Crunchy Con

Poisonous fruits of factory farming

Monday February 18, 2008

Categories: Food
It turns out that a slaughterhouse's cruel practices are behind the massive nationwide recall of beef, the largest in US history. Excerpt: Officials estimate that about 37 million pounds of the recalled beef went to school programs, but they believe...
Advertisement
Comments
Mont D. Law
February 18, 2008 3:33 PM

So we need to have lots of kids to support Western Civilization - but you want my wife to stay home and take care of them and me to pay $5.15/lb for the lean ground beef I need to feed them. And somehow find a place to put them in a housing market where I just put an offer in of an 800 sq/ft house to the tune of $270,000. (And this may not be enough)

It's nice that you are so realistic.

Mont D. Law
February 18, 2008 3:36 PM

PS - I make $45,000 a year.

IBreakCellPhones
February 18, 2008 3:39 PM

Wow, just wow.

There are a lot of things wrong with that video. Cows should never be dragged, nearly run over with forklifts, or shocked when they obviously cannot get up. Sick cows or other animals shouldn't make it into the food supply either.

But is all "factory farming" bad? Is there something inherently wrong with assembly-line style of processing carcasses if the animals are treated humanely? Is most of the reaction to a slaughterhouse environment the "icky blood" recoil?

I'm not trying to defend the actions filmed at Westland/Hallmark. I'm trying to understand more about some people's visceral reaction to pictures at feedlots and slaughterhouses.

Being raised on a small dairy (a milking herd of usually 65-75), was I immunized to images like this when I saw cows, even in pastures, still wallowing in cowpies? Or standing in water you couldn't see through? Even in an environment like that one, we dared not mess around when it came to antibiotics. Any cow that had a dose of drugs had her milk dumped down the drain until it had passed completely out of her system. We even had a couple die--they were sent to a special pick-up service where they might be sent to a dog-food manufacturer, but never to a regular beef processing plant. I know that the milk gets collected and processed in bulk, getting pasteurized, homogenized, fortified, bottled, and sold. It doesn't bother me because I saw some of my dad's inspection reports. They got him for walls with just specs on them (after cleaning the smears and dollops, it was hard to see specs with wet glasses). I know that the plants ought to be clean. Did I miss something, or is it a matter of people who weren't raised closer to a farm wanting to believe that farms are as clean and sanitary as their own kitchen?

Hillary Rettig / www.lifelongactivist.com
February 18, 2008 3:51 PM

Rod - thank you for taking such a strong stand on this. Of course, the same people who don't care about treatment of animals also lack compassion and empathy for the communities they poison with their pollutants, and the schoolchildren and other "consumers" who will eat their diseased meat. They sell out their humanity for a few extra pennies of profit.

Factory farms are also notorious labor abusers. **Human Rights Watch** actually singled out the U.S. meatpacking and slaughterhouse industry as a violator of human rights. Some cites below.

Of course, the recall of 143 MM pounds of beef means that something like 180K animals lived lives of misery and died in torment - all for nothing.

Hillary

In an article entitled Finger-Lickin’ Bad in the February 21, 2006 issue of the online environmental publication Grist, author Suzi Parker documents the exploitive and antiquated sharecropper-type business model used by poultry agribusinesses to dominate the small farmers who actually raise many of the birds sent to slaughter.

In an article entitled The Chicken Hangers in the February 2, 2004 online publication In the Fray documents not only the horrific working conditions in the poultry industry but management’s hostile (and often unlawful) resistance to unionizing efforts or even basic workers’ rights.

A January 26, 2006, The New York Times article entitled Rights Group Condemns Meatpackers on Job Safety , begins, For the first time, Human Rights Watch has issued a report that harshly criticizes a single industry in the United States, concluding that working conditions among the nation’s meatpackers and slaughterhouses are so bad that they violate basic human rights.

