Crunchy Con

Race, America and Michelle Obama, cont'd

Saturday February 23, 2008

Categories: Culture
Because people tend to stop reading threads after they drop off the list to the right, and because some interesting stuff is continuing to be posted to the Michelle Obama/theory thread, I want to continue it here, on a new...
Advertisement
Comments
Julie M
February 24, 2008 12:23 AM

I am ceetainly not a regular poster here but this topic, of which I have not read the first part, strikes me. I would not have ever thought of race and class in the way Dannielle discusses it. I have been going through life with my own blinders on and am reminded of a song I heard in church about how different races view Jesus. I believe it used terms like brown and yellow and such things but it also went right over my head until tonight. I think I need to rent and watch Crash again just to see the other sides of the stories involved. Thank-you, Danielle, for enlightening me.

rebeccat
February 24, 2008 12:57 AM

Rod, imagine having to negotiate the lines between class, while also being painfully aware that you can never be just you because your race is an ever present reality AND figuring out which of the rules you were taught to live your life by as an african american with a culture and value system which is different than the majority culture need to be abandoned to be successful in the majority cultures, which you should hold on to and trying to figure out at what point you are compromising who you are to succeed or when you're holding yourself back unnecessarily. And if that terrible sentence gives you a headache as you try to navigate it, imagine that this sentence was foundational to your life.

Then imagine extending a little more grace and compassion towards a woman who has lived with this confusion and much, much more her entire life.

Max Schadenfreude
February 24, 2008 2:23 AM

All I want to know is, did Mrs. Obama pay for her TV?

Seriously though, the woman's post is very intersting, however it is possible for a white person to know what it is like being the minority in every day in Amercia.

Once I was the only white (not counting my roommate) in a moderately middle-class black suburban area. The looks, comments, and attitudes from neighbors, local store employees, and others I met in the community were often (most always) less than friendly and open. I indeed became aware of my race on a daily basis (for the first time).

A few years later I had a similar experience at community college. With a student population of about 80% black, 15% hispanic, & the rest white. Was on campus when the OJ verdict was read on TV. THAT was an interesting moment in my education. A loud roar of cheers erupted throughout the campus (everone was watching it on TV); the whites (both of us; lol) just shook their heads.

Like I said before, it's not a white thing or a black thing; it's a human thing.

What we need (imo) is for blacks & whites of good will to band together, work together respectfuly, and tell all the others to grow up. It's that simple. Not easy (maybe impossible) but it is that simple.

Anonymous
February 24, 2008 3:05 AM

"I was talking with a friend today about race and class, and he said that the kind of behavior that many whites identify as "black," in the negative sense, is in truth mostly a function of class. If you factor out economic status, you'll find that lower-class whites have most of the same mores and behaviors associated with them. But it's even harder to talk openly and honestly about class in this country than it is to talk about race."

What a convenient and comforting thing for a white person to believe.

Cecile
February 24, 2008 5:29 AM

I'm a very pro-Obama person (voted already)-and I'm also white, which may help you understand where I'm coming from. As for the Michelle Obama comment, I can't know what was going on in her mind but I imagine it might have been a mix of her own experience as a black person in America, combined with her experience as a Senator's wife...one of the things Obama is constantly talking about (and indeed many political newscasters and citizens talk about) is the corruption in Washington...where "good ideas go to die" as he said in his speech a few days. And also I think her comment probably had to something to do with her just being very proud of her husband who she loves. Personally I think it was a really stupid thing to say, but I won't hold it against her, I still like her a lot and think that her husband is the right person for the next presidency.

I mean it's just a very narrow thing to say that she has NEVER been proud of her country before, because can you imagine all the many things that have gone on with all the many people in the country in her lifetime. It would have been cool of her to say that she hasn't been very proud of the American government very many times. I kind of agree with her that her husband as president may be one of the best things that has happened in a while (should it happen), but to say there was NOTHING good that any even single good person has ever done in the government, or any single person among the American people...that's pretty hurtful...and I think that hurtfulness far transcends any black or white issue.

anyway, I'm just assuming that she didn't mean it the way I'm interpreting, because I really like everything else I've seen from her and think she would be a great first lady.

