Lots of people worry that an assassin is lying in wait for Barack Obama. They are right to worry, I'm sorry to say. If some nut shoots him, aside from the personal horror, it would be a worse blow to...
I'd like to think that if a Sirhan-like assassin killed Obama for being an apostate that our country wouldn't be the one torn apart.
rte
February 25, 2008 8:54 AM
Well said, Rod.
I have no affection for the Clintons, and I've lost all my respect for President Bush, but they deserve a lot of credit and respect for putting themselves and their families in danger because of their public service.
Sometimes when I hear about what the Bush twins, or Chelsea Clinton, are doing, I genuinely feel concerned. It wouldn't be that hard for some nutcase or some terrorist to strike at them. I'm so glad that nothing like that has happened.
On a larger scale, I work near a statehouse, the meeting place for the general assembly in the capital of my state. It's amazing to me how easy it would be for someone with a grudge to cause tremendous damage. There's nominal security, and anyone who wanted to could probably enter with a firearm, or a suicide vest. Frankly, it wouldn't be that hard for someone to do what Timothy McVeigh did in Oklahoma. Imagine if someone wishing to do America, or some specific politician, harm, realized how easy it was. They don't need to use airplanes. America is very unprotected.
What a depressing thought to begin the week. Thanks, Rod!
Peter
February 25, 2008 9:20 AM
Much as I dislike George Bush I do think it is a bit naff that he will not get secret service protection for life. Presidents make enemies and even if they didn't there are plenty of nuts to worry about.
Eric W
February 25, 2008 9:22 AM
I assume it was a decision between letting most everybody in before Barack started speaking, or screening everyone and having Barack speak to an auditorium that was 1/3 full.
I arrived about 11 a.m., and was directed to the end of the line, which by then was at the very top (rooftop) level of the parking garage. It took us about 1-1/2 hours to get to the doors, because my camera shows that I took pictures/video of Barack entering the stadium about 1:13 p.m., and I got to a seat less than 10 minutes before he made his entrance.
I, too, was very surprised that they just let us in , cameras, bags, purses, bulky clothes and all - with not one bit of searching or scanning. It pleasantly reminded me of the old days when you could attend events like these without feeling like you were at the airport in Frankfort, Germany.
It was probably an unwise decision to forego security measures, but it was nice.
harvey lacey
February 25, 2008 9:51 AM
I too have fears about Obama's safety. Part of that I'm sure is based upon the fringe everywhere discovering more than ever before they can destroy it for everyone else with a little violence.
There's also some concern on my part by deepness of the feelings of some I interact with on Obama. Everything from my relatives in Lousisana going for the Republican candidate after a lifetime of yellow dawg democratitis because they don't see the nation ready for a black or woman President to comments like "Obama, the end of the United States as we know it" from folks I assumed were non-political.
It is a concern.
Jeannette
February 25, 2008 10:00 AM
Funny you should include Hillary. It's fairly well-known here in Beltway-land that more than one White House Secret Service agent had to "take one for the president" during the previous administration; seems the first 'lady' threw household items at him on a fairly regular basis.
Rob G
February 25, 2008 10:18 AM
I am, in pretty equal measure, afraid FOR Obama and afraid OF him.
Mrs. Pringle
February 25, 2008 11:43 AM
The 9/11 attacks brought us together as a country
Interesting that you should say that. It seems to me that it brought us together for a little while -- pretty much until the president's "they did it because they hate freedom" speech. After that those of us who wanted to consider any more complex causes were called unpatriotic America-haters. Not much togetherness after that.
Mrs. Pringle
Anonymous
February 25, 2008 12:23 PM
Let's not mince words- the Presidency is an extremely dangerous job.
Thus far, forty-two men have been President of the United States.
Four of them (Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy) have been murdered. Two more (Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan) survived being shot.
Gerald Ford was nearly shot twice in 1974. Harry Truman was nearly shot by Puerto Rican terrorists. Franklin Roosevelt was nearly murdered before taking office in 1933.
