Hagee endorses McCain
The fundamentalist pastor John Hagee has endorsed John McCain. Hagee is red-hot against Catholicism. The point is being made that Hagee = Farrakhan, ergo McCain must distance himself from Hagee as Obama has been expected to do from Farrakhan. But...
How come the Left is quick to jump on McCain for accepting "anti-Catholic" Hagee's endorsement/support, but is itself probably more virulently anti-Catholic than anything Hagee has said or believes? After all, Hagee probably prays for and with Catholics that they would come to know Jesus as their Personal Savior (as he understands salvation), whereas the Left wants nothing to do with Hagee's Jesus or Pope Benedict's Jesus or millions of pro-life Catholics' Jesus. The Left doesn't really want to protect Catholics from persons like Hagee; the Left wants to rid the country of Hagee and believing/practicing Catholics, esp. if such Catholics won't promote the Left's views on gays and abortion. The Left's hatred for Catholic teachings on these things far exceeds any hatred Hagee may have for Catholicism.
H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-S-Y.
Eric, do you actually know any real-life liberals? Because, you know, we are individuals. There is no all-powerful gestalt creature called "The Left" that eats babies and terrorizes Tokyo, any more than there is such a creature called "The Right", which acts with monolithic malevolence toward the poor and minorities.
And criticism of Hagee isn't just limited to his anti-Catholicism, but also his twisted eschatology that involves the Middle East being consumed in a fiery, bloody Armageddon while he and other "good Christians" onanize themselves in self-satisfied glee.
Still, I agree with Rod that Farrakhan is in a somewhat different category of unacceptable. Then again, McCain cheerfully accepted Hagee's support while Obama has done everything reasonable to distance himself from Farrakhan.
Teapots. Tempests.
It's interesting that all the most intolerant, controversial figures who cause problems for politicians are religious.
allen: And criticism of Hagee isn't just limited to his anti-Catholicism, but also his twisted eschatology that involves the Middle East being consumed in a fiery, bloody Armageddon while he and other "good Christians" onanize themselves in self-satisfied glee.
Allen, that's below the belt. "Onanize themselves"? Honestly. I don't believe in their eschatology, but you are being unfair to them. You act like this is something that makes them happy, or it's something they choose to believe out of pleasure. I've read their material, and whether you agree with it or not, they come by their beliefs honestly.
I think, for example, that the Shia eschatology is lunacy, and dangerous for the world, because they believe it, and will act on those beliefs. But it's wrong to accuse them of self-pleasuring because they hold these beliefs. What if they think it's true?
Anyway, I'm not sure where Hagee comes down on the question, but quite a few Christians who hold to that kind of eschatology believe the faithful will have been raptured to heaven before the End.
And yes, Daniel, it's really interesting that the troublemakers are religious.
...that's below the belt.
groan.
And yes, Daniel, it's really interesting that the troublemakers are religious.
Well, the Weathermen weren't religious, minor players though they be.
At any rate, while I wouldn't use a word like "onanize", there is an air of self-satisfaction around the Rapture Crowd. While I still wouldn't put Hagee in the same class as Farrakhan for the reasons detailed in Rod's post and other threads, I don't feel good about politicians schmoozing up to these cats either.
Maybe we're reading to deeply. Texas is up for a primary next week and Hagee spells v-o-t-e-s.
That's really all it is. At least I hope it goes no deeper than that.
too deeply
Rod: You act like this is something that makes them happy, or it's something they choose to believe out of pleasure.
Didn't Dante say something in the Divine Comedy about how one of the Joys of Heaven will be watching the torments of the Damned in Hell?
Then again, he was a Catholic, so I'm not sure how to work out the theological math on that.
Anyway, I think that yes, there is a none-too subtle undercurrent of glee and schadenfreude that runs through a lot of Evangelical eschatology when it comes to the Rapture, The Tribulation, etc. See the Left Behind series, for example... or just watch one of Hagee's televised sermons on the subject. I think the idea of people like Hagee "onanizing themselves" about the End of the World is fair characterization... but makes for a somewhat unpleasant visual.