Daniel
February 24, 2008 8:09 AM

The interesting part of Barack and Michelle Obama's life story is that they met at a top corporate law firm in Chicago. The reason they met was because Michelle was the only African American lawyer at the firm and Barack was the only African American summer associate. So in 1988 or so, she was the only African American lawyer in a firm with probably 300 lawyers. It's almost incomprehensible that in 1988 this giant, national law firm could only have one African American lawyer. Imagine what that experience must have been like.

A good friend of mine is an African American female lawyer. She tells me stories of being the only non-white and only woman in a meeting and that lawyers from other firms assumed she was the secretary. She was often asked to make copies and get coffee by lawyers from other firms because it was incomprehensible that she was actually "one of them." And this was in the late 1990s in Washington, D.C.

So regardless of the level of success, you are constantly reminded that you don't belong, that you don't fit in.

David Layman
February 24, 2008 8:33 AM

I think my father would have qualified as "working poor," supporting a large family on what would be, I've calculated, $15,000 in today's money.

On the strengths of my high school academic achievements, I attended the University of Chicago. To be sure, Chicago did not have the class-based elitism that a Princeton or Harvard might have, since its elitism is more intellectual. But I have to say the class-based disparity was never an issue.

It should be said that I was raised in a conservative non-conformist Protestantism ("crunchy" before its time!). Romans 12:2 ("be ye not conformed to this world") was part of my being from the time I could understand words.

Personally, in my quick review, I found Ms. Obama's thesis much ado about nothing. She turned her personal grievances into a pseudo-academic enterprise. Oh well, anything to jump through the hoops.

Steve
February 24, 2008 9:16 AM

I grew up dirt poor in rural southern Indiana in the 50's and 60's. Think "Hoosiers". Alcoholism was rampant, lots of unemployment, lots of good old fornicating and adultery. I really do have cousins who spent there summer days wearing overalls with no T-shirt just like in the movies. We were lucky that my parents stayed together (though my mother was always sick and we often couldnt afford to have her see a doctor) and we belonged to a very strict independent baptist church where I had wonderful friends. Our faith and our church kept us out of trouble.

After getting out of the military I worked full-time nights and weekends to get through undergrad and (Ivy League) medical school. I worked at a public health center that did a lot of home visits throughout West Philadelphia, nearly all black. I was usually the only white but I had worked with a lot of my fellow workers while we were in the service. Working there was like being back home except the people were black and it was drugs instead of alcohol. Instead of living in rundown houses with rusting cars all around it was big apartment bldgs or rundown rowhomes. The squalor seemed about the same as home . Just like home it was sometimes amazing how the insides of some the homes were immaculate while the outsides were so awful.It did seem a little more violent than home or maybe I just didnt understand the rules as I did get stabbed once and threatened with guns a few times.

In the Ivy league medical school there was certainly a large group of rich kids who seemed kind of intent on proving they were socially superior. They went to Aruba or Europe for their breaks while I worked to pay my bills. The black guys I worked with were actually incredibly supportive and arranged flexible hours for me so I could work less or more as needed. Looking back there was really none of the "crabs in the barrel" kind of thing. I wasnt really bothered that much by the rich kids I think because I was a bit older, married and having been through the service pretty self reliant. It was pretty tough on the "non-rich" kids though as they really were left out of a lot of stuff. Seemed was too much like high school I thought. Interestingly, the rich black and Asian kids hung out with rich white kids on breaks too.

Not sure if that helps you much but my experience (all anecdotal and totally subjective) was that poor whites acted a lot like poor blacks. There was clearly a class stratification in Med school. I suspect that in law school that could be more of an issue and certainly as a young undergrad it had to be an issue.

Steve

Christopher Mohr
February 24, 2008 9:33 AM

Daniel -

That last sentence of yours sounds just like my experience living in Japan (yes, I really do know what it feels like to be a minority). Any white in America who doesn't get what Mrs. Obama is talking about need only live in Japan for a year, and the truth of her statement will come home in a hurry. For all the good things that Japan has to be proud of, racist xenophobia is not one. But back on topic. The effects of racism do not simply "go away". Anyone who thinks that it's all in the mind, and can be overcome with the right effort is delusional.