Need I point out that all of the above were white males?
I do not make light of the dangers that would face a President Obama, because the Presidency is and long has been a very dangerous job. Firemen and astronauts don't face such high casualty rates.
Would Barack Obama be in greater danger than other Presidents? Marginally, perhaps. But there's no doubt that Rod is right. if Obama might be elected by a landslide, but if he were shot or killed while in office, America would get NO credit in any circles for electing him in the first place. We'd only be blasted worldwide as a racist society that collectively murdered a black man.
All the more reason for the Secret Service to take every reasonable (and practically every UNreasonable) precaution.
Larry Parker
February 25, 2008 12:58 PM
Someone needs to be fired on Obama's campaign staff for so pressuring the Secret Service.
Given all the threats out there, his safety comes before TV visuals, and even the (understandable) frustration of his supporters.
AnotherBeliever
February 25, 2008 1:02 PM
The risk, of course, exists.
But I'm not sure why everyone is dwelling on it right now. It's a worse case scenario, but one best not imagined, unless your line of work is ensuring the safety of elected officials and candidates.
It amazes me, this strain of anxiety I've sensed in Americans since 9/11. I was studying abroad that year, so I didn't really catch the anxiety bug that was going around at home. In Germany, the villagers banded together in support of our little American colony. There were vigils. There was anxiety and fear until everyone could reach their loved ones. But not a sense of over-arching fear. And don't tell me Europe wasn't under attack - they've dealt with terrorist attacks since the '70s, and have been targeted a number of times since 9/11.
Contrast, if you will, the British reaction to the bus bombings to our reaction to 9/11. Yes, we had a lot more casualties, but even so, the Brits pasted signs everywhere saying, "We're NOT afraid." Everywhere. Little kids were doing them up in elementary schools. People stopped and interviewed on street corners insisted they would not let the attacks make them live in fear. Everyone was rattled, and shocked, but there was a hard resolve and determination behind it.
Maybe part of the reason I didn't understand the rush to war in Iraq is because I didn't understand the anxiety over WMD. I figured we'd attack, but probably just airstrikes. I didn't understand the fear imperative that motivated Americans.
Why do you guys think we Americans are so anxious, even seven attack-free years after 9/11, even after reasonable efforts have been made and a few unreasonable ones as well, to address terrorism? What's missing here?
The chances of anyone one of us or even one our loved ones being injured in a terrorist attack, are slim to nil, even if, God forbid, it happens again. You do whatever you can to address risks, and you rest confident in the fact that you've made the best decisions you could at the time.
Marian Neudel
February 25, 2008 3:41 PM
Foreigners have had a lot of trouble understanding the American reaction to 9/11, but that's because they don't grasp what it's like to grow up in a country whose soil has not been attacked by foreigners since 1812. Wellllll, not exactly--there was, of course, Pearl Harbor, and a couple of other bombings of US soil at roughly the same time. And of course, Southerners had the experience of invasion and then some, and have been a very different culture from the rest of us as a result. But we all--even Southerners, I suspect--felt we were, and deserved to be, immune to the miscellaneous warfare that afflicts the rest of the world, until 9/11. By the standards of the rest of the world, we were damn lucky to have been un-bombed for as long as we were. Welcome to the human condition.
Mark Shea
February 25, 2008 4:53 PM
D'ja ever notice people who say slime like the above are *always* too chicken shit to write their names?
Scott Lahti
February 25, 2008 10:04 PM
Those of a certain age may have seen enumerated the "spooky" parallels between those two ill-starred presidents, Lincoln and Kennedy, first disclosed to me, aged around 9, by a talismanic engraved Jack-looks-at-Abe penny back in the deep and ancient mists of Nixontime, shrouded in the sort of secrecy that only a plastic gumball-machine capsule affords for a quarter and a turn of the crank, e.g.,
"Lincoln's assassin shot him from a theater and fled to a warehouse.