Didn't Dante say something in the Divine Comedy about how one of the Joys of Heaven will be watching the torments of the Damned in Hell?Then again, he was a Catholic, so I'm not sure how to work out the theological math on that.
St. Catherine of Sienna said as much. Her point was that in Heaven one would see God's justice so clearly that one would take delight in sinners damnation as an outgrowth of that beautiful plan.
>>>
Part of me wants to say to the left, "Relax, there's a lot less here than you think." In turn, I suspect that many of you would say to people like me, with respect to Obama and the Rev. Wright, "Relax, there's a lot less here than you think."
>>>
I think that is the case for both McCain and Obama that there is 'a lot less here' as far as the practical effects of the respective preacher's influence on the politicians in question.
I think the difference is that while Hagee despises Catholicism (I wonder if he met my in-laws at one point) he has not, at least to my knowledge, publicly advocated the extermination of Roman Catholics (which may mean that he never met my in-laws). And among Evangelicals Hagee is considered a gold-plated nutbar who runs around casting out demons, which may account for his dislike of the Catholic Church as it may be seen as a business competitor.
After all, there are only so many demons to go around and most of them are to be found at Obama rallies.
The Farrakhan issue is a complete waste of time and I wish that conservatives would drop it. Obama is dangerous not because it's possible that he secretly shares Farrakhan's racism (I doubt very much that he does) but because very publicly supports organizations like Planned Parenthood. He's a fringe lefty whose ideology is more representative of Berkeley than of the USA and this, if anything, will be his political undoing.
I should say that yes, there is a certain weird pleasure people take in dwelling on apocalypse. I'm sometimes guilty of that. Walker Percy writes about that kind of thing. I think there's something in human nature that cannot bear too much peace and tranquility, and to be more specific, cannot deal with the anxiety of the present moment. So it longs for restorative violence. Perverse, I know, but that's us.
Thought experiment: would it be more depressing to learn that we really are in the Last Days, that the Tribulation and all that is going to happen within the next 30 years? -- or to learn that we're not in the Last Days, and we'll just be muddling through as we always have.
Eric, do you actually know any real-life liberals? Because, you know, we are individuals. There is no all-powerful gestalt creature called "The Left" that eats babies and terrorizes Tokyo, any more than there is such a creature called "The Right", which acts with monolithic malevolence toward the poor and minorities.
No, but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express last week!
Sorry if I was in "rant" mode on my post. I couldn't read the article because Salon requires registration, and I assumed from the source and Rod's excerpt that the author was liberal/left-leaning. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe the author of the Salon article is really a committed God-fearing, Pope-loving, pro-life, Catholic-doctrine-supporting Catholic who takes great personal offense at John Hagee's mischaracterizations of and attacks on Catholicism, and thinks that John McCain is very wrong to accept his support.
I dunno.
"For one, the people Hagee identifies as enemies are -- gays excepted -- people whose ideas he rejects."
Ahem, gays excepted? Why exactly do you get to set gay people aside in this analysis?
Obama is dangerous not because it's possible that he secretly shares Farrakhan's racism (I doubt very much that he does) but because very publicly supports organizations like Planned Parenthood. He's a fringe lefty whose ideology is more representative of Berkeley than of the USA and this, if anything, will be his political undoing.
That's not a bad point, really. While I think Obama deserves some of the flack he's getting on this issue, conservatives should avoid the Clinton trap of personality politics, myself included.
I used to be a Hageeite. Him, Hal Lindsey, the whole crowd of "End Times are coming, send me money" preachers that help keep TBN afloat and make Pat Robertson look downright reasonable by comparison. There is absolutely a sense of satisfaction not only in their certainty of their own salvation, but in the firm belief that their self-identified enemies will one day be sorry. Do they derive pleasure from the thought that the queers and liberals and feminists and Catholics will one day suffer terribly while they themselves recline on clouds? You betcha.