Scott Lahti
February 18, 2008 4:05 PM

From Rod's weekend post on Ophuls' The Sorrow and the Pity:

"But you know, I wonder what our descendants 100, or 200 years into the future, will say about us. If they say, 'How could those people back then not have known how horrible that was, and done something about it!?', what do you suppose they'll be talking about? Abortion? Pollution? Or something that strikes most of us as completely normal and acceptable today?"

Like Chris Matthews does five days plus Sundays, you've asked your question and then answered it, though in this case with a decent interval and no interruptions.

We get properly stirred and shaken in viewing the wrenching TV adverts with Sarah McLachlan for the SPCA,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8EYocy_DN60
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9gspElv1yvc

where refraining from cruelty toward household pets asks next to nothing of us, but when it comes to an area as inextricably laced throughout our political economy as livestock farming, out goes ethical argument and in rushes what Albert Jay Nock used to call "economism."

Read John Jay Chapman's essay in heroic moral retrospection on William Lloyd Garrison, and you find the same infuriating whistling-unto-the-ceiling over slavery: "But all our contracts depend on the plantation system, world without end. We'd have to close up shop. Men would be without work, children forced into the mines, and our womenfolk reduced to white slavery. And *I'd* be blackballed at my 'civilised' men's club if I raised my voice - maybe even tarred and feathered. It's God's will."

The same blase attitude has also shoved prison reform to the very margin of the national radar. And we profess Claude Rains' "shock" to find the same criminals on the wanted list sooner rather than later upon release.

No, we can doze off next to our remotes and round-the-clock air-conditioning in the bliss that is ignorance: it's not like the skies are going to rain blood someday.

As was said in 1850.

Erin Manning
February 18, 2008 4:08 PM

Mont D. Law, I understand where you're coming from, but several years ago my family made the decision to quit buying and eating beef, period. There's not really any specific health benefits to eating red meat as opposed to other meats (and in fact for some of us eating red meat is a bad idea), and I can buy a lamb roast occasionally instead of feeding my children ground beef.

At the time we made the decision I did look carefully at it: would I be depriving my children of some needed vitamins if I didn't prepare any beef products? But my research showed that in most of the countries of the world, even the first-world nations, beef is more a once or twice a week "extra" than an every-day protein source, and there's a reason for that: it is, generally speaking, a more expensive protein source than chicken, fish, eggs, dairy products, legumes, and so forth.

The truth of the matter is that the beef-saturated American diet is out of sync with nature. If cows are being raised humanely, it takes time and effort to get them to the point where they're ready to enter the food supply; but our insatiable demand for cheap beef on the dinner table every day ignores the natural cost of raising cattle, and just about mandates dubious factory-farming practices, where the goal is to get as much beef as possible into the food supply in an unnaturally shortened time period. Add to that the fact that few of us are even aware what a normal portion size for a fat-laden meat like beef really is, and you have a demand that quickly outstrips supply--at least, if the suppliers are the least bit concerned about humane farming practices.

So for my family, it was easier and better to stop eating beef altogether than to drive a considerable distance to get "crunchy" beef for those rare occasions when we might actually want to eat it. In most of the world, beef isn't what's for dinner; it's a special treat, to be enjoyed with an appreciation of the costs that went into supplying it. Until Americans can reject the McDonaldization of the dinner menu and rediscover the principles of healthy beef-eating we may all be better off to find something else for dinner, at least five or six nights out of seven.

Matt
February 18, 2008 4:11 PM

I understand Rod's frustration and anger. For several years, I have been fortunate to have easy access to meat products from free-range animals who were raised and slaughtered humanely.

But I think Rod's emotions get the better of him, and his "solution" is borderline naive.