"Kennedy's assassin shot him from a warehouse and fled to a theater.
"Lincoln's secretary, Kennedy, warned him not to got to the theatre.
"Kennedy's secretary, Lincoln, warned him not to go to Dallas.
"Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials," &c.
- though old reliable Snopes tells the pennywise credulous as always to swallow a chill pill*,
snopes.com/history/american/lincoln-kennedy.asp
*[Including this waggish snip:
"A month before Lincoln was assassinated he was in Monroe, Maryland.
A month before Kennedy was assassinated he was in Marilyn Monroe.
This is a latter-day addition to the list and nothing more than a bit of salacious humor. Even as a humorous coincidence it fails the test, as Marilyn Monroe died well over a year before Kennedy's assassination."]
I found the hitherto buried parallels elsewhere even more flesh-goosing, as supplied eight years ago this month by Jason Morrison over at The Shrubbery, viz.:
New Lincoln-Kennedy Similarities Uncovered!
by Jason Morrison
theshrubbery.com/0200/lincoln.html
"Everyone's heard of the eerie similarities between presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Some are obvious and trivial like both having seven letters in their last names and being over 6 feet tall. Some are downright creepy like Lincoln getting shot at Ford's Theatre while Kennedy was shot in a Ford product, a Lincoln limousine. But the master list, with nearly 104 listings, leaves these key parallels out:
* Everyone knows Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon before the end of the 1960s. Few people realize, however, that Lincoln pledged to put a man on the moon before the end of the 1860's, except with a steam-powered space ship he designed himself.
* Lincoln's father was a pioneer who built his own log cabin; Kennedy's father was a racketeer who built his own financial empire.
* Lincoln was famous for his trademark beard and Kennedy was known to have the ability to grow a beard.
* John and Abraham are both names from the Bible, even though the two were born 100 years apart!
* Lincoln was a wrestler in school and Kennedy was a wrestler in the WWF.
* Both were elected president by a majority of the voters-in the same country!
* Some people were concerned about electing Kennedy because they feared he would be pressured by the Pope. Some people were concerned about electing Lincoln because they feared his spine would be pressured by the weight of his massive body.
* Lincoln was elected in 1860 and Kennedy in 1960-both years with four digits.
* Kennedy was once apprehended in the Lincoln memorial, trying to steal all the gold buried in Lincoln's head.
* Kennedy once said Lincoln was "an inspiration." Lincoln once said Kennedy was "the nicest future-man I've ever met."
* Kennedy slept in the Lincoln bedroom, and Lincoln slept in the Lincoln bedroom.
* Lincoln fought the confederates and Kennedy fought the communists, both start with a 'C' and have the same number of letters."
Call Ripley - And cue Twilight Zone theme!
Lahti's Hear Me Now, Believe Me Never!
bam in ri
February 25, 2008 10:26 PM
No, I haven't noticed that, Mark. In fact after reading all of the above comments, I haven't noticed anyone who has posted, as you call it, slime. What I have noticed is thoughtful, intelligent and insightful comments, which is why I so much enjoy this blog. I rarely comment, but I learn much from the comments of others here.
Scott Lahti
February 26, 2008 12:34 AM
bam -
I have a feeling the offending comment(s) was/were removed by Rod, who's usually, given time to catch his breath, fairly Argus-eyed in policing his beat the better to bust skulls when lowlifes come round seeking a rumble. Once in a while during my decade selling books and music in Borders stores, a customer would by his behavior befoul what he mistook for a commons, in the mistaken belief that he was in a "public" place and entitled to do pretty much as he pleased. Ascending levels of the old vaudeville yank-pole came in orders to leave, a gathering storm of intimidating united-front solidarity, a la the close of Tod Browning's FREAKS (minus daggers), of office-emerging managers and beefier staffers (men too!) providing the encircling hint, then, worst case, dispatch of lawn-forcement.
