Crunchy Con

God on Sinai: "The medium is the message."

Sunday February 3, 2008

Again, going through my bookshelf tonight, I pulled down a copy of the late media theorist Neil Postman's 1985 book "Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business" Consider this Postman passage in light of our discussion below of Marshall McLuhan (whose disciple Postman was):

In studying the Bible as a young man, I found intimations of the idea that forms of media favor particular kinds of content and therefore are capable of taking command of a culture. I refer specifically to the Decalogue, the Second Commandment of which prohibits the Israelites from making any concrete images of anything, “Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water beneath the earth.” I wondered then, as so many others have, as to why the God of these people would have included instructions on how they were to symbolize, or not symbolize, their experience. It is a strange injunction to include as part of an ethical system unless its author assumed a connection between forms of human communication and the quality of a culture. We may hazard a guess that a people who are being asked to embrace an abstract, universal deity would be rendered unfit to do so by the habit of drawing pictures or making statues or depicting their ideas in any concrete, iconographic forms. The God of the Jews was to exist in the Word and through the Word, an unprecedented conception requiring the highest order of abstract thinking. Iconography thus became blasphemy so that a new kind of God could enter a culture. People like ourselves who are in the process of converting their culture from word-centered to image-centered might profit by reflecting on this Mosaic injunction. But even if I am wrong in these conjectures, it is, I believe, a wise and particularly relevant supposition that the media of communication available to a culture are a dominant influence on the formation of the culture’s intellectual and social preoccupations.
Advertisement
Comments
CarolineWalker
February 4, 2008 11:58 AM

A book that I keep returning to is Malcolm Muggeridge's Christ and the Media, published in 1977. He had this to say about television:
"So I suggest that the cameras are our ego's eyes, our age's focus, the repository and emanation of all our fraudulence. Take them to any place of conflict and strife, and hey presto! in a matter of minutes, trouble stirs for them to register."

Scott Lahti
February 4, 2008 12:16 PM

I see the author of Amusing Ourselves to Death has appeared in many a CC thread:

http://tinyurl.com/36j5ll

Apparently, Postman rings far *more* than twice; me, I prefer (Albert Jay) Nock - three times is his ceiling...

I'll be here, all weak: try the canned ham, there's no dietary law against it here - I'm just Zion'...

Scott L

Remember the McGinnity
(For sixteen years she kept her virginity
And that's a record for this vicinity)

Sheilagh
February 4, 2008 2:02 PM

Computer science gets the pipes. [Net neutrality!]

So now we've moved to God's pipes.

The tablet, the voice from the sky, the Dream, the Prophet, the oral tradition, the papyrus scroll,The Book,the wandering teacher, the healer, the apostle, the Church, the mass, the creed, the missionary, the newspaper, the magazine,the website,the commercial.

The Holy Spirit.

All conduits. All with limits and benefits of space and time. Except the Holy Spirit.

Getting the chance to look at 350 yr old registers in my work, I'm always amazed at how well The Book continues to stand the test of time.

Sheilagh
February 4, 2008 2:04 PM

Still I don't believe they are the message. They're the delimiters of the message. The constraints and opportunities. Not the message.

Sheilagh
February 5, 2008 1:30 AM

Last thought.

To look more closely at the composition of the message, check out C.S. Peirce and Semiotics. [Icon,Index,Symbol]

Peirce was the son of the first chair of Harvard's Mathematics dept and the only American founder of a school of Philosophy - Pragmatacism.

Gates and Job etc. have conferences on Semiotics from what I hear.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.