True story: a guy here in a Texas suburb wants to teach his children something about poverty in America, and about their own blessedness. He somehow finds a needy family at Christmastime, and decides that he and his children are...
I am in total agreement with you. In their place, I would be tempted to throw these people out of my trailer.
The arrogance is obnoxious --- how does he know what they want or need? Maybe what they need is medicine or money to fix a car or roof? Does he even ask?
Charles Cosimano
December 20, 2007 1:34 PM
The poor have dignity? On what planet do they live? There is no romance to poverty, no dignity in it. It is a condition of misery and hardship, of despair and fear. The actions of the man and his clan may have been crass and stupid, but perhaps, for just that tiny moment, the despair of the people they descended upon was lessened, for just that minute. No more, no longer.
Chris S
December 20, 2007 1:40 PM
Yes, Charles, they have dignity, not because they are poor, but because they are humans.
KatieO'Connor
December 20, 2007 1:40 PM
First to Dana, i would be willing to be this is a family that asked for help, many options for "adopting a family" at Christmas time, I would imagine, they recieved a wish list from the family.
I've been that "obnoxious suburban" girl delivering presents to a familiy that asked for them. It was indeed awkward, her house was filthy and she was still in her nightgown at 3 in the afternoon, we did not recieve a thank you.
FWIW....
Abigail
December 20, 2007 1:44 PM
I agree with Rod. When my oldest daughter started elementary school she encountered her first impoverished classmate. We had the opportunity to make an anonymous donation to her for Christmas without her or her family ever knowing who it came from. Another family donated as well but made sure their gift was wrapped and card included! I still cringe every time I think of the embarrassment that the little girl most likely felt!
Franklin Evans
December 20, 2007 1:48 PM
With many details begging to be questioned... I would honor the impulse even while criticizing their choice in expressing it.
They could have taken the money they spent on presents, and arranged to give the chosen family a good, solid, basic meal, filled their pantry/fridge with staples, and given them cash to help them try to get ahead of the subsistance line. A gift for each person would not be out of line in that scenario, because people do need something besides their daily toil to exercise their minds and souls. Books, perhaps, or something basic that would last a child for some time (a bicycle, something like that).
Osvaldo Mandias
December 20, 2007 1:55 PM
Yes, you're wrong. Sure it could be done more quietly. But when you're attacking people for being too bumptious in their charity, you're off base.
AnotherBeliever
December 20, 2007 1:57 PM
Absolutely there is a way. Our parents would take us to soup kitchens either Thanksgiving or Christmas most years. We would spend HOURS making pumpkin pie the old fashioned way. We gave to food pantries when we could. I am sure there were also times when we GOT from food pantries, so maybe my family had their motives. There was a year or two (and that's probably all it was but it seemed longer) when we ate nothing but Ramen noodles and hotdogs and donated venison, when he had no heat and no plumbing to speak of. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the presents under the tree some years were not out of their own pockets - I never really thought about that before now.
Give material goods according to the Gospels. Anonymously. That won't step on anyone's dignity or privacy. Give gifts to toy drives - there are dozens. Parents pick up the toys and bring them home just as they would if they'd bought the toys themselves.
And if you want your children to see poverty up close and personal, to see the impact that service can have, visit shelters for homeless people or battered women and their families. Remember the shut-ins and widows, go to nursing homes and carol. But don't stop at the holidays. Where ever we lived (and we moved A LOT), my mom would often "adopt" an elderly woman at a nursing home, and drop by every week or so with some little dainty of food or perfumed soap and just talk for an hour or two. It was good therapy for both of them. In hard times, it helps to have a sympathetic ear. And these men and women have been through much harder times than us - they often have some wisdom we desperately need.
I took all of these things for granted growing up. As I've said before, ours is a family which emphasizes service and volunteerism. We should all make these activities as customary as carving a turkey or putting up a tree. It won't cure materialism, but it might serve as a good counterbalance and reminder of what really matters.
jaybird
December 20, 2007 2:10 PM
What Osvaldo said.