Compared to retail melodrama thus, deletion of cretinous comments as this blog witnesses anon and again, is Ralph Kramden's "mere bag of shells..."
[lucky we didn't say anything about the dirty *knife*...]
The Watcher
February 26, 2008 12:10 PM
Just being a political opponent of the Clintons is hazard enough. Even their 'friends' tend to end up dead.
The term "Arkancide" wasn't invented as a joke. It refers to things like suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe.
Scott Lahti
February 26, 2008 2:30 PM
"...like suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe." - The Watcher
Even tougher to pull off (as it were) than the proverbial "pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps". Just *try* the latter sometime - not so easy after all, eh, Horatio?
I used to hear that Abe Lincoln was born in the log cabin he helped his dad build...
Marian Neudel
February 26, 2008 4:17 PM
..."suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe...." Yeah, I always thought the Lizzie Borden killings were a murder-suicide.
Mrs. Pringle
February 26, 2008 5:07 PM
Gilbert & Sullivan have it covered:
And so we straight let out on bail A convict from the county jail, Whose head was next On some pretext Condemned to be mown off, And made him Headsman, for we said, "Who's next to be decapited Cannot cut off another's head Until he's cut his own off, His own off, his own off, Until he's cut his own off."
Mrs. Pringle
Mrs. Pringle
February 26, 2008 5:10 PM
Actually, a lot of you we're-a-nation-of-sluts types might like the beginning of that song:
Our great Mikado, virtuous man, When he to rule our land began, Resolved to try A plan whereby Young men might best be steadied. So he decreed, in words succinct, That all who flirted, leered or winked (Unless connubially linked), Should forthwith be beheaded, Beheaded, beheaded, Should forthwith be beheaded. And I expect you'll all agree That he was right to so decree. And I am right, And you are right, And all is right as right can be!
Mrs. Pringle
bam in ri
February 28, 2008 12:02 AM
Thanks, Scott! Yes, after I posted my response, I realized that perhaps Rod had deleted a slimey comment!
My apologies, then, to Mark Shea.
Scott Lahti
March 1, 2008 12:58 AM
bam:
Neither do *I* condemn thee: go, and *Shea* no more*
*After John 8:11, Monty Python's "Nudge, Nudge" sketch, and Foster "Hic" Brooks...I'm tempted quote to John *7*:11 as well, but I can do that any time of the day or night, it being a Convenient Store of sacred wisdom...
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.
Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.
Subscribe
Sign Up: Receive Crunchy Con in your in-box every day
I'd like to think that if a Sirhan-like assassin killed Obama for being an apostate that our country wouldn't be the one torn apart.
Well said, Rod.
I have no affection for the Clintons, and I've lost all my respect for President Bush, but they deserve a lot of credit and respect for putting themselves and their families in danger because of their public service.
Sometimes when I hear about what the Bush twins, or Chelsea Clinton, are doing, I genuinely feel concerned. It wouldn't be that hard for some nutcase or some terrorist to strike at them. I'm so glad that nothing like that has happened.
On a larger scale, I work near a statehouse, the meeting place for the general assembly in the capital of my state. It's amazing to me how easy it would be for someone with a grudge to cause tremendous damage. There's nominal security, and anyone who wanted to could probably enter with a firearm, or a suicide vest. Frankly, it wouldn't be that hard for someone to do what Timothy McVeigh did in Oklahoma. Imagine if someone wishing to do America, or some specific politician, harm, realized how easy it was. They don't need to use airplanes. America is very unprotected.
What a depressing thought to begin the week. Thanks, Rod!
Much as I dislike George Bush I do think it is a bit naff that he will not get secret service protection for life. Presidents make enemies and even if they didn't there are plenty of nuts to worry about.
I assume it was a decision between letting most everybody in before Barack started speaking, or screening everyone and having Barack speak to an auditorium that was 1/3 full.