Amy
February 24, 2008 9:40 AM

I'm white, married, with children. If I were in Africa looking for a birthday card, I'd buy one with a black child on it, give it to one of my white children, and be done with it. To cry about the lack of white birthday cards would be to make something an issue that isn't. There obviously wouldn't be a lot of demand for a card with a white smiling kid, and that would be OK with me.

Rawlins
February 24, 2008 9:54 AM

I was raised a liberal by activists, and only now, well into middle age, do I start to 'get' it. And after being at the massive Obama rally in Dallas and watching the faces in the crowd, my path widdened.

There are no Cliff Notes to racial matters and Michelle Obama's story in college is a lesson. As liberal and 'color blind' as I wish to believe I am, the fact is, I have had an epiphany and know she speaks the truth of her experience; having been seen as 'black first' and as a student second.

Last week was the first time I looked at someone's face and transcended the distraction of their African features and color. If that realization was mine,…a man who marched in civil rights, whose Dad was a jazz musician, ……whose mother was a member of the NAACP, whose neighbors across the street for ¼ century have been all three colors……. then trust me when I say, you who are living a white life surrounded by white lives have little chance to comment on Michelle Obama’s thesis beyond the anecdotal.

Let's listen and learn rather than assume we have the rebuttal 'answers'. Knowledge is power, and those on the inside looking out of racial realities are those from whom we can learn. Seize the moment rather than occupy it.

Demetrio
February 24, 2008 11:05 AM

I don't know... Everyone has issues to overcome. Some people's issues are apparent at first glance (belonging to a "minority race"), others' are less so (lower social class), and some people's are invisible unless you know them well (dysfunctional family of origin). I have sympathy for the difficulties she must have felt and still feels as a trailblazing black woman and so on, but she *is* the wife of a candidate for President of the United States of America, and I will not hold her to a lower standard because of where she comes from in life--that would be racist.

Bugg
February 24, 2008 11:25 AM

As the son of an NYPD cop going to a liberal palce like NYU, I didn't really fit in. But so what? There's no point to keep harboring resentments. And the idea that policy choices should be crafted to make us all FEEL GOOD in such circumstances is just ridiculous.

Further, Michelle Obama managed to get her thesis accepted and approved (with spelling errors and absymal grammar) because no one was going to question her, a black woman espousing racial studies claptrap. Again, 77% of Princeton graduates didn't even respond to her. And she majored in business or biology, that wouldn't have been allowed. It would've been laughed off as a joke. But in the 1980s PC racial grievance industry error, such silliness were encouraged.

Aaron Baugher
February 24, 2008 1:09 PM

Agreed, Demetrio. I don't fault her for her resentment, and I'll grant that she's had to overcome a lot more than I have. But I'm not running for President or married to someone who is. I don't know how much her anger should play into her husband's electability, but it's not like she's the first potential First Lady whose past and attitudes mattered.

Barack's racialism and personal baggage from being abandoned by his bigamist father are the same way: not his fault, and maybe he's entitled to them, but they're part of what made him who his is (a significant part, to judge by his own book), and part of who he would be as President. That makes them fair game for voters to consider and reporters to ask and write about, unfair as that may seem.

If people had cared more about the known personal baggage of the candidates in the last four elections, maybe our two most recent Presidents wouldn't have been such embarrassments.

Don Altabello
February 24, 2008 1:10 PM

Race is certainly a big issue in law schools. I do think that quite a few of the blacks at my school feel a great deal of tension between the values or lifestyle they grew up with and the course they must navigate in the legal profession. I think that one of the problems is that many minorities are allowed into our law school (on scholarship) with substantially lower LSAT scores (like 10 points, on average, which is huge) than the rest of the school.

For me, it is a bit of a tension, especially when you see minorities (who may be barely above average) displaced people who score at the very top of their class for firm jobs. I understand the reason we have these types of programs, but it will be extremely difficult for minorities who do get hired at these firms to be accepted, not only because of their race, but because they got into their position on substantially less academic achievement.