PatientWitness
December 20, 2007 2:17 PM
Once again I find myself in honest-to-goodness awe of AnotherBeliever! She is caring, level-headed, and wise beyond her years, and I feel blessed to read what she writes. I don't know what your future holds after your military service is over, young lady, but I know it will be bright. Our country is in good hands with people like you coming into your own.
Stay safe, and Merry Christmas!
DeeAnn
December 20, 2007 2:19 PM
We are all in different places in our understanding. To this guy, it might have been a great step forward to think of someone else. Maybe the next time he wants to help, he will do it better, but I think we need to be careful in judging others because, frankly, we all have things we need to work on. The important thing is motive and only he knows what his motive was. And I imagine in his own way, his motives were good. (Maybe he wanted some acknowledgment for what he did as well, not the end of the world.)
Frankly, I think that giving people anything may help short term, but still falls short of what is really needed. People who may find themselves in these situations need help to gain the skills to get out and stay out of poverty. Donating to organizations that provide life skills, or education, or teach how to be good parents, and teaching them about the gospel of Christ (if they want to hear it), are much more worthwhile endeavors.
DeeAnn
December 20, 2007 2:22 PM
Oh, just wanted to amend my post a bit. I'm not critizing helping those with immediate needs. That's necessary as well. And I love AnotherBeliever's story about her mom and visiting nursing homes. The elderly and the widows and the fatherless need our friendship as well.
DeeAnn
December 20, 2007 2:24 PM
Please forgive my multiple posts. Just found this quote I was looking for:
The Lord works from the inside out. The world works from the outside in. The world would take people out of the slums. Christ takes the slums out of people, and then they take themselves out of the slums. The world would mold men by changing their environment. Christ changes men, who then change their environment. The world would shape human behavior, but Christ can change human nature.
Ezra Taft Benson
Matt
December 20, 2007 2:25 PM
If you guys are interested in a recent work of fiction that addresses this very topic, I would heartily recommend a book by one of my favorite authors, "Samaritan" by Richard Price.
Erik
December 20, 2007 3:22 PM
"Charity isn't giving people what you want to give; it's giving them what they need to get." - Terry Pratchett
Erin Manning
December 20, 2007 3:23 PM
I would like to take this opportunity to thank several anonymous citizens of Jefferson City, Missouri, who at Christmas a very long time ago made it possible for a large family that was having temporary financial difficulties to celebrate a joyous Christmas with their children. From a surprise gift that showed up on the doorstep to an understanding person at a thrift store to several other quietly helpful people, my parents were given more than merely what was needed, and gave us children a Christmas that is still among my favorite memories. I'm not sure where the tiny brown teapot (which I still treasure) came from, but it was the perfect gift for a junior high school student who was just discovering the joy of caffeine; and so many other things given outright or bought at a suddenly "reduced" price were greatly enjoyed by us all. The spirit of kindness and generosity poured out upon us that year has borne, and continues to bear, fruit, and I know that our God Who saw your secret deeds of love has blessed you richly for them; may He continue to bless all who give so that the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing, or who manage to make the one receiving the gift believe that in truth the receiver is doing the giver a favor by accepting the gift.
Simon
December 20, 2007 3:40 PM
Erin - beautiful post. Thank you for sharing that!
Can't argue against Rod's point that it's far better to make such donations anonymously ....
HOWEVER, this is a second hand story, and who knows how much it has been embellished? One of the very worst features of contemporary culture is our chronic need (by the Left, Right and everyone in-between) to point out two dimensional straw men and express our moral outrage. Each of us acknowledges we have faults, of course, but we love examples of behavior far more crass than anything we or anyone we actually know would ever do. I would like to see these "Suburbanites" in three dimensions and strongly suspect that in real life they aren't the shallow narcissists they appear in this account.
Also, while we're talking about turning The Poor into mere "objects," let's not assume that the needy family was simply acted upon here. Not long ago, it was almost a stereotype of the rural poor in America that such families were too proud to accept charity. If this event so clearly infringed upon the dignity of the trailer-dwellers, why did they invite the "Suburbanites" into their home to begin with?
Jim
December 20, 2007 3:50 PM
The only people who can and should judge whether the suburbanites acted appropriately or not are the people who received their gift. How people behaved and how people felt are something only the rest of us can speculate on.
Rod Dreher
December 20, 2007 3:52 PM
If this event so clearly infringed upon the dignity of the trailer-dwellers, why did they invite the "Suburbanites" into their home to begin with?
I don't know the details of the incident beyond that which I shared in the blog post. I could easily imagine a father or mother opening the door, seeing all the people outside with gifts, and not knowing what to do ... and therefore letting them in. Especially if deprived children see people carrying gifts.
Mark
December 20, 2007 3:54 PM
The better way to teach your children to be thankful for their blessing and to act in charity towards others is to be an example, to make those things a regular part of your own life. They will see it.
People like this guy, however, spend most of their time being ambivalent towards the less fortunate until all of the sudden they feel guilty. So they concoct some big, showy act of charity as an example for their kids to try to replace the sincere charitable mindset they've been lacking all along.
In other words, if this behavior was translated to saving for retirement, Mr. Suburbanaut would go to a casino on his last day of work instead of regularly putting money away over his career.
KatieO'Connor
December 20, 2007 4:16 PM
Mark, I find it stunning that you feel comfortable passing judgement on "this guy" based on a second hand story with no back up at all.
Simon
December 20, 2007 4:27 PM
I don't know the details of the incident beyond that which I shared in the blog post. I could easily imagine a father or mother opening the door, seeing all the people outside with gifts, and not knowing what to do ... and therefore letting them in.
Rod, I can imagine that, too. But we don't know what actually happened (was the friend who recounted this to you an eyewitness, or was he relaying something he heard second or third hand?).
To me, the whole story seems like a classic case of our impulse to feel good about ourselves by identifying someone out there whose behavior is far beyond the bounds of basic human decency. But I'm betting that in real life these Suburbanauts aren't the caricatures of self-absorbed materialists that this account makes them out to be.
I do agree, though, with your principle that genuine charity does not seek any recognition.
People like this guy, however, spend most of their time being ambivalent towards the less fortunate until all of the sudden they feel guilty.
Pardon me, but how exactly do you know this, Mark?
Mark
December 20, 2007 4:38 PM
Katie - "like", as in how the person is portrayed in the shared anecdote. This is going to sound wholly sophistic, but whoever this person is in real life is entirely irrelevant. What matters is the character shown here and the fact that people like that really do exist.
Simon - See above. Also, having met them (the type, not the actual guy in the story) helps. Our society is rife with such examples.
Caroline
December 20, 2007 5:23 PM
"genuine charity does not seek any recognition. "
Totally true. BUT, it is still good for the recipient to show recognition or thanks in some form or another. Good for the recipient. To receive help or gifts and have no thanks in one's heart, to have no desire to express the gratitude, to make no effort to say thank you, that is to be really poor. God puts up with the like in us all the time and we should put up with it in others too, but still, ingratitude is not a good thing.
During the holidays some of us will experience ingratitude. Before we condemn ourselves for feeling hurt if we do feel hurt we might consider
that our hurt is really sorrow over another person's poverty. Also, acknowledging the fact of being hurt by ingratitude might be a meritorious act of humility recognizing our own neediness. To be above being glad of thanks as of being glad of compliments may be very holy and maybe not.
Zoetius
December 20, 2007 7:46 PM
"do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing...." Jesus
Larry Parker
December 21, 2007 1:53 AM
This sounds like that awful TV show with Ty Pennington ... or the well-intentioned but nevertheless equally awful TV show with Amy Grant that got cancelled a couple of years ago.
David
December 21, 2007 5:37 AM
I agree that this is pretty disgusting, and I would add the same comment about the new popular trend of "charity vacations" in which people go to some foreign country for two weeks, gawk at the "poor, needy natives," dig a couple of ditches, and take off back home for their comfortable suburban lives. As Blessed Father Cosmas of Grigoriou, apostle to Zaire, said, real missionary work is not possible unless you intend to "leave your bones among the natives." A real dedication is what is required to make a difference, not some feel-good "when I have time" charity.
Rod Dreher
December 21, 2007 8:47 AM
OTOH, a lot of Evangelical churches around where I live go on "mission trips" to poor parts of Mexico and Central America, taking teenagers down for a week or 10 days to build housing for the poor. I think that's a great thing, and not the same as the fly-by Christmas visit. The kids actually live with the communities they're helping, pray with them, and get to know them.
mom4vr
December 21, 2007 10:31 AM
Rod, You are right about the Evangelical churches going on "mission trips" & my sons have been on many. The problem I have with them is that when they go for their 10 days it costs thousands of dollars & I mean thousands. The kids are given the choice to send letters asking for prayer & support (which we did NOT do - we would send a letter asking for prayer only), fund raisers, etc.
Usually there would be 30 - 40 students who went & when they went to Mexico it costs each kid an average of $1500 - 2000. If you multipy that by 30 it is $45,000 - $60,000 for a 7 - 10 day trip. After a while, I decided that this was absolutely crazy & to tell you the truth many parents (& kids) got the same feeling that the guy in your article was talking about. Wow look at me I went to Mexico - yippee!
Did my church have a soup kitchen, food bank, clothing, or help the poor on a daily, weekly, monthly basis? Uh NO. Think what this church could have done with this money in our own community. While we did have a benevolent (spelling?) fund it was not taken out of our regular tithing it was "in addition to".
Part of the reason I am no longer in the church business.
AnotherBeliever
December 21, 2007 3:32 PM
Thank you for your kind words, PatientWitness and DeeAnn. If I am at all wise beyond my years it is because of people like my grandparents and parents - people who've tried to live life the way it should be led, and who've inspired my generation of family and friends. And that is one trait they've pointed out about us younger people - we aren't exactly the rebelling-against-the-system kind. ;)
Chris Robinson
December 21, 2007 4:47 PM
I think this guy doesn't need to be chastised but pushed in the right direction. He is doing the right thing...maybe for the wrong motive, maybe not. Chances are he's never been in the other families position. Most American's are completely ignorant about how dehumanizing their actions can be. He could very well have known no better way to help the family. (although you'ld think with common sense he'd come up with not giving the gifts privately i can't say i've never gone on about my business without evaluating how stupid my methods were before)
@mission trips. There is a value to taking groups overseas. While I agree money can be put to better use I believe that without people taking trips the money never would be. I think in both cases there must be a progression. Rarely will someone stay in a suburb and care about the trailer park or poverty stricken third world country. They may say they do but it will never move them to action. When they see that person...when even in a misguided, not ideal way they begin to understand that the "poor" are real actual human beings with wants and needs and value. With some guidance this (often surprising) revelation that the poor are people can (should) move the "charitable visitor" to a different kind of charity that values the person. It moves some of those youth to devoting their lives to helping people overseas. it moves families to cut back and give. It sensitizes them to whats going on around the world...these "dehumanizing" trips can actually do quite the opposite for both sides. There can be value in these "charitable vacations" and we need to have grace and patience with the giver as well as with those who receive. Instead of reaming this guy for his "misdeeds" lets promote an alternative and encourage the right behavior.
BILL
December 26, 2007 11:08 AM
There are many ways to help the less fortunate. The man in this story
may have went about it improperly but at least he made an effort. The problem I have with the christmas charity deal is where is everyone
the other 364 days of the year? I have been on shortterm mission
trips to Jamaica and to mexico, Its not about tourism its about
making an effort to help others and to show some how fortunate we
are. If you have undertaken these trips for the proper reason then
there is no way that you will not be a changed person after seeing
the lives that many others live.
Carol
November 30, 2008 9:52 PM
Well, I agree in part. I gave to an organization last Christmas, per the urging of my friend. I was supposed to deliver the gifts in person. I told my friend the last thing someone wanted was some "rich" (by the recipient's definition) white-bread woman showing up at their door bearing gifts. The gift wasn't to make me feel good; it was to help them. She was disappointed that I didn't deliver the gifts, but I had her mail them to the families instead. So common sense would dictate that's the best course of action.