I arrived about 11 a.m., and was directed to the end of the line, which by then was at the very top (rooftop) level of the parking garage. It took us about 1-1/2 hours to get to the doors, because my camera shows that I took pictures/video of Barack entering the stadium about 1:13 p.m., and I got to a seat less than 10 minutes before he made his entrance.
I, too, was very surprised that they just let us in , cameras, bags, purses, bulky clothes and all - with not one bit of searching or scanning. It pleasantly reminded me of the old days when you could attend events like these without feeling like you were at the airport in Frankfort, Germany.
It was probably an unwise decision to forego security measures, but it was nice.
I too have fears about Obama's safety. Part of that I'm sure is based upon the fringe everywhere discovering more than ever before they can destroy it for everyone else with a little violence.
There's also some concern on my part by deepness of the feelings of some I interact with on Obama. Everything from my relatives in Lousisana going for the Republican candidate after a lifetime of yellow dawg democratitis because they don't see the nation ready for a black or woman President to comments like "Obama, the end of the United States as we know it" from folks I assumed were non-political.
It is a concern.
Funny you should include Hillary. It's fairly well-known here in Beltway-land that more than one White House Secret Service agent had to "take one for the president" during the previous administration; seems the first 'lady' threw household items at him on a fairly regular basis.
I am, in pretty equal measure, afraid FOR Obama and afraid OF him.
The 9/11 attacks brought us together as a country
Interesting that you should say that. It seems to me that it brought us together for a little while -- pretty much until the president's "they did it because they hate freedom" speech. After that those of us who wanted to consider any more complex causes were called unpatriotic America-haters. Not much togetherness after that.
Mrs. Pringle
Let's not mince words- the Presidency is an extremely dangerous job.
Thus far, forty-two men have been President of the United States.
Four of them (Lincoln, Garfield, McKinley and Kennedy) have been murdered. Two more (Teddy Roosevelt and Reagan) survived being shot.
Gerald Ford was nearly shot twice in 1974. Harry Truman was nearly shot by Puerto Rican terrorists. Franklin Roosevelt was nearly murdered before taking office in 1933.
Need I point out that all of the above were white males?
I do not make light of the dangers that would face a President Obama, because the Presidency is and long has been a very dangerous job. Firemen and astronauts don't face such high casualty rates.
Would Barack Obama be in greater danger than other Presidents? Marginally, perhaps. But there's no doubt that Rod is right. if Obama might be elected by a landslide, but if he were shot or killed while in office, America would get NO credit in any circles for electing him in the first place. We'd only be blasted worldwide as a racist society that collectively murdered a black man.
All the more reason for the Secret Service to take every reasonable (and practically every UNreasonable) precaution.
Someone needs to be fired on Obama's campaign staff for so pressuring the Secret Service.
Given all the threats out there, his safety comes before TV visuals, and even the (understandable) frustration of his supporters.
The risk, of course, exists.
But I'm not sure why everyone is dwelling on it right now. It's a worse case scenario, but one best not imagined, unless your line of work is ensuring the safety of elected officials and candidates.
It amazes me, this strain of anxiety I've sensed in Americans since 9/11. I was studying abroad that year, so I didn't really catch the anxiety bug that was going around at home. In Germany, the villagers banded together in support of our little American colony. There were vigils. There was anxiety and fear until everyone could reach their loved ones. But not a sense of over-arching fear. And don't tell me Europe wasn't under attack - they've dealt with terrorist attacks since the '70s, and have been targeted a number of times since 9/11.
Contrast, if you will, the British reaction to the bus bombings to our reaction to 9/11. Yes, we had a lot more casualties, but even so, the Brits pasted signs everywhere saying, "We're NOT afraid." Everywhere. Little kids were doing them up in elementary schools. People stopped and interviewed on street corners insisted they would not let the attacks make them live in fear. Everyone was rattled, and shocked, but there was a hard resolve and determination behind it.