I don't want to turn this into an affirmative action discussion--it's just that this is a fact of professional life in the legal field.

butches
February 24, 2008 1:12 PM

As a white, 71 year old woman, I was not offended by her remarks. I realize that blacks have a different view of America and why not after the way they have been treated. Sometimes I find it hard to be proud of America myself, why not her?

Steve
February 24, 2008 2:15 PM

If Rod's supposition that a lot of this is class more than race (the economists seem to at least partially support this) then I think it can be seen that whites get preferences early in the educational process and blacks get it later in the process.

Bugg- I didnt read Obama's thesis but based on personal experience anything over 20% on a mail survey is pretty good. Survey responses have been steadily dropping for years. I dont know what a typical response was for surveys 25 years ago tbh. The absolute size of the study is also important. Standards also seem to be much different for the social sciences (freely conceding that there is a lot of awful science published in the biological and medical worlds).

Steve

Elizabeth Anne
February 24, 2008 3:15 PM

Did anyone watch "Eli Stone" this week? The 'B' plot touched on a lot of these issues, and promises to do so more. It's not the best show on TV, but it has consistently, and pleasantly, surprised me.

James
February 24, 2008 3:24 PM

Amy--

In my experience, in Africa it's as easy (or easier!) to find a birthday card with a white kid on it: that sort of thing tends to be imported from Europe rather than made locally.

Bugg--

Michelle Robinson's undergraduate thesis (you can access the whole thing here) is a good deal better than mine was, in terms of thorough research & methodology. Do recall that this is an unpublished undergraduate paper written 23 years ago, long before the days of spellcheck. I've seen PhDs write with worse spelling than the minor typos in this thesis.

And seriously, what kind of rigorous scholarship do you expect from an undergraduate paper? Keep in mind that most undergrads (and many M.A.s!) do no real scholarship or any sort of thesis in their entire academic career.

It's the third paragraph of the introduction (lazy journalists!) that has received the most attention; that paragraph describes Michelle Robinson's own experience as motivation for carrying out her research. But in the conclusion we find that Michelle Robinson's own experience was actually atypical; the results of the survey reveal:

"...After Princeton, respondents experienced the opposite change in attitude; their identification with Blacks and the Black community decreased as their identification with Whites and the White community increased. Thus, these findings suggest that respondents who experience change as a result of their Princeton experience are likely to identify less with Blacks and the Black community in comparison to Whites and the Whites community."

James
February 24, 2008 3:48 PM

I'm White, grew up in East Africa. While my parents were there for humanitarian/ rural development purposes, I unconsciously identified with White Africans and with the colonial legacy (which I took to be overwhelmingly positive). We're rich, they're poor, and it has something to do with our culture, class and skin color. But it's OK because we're here to help.

My occasional visits to America did little to endear me to this country-- it had McDonalds, which was nice, but folks were just so self-absorbed and uninteresting that I longed to get back home to Africa as quick as possible. Didn't find America bad so much as I found it lonesome and boring. And thought nothing but the very best of American involvement in my continent.

It wasn't until college (in the US) that I began, very slowly, to self-identify as an American and to think critically about the legacy of colonialism and Western cold-war involvement in Africa. When I realized that my country was accountable for Mobutu and for apartheid; and when I understood how racist, murderous and cruel White colonialism had been; it made me sick and I felt so deeply ashamed of my country and my race that I would've said something along the lines of "I have never had reason to be proud of my country."

When I would return to Africa to visit, I'd spend the whole time feeling miserable-- guilty and ashamed for the ways that my country and my race had abused and were abusing the continent.

I have a more balanced viewpoint now: while we were funding Mobutu's genocides and propping up South Africa's racism, we were also feeding and saving the lives of millions. There's lots to be ashamed of but there's plenty to be proud of as well.

Still, there are times when I'll use-- or at least be tempted to use-- such rhetoric. When Colin Powell brokered the peace accords in southern Sudan my response was at last, I can love my country! although of course there had already been many many many other reasons.