Now here's a question for you. Is the family better off having had the guy show up or not? I think if you truly are impoverished and want your kids to have a decent Christmas, the answer is "Yes." So you can judge all you want, but he DID give to them. God tells us to give no matter what. Even if the recipient doesn't use the gift wisely, we are to give. The reverse is true in my opinion. Even if the guy's motives aren't as "pure" as you would like, the consequences were the same. The family was enriched.
And yes, we should all give all year long, not just at Christmas. But the fact is, Christmas DOES put people in a giving mood and if it takes a holiday to do so, more power to the spirit of Christmas.
I'm sure impoverished families will be appreciative of any gifts, even if they're wrapped in a feel-good package. God works in mysterious ways and in this case, he worked through a man who, however well-intentioned, went about things the wrong way. So should we condemn him for this? Put yourself in the impoverished family's position. At least a family was blessed. It's not the package; it's what's inside that counts.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
I am in total agreement with you. In their place, I would be tempted to throw these people out of my trailer.
The arrogance is obnoxious --- how does he know what they want or need? Maybe what they need is medicine or money to fix a car or roof? Does he even ask?
The poor have dignity? On what planet do they live? There is no romance to poverty, no dignity in it. It is a condition of misery and hardship, of despair and fear. The actions of the man and his clan may have been crass and stupid, but perhaps, for just that tiny moment, the despair of the people they descended upon was lessened, for just that minute. No more, no longer.
Yes, Charles, they have dignity, not because they are poor, but because they are humans.
First to Dana, i would be willing to be this is a family that asked for help, many options for "adopting a family" at Christmas time, I would imagine, they recieved a wish list from the family.
I've been that "obnoxious suburban" girl delivering presents to a familiy that asked for them. It was indeed awkward, her house was filthy and she was still in her nightgown at 3 in the afternoon, we did not recieve a thank you.
FWIW....
I agree with Rod. When my oldest daughter started elementary school she encountered her first impoverished classmate. We had the opportunity to make an anonymous donation to her for Christmas without her or her family ever knowing who it came from. Another family donated as well but made sure their gift was wrapped and card included! I still cringe every time I think of the embarrassment that the little girl most likely felt!
With many details begging to be questioned... I would honor the impulse even while criticizing their choice in expressing it.
They could have taken the money they spent on presents, and arranged to give the chosen family a good, solid, basic meal, filled their pantry/fridge with staples, and given them cash to help them try to get ahead of the subsistance line. A gift for each person would not be out of line in that scenario, because people do need something besides their daily toil to exercise their minds and souls. Books, perhaps, or something basic that would last a child for some time (a bicycle, something like that).
Yes, you're wrong. Sure it could be done more quietly. But when you're attacking people for being too bumptious in their charity, you're off base.
Absolutely there is a way. Our parents would take us to soup kitchens either Thanksgiving or Christmas most years. We would spend HOURS making pumpkin pie the old fashioned way. We gave to food pantries when we could. I am sure there were also times when we GOT from food pantries, so maybe my family had their motives. There was a year or two (and that's probably all it was but it seemed longer) when we ate nothing but Ramen noodles and hotdogs and donated venison, when he had no heat and no plumbing to speak of. I wouldn't be surprised if some of the presents under the tree some years were not out of their own pockets - I never really thought about that before now.
Give material goods according to the Gospels. Anonymously. That won't step on anyone's dignity or privacy. Give gifts to toy drives - there are dozens. Parents pick up the toys and bring them home just as they would if they'd bought the toys themselves.
And if you want your children to see poverty up close and personal, to see the impact that service can have, visit shelters for homeless people or battered women and their families. Remember the shut-ins and widows, go to nursing homes and carol. But don't stop at the holidays. Where ever we lived (and we moved A LOT), my mom would often "adopt" an elderly woman at a nursing home, and drop by every week or so with some little dainty of food or perfumed soap and just talk for an hour or two. It was good therapy for both of them. In hard times, it helps to have a sympathetic ear. And these men and women have been through much harder times than us - they often have some wisdom we desperately need.