Eric -- is it even a possibility in your mind that even a degraded and loathsome liberal could genuinely find Hagee's anti-Catholic bigotry offensive, on the grounds that it's simple bigotry?
Nice double standard there, Rod.
Eric -- is it even a possibility in your mind that even a degraded and loathsome liberal could genuinely find Hagee's anti-Catholic bigotry offensive, on the grounds that it's simple bigotry?
Sure. ;^)
Rod:
As John E. said, there is much wisdom in your last paragraph.
"Allen, that's below the belt. "Onanize themselves"? Honestly. I don't believe in their eschatology, but you are being unfair to them. You act like this is something that makes them happy, or it's something they choose to believe out of pleasure."
I am an Orthodox Christian and clinical psychotherapist and I have to agree with Allen. My reading of Hagee's affect and the emotional tone of his preaching suggests an emotion akin to glee when describing the rapture and its aftermath in the tribulation. "Onanize" is perhaps the most delightful description I have yet heard to describe this aspect of protestant fundamentalism. As a resident of the rural South, I observe firsthand the effect these teachings have within many of the weirder backwaters of protestant fundamentalism. It is as if a combination of noxious narcissism and sinful spiritual pride creates a sense of enormous anticipatory schadenfreude. At times, it seems as if the hold of the book of Revelation on the imagination of the collective fundamentalist psyche exceeds that of the Beatitudes. The question is why?
The whole psychological aspect of this is what really intrigues me. What I suspect is that the reduction of cognitive dissonance is at work here. Perhaps it is the ongoing assault of the Enlightenment and modern rationalism which has led to a crisis of faith and a subsequent desperate embrace of medieval eschatology and world view. The primary impression is of men grasping or clutching at theological and prophetic straws that will soothe underlying doubts that eat away at their souls.
You mean to tell me there are people that take seriously anything Hagee says??? Now, THAT is truly scary!
I rarely took Hagee seriously, and didn't pay much attention to those who did, even though I knew there was at least a churchful of such people in San Antonio.
Maybe I'm underestimating the extent of Hagee's eccentricity.
But what exactly has he said against Catholicism that differs from the standard stuff - e.g., The Two Babylons, Lorraine Boettner, James White, Dave Hunt, etc.?
Well, he's got a daily, yes, daily tv show on TBN. And while we can dismiss TBN, I can tell you that nobody gets to stay on that network unless they show them the money. So he has enough of a following to finance that television show, which is a bit more than a churchfull. Though Wiki puts his church's active membership at 19 THOUSAND. (Whoa, gotta love those Mega-churches.)
Here's what he said about the Catholic Church, specifically.
"Adolf Hitler attended a Catholic school as a child and heard all the fiery anti-Semitic rantings from Chrysostom to Martin Luther. When Hitler became a global demonic monster, the Catholic Church and Pope Pius XII never, ever slightly criticized him. Pope Pius XII, called by historians 'Hitler's Pope,' joined Hitler in the infamous Concordat of Collaboration, which turned the youth of Germany over to Nazism, and the churches became the stage background for the bloodthirsty cry, 'Pereat Judea'.... In all of his [Hitler's] years of absolute brutality, he was never denounced or even scolded by Pope Pius XII or any Catholic leader in the world. To those Christians who believe that Jewish hearts will be warmed by the sight of the cross, please be informed—to them it's an electric chair.
The Roman Catholic Church, which was supposed to carry the light of the gospel, plunged the world into the Dark Ages.... The Crusaders were a motley mob of thieves, rapists, robbers, and murderers whose sins had been forgiven by the pope in advance of the Crusade.... The brutal truth is that the Crusades were military campaigns of the Roman Catholic church to gain control of Jerusalem from the Muslims and to punish the Jews as the alleged Christ killers on the road to and from Jerusalem."
From 'Jerusalem Countdown'.
