You ever listen to Sandra Tsing Loh's commentaries on public radio? She's got a real sense of comic brio. You can see that in her essays for the Atlantic too. Here's a great STL essay from the current issue of The Atlantic, in which she discusses how she and her husband betrayed their class and put their kids in Los Angeles public schools -- and how she threw herself wholeheartedly into trying to help the school. There's something in here to challenge almost everybody.
For starters, she talks about how she used to hero-worship the liberal education writer Jonathan Kozol.
I am the sort of impressionable woman whose eyes seep tears while reading his heartrending descriptions of racial inequity in public education. Kozol doesn’t just decry what he sees as the pre-civil-rights-South level of segregation that persists to this day, the percentage of African American children in integrated schools having fallen to its lowest level since the death of Martin Luther King.
But she admits she wasn't about to put her kids into LA's troubled public schools. However, STL and her husband tried to move to the suburbs, but "failed" (this isn't explained). So they had no choice but to stick their girls in their local public magnet school. There was culture shock:
Yes, a First World family’s initial entry into Los Angeles’s 21st-century urban public schools can be daunting. Yes, one’s uniquely American expectations of giving one’s children a better life than one had growing up can be challenged. On simple demographics alone, the landscape startles.Among educated, upwardly aspiring English-speaking families, my neighborhood of Van Nuys—with its 99-cent stores, pupuserias, and throngs of Hispanics waiting for Godot at MTA bus stops—is considered a no-man’s-land. A study by Van Nuys High School suggests that about 80 percent of our residents are Hispanic, a substantial portion of whom are recent arrivals (although many live in apartment buildings with glamorously scrawled—if faded—British royalty–inspired monikers like “Castle Arms” or “The Windsor!”). Our eldest daughter is the only blonde in her class of 20, her grade being about one-third English-learners.
More:
After a fair amount of heartache, I have to admit I have given up on trying to charm white people, at least a certain NPR-listening, Bobo, chattering class of white people, back into public school. For these shrinking families, the aesthetics alone of public schools are horrifying—the chain-link fence, putty-colored bungalows, fluorescent lighting. Confessed one writer dad to me, about his son’s corner elementary (which he did not have the heart to step inside): “Even the grass made me sad.” Another white mom rejected my daughters’ school because our kindergarten wall art looked “rote.” Asians, on the other hand, tend to overlook the occasional snarl of graffiti (in our city, a way of life). What they see at Van Nuys High, for instance, with penetrating laser vision, are the math and medical magnets embedded within. Indeed, I’ve gradually become aware—via frequent newsletters—that behind those high brown walls flourishes a buzzing hive of Korean Magnet Parents. They are busily committee-meeting, Teacher Appreciation–lunching, and catapulting their children from Van Nuys High School directly into Harvard, Stanford, Yale, Caltech, Berkeley! Why should they spend $25,000 for each year of high school to make the Ivy League? These immigrants know how to find value!
Still more:
The bad news in our most cosmopolitan and vibrant cities is that many middle-class people can no longer afford to live in “middle-class” school districts. The good news, if my experience is any indication, is that this could drive middle-class white children back into local poor brown schools, and they would come with parents armed with higher educations, the Internet, fiercely lofty expectations, and an ability to read and (at least vaguely) understand federal legislation. What happens to poor public schools when, God forbid, pushy middle-class, Type A, do-it-yourself PTA mothers become involved and agitate to lift up the boats, not just of their own children but, perforce, of their children’s disadvantaged classmates as well?
It's a pretty amazing story, actually, and I encourage you to read it. What's especially interesting is how her experience of actually becoming fully engaged in the public school, and seeing what individuals can do, put her off Kozol. She says Kozol is an old-fashioned liberal who believes nothing can happen without government throwing more money at the problem and coming in to fix things. Tsing Loh says what made things change for the better was the invasion of "the pushy, whitish, Type A middle-class poor."
Economics has forced us to realize that we are indeed all in this together. We are compelled to play Lady Bountiful. We will bring unneeded extracurricular “enrichment” classes and speak English at them until they turn blue. We must invest in the poor urban school, not because any moral authority à la Jonathan Kozol exhorts us to, but because that school is our school. And in return, we get to be infused with the energy of hopeful immigrants ready to try anything, in a brave new land that, to them (aside from the occasional “bad person” one might encounter in a weekend violin class), itself represents optimism, resources, and a better and better future.
This whole piece put me in mind of a 2004 essay from the Dallas Observer, written by Jim Schutze, a columnist who is liberal to the marrow (and who cannot stand your host, by the way). Schutze's son went to a public high school in our East Dallas neighborhood, and when he graduated from the school, Schutze got something off his chest. Schutze's son sang in what was apparently a great little show choir at the school, but the then-superintendent of Dallas public schools, a white guy named Mike Moses, didn't like the choir because it was too white.
I got the impression, in my few one-on-one conversations with Dr. Moses, that he was by no means warmly disposed toward the tiny minority of white middle-class parents who stubbornly remained in his school system. He spoke with disdain about white people whose attitude is that they have stayed in DISD when they could afford to go elsewhere, and therefore they think the school district owes them something.Oh, I know, I know. White people are so embarrassing sometimes. But here's the thing. If we have to wait for all white people to be smart and politically cool, that's going to take way, way, way too long.
Meanwhile, I sometimes think that when white middle-class people are being obnoxious, other people should take out pens and pads and begin taking notes. There are some advantages to this obnoxious thing.
Jesse Diaz, the Latino activist, told me once that he and his cohort were aware that whites and even middle-class minorities were attempting to take over the PTAs in certain schools in order to win advantages for their own children.