I took all of these things for granted growing up. As I've said before, ours is a family which emphasizes service and volunteerism. We should all make these activities as customary as carving a turkey or putting up a tree. It won't cure materialism, but it might serve as a good counterbalance and reminder of what really matters.
What Osvaldo said.
Once again I find myself in honest-to-goodness awe of AnotherBeliever! She is caring, level-headed, and wise beyond her years, and I feel blessed to read what she writes. I don't know what your future holds after your military service is over, young lady, but I know it will be bright. Our country is in good hands with people like you coming into your own.
Stay safe, and Merry Christmas!
We are all in different places in our understanding. To this guy, it might have been a great step forward to think of someone else. Maybe the next time he wants to help, he will do it better, but I think we need to be careful in judging others because, frankly, we all have things we need to work on. The important thing is motive and only he knows what his motive was. And I imagine in his own way, his motives were good. (Maybe he wanted some acknowledgment for what he did as well, not the end of the world.)
Frankly, I think that giving people anything may help short term, but still falls short of what is really needed. People who may find themselves in these situations need help to gain the skills to get out and stay out of poverty. Donating to organizations that provide life skills, or education, or teach how to be good parents, and teaching them about the gospel of Christ (if they want to hear it), are much more worthwhile endeavors.
Oh, just wanted to amend my post a bit. I'm not critizing helping those with immediate needs. That's necessary as well. And I love AnotherBeliever's story about her mom and visiting nursing homes. The elderly and the widows and the fatherless need our friendship as well.
Please forgive my multiple posts. Just found this quote I was looking for:
The Lord works from the inside out. The world works from the outside in. The world would take people out of the slums. Christ takes the slums out of people, and then they take themselves out of the slums. The world would mold men by changing their environment. Christ changes men, who then change their environment. The world would shape human behavior, but Christ can change human nature.
Ezra Taft Benson
If you guys are interested in a recent work of fiction that addresses this very topic, I would heartily recommend a book by one of my favorite authors, "Samaritan" by Richard Price.
"Charity isn't giving people what you want to give; it's giving them what they need to get." - Terry Pratchett
I would like to take this opportunity to thank several anonymous citizens of Jefferson City, Missouri, who at Christmas a very long time ago made it possible for a large family that was having temporary financial difficulties to celebrate a joyous Christmas with their children. From a surprise gift that showed up on the doorstep to an understanding person at a thrift store to several other quietly helpful people, my parents were given more than merely what was needed, and gave us children a Christmas that is still among my favorite memories. I'm not sure where the tiny brown teapot (which I still treasure) came from, but it was the perfect gift for a junior high school student who was just discovering the joy of caffeine; and so many other things given outright or bought at a suddenly "reduced" price were greatly enjoyed by us all. The spirit of kindness and generosity poured out upon us that year has borne, and continues to bear, fruit, and I know that our God Who saw your secret deeds of love has blessed you richly for them; may He continue to bless all who give so that the right hand doesn't know what the left is doing, or who manage to make the one receiving the gift believe that in truth the receiver is doing the giver a favor by accepting the gift.
Erin - beautiful post. Thank you for sharing that!
Can't argue against Rod's point that it's far better to make such donations anonymously ....
HOWEVER, this is a second hand story, and who knows how much it has been embellished? One of the very worst features of contemporary culture is our chronic need (by the Left, Right and everyone in-between) to point out two dimensional straw men and express our moral outrage. Each of us acknowledges we have faults, of course, but we love examples of behavior far more crass than anything we or anyone we actually know would ever do. I would like to see these "Suburbanites" in three dimensions and strongly suspect that in real life they aren't the shallow narcissists they appear in this account.
Also, while we're talking about turning The Poor into mere "objects," let's not assume that the needy family was simply acted upon here. Not long ago, it was almost a stereotype of the rural poor in America that such families were too proud to accept charity. If this event so clearly infringed upon the dignity of the trailer-dwellers, why did they invite the "Suburbanites" into their home to begin with?
The only people who can and should judge whether the suburbanites acted appropriately or not are the people who received their gift. How people behaved and how people felt are something only the rest of us can speculate on.