Asking tens of millions of Americans to simply stop buying factory-farmed meat just isn't realistic. The people who have the time and money to seek out local sources probably will, but for tens of millions of Americans, they'll shake their head at this video and then go right out and buy factory-farmed meat because it's cheap and easily accessible. If more were being done to promote local farming, if more were being done to examine to real costs of our collective, failed stewardship of the animals we raise to eat, things might begin to change. In other words, education is what is going to get us down the raod of changing factory farming. People don't know, so they don't care. The emotions this video provokes don't last. Understanding how the system works and how it could catastrophically affect us as citizen, would be much more lasting and effective. (This is precisely where PETA gets it so wrong, and why I believe they acutally do more harm than good to the animals they claim to speak for.)

Government might provide a solution, but the argi-businesses represent a major lobbying force in Washington. They'll get what they want. They only thing that's going to change that is if a bunch of kids die. Government, I believe, works when it is governed by an informed citizenry. If no effort is made to educate the public, then informed lobbyists are going to make those choices for us.

Education is the first step in resolving this problem.

Peterk
February 18, 2008 4:13 PM

The HSUS and PETA target the rogue farms and then use the videos to promote their agenda which is the promotion of vegetarianism/veganism.

Were the actions of the farm wrong? you betcha, but the folks taking the video are not really concerned about our health. Notice too that the videos are edited.

How long did the HSUS have the videos in their possession. How long did it take for them to notify the USDA? were they waiting until they got their fundraising materials prepared?

tulip
February 18, 2008 4:28 PM

I remember reading Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle" when I was in high school. His description of the Chicago meatpacking industry led to many of the first food sanitation laws. Who would have thought that the cruelties he described in the early 1900's would still exist?

Thane
February 18, 2008 4:28 PM

I share Rod's concern about the specific abuses recorded by this video, but I don't think that means we need to condemn so-called "factory farming" on the whole. That's about as logical as saying that last year's e coli outbreaks caused by contaminated spinach mean we need to abandon spinach farming.

Most beef farming in America doesn't engage in the practice of using downed livestock depicted in this video, which is illegal. And it's just a falsehood to claim that meat in America isn't healthy on the whole. Instances of genuine risks to life or health from food poisoning are very rare in this country. Let's not use an isolated case of wrongdoing to tar an entire industry.

logic
February 18, 2008 4:28 PM

An *abuse* of any system is never an argument against the system.

Jim
February 18, 2008 4:42 PM

It's them ding-dang regulators from the FDA not doing their jobs, by gum. Oops - we're not really that much into regulation anymore. Regulation is such a pre-1980s thing. Never mind.

IBreakCellPhones
February 18, 2008 5:07 PM

Jim,

I don't think you'll find too many people who are anti-regulation when it comes to matters of safety. It's when it nails airlines' business plans and toilet manufacturers that we wonder.

Sarah in Maryland
February 18, 2008 6:15 PM

We don't buy this stuff at all! Instead, we eat locally produced meats from people we know. I have sworn off eating beef when we eat out, but I went against my own rule and I had beef at a restaurant over the holidays. I got food poisining. I spent three days throwing up and shivering with a fever. This is REAL folks. I am actually very lucky that it wasn't bad enough to be hospitalized, but boy was I sick.

Brian
February 18, 2008 6:21 PM

I'm sympathetic to the grass fed cause and organic farming but I think it's cheap to take events like this and extrapolate it to the entire industry.

One, instances are rare as Thane said. Second, "factory farming" has made foods affordable to everyone, albeit to the extent that obesity is a problem now.

Should we do away with the Catholic Church just because their were abuses in that industry? Islam? There is nothing free from taint in this world.

As for Jim, what do you think caught this in the first place? Regulation!

Dave Chirico
February 18, 2008 7:22 PM

"An *abuse* of any system is never an argument against the system."
Well, a system filled with abuses (this is simply one of many) is an argument against that system.

As for "Cheap" food, the only reason factory farming is cheap is that the costs are externalized and the governments subsidizes it. Factory meat is cheap the same way housing in communist Russia was cheap!
Corn fed/industialized beef causes cancer, while grass fed beef is full of CLA's -one of the leading cancer fighters in our food. You think grass fed is expensive try paying for health care.