So I don't find Michelle Obama's statement offensive or belittling of America. Of course she has many reasons to be proud of this country and of course she is proud of this country in many ways. But when you've been smothered so long in the bad and finally get a glimpse of the good, the reaction is exactly that sort of hyperbole-- I've never been proud of America before, but now I am! There really is hope for us yet!

Rawlins
February 24, 2008 3:51 PM

Bravo, James.

o.h.
February 24, 2008 4:39 PM

Rod,

In answer to your last question, I was raised by a single mom at or below the poverty level most of my childhood (we made it into lower-middle class by my high school years), and ultimately attended Stanford. Actually I was more bitter in grade school: my mom made sure to find housing near good schools, so I was always among kids with substantially higher incomes. Up through middle school I was still getting free breakfasts and lunches, and everyone knew who used the free meal cards and who didn't (the other kids supplemented the not-so-tasty food by paying cash at the snack bar), and (surprise) kids feel free to comment on Goodwill clothing and free cafeteria food. The lowest moment was having to ask in the main office, in front of God and everyone, for the forms for reduced-price AP exams, since Mom couldn't afford the $60 fee per exam, and then watching all but two of the students (me and one other guy) walk out of the AP Physics exam as soon as it started: our high school let you skip the final if you took the AP exam in a subject, and nearly every other kid had paid $60 just to skip the physics final!

At Stanford I didn't feel half so bitter, mostly because college is all about poverty chic, and it was much easier for my background to go unnoticed. I well remember one conversation, though, where several students were discussing the Republican proposal to cut back on the free school lunch program, and there was much discussion about "those people" whose kids had to have free lunches, and what "those people" were like. The superciliousness of it all left me speechless. In many conversations with a friend of mine at Stanford who had also come from a sub-middle-class background (he had been homeless in high school) we couldn't help noticing that for all the Stanford rancor at Republicans who hated the poor, there was no shortage of contempt for things that actually characterize sub-middle class existence, ranging from religious conservatism to being overweight. They felt for the poor there at Stanford; they just didn't like anything about them, nor think there could be any of Them around.

o.h.
February 24, 2008 4:44 PM

Let me add to the above that all of that sounds much whinier than I actually felt in general; while in grade school the income differences loom large, really in college I seldom thought about anything other than my studies and my social life. It was only the occasional jarring incident or conversation that made me think "the rich really aren't like us." Certainly I have lapsed into complacent middle-classness now.

danielle
February 24, 2008 4:48 PM

Didn't expect to be cast in the limelight, but I feel honored that you'd find my post thought-provoking.

Rod said: Americans are extremely touchy on the subject of class, and I think we train ourselves to suppress noticing class differences.

Americans tend not to talk about "class," at least in public (after all, we're the land of opportunity where anyone can make it, right?) istm it's more taboo to talk personal finances in the US than anything else.

Interestingly, we in the US don't tend to see run-down shacks next to gated mansions along a street as is the case in some other countries. Instead, rich and poor tend to live segregated existences (leading to weird phenomena such as some dilapidated buildings in the Bronx once having been cheerily painted with false window scenes along the highways taken by commuting suburbanites). Sometimes this segregation coincides with race, sometimes not.

However, istm races/ethnicities often have in-house expectations concerning wealth status/class and the ways in which money is handled. One's class concept is often formed by the ethnic/racial ideology in which one was steeped in childhood. If one bucks the status quo in one's family, whether for better or worse economic station (by choice or happenstance), dealing with comments "from the neighborhood" and feeling one must "prove" onesself are not uncommon... but as some have commented, that does not mean one has to carry that baggage around for life.

fwiw, I am neither sympathetic to nor offended by MO's remarks. I was seeking more to understand what drives/informs her thinking as that will potentially affect us all if her husband is elected.

Reaganite in NYC
February 24, 2008 7:08 PM

Rod asks: "Any readers of this blog go to a high-status college though coming from a non-upperclass background? How did you fit in? What was that like for you?" I went from a socially conservative and proudly "working-class" family to an Ivy-League college in the early 1980s. I'm not African-American. I was educated in public schools in a small town. My parents had not attended college and my grandparents were immigrants.