If this event so clearly infringed upon the dignity of the trailer-dwellers, why did they invite the "Suburbanites" into their home to begin with?
I don't know the details of the incident beyond that which I shared in the blog post. I could easily imagine a father or mother opening the door, seeing all the people outside with gifts, and not knowing what to do ... and therefore letting them in. Especially if deprived children see people carrying gifts.
The better way to teach your children to be thankful for their blessing and to act in charity towards others is to be an example, to make those things a regular part of your own life. They will see it.
People like this guy, however, spend most of their time being ambivalent towards the less fortunate until all of the sudden they feel guilty. So they concoct some big, showy act of charity as an example for their kids to try to replace the sincere charitable mindset they've been lacking all along.
In other words, if this behavior was translated to saving for retirement, Mr. Suburbanaut would go to a casino on his last day of work instead of regularly putting money away over his career.
Mark, I find it stunning that you feel comfortable passing judgement on "this guy" based on a second hand story with no back up at all.
I don't know the details of the incident beyond that which I shared in the blog post. I could easily imagine a father or mother opening the door, seeing all the people outside with gifts, and not knowing what to do ... and therefore letting them in.
Rod, I can imagine that, too. But we don't know what actually happened (was the friend who recounted this to you an eyewitness, or was he relaying something he heard second or third hand?).
To me, the whole story seems like a classic case of our impulse to feel good about ourselves by identifying someone out there whose behavior is far beyond the bounds of basic human decency. But I'm betting that in real life these Suburbanauts aren't the caricatures of self-absorbed materialists that this account makes them out to be.
I do agree, though, with your principle that genuine charity does not seek any recognition.
People like this guy, however, spend most of their time being ambivalent towards the less fortunate until all of the sudden they feel guilty.
Pardon me, but how exactly do you know this, Mark?
Katie - "like", as in how the person is portrayed in the shared anecdote. This is going to sound wholly sophistic, but whoever this person is in real life is entirely irrelevant. What matters is the character shown here and the fact that people like that really do exist.
Simon - See above. Also, having met them (the type, not the actual guy in the story) helps. Our society is rife with such examples.
"genuine charity does not seek any recognition. "
Totally true. BUT, it is still good for the recipient to show recognition or thanks in some form or another. Good for the recipient. To receive help or gifts and have no thanks in one's heart, to have no desire to express the gratitude, to make no effort to say thank you, that is to be really poor. God puts up with the like in us all the time and we should put up with it in others too, but still, ingratitude is not a good thing.
During the holidays some of us will experience ingratitude. Before we condemn ourselves for feeling hurt if we do feel hurt we might consider
that our hurt is really sorrow over another person's poverty. Also, acknowledging the fact of being hurt by ingratitude might be a meritorious act of humility recognizing our own neediness. To be above being glad of thanks as of being glad of compliments may be very holy and maybe not.
"do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing...." Jesus
This sounds like that awful TV show with Ty Pennington ... or the well-intentioned but nevertheless equally awful TV show with Amy Grant that got cancelled a couple of years ago.
I agree that this is pretty disgusting, and I would add the same comment about the new popular trend of "charity vacations" in which people go to some foreign country for two weeks, gawk at the "poor, needy natives," dig a couple of ditches, and take off back home for their comfortable suburban lives. As Blessed Father Cosmas of Grigoriou, apostle to Zaire, said, real missionary work is not possible unless you intend to "leave your bones among the natives." A real dedication is what is required to make a difference, not some feel-good "when I have time" charity.
OTOH, a lot of Evangelical churches around where I live go on "mission trips" to poor parts of Mexico and Central America, taking teenagers down for a week or 10 days to build housing for the poor. I think that's a great thing, and not the same as the fly-by Christmas visit. The kids actually live with the communities they're helping, pray with them, and get to know them.
Rod, You are right about the Evangelical churches going on "mission trips" & my sons have been on many. The problem I have with them is that when they go for their 10 days it costs thousands of dollars & I mean thousands. The kids are given the choice to send letters asking for prayer & support (which we did NOT do - we would send a letter asking for prayer only), fund raisers, etc.
