Crunchy Con

Marcial Maciel is dead

Thursday January 31, 2008

Categories: Catholicism
Marcial Maciel, the founder of the conservative religious order the Legion of Christ, has died of natural causes at 87. He had been disciplined by Pope Benedict following multiple accusations of sex abuse from early in his priesthood. He died...
Advertisement
Comments
Alberto Hurtado
January 31, 2008 2:28 PM

That is one reading of the situation. The other is, however, that whatever investigation that would go forward would be very invasive on the Legion, whether or not the accusations were true. It is true that Father Marciel accepted a punishment. But the procedures of Cannon Law do not allow for charges like this to be dispensed without an investigation. The reality as that now that his death has passed this case IS going to be opened because I'm sure the Legion will be pushing for his canonization. It is not uncommon that a founder of a religious order dies in ignominy.

That's simply another reading on the situation. The Legionaries have certainly produced many good fruits (with many hesitations, notwithstanding...).

Glenn F.
January 31, 2008 2:34 PM

Although I hold no grudge against Marciel Maciel, after 14 years in the Legion, I will not dignify him with the title of "Father" or "Reverend".

xLC
January 31, 2008 2:58 PM

I hope the cult methods die with him. The LC is suing Regain trying to harass, intimidate, bankrupt and shut them up.

RC no more
January 31, 2008 2:59 PM

Alberto,

This is not just "one reading of the situation." It is the considered judgment of every canon lawyer I have come across who commented on the Vatican's resolution of its investigation into the charges against Fr. Maciel.

For example,

The Rev. John Coughlin, professor of canon law at the University of Notre Dame Law School, said such a penalty was common for elderly clerical abusers. Although Maciel was not removed from the priesthood, Coughlin said the Vatican sanction was still a "very serious penalty."

"The Vatican wouldn't have taken this action if they thought he was totally innocent," Coughlin said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/19/AR2006051900727.html

not a cath
January 31, 2008 3:03 PM

Perhaps the RCC should reconsider their doctrine of priestly celibacy. If priests could marry, this would happen far less often.

Mike
January 31, 2008 3:11 PM

Yeah too bad all those abusive teachers, or protestant pastors or parents can't get married either it would happen far less often with them also!

Bartholomew
January 31, 2008 3:27 PM

Father Maciel is a saint. Now that the Lord has seen fit to take him from this world, the Legion of Christ has difficult responsibility to remain true to spirituality of charity and Christ centeredness that he taught.

By the way, I'd hardly say he died in disgrace. If anything, retirement from public ministry is a blessing to an old priest who desires nothing more than union with God in prayer and penitence.

guy
January 31, 2008 3:42 PM

Good riddance.

RC no more
January 31, 2008 3:44 PM

Bartholomew,

Please consider the following, from a John Allen report on July 22, 2005.

The first decree issued by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith under Benedict XVI punished Fr. Burresi. The decree cited abuses in confession and spiritual direction, but Vatican sources have confirmed that to these reasons must be added the accusations of sexual abuse made against Fr. Burresi by some men who were his followers and seminarians during the 1970’s and 80’s. The Vatican stripped Burresi of the right to hear confessions, give spiritual direction, give interviews, publish or broadcast, or say mass publicly.

According to John Allen, the Fr. Burresi case has significance because it is the first such decree under Levada and Pope Benedict, and “because it involves action against a widely known founder of a religious community on the basis of decades-old accusations.”

The Vatican statement regarding Fr. Maciel, issued less than one year later, listed the same precise list of restrictions. Do you propose that the Vatican did not intend the faithful to connect these two cases?

http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word072205.htm

Don Altabello
January 31, 2008 3:52 PM

"The Vatican statement regarding Fr. Maciel, issued less than one year later, listed the same precise list of restrictions. Do you propose that the Vatican did not intend the faithful to connect these two cases?"

RC no more,

Logic won't work. According to the LCs and their defenders, unless there hasn't been something etched in stone from the Vatican, Fr. Maciel is not guilty of anything and we have no right to caution anyone about the LCs. And even if there was, according to them, he will some day be vindicated and canonized like St. Padre Pio.

An by the way, the "Fr. Maciel is a saint" mantra is repeated on many a forum when this discussion comes up.

Irenaeus
January 31, 2008 3:54 PM

"Perhaps the RCC should reconsider their doctrine of priestly celibacy. If priests could marry, this would happen far less often."

Oh BS. This is such a non-sequitur. Look, I'm not Catholic, but clerical marriage wouldn't fix this, because pederasty isn't a normal expression of sexuality. It's not like pederasts need a legitimate outlet. There are plenty of married men who are also pederasts. You can think what you want about celibacy, but do so using sound reasoning.

