Crunchy Con

Real estate, not religion, divides America

Thursday October 4, 2007

Categories: Consumerism, Culture

My friend Virginia Postrel just moved with her husband back to Los Angeles from Dallas. And in the new issue of The Atlantic, she's written a fascinating analysis (subscription-only) of what the radical difference in the price of housing in both places says about America. Seems that the Postrels kept ownership of their L.A. place during their seven-year sojourn in Dallas, and its value doubled. But they sold their nice townhouse (I've been there) in a happening Dallas neighborhood for ... slightly less than they paid for it. What gives?

She explains that the housing supply in Dallas, which has lots of room for development, is elastic; in L.A., it's not. It's a lot easier for middle-class and upwardly mobile people to afford housing in Dallas than it is in a place like L.A. -- I got my renovated 1914 Arts & Crafts bungalow for $165K three years ago; my L.A. pal Chris has a similar bungalow that's worth over $500K, if memory serves -- though both cities thrive for very different, even opposite, reasons:

Dallas and Los Angeles represent two distinct models for successful American cities, which both reflect and reinforce different cultural and political attitudes. One model fosters a family-oriented, middle-class lifestyle—the proverbial home-centered “balanced life.” The other rewards highly productive, work-driven people with a yen for stimulating public activities, for arts venues, world-class universities, luxury shopping, restaurants that aren’t kid-friendly. One makes room for a wide range of incomes, offering most working people a comfortable life. The other, over time, becomes an enclave for the rich. Since day-to-day experience shapes people’s sense of what is typical and normal, these differences in turn lead to contrasting perceptions of economic and social reality. It’s easy to believe the middle class is vanishing when you live in Los Angeles, much harder in Dallas. These differences also reinforce different norms and values—different ideas of what it means to live a good life. Real estate may be as important as religion in explaining the infamous gap between red and blue states.

How come? Virginia 'splains:

The unintended consequence of these land-use policies is that Americans are sorting themselves geographically by income and lifestyle—not across neighborhoods, as they used to, but across regions. People are more likely to live surrounded by others like themselves, creating a more-polarized cultural map.
Advertisement
Comments
Will
October 6, 2007 11:27 AM

The housing runup in LA was not due to "supply and demand," but due to toxic loan products that allowed 7 dollar per hour illegals to purchase homes for $750,000! Thus, the huge numbers of foreclosures.

What a relief! I was worried that maybe law-abiding Anglos has something to do with the housing bubble. What's on TV?

Denny Fair
October 6, 2007 11:43 AM

Great sarcasm, but what's your point?

AnotherView Here
October 7, 2007 10:07 AM

Honestly in most big cities and suburbs, how much you can afford a month for rent or mortgage, determines your exact zip code.

The only place this is not so in force is in small rural towns where there is much more discourse between classes.

This is one reason I will never live in a place that has over 50,000 in population again.

Anonymous
October 7, 2007 1:59 PM

This will teach Postrel and others to 1) not buy into a mythical part of town whose who 'cache' is invented by realtors; i.e. Dallas' 'Uptown' which broke away on paper (and word of imported marketing mouths) from the actual sector that contains it, 'Oak Lawn', because the term 'Oak Lawn' had come to be equated with the so-called 'Gay Community' (like they hover in masses). The result? You buy a balloon? You find out someone simply inflated a condom. C'est la Vie.

richie
April 29, 2009 1:00 AM

I think that the blue state stereotypes are pretty accurate for LA, despite the post above. I listen to a daily din from hysterical Bush haters, made ironic by the fact that I don't much care for him myself.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.