Usually there would be 30 - 40 students who went & when they went to Mexico it costs each kid an average of $1500 - 2000. If you multipy that by 30 it is $45,000 - $60,000 for a 7 - 10 day trip. After a while, I decided that this was absolutely crazy & to tell you the truth many parents (& kids) got the same feeling that the guy in your article was talking about. Wow look at me I went to Mexico - yippee!
Did my church have a soup kitchen, food bank, clothing, or help the poor on a daily, weekly, monthly basis? Uh NO. Think what this church could have done with this money in our own community. While we did have a benevolent (spelling?) fund it was not taken out of our regular tithing it was "in addition to".
Part of the reason I am no longer in the church business.
Thank you for your kind words, PatientWitness and DeeAnn. If I am at all wise beyond my years it is because of people like my grandparents and parents - people who've tried to live life the way it should be led, and who've inspired my generation of family and friends. And that is one trait they've pointed out about us younger people - we aren't exactly the rebelling-against-the-system kind. ;)
I think this guy doesn't need to be chastised but pushed in the right direction. He is doing the right thing...maybe for the wrong motive, maybe not. Chances are he's never been in the other families position. Most American's are completely ignorant about how dehumanizing their actions can be. He could very well have known no better way to help the family. (although you'ld think with common sense he'd come up with not giving the gifts privately i can't say i've never gone on about my business without evaluating how stupid my methods were before)
@mission trips. There is a value to taking groups overseas. While I agree money can be put to better use I believe that without people taking trips the money never would be. I think in both cases there must be a progression. Rarely will someone stay in a suburb and care about the trailer park or poverty stricken third world country. They may say they do but it will never move them to action. When they see that person...when even in a misguided, not ideal way they begin to understand that the "poor" are real actual human beings with wants and needs and value. With some guidance this (often surprising) revelation that the poor are people can (should) move the "charitable visitor" to a different kind of charity that values the person. It moves some of those youth to devoting their lives to helping people overseas. it moves families to cut back and give. It sensitizes them to whats going on around the world...these "dehumanizing" trips can actually do quite the opposite for both sides. There can be value in these "charitable vacations" and we need to have grace and patience with the giver as well as with those who receive. Instead of reaming this guy for his "misdeeds" lets promote an alternative and encourage the right behavior.
There are many ways to help the less fortunate. The man in this story
may have went about it improperly but at least he made an effort. The problem I have with the christmas charity deal is where is everyone
the other 364 days of the year? I have been on shortterm mission
trips to Jamaica and to mexico, Its not about tourism its about
making an effort to help others and to show some how fortunate we
are. If you have undertaken these trips for the proper reason then
there is no way that you will not be a changed person after seeing
the lives that many others live.
Well, I agree in part. I gave to an organization last Christmas, per the urging of my friend. I was supposed to deliver the gifts in person. I told my friend the last thing someone wanted was some "rich" (by the recipient's definition) white-bread woman showing up at their door bearing gifts. The gift wasn't to make me feel good; it was to help them. She was disappointed that I didn't deliver the gifts, but I had her mail them to the families instead. So common sense would dictate that's the best course of action.
Now here's a question for you. Is the family better off having had the guy show up or not? I think if you truly are impoverished and want your kids to have a decent Christmas, the answer is "Yes." So you can judge all you want, but he DID give to them. God tells us to give no matter what. Even if the recipient doesn't use the gift wisely, we are to give. The reverse is true in my opinion. Even if the guy's motives aren't as "pure" as you would like, the consequences were the same. The family was enriched.
And yes, we should all give all year long, not just at Christmas. But the fact is, Christmas DOES put people in a giving mood and if it takes a holiday to do so, more power to the spirit of Christmas.
I'm sure impoverished families will be appreciative of any gifts, even if they're wrapped in a feel-good package. God works in mysterious ways and in this case, he worked through a man who, however well-intentioned, went about things the wrong way. So should we condemn him for this? Put yourself in the impoverished family's position. At least a family was blessed. It's not the package; it's what's inside that counts.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.