Yup. That's how it's done.
There is always going to be something starkly unromantic about the middle class. Always worrying and grabbing. Never truly insouciant, like Ben Affleck. They have no Palm Springs élan, nor do they have the Steinbeckian glory of the poor and dispossessed.
But pushy middle-class people also happen to be the people who get the garbage picked up on time.
I'm not a public-school parent, so I'm not sure what to think about all this. But I do find it fascinating, and am wondering what your thoughts and experiences are. As ever, discuss.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
If you want to assure going to segregated schools (racially and classwise), move to New Jersey, with the most segregated schools in the entire country.
I was fortunate to go to a very diverse high school in the mid-1980s, which was unheard of at the time in N.J. (the increasing Asian population in New Jersey today, and affluent African-Americans moving to suburbia, are finally starting to make a few districts both more white-collar and more racially diverse). It was all thanks to a quirk in the district lines (which, while mostly white suburbia, also took in a few large apartment complexes, a military base, and a historic African-American neighborhood), which again is extraordinarily rare in New Jersey.
We didn't have "black lunch tables" or other such phenomena seen at so many schools; the main problem was not with the kids, but the adults, who tracked most of the African-American and Latino students into vocational classes, whether they deserved to be or not.
If you want pushy parents to make a difference in schools, it might help to decrease the size of some of these schools. In the 1992-93 school year my sister attended school in our rural Texas town. There were maybe 150 students in the entire high school. My mother knew all of the teachers and administration. She could see the principal any time she wanted. The school was pretty responsive to parents. And every teacher knew every student.
The next school year (93-94) my sister attended a huge public high school here in the Dallas/Ft Worth metroplex. It had about 2000 students. It was pretty difficult for my mom to get even basic information about what was going on in the school. If she wanted to meet with a teacher or someone in administration, it was a half-day ordeal and they often didn't know my sister. It was pretty bureaucratic. And it's considered one of the better public schools in DFW.
Why couldn't she same kids be sent to 7-8 smaller high schools closer to their neighborhood? What about schools small enough that all of the teachers/students/parents actually know each other?
If only the solution were as simple as funding. As someone above points out, our inner city schools spend more per pupil than just about anywhere else and in most terrible school, teachers are paid a premium for being there. However, inner city school bureaucracies tend to be very corrupt and foolish with how they spend money. If I were made goddess of all things, one of the first things I would do is give principals control over staffing and at least 80% of how their funding is spent.
There are two inter-related problems with inner city schools which tend to lead to the sorts of problems. Many people in impoverished neighborhoods are undereducated themselves and feel that thy have no choice but to trust in the "experts" at the school district. Often they do not realize how badly the school officials are screwing things up and so do not protest when they ought to. They also tend, more than other Americans to believe the nonsense about lack of funding (there isn't a lack of funding - there's a lack of discretionary funding for principals to use to meet the unique needs of their schools). So when they do complain and are told, "there's not enough money", they are more likely than others to accept this situation and feel like there's just nothing they can do about it. It's almost a sort of learned helplessness that the school system engenders in people.
The other problem, which is grossly enabled by the problem outlined above is that many of our inner city school systems have become the experimental playgrounds of the ivory tower wack jobs. For example, the Chicago School system has a partnership with the University of Illinois Chicago education department, one of whose most prominent professors is a former domestic terrorist and Marxist. Because they are the experts, they get to press the school system into implementing all sorts of social justice programs, crayola curicculum, everyday math nonsense and democratic schools which don't work in practice all while neglecting basic reading, writing and math skills. In a middle class white suburban school, parents would see these sorts of things coming and mount an insurrection. However, in many inner city schools, parents assume that the experts know best and trust them to do the right things. However, many of the problems seen in our inner city schools, particularly the lack of discipline, can be traced back to the nonsense coming out of these ivory tower nutjobs.
Anyhow. I must admit that this woman has a lot more energy for the fight than I do. I had my son in the local public school for kindergarten. They were completely unresponsive to my concerns and my son's needs. The bizarre thing is that they acted like I was nuts and the only person to ever have a problem with anything they were doing. Yet the next year the implemented many changes which addressed precisely the problems I had raised concerns about, so obviously there was a problem and I wasn't the only one who saw it. I just knew that I wasn't willing to spend the next 12 years fighting with them. Especially if they would only make changes after my son had been screwed over. People think homeschooling is a lot of work, but to my mind it's much easier than fighting the school beast.
I am a product of the L.A. public school system in the late 70s to early 80s. Even then, my school was minority white. The academics were lousy; I did not have a single science or music lesson until I was in the 7th grade, and I remember a tremendous sense of boredom as the teachers were constantly trying to get the 30 or so kids in my classes on the same page, so to speak.
Thankfully, when I was about to enter the 8th grade, we moved to upstate New York, where I promptly failed math and science. Due to the tutoring efforts of my parents, however, I eventually got caught up.
Looking back at growing up in L.A. (I am now a family doctor in rural New England), I have to agree with Russell Crowe when he said, "I'd move to Los Angeles if Australia and New Zealand were swallowed up by a huge tidal wave, if there was a bubonic plague in Europe, and if the continent of Africa disappeared from some Martian attack."
This is a blast from the past for me -- I met Sandra Tsing Loh when I lived in Los Angeles (back then, she was a performance artist) and it is great to see that she is still around. I really enjoyed this essay, and I think she is on to something in her description of "the middle class poor" and her proposed solutions to problems in the public schools.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.