Maybe part of the reason I didn't understand the rush to war in Iraq is because I didn't understand the anxiety over WMD. I figured we'd attack, but probably just airstrikes. I didn't understand the fear imperative that motivated Americans.
Why do you guys think we Americans are so anxious, even seven attack-free years after 9/11, even after reasonable efforts have been made and a few unreasonable ones as well, to address terrorism? What's missing here?
The chances of anyone one of us or even one our loved ones being injured in a terrorist attack, are slim to nil, even if, God forbid, it happens again. You do whatever you can to address risks, and you rest confident in the fact that you've made the best decisions you could at the time.
Foreigners have had a lot of trouble understanding the American reaction to 9/11, but that's because they don't grasp what it's like to grow up in a country whose soil has not been attacked by foreigners since 1812. Wellllll, not exactly--there was, of course, Pearl Harbor, and a couple of other bombings of US soil at roughly the same time. And of course, Southerners had the experience of invasion and then some, and have been a very different culture from the rest of us as a result. But we all--even Southerners, I suspect--felt we were, and deserved to be, immune to the miscellaneous warfare that afflicts the rest of the world, until 9/11. By the standards of the rest of the world, we were damn lucky to have been un-bombed for as long as we were. Welcome to the human condition.
D'ja ever notice people who say slime like the above are *always* too chicken shit to write their names?
Those of a certain age may have seen enumerated the "spooky" parallels between those two ill-starred presidents, Lincoln and Kennedy, first disclosed to me, aged around 9, by a talismanic engraved Jack-looks-at-Abe penny back in the deep and ancient mists of Nixontime, shrouded in the sort of secrecy that only a plastic gumball-machine capsule affords for a quarter and a turn of the crank, e.g.,
"Lincoln's assassin shot him from a theater and fled to a warehouse.
"Kennedy's assassin shot him from a warehouse and fled to a theater.
"Lincoln's secretary, Kennedy, warned him not to got to the theatre.
"Kennedy's secretary, Lincoln, warned him not to go to Dallas.
"Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials," &c.
- though old reliable Snopes tells the pennywise credulous as always to swallow a chill pill*,
snopes.com/history/american/lincoln-kennedy.asp
*[Including this waggish snip:
"A month before Lincoln was assassinated he was in Monroe, Maryland.
A month before Kennedy was assassinated he was in Marilyn Monroe.
This is a latter-day addition to the list and nothing more than a bit of salacious humor. Even as a humorous coincidence it fails the test, as Marilyn Monroe died well over a year before Kennedy's assassination."]
I found the hitherto buried parallels elsewhere even more flesh-goosing, as supplied eight years ago this month by Jason Morrison over at The Shrubbery, viz.:
New Lincoln-Kennedy Similarities Uncovered!
by Jason Morrison
theshrubbery.com/0200/lincoln.html
"Everyone's heard of the eerie similarities between presidents Abraham Lincoln and John F. Kennedy. Some are obvious and trivial like both having seven letters in their last names and being over 6 feet tall. Some are downright creepy like Lincoln getting shot at Ford's Theatre while Kennedy was shot in a Ford product, a Lincoln limousine. But the master list, with nearly 104 listings, leaves these key parallels out:
* Everyone knows Kennedy pledged to put a man on the moon before the end of the 1960s. Few people realize, however, that Lincoln pledged to put a man on the moon before the end of the 1860's, except with a steam-powered space ship he designed himself.
* Lincoln's father was a pioneer who built his own log cabin; Kennedy's father was a racketeer who built his own financial empire.
* Lincoln was famous for his trademark beard and Kennedy was known to have the ability to grow a beard.
* John and Abraham are both names from the Bible, even though the two were born 100 years apart!
* Lincoln was a wrestler in school and Kennedy was a wrestler in the WWF.
* Both were elected president by a majority of the voters-in the same country!