So much of the alienation which Michelle Robinson (Obama) wrote about in her 1985 Princeton senior thesis sounds familiar. I found the Andover/Groton/St. Paul's types extremely intimidating and, in many individual cases, loathsome. I went through a period of intense class envy and other un-Christian attitudes toward my "betters." IMHO, some of what Michelle experienced was more class conflict than racial conflict. A few other point I would like to share:

(1) At least half of my African-American peers were better educated and wealthier than I was. This group was far better prepared, academically and socially. In addition, those who were children of Caribbean and African immigrants benefited from affirmative action programs that had been designed NOT to help them so much as the descendants of the original American slave population. It was an early lesson in the unintended consequences of social engineering.

(2) During my freshman year it occurred to me that most of my upper-crust classmates were, ironically, narrow-minded and parochial. Sure, most of them had traveled widely and taken advanced and specialized courses in prep schools. (By contrast, I had never traveled outside the Northeast and spent 12 years in the same small-town public school system.) However, most of these upper-class kids read the same newspapers (e.g., The New York Times) and shared the same assumptions about the world. They knew nothing about how most people live. Few had any religious faith.

(3) My initial feelings of intimidation, envy and anger eventually gave way to acceptance and Christian forgiveness. After all, many of these preppies were -- and remain into their middle-age -- prisoners of their conditioning. Part of me feels sorry for them (they are unlikely to ever transcend their class). Indeed, I am the fortunate one for I had the best of both worlds: a working-class (and conservative Catholic) upbringing and an Ivy-League education :-)

Does Michelle Obama in 2008 hold different views about race and class than Michelle Robinson did in 1985? Does her husband share her views about these things? These are important questions to which we don't have clear answers. I'm grateful that they are part of the discussion on the "Crunchy Con" blog.

danielle
February 24, 2008 8:02 PM

Amy, the sad part was that the town in which the card was sought was known nationally as a resort town for blacks. The point was the awakening of one person to see things of which she'd previously been unaware in the majority race, not the buying of a card, per se.

Reaganite, I appreciate your final paragraph. I, too, would like to know how specifics on issues such as this will define "change" during a potential Obama presidency.

Rod Dreher
February 24, 2008 9:59 PM

Barack Obama's experience of race and class was different from his wife's. I've read in several profiles of him that his wife is one of his most important advisers (as it should be). I saw Michelle interviewed on "60 Minutes," and found her impressive. I want to know more about her, esp. because she will have a lot of influence on her husband if he becomes president, as I suspect he will.

I suppose it's a characteristics of the Boomers and post-Boomers, but I think as a general matter men of the Boomer generation and subsequent generations collaborate more with their wives. At least I've seen that among my circles in the various places in which I've lived. I mean, if I were running for president, you would be well advised to find out as much as you could about my wife, because she is my dearest friend and probably the greatest personal influence on the decisions I make day to day, and the way I approach lots of challenges. And I'm glad for that.

Herb
February 24, 2008 10:07 PM

In my experience, there are no easy rules for this race/class business, but I do think we are deaing mostly with racial issues. What Michelle Obama said is, I believe, a clear reflective of the true feelings of the Obamaa and is more racial than class oriented. Why else go to a black liberation church? I myself am Jewish and my parents grew up very much in poverty, the children of immigrants fleeing Europe. When my father went to a midwestern university shortly after WWII, he met people who were quite surprised to discover that he didn't have horns (no, he wasn't makeing this up), and he found quite a lot of prejudice from the faculty as well. This was all related to religion/race and not class. His reaction to the prejudice was simply to work harder than his fellow Christian classmates, and he held no grudge against America or anyone else. He was grateful to the country for the opportunities he had. My daughter went to a rather high status private high school, one with the usual affirmative action program, so there were a representative number of blacks. She became good friends with a black girl from a middle class family. It was noticeable that most black students hung out with each other most of the time. My daughter's friend was the exception and found a lot of white friends because she was quite insistent on finding friends regardless of their race; she wanted friends of like mind and interests and she wanted no part of any race game. This made her persona non grata for the rest of the blacks at the school. It all seemed quite racial to me and had nothing to do with class. I have seen and read about many other similar examples. All of this tribal stuff has been breaking down very quickly. Just think of the incredible changes in a mere 50 years. That is one reason that it is surprising that the Obamas belong to such a radical church. They try to present a very different picture to America now that he is running for President, but it seems to be quite fraudulent.

