Crunchy Con

Kids these days

Thursday January 24, 2008

Categories: Conservatism, Culture, Family

I was talking on the phone yesterday with a conservative acquaintance who mentioned that he'd been listening to Laura Ingraham's radio show. I forget what the topic was, but he said that he likes her show in general, but she really doesn't know what she doesn't know. He explained that she doesn't have children, and that there's something ...not quite there when conservatives who don't have families give advice and commentary on family-related issues. To be fair, he said that Ingraham kept qualifying her remarks by saying she doesn't have kids.

The guy went on to tell me that one of his children suffers from autism and other serious disorders, and the struggles and heartbreaks he and his wife have raising this boy beggar belief. He explained that the experience of raising kids, especially the one who suffers so much, has made him far less willing to pass judgment on other parents.

Later in the day, I met with a friend who is also a conservative, and I recounted this conversation to him. He told me that we'd get a much different kind of conservatism if more conservative intellectuals had kids, or were more involved in family life. Conservatives whose intellections and contributions to public debate don't factor in family life are in general too narrowly focused for their own good, he said.

All this came to mind today as I left the office for a bit this afternoon to take care of a medical situation with one of my kids (not an emergency). As I so often have to do, I gave thanks that I work for a company that provides good health coverage for its employees, and I wondered about moms and dads who don't have what we do. Furthermore, I reflected on how having children changed me and my focus. It might sound paradoxical, but the experience of child-raising has made me both more conservative and more merciful.

How to explain? Well, when you have children, you suddenly become aware of the broader culture in ways that might have eluded your notice before. You realize, unless you're an idiot, that you are responsible for the protection and formation of human beings who did not ask to come into this world, but whom you have a duty to shield and instruct. And you necessarily have to quit living in the moment, and think hard about the future, and the kind of world you want to leave for your children. If you're responsible, you'll want it to be a world in which it's easier for them to be good. All this made me a lot less laissez-faire about public and private morality than I was earlier.

But it also made me less quick to judge others harshly. Having children is a joy, but it's also incredibly difficult. Children aren't robots. Working with our kids on this or that issue can be exhausting, emotionally and physically. If you have kids, you know exactly what I'm talking about. I know good families in which the parents did everything they reasonably could have to provide a strong, safe, loving home for their children ... and one of the kids went inexplicably bad. I've known people who came from rotten homes, and somehow got their lives together and thrive. It's impossible to know what kind of struggles go on inside families, and how parents pour themselves out for their children ... and for reasons outside of their control, fall short of the mark.

The older I get, and the further I get along into fatherhood, the more important I believe having strong moral standards and institutions to back those standards up are, and the more important I believe charity and mercy in family situations are. Go figure.

But you know, things like this really do stop you dead in your tracks, and make you wonder if we're not seeing some rough beast emerging. That link will take you to The Mighty Favog's blog, where he discusses the Omaha teenager who allegedly blew a stranger's brains out, just to watch her die. When Favog criticized the suspect, who has reportedly confessed to the murder, he was attacked by a teenager for passing judgment. In a private e-mail to me, Favog writes:

Rod, I believe we may have come to the point where we're entering into real "Love in the Ruins"-type stuff. I think we finally have reached the point where the young -- and this is a gross generalization, I realize -- are really, really pissed, utterly adrift and are starting to turn on society. There are no rules, and it's absolutely tribal. Yeah, there are lots of good kids . . . of course. But my gut feeling is that the trend lines for the sociopathically P.O.'d and violent are creeping steadily upward. Something is seriously wrong here.

A school teacher friend tells me that I would be shocked by how lost so many of the kids she deals with are. These kids -- and most of her students are middle-class -- are so lost, having been jerked around by parents who have had multiple marriages, etc. -- that, in my friend's words, "You learn to be proud of them when they manage to come to school with their shoes tied; it's too much to expect them to have their homework done." She explained that in most cases, she has nothing but pity on the kids; it's the self-centered, couldn't-give-a-s**t parents she can't abide.