* Some people were concerned about electing Kennedy because they feared he would be pressured by the Pope. Some people were concerned about electing Lincoln because they feared his spine would be pressured by the weight of his massive body.
* Lincoln was elected in 1860 and Kennedy in 1960-both years with four digits.
* Kennedy was once apprehended in the Lincoln memorial, trying to steal all the gold buried in Lincoln's head.
* Kennedy once said Lincoln was "an inspiration." Lincoln once said Kennedy was "the nicest future-man I've ever met."
* Kennedy slept in the Lincoln bedroom, and Lincoln slept in the Lincoln bedroom.
* Lincoln fought the confederates and Kennedy fought the communists, both start with a 'C' and have the same number of letters."
Call Ripley - And cue Twilight Zone theme!
Lahti's Hear Me Now, Believe Me Never!
No, I haven't noticed that, Mark. In fact after reading all of the above comments, I haven't noticed anyone who has posted, as you call it, slime. What I have noticed is thoughtful, intelligent and insightful comments, which is why I so much enjoy this blog. I rarely comment, but I learn much from the comments of others here.
bam -
I have a feeling the offending comment(s) was/were removed by Rod, who's usually, given time to catch his breath, fairly Argus-eyed in policing his beat the better to bust skulls when lowlifes come round seeking a rumble. Once in a while during my decade selling books and music in Borders stores, a customer would by his behavior befoul what he mistook for a commons, in the mistaken belief that he was in a "public" place and entitled to do pretty much as he pleased. Ascending levels of the old vaudeville yank-pole came in orders to leave, a gathering storm of intimidating united-front solidarity, a la the close of Tod Browning's FREAKS (minus daggers), of office-emerging managers and beefier staffers (men too!) providing the encircling hint, then, worst case, dispatch of lawn-forcement.
Compared to retail melodrama thus, deletion of cretinous comments as this blog witnesses anon and again, is Ralph Kramden's "mere bag of shells..."
[lucky we didn't say anything about the dirty *knife*...]
Just being a political opponent of the Clintons is hazard enough. Even their 'friends' tend to end up dead.
The term "Arkancide" wasn't invented as a joke. It refers to things like suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe.
"...like suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe." - The Watcher
Even tougher to pull off (as it were) than the proverbial "pulling yourself up by your own bootstraps". Just *try* the latter sometime - not so easy after all, eh, Horatio?
I used to hear that Abe Lincoln was born in the log cabin he helped his dad build...
..."suicides where the person chops his own head off with an axe...." Yeah, I always thought the Lizzie Borden killings were a murder-suicide.
Gilbert & Sullivan have it covered:
And so we straight let out on bail
A convict from the county jail,
Whose head was next
On some pretext
Condemned to be mown off,
And made him Headsman, for we said,
"Who's next to be decapited
Cannot cut off another's head
Until he's cut his own off,
His own off, his own off,
Until he's cut his own off."
Mrs. Pringle
Actually, a lot of you we're-a-nation-of-sluts types might like the beginning of that song:
Our great Mikado, virtuous man,
When he to rule our land began,
Resolved to try
A plan whereby
Young men might best be steadied.
So he decreed, in words succinct,
That all who flirted, leered or winked
(Unless connubially linked),
Should forthwith be beheaded,
Beheaded, beheaded,
Should forthwith be beheaded.
And I expect you'll all agree
That he was right to so decree.
And I am right,
And you are right,
And all is right as right can be!
Mrs. Pringle
Thanks, Scott! Yes, after I posted my response, I realized that perhaps Rod had deleted a slimey comment!
My apologies, then, to Mark Shea.
bam:
Neither do *I* condemn thee: go, and *Shea* no more*
*After John 8:11, Monty Python's "Nudge, Nudge" sketch, and Foster "Hic" Brooks...I'm tempted quote to John *7*:11 as well, but I can do that any time of the day or night, it being a Convenient Store of sacred wisdom...
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.