and "the service economy," of massive foreign ownership of US government debt and our reliance on "foreign oil" (a.k.a., oil)? Why do we not hear from illegal immigration opponents any arguments on behalf of paying higher prices for citizen-produced goods? Organic markets have sprung up to ensure that certain kinds of goods have been produced humanely (e.g., free range chickens or grass-fed cattle), and tend to be a mainstay in Blue State cities (e.g., Whole Foods, etc.). Couldn't some illegal immigration critic begin a supermarket that would sell "citizen-produced" products or housing tracts built only by citizen-contractors? How about a fast food chain with only citizen-produced ground beef and chicken nuggets? Would our consumers flood them, in spite of the higher prices? Would it force producers who use illegal immigrant labor to start doing employment I.D. checks? Think of what happened last time there was a "Buy American" effort. The dominance of Wal-Mart throughout Red State America (not to mention Blue State America) does not inspire confidence.

Sure, by all means let's secure our borders. Nevertheless, the argument that securing our southern border will ensure our "sovereignty" just rings a bit false in an era in which America demands "everyday low prices," and as a result is everyday more beholden to Saudi Arabian oil, Chinese plastic products and Far Eastern purchasers of our debt. Practicing the primary end of sovereignty - self-governance - would go a long way to securing our borders.


Advertisement
Comments
Max Schadenfreude
October 22, 2007 12:52 PM

Please inform, what are the marks of just and unjust immigration laws?

Larry Parker
October 22, 2007 7:21 PM

Max:

"Abstract" tends to lose its truthiness, as Stephen Colbert would say, when it immediately follows the posts (and posters) in question.

Max Schadenfreude
October 22, 2007 9:07 PM

""Abstract" tends to lose its truthiness, as Stephen Colbert would say, when it immediately follows the posts (and posters) in question."

I understand the Colbert part, but I not sure what you mean by the rest (perhaps you can 'splain). In any event, (and for the third time) I wasn't refering to anyone, least of all you.

MegaSheesh.

Larry Parker
October 22, 2007 11:13 PM

You can say you weren't attacking me -- but it's clear from responding immediately to me, citing my language, you were -- but it's all O/T anyway ...

Max Schadenfreude
October 23, 2007 11:15 AM

Gee Larry, why not just call me a liar?

I stand by my posts.

I was addressing you directly in my original post in order to contradict your assertion that no commandment existed proscribing parents berating children.

Now, as far as if the subsequent abstract comment was directed at you, again, simply no. As I wrote, I hadn't even read the original post so I don't even know the particulars (that would be where you come in; the particular).

That you identify so strongly with as the subject of my abstract observation only serves to show that, well, I guess the shoe fits. We should not be surprised when the universal has many occurances in the particular (maybe not you).

In retrospect, you comment about "truthiness" gains a certain currency from you other comments which I don't think you intended. Not that you deliberately trash truthiness (as I think you accuse me), but that you are blinded by it by an apparent narcissism on your part.

So, as to not disabuse you further of your cosmology, I will, in the spirit of community, capitulate and agree to that solipsism to which you seem so prone to cling: It's all about you.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.