Advertisement
Comments
Liam
January 27, 2008 12:50 PM

Kudos to Mrs Pringle on the correct diagnosis about fear of nudity - the "that's so GAY" rejoinder has much more to due with fear of being deemed imperfect physically than sexuality as such. Boys have simply adopted what was once confined to women - self-consciousness about their own shortcomings in terms of physical beauty. That also helps to explain the hideous clothing fashions dominant among boys and young men - they disguise the body with a kind of comparatively neutral graffiti.

That's the market at work - because it's the market's job to make consumers anxious so that they will buy a product or service to relieve their anxiety. Much more of an issue than feminism or gay activism.

stefanie
January 27, 2008 8:41 PM

M_David: Dead eyes and overweight are "dead giveaways" for an awful lot of kids on anti-depressants, anti-psychotics, anti-seizure meds like Depakote, etc. These drugs cause dampening of affect, sluggishness, suicidal thoughts, and sometimes severe overweight. Their use is "black-boxed" by the FDA for teens, but doctors continue to prescribe them by the bushel-load anyway. Parents demand them. It's far, far worse than mere "institutionalization."

Larry Parker
January 27, 2008 11:01 PM

Stefanie:

I'm the first to admit doctors are too easy to prescribe Ritalin. And that children who are seriously ill are not monitored enough on anti-depressant medications that can animate their will to action before it elevates their moods, with potentially (if rarely) tragic results.

Yet and still ...

The increased diagnosis of depression and bipolar disorder in children is NOT quackery. Numerous scientific studies have concluded that the higher prevalence is NOT merely an issue of overdiagnosis. I know, as someone diagnosed with bipolar disorder in my 20s, when I go back with hindsight and read my old high school journals, I HAD BIPOLAR DISORDER THEN. I would have benefited enormously from having medication at an earlier age.

There seems to be a consistent anti-psychiatry bent among Crunchy Cons. Which is strange, because I would think you would be the last folks on earth to make common cause with Tom Cruise and his fellow Scientologists.

Marian Neudel
January 28, 2008 5:09 PM

"So where is the dividing line where a person suddenly goes from "gift of God" to "self-centered, couldn't give a sh*t" moral reprobate upon whom we can spit without remorse?"

At birth? If not, obviously, the earlier you can date it, the better. The earlier the age at which a child becomes "irretrievably" messed up, the less responsibility anybody else has to help him or her.

Peggy
January 31, 2008 3:08 PM

I appreciate your post very much. We adopted toddler brothers from Russia in 2004. We didn't see ourselves up for special needs kids. We didn't think our boys were "special needs" kids. Our boys--wonderful, lovely boys--have extensive emotional behavior and some learning problems. After 3 years, the emotional battles and defiance have not gotten better. We have been working on changing our techniques. It is incumbent upon us to do so. I broke my "conservative" principles by agreeing to sending them both away from their mommy to Pre-K where they can get some structure and learning. Most recently, we have succumbed to medication for ADHD in one and possible seizures in the other. It has been painful to admit we are not able to give them all that they need with our love and affection. Firm and clear rules are also vital to children's wellbeing and sense of security. It has been heartbreaking to realize how damaged they were by spending 2 yrs (oldest) and 6 mos (younger) with their lethargic alcoholic bio-parents and the time in the orphanage. [It's a larger sadness for society in Russia, of course.] They've been through a lot. I don't know how much loss and pain we can heal. I hope as they get older, we can teach them more effectively about behavior and academic matters. [I am annoyed at the pressure the public school has on academic objectives for K entry!] And as long as we need special services, which are excellent in the small town we moved to, we can't send our boys to the parish school.

Thanks for the opportunity to share this sadness I feel of late and confirming my distress at having felt like I abandoned my high-minded principles.

We are celebrating our big boy's 6ht birthday this weekend. He's so excited. His school friends are coming, as are many cousins. It is such a joy to see such happiness in his little face. Pax.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.