Crunchy Con

Au revoir, les enfants

Saturday February 16, 2008

Categories: Culture

That's the title of a 1987 French film by Louis Malle, based on an actual experience of his childhood. He spent the Nazi occupation in a French Catholic boarding school. The priests there were hiding Jewish schoolchildren from the Gestapo, under false (French Catholic) names. But an employee of the school ratted the children out to the Nazis, who turned up one day to cart the Jewish kids away. All of them died in the Shoah. Malle's emotional identification with his Jewish classmates haunted him the rest of his days.

I bring it up today in light of the NYT report that French president Nicolas Sarkozy is instituting a controversial new change in French education:

President Nicolas Sarkozy dropped an intellectual bombshell this week, surprising the nation and touching off waves of protest with his revision of the school curriculum: beginning next fall, he said, every fifth grader will have to learn the life story of one of the 11,000 French children killed by the Nazis in the Holocaust.

“Nothing is more moving, for a child, than the story of a child his own age, who has the same games, the same joys and the same hopes as he, but who, in the dawn of the 1940s, had the bad fortune to be defined as a Jew,” Mr. Sarkozy said at the end of a dinner speech to France’s Jewish community on Wednesday night. He added that every French child should be “entrusted with the memory of a French child-victim of the Holocaust.”

Adding to the national fracas over the announcement, Mr. Sarkozy wrapped his plan in the cloak of religion, placing blame for the wars and violence of the last century on an “absence of God” and calling the Nazi belief in a hierarchy of races “radically incompatible with Judeo-Christian monotheism.”

Education Minister Xavier Darcos explained later that the aim of the plan was to “create an identification between a child of today and one of the same age who was deported and gassed.”

The Holocaust is already taught in French schools, but some psychiatrists and educators predicted that requiring students to identify with a specific victim would traumatize them.

Secularists accused Mr. Sarkozy, who is already under fire for his frequent praise of God and religion, of subverting both the country’s iron-clad separation of church and state and the national ideal of a single, nonreligious identity for all.

Political opponents dismissed the plan as his latest misguided idea, unveiled without reflection or consultation. Some historians argued that the focus on victims could steer attention away from the Vichy government’s collaboration with the Nazis. Still others warned that the plan could backfire, creating resentment among France’s ethnic Arab and African populations if they felt their own histories were getting short shrift.

“Every day the president throws out a new unhappy idea with no coherence,” said Pascal Bruckner, the philosopher. “But this last one is truly obscene, the very opposite of spirituality. Let’s judge it for what it is: a crazy proposal of the president, not the word of the Gospel.”

The initiative has also pitted some Jews against one another. “It is unimaginable, unbearable, tragic and above all, unjust,” Simone Veil, a Holocaust survivor and honorary president of the Foundation for the Memory of the Holocaust, told the Web site of the magazine L’Express. “You cannot inflict this on little ones of 10 years old! You cannot ask a child to identify with a dead child. The weight of this memory is much too heavy to bear.”

Ms. Veil was in the audience when Mr. Sarkozy spoke, and said that when she heard his words, “My blood turned to ice.”

But Serge Klarsfeld, a Jewish historian who has devoted his life to recording the list and biographies of France’s Holocaust victims, praised the president for his “courage.”

“This is the crowning glory of long and arduous work,” he said. “To those who say it’s too difficult for young children — that’s not true. What they see on television or in a horror film is much worse. This is not a morbid mission.”

Mr. Klarsfeld likened the plan to a practice by the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., which gives visitors small booklets describing the experiences of Holocaust victims and survivors.

The Times story, bizarrely (or on second though, maybe not-so-bizarrely), makes no mention at all of one of the leading causes for the resurgence of anti-Semitism in France: the Islamization of the public schools, which the Inspector General for Education in France says the state prefers to ignore:


"The minister of education has done nothing," said Jean-Pierre Obin, an inspector general of education in France, who wrote a report in 2004 that called anti-Semitism "ubiquitous" in the 61 schools surveyed. "He prefers not to talk about it."

Mr. Obin wrote in the report of "a stupefying and cruel reality: in France, Jewish children — and they are alone in this case — can no longer be educated in just any school."

Ianis Roder, 34, a history teacher in a middle school northeast of Paris, said he was stunned by what he witnessed after Sept. 11, 2001. The next day, someone spray-painted in a stairwell of the school the image of an airplane crashing into the World Trade Center beside the words "Death to the U.S., Death to Jews."