Sheilagh
January 31, 2008 4:01 PM

It's God's job to judge not ours.

But unfortunately,Wolves like to dress in sheep's clothing. Always have, always will.

God save us and continue to heal all injured souls. May the light of God's love reach them and their sufferings be redeemed by uniting them to the Cross of Christ.


Anonymous
January 31, 2008 4:12 PM

By the way, I'd hardly say he died in disgrace. If anything, retirement from public ministry is a blessing to an old priest who desires nothing more than union with God in prayer and penitence.

Serious Kool-Aid drinking here!

Rome doesn't order 86-year old founders of religious orders to spend the remainder of their lives in prayer and penance and to renounce any further active ministry if their claims of innocence are credible. As John Allen reported in 2006, every one of the cardinals who looked at the evidence determined that some sort of improper activity surely occurred. The only question involved Maciel's state of mind. That discipline against him was specifically approved by the Pope leaves no doubt that Benedict XVI agrees.

Usually when someone dies the maxim De Mortuis Nihil Nisi Bonum applies. Pretty hard to live by that though when revisionists start claiming that a very serious, high profile and unambiguous disciplinary action was actually not a big deal, that the man in question probably wanted that to happen, and that he will obviously be regarded by the Church as a great saint.

Absolute buncombe.


Erin Manning
January 31, 2008 4:22 PM

True saints have a horror of being considered saints. The closer they grow to holiness, the more they experience the radiance of God, and the more their own tiny faults seem magnified beyond the most grievous of sins.

By all reports, Fr. Maciel enjoyed very much being treated like a "living saint" by his devoted followers, in sharp contrast to Mother Teresa who found any such attention deeply painful and would reportedly confess her sins to priests at every opportunity.

I realize that the Legion's devotees will never stop believing that their leader was merely a maligned and misunderstood saint, but the nature and gravity of the charges against him, the number of people making those charges, and the Vatican's extraordinary actions in removing him from public ministry do not readily lead one to any such conclusion.

pb
January 31, 2008 4:34 PM

I don't see how this is really a constructive thread. What is there really to discuss? Shouldn't we just be praying for him?

Erin Manning
January 31, 2008 5:02 PM

Pb, I think most of us have or are praying for him. The reason this is a topic for discussion, I think, is because the Legion is very closely identified with the presence and writings of Fr. Maciel, and if they truly do expect to open a cause for his canonization as one poster earlier speculated then they might be in for a bit of a surprise.

More than that, the Legion's current leaders will have to decide, going forward, what stays and what goes, in a manner of speaking. Fr. Maciel's picture plastered everywhere, books and prayers authored by "Nuestro Padre" as he liked to be called, even some of the rules he established are being called into question in light of the accusations made against him, as was already being done before his death (I have heard that some of the "private vows" have already been suppressed, but don't know if that is rumor or fact). So there is plenty to talk about (in charity and civility, as Rod reminded us above).

jaybird
January 31, 2008 5:12 PM

Despite being raised Catholic and going to Catholic schools, I never heard of this guy until a few years ago. Is this some sort of Opus Dei type-thing? What is it about ultra-traditional Catholicism that seems to encourage this sort of cult-ish behavior?

Francisco
January 31, 2008 5:33 PM

For whatever little anecdotal evidence it is worth, I happen to know some people very involved in the Legion of Christ whose close acquaintances had worked directly with Father Maciel. According to these people, Maciel was a blameless victim of outrageous slander. I do not know enough about the facts to support these opinions, but they are worth pondering. I humbly suggest refraining from judgement til the facts become better known, now that he has passed away. Were he still alive, prudence, such as that exhibited by the Vatican, would be the most sensible alternative.

John E.
January 31, 2008 5:35 PM

>>>
What is it about ultra-traditional Catholicism that seems to encourage this sort of cult-ish behavior?
Posted by: jaybird | January 31, 2008 5:12 PM
>>>

You may have answered your own question, tautologically speaking...

pb
January 31, 2008 5:52 PM

The reason this is a topic for discussion, I think, is because the Legion is very closely identified with the presence and writings of Fr. Maciel, and if they truly do expect to open a cause for his canonization as one poster earlier speculated then they might be in for a bit of a surprise.

I think the discussion is pointless because it doesn't bring anything about, nor does is it likely to change the mind of anyone participating. Most lay Catholics (and those reading this blog) have no role in changing the Legion or RC; those who do, or in contact with people associated with either would be discussing it with them, not doing it through some internet blog.

pb
January 31, 2008 5:54 PM

"What is it about ultra-traditional Catholicism that seems to encourage this sort of cult-ish behavior?

LC can hardly be characterized as ultra-traditional. What cultish groups have in common are erroneous notions of obedience and authority, not "ultra-traditionalism"--unless one wishes to say that all forms of ultra-traditionalism necessarily have erroneous notions of obedience and authority, but that would be wrong.

Sheilagh
January 31, 2008 5:55 PM

pb, I think you're right.

Maybe more info on exactly what the Legion of Christ is and does would be helpful. It seems from this thread that some believe him guilty, others innocent. There are 9 people who came forward - that's a compelling number. But we don't really have the facts to judge the validity of their claims.

Obviously,any request for sainthood would take all of these charges into consideration. I'd think that makes his chances slim. But in the end Rod was right. It's all in God's hands now.

The more pressing fact is that there are still many walking wounded out there in America and across the globe who have lost their faith and/or been seriously damaged. I met an old friend a few weeks ago who'd been abused and he wanted me to know that he'd been off of Heroin for 3 years now. Alot of people I've met fall into drugs to forget. He tries to do what he can to help others. Buys heat for a few needy families over the winter. Even called me a couple days before Christmas to find presents for a friend with 5 kids who'd lost his job. [All the agencies were out.] And he ended up being able to give him $1500 in gift ctfs, grocery coupons, etc. He was a great kid. Really involved in teen ministry. Still trying to put his faith in action. But that damn priest fooled everyone and made the kids feel like it was all their fault.

Anyways, point is, his wife really wants to take their girls to Church but he just can't do it. He wants them to have what he had growing up. But he hasn't been able to bring them. These are the real travesties. This is where our resources and prayers should be directed. God bless and heal, each and every soul. That's my prayer. It seems like the only thing I can do. Pray and reach out. Let them know The Church is NOT these abberations (sp?) The Church is a human institution. The real Church is the work of God and the Holy Spirit in our communities. Those who committed these atrocities violated the values of our Faith, our Church and our God.

Amen

Sheilagh
January 31, 2008 5:57 PM

I suppose I should say 'Human institution, divinely inspired'

Charles Cosimano
January 31, 2008 6:18 PM

Uh, who is dead?

Gil Garza
January 31, 2008 6:32 PM

The Vatican imposed the same penalty upon Marciel had he undergone a trail and been found guilty. He was removed from all public ministry, sequestered and asked to do "penance." The only penalty left for Rome to impose upon Marciel was to defrock him. That, of course, would have required a trial.

Franklin Jennings
January 31, 2008 7:55 PM

Ya just have to laugh at the ignorance of some when Opus Dei is held up as "ultra-traditionalist".

Steve
January 31, 2008 7:58 PM

Ok, Im not Catholic but as an outsider looking in I have never understood the whole approach here. I have 2 kids and if anyone did any of this stuff to them Id hope for really long jail sentences (after I suppressed the urge to kill them). The RCC whole approach seems to be lets pay some fines and keep these guys viable for future priesthood or sainthood. Does it make a difference because they are priests?

Steve

Anonymous
January 31, 2008 7:59 PM

I happen to know some people very involved in the Legion of Christ whose close acquaintances had worked directly with Father Maciel. According to these people, Maciel was a blameless victim of outrageous slander.

According to the staff and Cardinal members of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and according to Pope Benedict XVI, all of whom (unlike the friends of your friends) actually reviewed the massive evidence in the matter, the man's conduct deserved the severe and very public discipline that was imposed upon him.

It's not our place to judge anyone, least of all the dead: Requiescat in pace. Just PLEASE don't try to change or spin the facts to fit some false hagiography.

Anonymous
January 31, 2008 8:05 PM

I have 2 kids and if anyone did any of this stuff to them Id hope for really long jail sentences (after I suppressed the urge to kill them). The RCC whole approach seems to be lets pay some fines and keep these guys viable for future priesthood or sainthood.

What?? These allegations date from the 1950s. No legal system on earth would put someone in jail for anything alleged here. Maciel was an 86 year old man when Rome imposed sanctions against him in lieu of a formal trial. His most valuable asset in this life was his reputation, and it was taken away.

Only a handful of Kool-Aid drinkers believe he's "viable for sainthood." That doesn't pass the laughter test.

Jaybird
January 31, 2008 9:30 PM

Ya just have to laugh at the ignorance of some when Opus Dei is held up as "ultra-traditionalist".

I admit I don't really know or care what Opus Dei's official stance is on usual traditionalist Catholic bug-a-boos like say, the Tridentine Mass, but I'm guessing that if you polled the average OD member, they wouldn't be big fans of Vatican II either.

pb
January 31, 2008 9:44 PM

The average member of OD has no problems with Vatican II--in fact, they see much of what the documents of Vatican II say as a confirmation of the work and teachings of St. Jose Maria. And the other part is that they accept Vatican II as an authentic council of the Church, because this is what it is to be a good Catholic, etc.

Jaybird
January 31, 2008 9:52 PM

Live and learn. Opus Dei = Not traditionalist. Got it.

Franklin Jennings
January 31, 2008 10:56 PM

That's a pretty narrow lesson. How about "I should know what I am talking about when I run my mouth on any given topic" or "I really don't know what I don't know"?

But yeah, Josemaria Escriva anticipated Vatican II's universal call to holiness by 3 or 4 decades. The man, in a lot of ways, set the stage for the changes that came in the late 20th century of the Church. Its recently been revealed that no less august personage than Archbishop Romero not only was himself informed by Escriva's charism, but expected the priests under him to be formed in this way as well.

But if all you get out of it is "Opus Dei =/= traditionalist", well, I can't force ya to learn anything but trivia.

jaybird
January 31, 2008 11:21 PM

I think your cilice is too tight. Lighten up, Francis.

Pazdziernik
January 31, 2008 11:36 PM

The Legion of Christ is not an Order. They are a Religious Congregation. "Orders" follow rules. "Congregations" have constitutions. Examples of Orders: Franciscans, Dominicans. Examples of Congregations: Salesians, Jesuits, Legionaries.

John E.
February 1, 2008 12:55 AM

Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

meh
February 1, 2008 1:34 AM

I hate mimes. Good riddance.

Rod Dreher
February 1, 2008 11:03 AM

Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead.

Oh ho ho, that's what they want you to think! You just wait: he's going to come back with the Lubavitcher rebbe at his side!

Franklin Jennings
February 1, 2008 11:46 AM

Jaybird,

If only I had that kind of desire to answer the Church's call to holiness.

But I can't force people to substitute observation and investigation for easy cliches.

By the way, as was covered in a previous thread, I am part of Communion and Liberation, or as NY Times columnist (and my spiritual father) Lorenzo Albacete once put it "Opus Dei for bad catholics".

Jeannette
February 1, 2008 1:31 PM

I'm assuming the Vatican knew that 'Our Father' was close to death when they JUST THIS WEEK tightened up the conditions for canonization. It's just a shame that his followers are so convinced of his holiness that they have been unable to pray for his conversion and repentance these past years. Now, he might very well be in Hell, so it might be too late.

Forget the OD stuff; back to the LC's!

Paul Pfaff
February 1, 2008 1:45 PM

Jeannette'

Such a great line - "his followers are so convinced of his holiness that they have been unable to pray for his conversion and repentance"

I've been wondering for a long time where the line is between charismatic spiritual leadership and cult of personality. I think you've found it. We are all in need of conversion and repentance, always. It is dangerous when a leader, or especially his followers, forget that. Back to the classic sins - lack of humility, spiritual pride, leading others astray (the original scandal). I've seen it here in Phoenix with some high profile priests, nationally, and most famously with Maciel. May God have mercy on his soul.

Sebastian
February 1, 2008 2:49 PM

We are never going to know the truth, as an RC member I hope its untrue and pray for his eternal rest, without Fr. Maciel my life would be much different. I cannot speak for others.

Jeannette
February 1, 2008 2:50 PM

Paul,
I'm reminded that my childhood pastor always ended conversations with "pray for me". He was invited to a private life of prayer and penance 11 years ago, and died in 1998 I think. I do pray for him and though I'm not sure how fully I can forgive him, I pray that he isn't in Hell. We're asked in the Our Father, (the prayer, not the founder) that God forgive us as we forgive. That's a one-to-one ratio, and reminds us that "the measure with which we measure, will be measured out to us overflowing" etc

Joseph D'Hippolito
February 1, 2008 3:53 PM

I suggest everybody read Jason Berry's article that Rod linked. It makes me admire Benedict all the more. It also reinforces my contempt for JPII and the bunker mentality that afflicts all-too-many Catholics on this issue. That bunker mentality reflects the fact that these same Catholics confuse the hierarchy with Christ, and give it the deference it doesn't deserve.

Franklin Jennings
February 1, 2008 4:34 PM

That's alright, Joe D'oH, most everyone here has plenty of contempt for guys who think we should nuke Muslim population centers as a matter of course.

Joseph D'Hippolito
February 2, 2008 1:41 AM

Franklin, it's good to know that you're a cum laude graduate of the Mark Shea Corresponsdence School of Snark, with a doctorate in Using Personal Attacks To Deflect Attention From The Truth. Congratulations!

But what they didn't teach you, Franklin, is that such tactics (and your skillful use of them) just happen to reinforce my point better than I ever could!

Joseph D'Hippolito
February 2, 2008 1:49 AM

BTW, Franklin, do you like ice with your Kool-Aid? ;P

Bib Babaloo
February 7, 2009 4:05 AM

How did this conversation STOP on February 2nd?

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.