Crunchy Con

Liberal geldings, Huckabee and Hagee

Monday January 14, 2008

Categories: Republicans

Frank Beckwith, a leading Evangelical scholar who returned to the Catholicism of his youth last year, explains in a combox below why he's not offended by Protestant pastors like John Hagee who strongly reject Catholicism. In fact, he'd rather stand with them than with the tolerance uber alles crowd:

As someone who was a Protestant Evangelical (and a former president of the Evangelical Theological Society) who came out of Catholicism as a young teen and recently returned to the Church (May 2007), I think too much is made of anti-Catholicism that is borne of theological beliefs. It one thing to think that the Pope will take over America and bring his "medievel ideas" with him (as mid-20th century nativists believed), but is quite another to think that Catholicism is a mistaken theological point of view bested by the Protestant Reformation.

That is where people like Hagee are coming from. I think they are wrong, of course. But they are not bad people. They are people who take theology seriously. They actually believe that theological claims could be true and are worth disputing about. I think this is healthy and refreshing. It is much better than the namby-pamby "religion is private" mantra, the patronizing pablum offered to those to which elites love to condescend.

Because religion is thought by many to be no different than matters of taste and personal hobbies, it seems downright rude for anyone to suggest that another's religious beliefs are mistaken. For such people, "intolerance" is equivalent to merely believing that one is correct on a theological topic. But, ironically, this is a form of intolerance, for it is saying that there is only one way to think of theology, namely, that it cannot in principle be true and it is on the same level of personal preferences such as tastes in food, sports, etc. This, it seems to me, is far worse than theologically-shaped anti-Catholicism and anti-Mormonism, since, in both cases, they implicitly respect their opposition by taking their theologies and their beliefs seriously.

In many ways, the typical Evangelical Protestant and conservative Catholic exhibits the virtue of tolerance in a much grander sense than the liberal religionist who thinks that no religions are true. For it is only when you believe that you are right and others wrong that the virtues of graciousness and respect become real, manly, virtues. The liberal religionist is like a man without genitals bragging of his chastity.

Great line! And exactly the point that needed making.

Advertisement
Comments
IBreakCellPhones
January 15, 2008 3:31 PM

Robb,

Men without chests is a different argument. Lewis was pointing out that the modern curriculum denied the existence of the numinous (and other things, like beauty). He likened the people who are subjected to this education to men without chests, because they would have their appetites (stomachs) directly inform their minds instead of filtering that information through the heart.

Cindy
January 15, 2008 3:41 PM

As far as Francis Beckwith goes, he's just one more ex-evangelical who excuses anything evangelicals say on the grounds that they are "faithful" or "taking a position on the truth." Other than that, the increasing flow of evangelicals into the Catholic Church is slowly eroding any kind of Catholic identity and practice in favor of shallow, subjective, evangelical "Christianity."

Sheilagh
January 15, 2008 4:33 PM

Who are we to judge anyone's faith?

I for one think we Catholics would greatly benefit from a little new blood every once in awhile. Have you seen the pews in a lot of our parishes? More than enough room.

Google the definition of catholic - small c. for another P.O.V.
I particularly like 'Beyond provincialism'.

Pax

Sheilagh
January 15, 2008 4:34 PM

Got Eucharist?

John.

jestrfyl
January 16, 2008 2:27 PM

And a conservative expounding on their exclusive "truth" is like a quadrapalegic bragging about how fast they used to run.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.