Dave Chirico
West Liberty Farm

frosty
February 18, 2008 11:13 PM

This cruelty happens everyday in factory farms and slaughter houses.
This is the normal for this industry, these guys just got caught on video by people that care about the humane treatment of animals! They will get a slap on the hands and it will be business as usual, the cruelty will continue.

Kit Stolz
February 18, 2008 11:59 PM

This evening Eric Schlosser, author of "Fast Food Nation," commented on this outrage to an interview program based in Los Angeles, called "Which Way L.A.?"

http://www.kcrw.com/news/programs/ww

He said:

“I think the Clinton administration was making a sincere effort to try and impose some tough rules on the meat-packing industry, and it was the right wing of the Republican party in Congress that was blocking these proposals, again and again. Once President Bush took office, the meat-packing industry was essentially empowered. And it’s very difficult to tell the difference between USDA policy and the policy of the American meat-packing industry. It’s tragic, because this should be a non-partisan issue. All Republicans and Democrats have to eat, but the right wing of the Republican industry has very close ties to the meat-packing industry and has prevented any kind of meaningful reform.”

Eric
February 19, 2008 8:43 AM

Ah, I'm glad we were finally able to get the heart of the problem with Schlosser's comments. It's all the fault of Republicans! Democrats are the angels and Republicans are the devils. It doesn't have anything to do with the "see no-evil" approach to consumption of the American people.

Todd
February 19, 2008 9:51 AM

"But I think Rod's emotions get the better of him, and his "solution" is borderline naive."

Sort of like a bleeding heart liberal. But at least our blog host has a heart.

Threads like this are just so amusing to read. Conservatives tying themselves up in knots to cover their butts as the dark side of free-market policies come back to haunt them. One commonality with Abu Ghraib remains: blame the stiffs caught in tape, but management gets off with just a dusting of a dirty look.

jgdc
February 19, 2008 10:12 AM

Please write more on this and these kind of issues. Of your 8 last posts, we've got four anti-Muslim articles with one on procreation and, given your past posts, I'm sure the threat of the barbarians at the gate was in the back of your mind. Where'd the crunchy go? This recall is big news, other blogs say this is a big crunchy con issue, but you've got mostly a cut-and-paste job here with a couple of of your own sentences thrown in. Sure, there's plenty out there denouncing factory farming, but there's very little written from the conservative perspective. That conservatives don't like Muslims - I'm pretty sure that's covered.


(As a side note -- whenever you denounce Rowan I wonder if I missed the transformation of Texas into Texistan when a court there allowed arbitration of a family matter by an Islamic tribunal. Hope you're holding out okay down there while under siege!)

Christine
February 19, 2008 2:17 PM

Trust the industrial food system? Not in a million years. The HSUS notes that the abuse occurred even though USDA had a number of inspectors at the slaughter plant. Every time something like this happens it's called an "isolated" incident. This kind of abuse takes place behind closed doors so who knows how much of it is going on.

If we saw dogs and cats being treated this way we'd be screaming bloody murder.

I've learned to cook so many wonderful dishes since becoming vegetarian I don't miss meat at all. I'm not about to subsize this kind of barbaric behavior with my hard earned dollars.

By the way, I understand Tyson is under investigation -- again -- for abuses occurring at a couple of its poultry plants. Same old, same old. They'll pay the fine and its business as usual.


unrepentant beefeater
February 19, 2008 6:19 PM

All the comments by vegetarians here make me want to eat a cheeseburger. I'll scarf one down and think of y'all.

Scott Lahti
February 19, 2008 6:42 PM

...and if any of you should actually run into the UB,

http://images.wikia.com/marvel_dc/images/d/dd/Beefeater.JPG

buy it a gin-and-tunic on all of us - and, from the looks of things, pitching in for a free tube of mega-SPF sunscreen wouldn't hurt, either...

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.