When he told his class months later that Hitler had killed millions of million Jews, one boy blurted out, "He would have made a good Muslim!" Mr. Roder told of a Muslim teacher who dismissed her class after a shouting match over Nazi propaganda. The students said the offensive images accurately depicted Jews.

Today the Jewish schoolchildren, tomorrow the Christians. One complicating factor in Sarko's proposal is that French schoolchildren already receive extensive education in the Holocaust. But according to this Hebrew University report on anti-Semitism in French schools, this education has done little to stop the rising tide of anti-Semitism. The theory is that if people only knew what the Nazis and their collaborators did, they would be horrified. But that's not proving to be the case:

However, it is in the twenty-year period which has seen a marked improvement in the teaching of the Holocaust in French schools, that antisemitism has flourished as never before, adopting an outspoken virulence the likes of which have not been known in France since the Occupation and the Vichy regime. The Holocaust has never been taught as well as it is today, and never has antisemitism been as robust as it is today. Yet this fact cannot be explained by citing the lack of information about the horrors of antisemitism, the complicity from which these horrors benefited, the ordeals of the forced transportation, arrests, and incarceration, the nightmare of the deportation, or the nameless abyss of the mass exterminations.

Nothing has helped. Antisemitism has continued to thrive. At the beginning of 2004, in a secondary school in the Val de Loire (in the center of France), a teenager wrote the following anonymous message after seeing a Holocaust exhibit: “This is what we feel: ‘the poor wretches,’ especially the crematoria, it’s hot in there! Great, you couldn’t escape. As for me, I’m doing well. Alhamdulillah (thank God!). It did the trick!”

France has a massive problem with these Muslim ghettoes and the children within them who are being raised as veritable Hitler Youth, and if Sarkozy thinks expanding Holocaust education is going to solve the problem, he's dreaming. On the other hand -- and this is why I support what he's doing, with the same reservations that offend Simone Veil -- I believe it is imperative to reach the hearts of the French majority, and inculcate within them from a young age an emotional identification with the victims of the Shoah. It has to do with what happened to me as a child.

In 1978, when I was 12, NBC aired the miniseries "Holocaust." At the time, I was really interested in all things World War II and Nazi. I hasten to add that I wasn't sympathetic to the Nazis, but rather simply had a geeky fascination with them and that era of history. I knew vaguely about the Holocaust, but didn't really understand it. When the miniseries was announced, though, I asked my parents if I could watch it. It was about World War II, so naturally I was interested.

The fictional program told the story of the Weiss family through the Holocaust. Of course you come to identify with them from the beginning, so when the Nazi persecution begins, you feel it. I kept asking my dad, "Did that really happen?" Yes, he said, it did. I will never forget as long as I live what it was like on what I guess was night three of the week-long broadcast. I was lying on our living room floor, with my left cheek pressed against the shag carpet, when I watched on the screen the Nazis line up naked Jews against a trench, and mow them down with machine guns. I started sobbing convulsively, and my father had to carry me to bed, big as I was.

I've never talked to them about it, but I'm sure my parents hated themselves for letting me watch "Holocaust," given how emotionally shattering it was to me as a child. But you know, that was one of the best things they ever did for me. After that, I understood what anti-Semitism really meant. That experience in my family's living room defined my beliefs about the Jewish people, the diabolical evil of anti-Semitism and the state of Israel more than anything else. It would be a good thing if those French children who are still educable on the subject could come to understand that the Holocaust was not just about facts, figures and newsreels, but about real people, people like them, who were sent to their deaths because people believed in anti-Semitism. Maybe fortifying their moral imagination in the way Sarkozy proposes will give the French who will end up confronting the Islamofascists within in a more direct way a profound understanding of what's really at stake in this war of ideas.

Comments
Max Schadenfreude
February 18, 2008 1:56 AM

The Muslim who doesn't want Sharia is like a Catholic who doesn't believe in the Eucharist: MINO and CINO respectively.

rombald
February 18, 2008 2:38 AM

Susan: "I read with dismay stories of people who have been in the UK for three or four generations who are plotting to blow up airplanes in the name of Islam. (I actually got stranded in the UK during one of these scares.) ...
I'd challenge you to come up with equivalent stories about the US. We have trouble sometimes with first-generation immigrants, but our difficulties with third-generation immigrants (besides wearing their iPods in their heads too much) are hard to find."

How many times do I have to say it - this is not a British problem or a European problem, but a Muslim problem.

In my original post, I actually went through, quite carefully, all the major immigrant groups in the UK, and showed that, apart from Muslims, they have all assimilated reasonably well, certainly no worse than in the USA. Did you read my post?

