Crunchy Con

The declining Kennedy brand

Thursday January 31, 2008

Categories: Democrats
Froma Harrop of the Providence Journal is one of the better liberal columnists writing today. And she just about lost her lunch over the Kennedy Obamafest earlier this week. Excerpt: JFK was indeed a charismatic figure, but the more we...
Advertisement
Comments
Derek Copold
January 31, 2008 5:49 PM

Red Ted a hypocrite?

Shocking.

Irenaeus
January 31, 2008 6:13 PM

I've never got the whole Kennedy fascination, but I'm only in my 30s. And I also think Joe McCarthy is a hero...maybe that's the problem. OK. Not really. Bit this Camelot thing, esp. when it's presented as if the whole country was just enraptured by the clan. It seems that that part of the country that thought (and thinks) they're the whole country was enraptured by the clan.

That Ted Kennedy is a liberal hero speaks ill of liberalism. Womanizer, drunkard, hypocrite, and very possibly a murderer. I might have liked JFK had I been from a different generation, from what I know of him from history, but the rest of that clan, esp. Ted, is a disgrace.

Charles Cosimano
January 31, 2008 6:17 PM

It was amazing that they got Teddy sober enough to get dressed and not give his speech in his underwear.

Kit Stolz
January 31, 2008 6:27 PM

What's startling to me is that despite the huge crowds that turned out for Ted Kennedy's endorsement of Obama, the endorsement that seemed to matter to the people I talked to was Caroline's.

If it's true that what really matters in American politics today is symbolism, I think Obama should go for Ron Reagan's endorsement. If both Reagan and Kennedy passed Obama the torch, how could he lose?

Aaron Baugher
January 31, 2008 6:30 PM

I was born in 1969, so I missed JFK. Was the "Camelot" thing really sweeping the country back then the way we're now told, or was it mostly in the eyes of the media and Hollywood? I've also wondered how much of it is the rose-colored glasses of Boomer nostalgia. After all, he barely beat Nixon, and only with dead Democrats voting. That doesn't really square with the modern image of him as the most beloved President ever.

ChuckDFW
January 31, 2008 6:42 PM

Well, for that comment, Teddy's entire life and work -- and those of his brothers and relative -- are just OUT THE WINDOW! Yesiree.

Rod Dreher
January 31, 2008 6:53 PM

I think Obama should go for Ron Reagan's endorsement. If both Reagan and Kennedy passed Obama the torch, how could he lose?

Do you know how little interest any remotely conservative person has in the opinions of Ron Reagan? He was a ballet dancer and a TV presenter. And a liberal.

Larry Parker
January 31, 2008 7:07 PM

I thought the whole idea of "the torch being passed" was as much from Robert as from John -- to complete the mission Bobby Kennedy started in 1968.

It was interesting reading the Chappaquiddick speech verbatim here on CC, though. Ted Kennedy, even if you hate him, has been a powerful Senator with a lot of influence on public policy for 47 years -- pretty remarkable, when you think about it.

At the same time, these days, even in the Kennedy clan in Massachusetts, if that was the best speech Ted could come up with to explain his disgraceful (at best -- let's not even get into the "at worst") behavior, somebody would have said, "Ted, it's over -- resign and get out of Dodge."

M_David
January 31, 2008 7:21 PM

Rod, He was a ballet dancer and a TV presenter. And a liberal.\

Redundant.

Peterk
January 31, 2008 8:17 PM

I, too, have never understood the utter slobbering fascination and adulation heaped upon the Kennedys. Papa Joe was reprehensible as he played around on his wife Rose, was an anti-English while he was Ambassador to the Court of St. James, a bootlegger and who knows what else.
the only thing that JFK did that I can say I admire is that he implemented a tremendous tax cut at the beginning of his administration.
If a Republican had done what Teddy had done to Mary Jo Kopechne he would not be in the Senate.
The third generation Caroline, Bobby Jr. patrick the whole lot have never worked a day in their lives.

The whole lot are definitely "do as I say, not as I do"

sinsonte
January 31, 2008 10:12 PM

If "ballet dancer" means ballet dancer, why bring it up? If "ballet dancer" means "queer" or "fag," then please me man enough to say so.

Zoetius
January 31, 2008 10:15 PM

See Obama tonight? He pulled HIl-billys chair out for her after the debate. That is class people.


Bugg
January 31, 2008 10:18 PM

"Do you know how little interest any remotely conservative person has in the opinions of Ron Reagan? He was a ballet dancer and a TV presenter. And a liberal."

That's very true. Yet Ron Reagan was smarter than most of us about what a complete jerk GWB was. I cannot help but think his speech at his father's graveside was one of the stop signs this country crashed through while entrusting this fool.


M_David
January 31, 2008 11:05 PM

sinsonte, If "ballet dancer" means ballet dancer, why bring it up?

Because male ballet dancers are not conservative. He's a lib.

I'm guessing that's Rod's point.

Max Schadenfreude
February 1, 2008 12:51 AM

"If "ballet dancer" means ballet dancer, why bring it up? If "ballet dancer" means "queer" or "fag," then please me man enough to say so."

If "man" means man, why bring it up? If "man" means "non-queer" or "non-fag", then please, be enough of a ballet dancer to say so.

Peter
February 1, 2008 4:55 AM

What about female ballet dancers?

Max Schadenfreude
February 1, 2008 5:49 AM

"What about female ballet dancers?"

I'm all for them.

Peter
February 1, 2008 6:34 AM

Even the left handed ones Max? Sure sign of the liberal elite is being left handed.

Nick the Greek
February 1, 2008 8:52 AM

Peter: at least one female ballet dancer was the subject of controversy in the UK for voicing her support of the neo-Nazi British National Party. Not sure if one can draw any meaningful conclusions about female ballet dancers as a whole from that, though.

JLF
February 1, 2008 9:46 AM

"One might start at the 1960 election, which was stolen with an assist by the mob."

Let's put this old urban myth to bed once and for all, shall we? Assuming for the sake of argument that the allegations against Richard Daily and the Chicago machine are correct in every detail and that the Illinois electoral votes were stolen from Nixon, it would have reduced Kennedy's electoral total from 303 to 276, well above the 218 needed for election. And no tale told has the number of votes stolen exceed the 120K Kennedy margin in the popular vote, an irrelevancy that Bush underscored in 2000.

Kit Stolz
February 2, 2008 3:53 AM

Well, it's not Ron Reagan, but the same concept, the passing-of-the-torch-from-a-Republican-conservative-to-Obama:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/01/AR2008020102621.html?hpid=opinionsbox1

And to those who say Susan Eisenhower isn't a conservative, I can only ask: How do you know? After all, the Republican in the White House calls himself a conservative and an heir to Ronald Reagan. Almost no one believes him -- even among dyed-in-the-wool right-wingers. So what right does the GOP have to judge the conservatism of others, if it has proven inable to correctly assess the lack of conservatism of its own?

Max Schadenfreude
February 2, 2008 6:43 AM

"Even the left handed ones Max? Sure sign of the liberal elite is being left handed."

Left handed? Hmmmm...I don't know about that one. Ambidexterous is okay though.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.