"I don't for a moment think John McCain believes the stuff Hagee believes. I think he's just making nice with the guy. Fault him for being cynical, but don't believe that Hagee's views are going to influence him. John McCain cannot stand the religious right. It's surely eating him up to have to be so nice about Hagee."
--Rod
"There are plenty of staunch evangelical leaders who are pro-Israel, but are not anti-Catholic. John Hagee is not one of them. Indeed, for the past few decades, he has waged an unrelenting war against the Catholic Church. For example, he likes calling it 'The Great Whore,' an 'apostate church,' the 'anti-Christ,' and a 'false cult system.'"
--Catholic League president Bill Donohue
Wasn't it just yesterday that we were hearing so much about the rhetoric of Obama's minister, and how damaging it would be to his election bid?
Not only does this incident point to a glaring double standard for McCain and his defenders, but the only Catholic in the crowd who seems offended by Hagee's vile description of the church is Eric W., who complains bitterly about the left treats Catholics, seemingly unaware that many lefties are Catholics!
Bizarre. And it's only February.
Kit writes "Not only does this incident point to a glaring double standard for McCain and his defenders, but the only Catholic in the crowd who seems offended by Hagee's vile description of the church is Eric W."
I suppose for many of us Catholics the things Hagee says about Catholic and the Church are very old and worn and we take it as a bit humorous. We are in a nominally Protestant country and oddly enough Churches such as the Wisconsin and Missouri Synod Lutherans and others have not, and still will not adjust their official "position" that the Pope is the anti-Christ. And other denominations are the same. We know this is not taken very seriously by most practicing Protestants and Evangelicals and many of the more learned of us understand that there is an identity issue here with Protestants having to "protest" on some collective primitive level. Many of us just consider this "bad theology". We have little affinity for Hagee and others but also little if any animus unlike the situation of a hundred years ago.
Hagee and his followers are no longer burning convents in Boston or throwing rocks through church windows anymore; or trying to shut down adoption agencies or Catholic charities as the Left is trying to do.
FYI - I'm not Catholic. ;^)
But my father, who is secular Jewish, considers the Catholic Church and the Vatican's refusal to recognize Israel (at the time; I don't know its status now) to be one of the leading causes of anti-Semitism in the world today.
CORRECTION
My above post should read:
FYI - I'm not Catholic. ;^)
But my father, who is secular Jewish, considers the Catholic Church and the Vatican's refusal to recognize Israel (at the time; I don't know its status now) to be one of the leading causes of the problems of that area of the world (i.e., the Middle East) today.
**I should say that yes, there is a certain weird pleasure people take in dwelling on apocalypse. I'm sometimes guilty of that.**
SOMETIMES, Rod?!?!!?
**I think there's something in human nature that cannot bear too much peace and tranquility, and to be more specific, cannot deal with the anxiety of the present moment. So it longs for restorative violence. Perverse, I know, but that's us.**
Get yourself a DSM-IV diagnosis and you'll no longer have that worry.
A whole set of new ones, but not that one.
hmmm. radical cleric who disparages entire denominations and advocates aggressive war to hasten the apocalypse endorses presidential candidate. even says that said presidential candidate "gets it." turns out the presidential candidate has been courting endorsement for a year. alleged defenders of faith, Christendom, and All That Is Right shrug.
Well, I'm not quite as sanguine about this type of belief system as you guys appear to be. The history of anti-catholicsm in the U.S. isn't a strictly a doctrinal disagreement, but was always mixed up with suspicion of national groups like Irish, Italians and Latinos. And I'm not sure that racism is been perfectly excised from the argument.
I think the collective shrug that conservatives are making on this is hypocritical. It's an inconvenient political development, and rather then look at it honestly, they're just hoping it goes away.
I think there's a big difference between thinking Catholicism is mistaken and the kind of stuff Hagee says. Still it is true that Republicans cynically try to get support of Evangelicals they wouldn't cross the street to spit on. Still I don't much care for it and I'm kind of a McCain supporter.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.