Anonymous
February 24, 2008 11:44 PM

This is an idea called intersectionality that has existed in academia for a long time. Prejudices rarely exist in isolation. That does not mean one is necessary better or worse than another. They're different and have their own unique problems and pains.

Somethings are clear, though:

Upper class people are privileged relative to lower class people.

White people are privileged relative to black people.

So who's worse off, an upper class black person or a poor white person? It depends on a lot of other factors, like where you live, the degree of poverty, the malice of the general population around you, etc.

The question is, to what degree is being "poor" influenced by racism (a whole lot, historically, and people are still living with the results of that history), and to what degree classism is fueled by racism. Just think about the term "white trash"... by it's nature, it's a failure of expectations of what we expect white people to be.

rte
February 25, 2008 9:38 AM

I'm sorry, I just don't think it's that tragic if a person can't find a Hallmark card with a minority on the cover. (How hard has she looked?) It's a free country - quit your whining and make the card yourself. If you feel so inclined, start a company that caters to the demand.
The real world can be a lot worse than that. Some people just need thicker skin.

tehag
February 25, 2008 10:21 AM

I sympathize with the woman whose son couldn't find a greeting card with the proper race on it. When I look for greeting cards, I find almost all of cards with semi-recognizable human figures are filled nasty, sarcastic comments uttered by revolting cartoon parodies of human beings. I am sure the sentiments on those cards are the ones the artists feel, but they aren't the ones I want to express.

tehag

Jim
February 25, 2008 1:02 PM

rte,

You are so right! Those 6-yr old kids looking for cards for mommy and daddy should just suck it up and make their own or form their own card company for that matter. The whiny, lazy little deadbeats.

Time to get a thick skin, ye little ones, people like "rte" have spoken, so you'd better listen up, you hear?

Larry Parker
February 25, 2008 1:15 PM

**I found the Andover/Groton/St. Paul's types extremely intimidating and, in many individual cases, loathsome. I went through a period of intense class envy and other un-Christian attitudes toward my "betters."**

See, Reaganite in NYC, some experiences go beyond partisan politics ...

I shared them at Rod's favorite TDJA* school in Washington, D.C., Gtown, as well.

*TDJA = Those Da*n Jesuits Again

Reaganite in NYC
February 25, 2008 2:36 PM

Larry Parker:

Sure, every 18- and 19-year old kid away from home experiences a range of strong emotions. Envy can be one of them. But as we grow in maturity and ground ourselves in Gospel values, personal envy is something we work to minimize -- if not eliminate -- in our daily lives.

This thread is about Michelle Robinson Obama's college senior thesis and what it tells us about this woman when she was in early twenties. To what extent did class envy and racial enmity influence the attitudes of this woman BACK THEN? To what extent, if any, does her husband share these attitudes NOW?

These questions are important, I think, because the exploitation of group envy by politicians worldwide has triggered some of the worst atrocities of the past century. In this country, it has lead to corrosive politics and lousy policy. That's why I'm glad this blog is taking a thorough look at this new face in politics -- as well as the person with evidently the greatest influence on him now.

rte
February 25, 2008 3:23 PM

Jim, talk about overreacting!

My (white) daughters have received cards with black children on the cover and the inside from their friends. They survived. Life goes on.

I challenge you to go to a card store and see if you can't find cards with minorities, including high quality ones that anyone regardless of race would feel comfortable sending.

I didn't say anything about deadbeats, etc., so you are indulging in fantasy. I simply said that of all the things that can go wrong in the world, being unable to find a Hallmark card (or whatever) is not at the top of the list.

How about Snoopy? Is that too white? He's got black spots. He even speaks French.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.