"Remind me to recommend your evaluation to the Imam the next time we meet. He's certain to be interested in the opinion of a non-Muslim Brit on this topic."

A Christian, almost by definition, believes in the need to proselytise - the Great Commission. There are different approaches - there are hellfire preachers on soapboxes, and people who think that good works and personal virtue will draw people to the faith - but a body that rejects conversion is not Christian. That's my evaluation as a non-Christian.

Islam also teaches that everyone should ideally be Muslim. However, it goes further than Christianity, in saying that Islam is not purely religious, but is a system for the whole of human life, including the legal system. This really is about as basic as you can get in a definition of Islam.

AnotherBeliever
February 18, 2008 2:30 PM

Anyone who in the same breath as condemning the Holocaust can say Muslims are INCAPABLE of assimilation, are inherently violent, are unreasonable, exist always in filth and squalor, and do not value knowledge or educating their children, REALLY needs re-examine what was said about the Jews in the 1930s.

There are problems in assimilation. But we in the United States have a better system laid out than in Europe, in my opinion. Our Constitution is what binds our very disparate parts, and not our ethnic nor even our religious identity. Couple that with a barebones welfare system (in comparison with a Social Welfare System as exists in many industrialized countries) which insists even asylum seekers work within a few years of arrival, and our policy of granting citizenship to anyone born within our borders; and our immigrants have more incentive to assimilate than do many of Europe's.

As far as "assimilation." Muslims have assimilated, and continue to do so. Thousands already play their part economically and socially in the United States. They work, pay taxes, send their children to school, buy houses, own businesses, shop, participate in local governance, and even run for and win political offices. What more do you want as proof of assimilation?

Will many Muslims continue to dress modestly, pray five times a day, go on Hajj, give to Islamic charities, fast at Ramadan, and attempt to convert the world around them to Islam? Yes. Those are the outward tenets of their faith! As long as as they seek their converts peacefully, without disturbing the peace, or undermining our government, they have the freedom to do so. As long as they pursue the other tenets of their faith according to law, they are also free to do so.

People tend to forget the great leeway we give to religious groups in our country. The Amish are permitted to follow their custom of not educating their children past the 8th grade. Jehovah's witnesses will not pledge allegiance to our flag. Neither they nor Mennonites nor other conscientious objectors are required to serve in our military during time of conscription. There are even religious waivers granted for vaccinations for children, despite the very real public health risk.

Now I hope as much as anyone that Muslim women do not begin to wear the full black face veil as they do in the Gulf countries, and increasingly, in Europe. And I hope that many (though not all, it is a free country) will continue to educate their children in the same schools as ours. I hope our more open-minded climate will not polarize Muslims against us as happened in some communities in Europe, and then perhaps these things will not come to pass.

As far as seeking to convert the world to Islam, Islam is hardly the only faith which seeks the conversion of all of humanity. Most conservative Christian groups seek the same goal. Indeed, I would have to say that persuading others of the truth and fullness of Christianity is a basic tenet of my OWN faith, even if my preferred method is not door-to-door Bible tract hand-outs.

There are real problems which need to be addressed here. There are Islamic groups which advocate violence, and Islamic charities which funnel money to terrorists. There are issues with domestic violence against women, as many Muslims hail from traditional cultures where such violence is tolerated, if not sanctioned. Law enforcement and civil law can address these problems. So can Muslim communities themselves.

We should neither sweep these problems under a rug, nor throw up our hands and refuse to address them with the excuse that Muslims are un-assimilatable. The only way violent movements inside Islam can be countered is by dividing these wayward groups out from the greater Islamic society as a whole. This will take initiative on the part of Muslims, and a coherent and nuanced policy on the part of the West. Saying "you are either with us or against us," only aggrandizes our enemy, which is giving him precisely what he wants.

Alicia
February 19, 2008 2:00 PM

Great post, as usual, AnotherBeliever. But, I also think Sarkozy's idea is really excellent. Anti-Semitism needs to confronted head-on, but not with violence, with acknowledgement of the problem, with education, and enforcment of the rule of law.

Anonymous
February 19, 2008 9:09 PM

It is increadible that in the shadow of a tragic event of biblical proportions in the history of humanity , like the Holocaust, there are still people (like the President of Iran), who challenge the validity of the this mass murder of innocent victims. I can only parallel them to the adherents to the " The World is Flat" believers.
`Armand (A Mauthausen Extermination Camp survivor)``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement