The Obama-as-Muslim photo
From a strictly Machiavellian point of view, this photo is brilliant politics. It doesn't matter that it does not, in fact, show Barack Obama revealing his inner Muslim. What it does is strike a resonant chord within voters who, however...
Reason #487 why I will vote 3rd party if Hillary is the D nominee.
The Dragon is furious. For she knows her time is short.
This really does remind me of a sort of scorched earth policy. There's *nothing* behind it but malice. It will only hurt her with the Dem party, who are far and away going to be the people most sensitive to the pure racism at work in this little smear. So she's actually just hurt her chances of beating him next week. But it's like she doesn't even care about winning anymore. She just wants to display her spite and go down hissing. What a vicious, repellent woman.
The Willie Horton story originally came from the Gore campaign, but most people nowadays would probably tell you that Bush's people invented it. If this story lingers into the general election, it'll probably similarly be blamed on the GOP.
The Clinton campaign is utterly debased. But if she hadn't done this, the GOP would have eventually (already has-- Mitt's "Osama/Obama" comment, etc.)
As I mentioned on my blog...is it just me, or does he look like Hadji from Johnny Quest? And with his proficiency at magically charming audiences...I'm just saying.
I think I've been discounting, Pauline Kael-like, (a) the willingness of people to believe Obama is Muslim and (b) how hostile their reaction is. My daughter, who's a nurse, comes into contact with more and more various people day-to-day than I do, and she insists that it's widespread. So it's possible this sort of thing could actually hurt Obama in the general election (if he's the nominee).
Mac, I've had several conversations with people who believe that, and who will not be dissuaded. I've also been hearing the "Manchurian candidate" them, e.g., the woman who said to me the other day, "Obama just came out of nowhere." I pointed out that that's not true, and explained why it wasn't true. She refused to budge.
I must say, what is it with Democrats and dorky photographs? Dukakis, Kerry, now Obama.
It's campaign-killer if used properly by the Republicans, who have long-ago learned that charges of racism affect their candidates like water affects a duck. One of the reasons the Democrats keep getting surprised is that they use attacks that would kill a fellow Democrat against Republicans, forgetting that one of the reasons that people become Republican is that they hold the Democrats' sensitivities in contempt. Calling a Republican a racist will usually bring out 4 votes for every 1 lost for the Republican.
What surprises me is that Obama, who is nothing if not a savvy politician (unlike his wife who is regarded by her colleagues as the archetypal affirmative-action baby and a genuine liability), would let himself get caught doing something so incredibly stupid and guaranteed to feed the unconcious (and often conscious) fears that his very name creates.
All in all, from a strategic point of view, this last week has been the worst nightmare for the Obama campaign and may prove to be the time when the end began. Properly used this stuff will render him unelectable in the fall.
Mama Obama put her foot in her mouth giving the Republicans a great attack ad that is almost impossible to answer.
The New York Times shot itself and the rest of mainstream media in the head with that stupid story that no freshman journalism student would have written. (I wondered where the editorial staff of the Weekly World News was going to go when that august journal folded. Now I know.)
And now Obama has virtually changed his name to Osama for real in the minds of lots of people who see that picture. And, by November, everyone who is not physically blind will have seen it somewhere.
Grrr. Between this and her latest need to use sarcasm in order to buttress her own stance (celestial heavens?), I am fast considering changing parties if she wins the nomination. She isn't only insulting him, she's insulting anyone who allows themself to be inspired by the thought of something greater than old school politics. It's clearly not just Obama that people love, it's what he is attempting to stand for, so to my view, she's insulting hope. HOW can anyone be one over by someone who needs to invoke cynicism in order to prove their point?!
He does look like Hadji from Johnny Quest.
I want Teddy Kennedy dressed as a lepruchuan, singing in Spanish of his heartfelt love for another 2 fingers of Johnny Walker Blue(no ice, of course).
I am not suprised. Obama will happily play dress up Muslim, but won't salute the flag nor stand at attention during the SBB nor wear a simple flag pin.
Are we beginning to see what he's all about? America is bad, multi culti diversity nonsense is a good.
PLEASE, DEMS-NOMINATE THIS MAN!
Bugg is the kind of voter this nonsense panders to.
Drudge notes G.W. Bush and all the Clintons wearing local costumes at one time or another (scroll down a bit): http://www.drudgereport.com/flashoa.htm
Zach: there's your Republican dorky photo.
HOW can anyone be one over by someone who needs to invoke cynicism in order to prove their point?!
--How can anyone that is not already a cynic vote for a Democrat?
How can anyone that is not already a cynic vote for a Democrat?
-I don't buy that. Hope doesn't fall across a party line--policy does. Hopeful and inspired people can easily disgree about the best way to manifest their values.
Blah Blah. I've heard all that "hope" stuff from Obama... How much "hope" will he bring to the millions of babies that are murdered every year in this country?
Honestly, I look at the photo and don't see what the big deal is. I find it endearing, and I'm not an Obama-ite. It looks to me like he's someone willing to adopt the local customs of wherever he's visiting. What's wrong with that?
This is a tangent, but among Chrisitan missionaries in the 1800's, there were a small number who endeavored to leave behind their Western culture and live like the native peoples. The most famous was Hudson Taylor in China. He dressed as a Chinese, not out of condescension, but out of respect. His missionary work among them was very successful, and didn't require the Chinese people to adopt Western culture in order to become Christians. (No, I'm not comparing Obama to the messiah.)
I think after 8 years of Bush it will be wonderful to have a president who isn't afraid to show respect for other cultures. Imagine the impact worldwide if, in order to reach out to the Muslim world, he dresses like a Muslim on occasion? The man has chosen to identify himself as a Christian, so for people to accuse him of being a secret Muslim is ridiculous. If people are that shallow, as to react to this photo, then that's their problem, not his.
The Obama campaign has provided a persuasive explanation about this photo. One of his foreign-policy advisers (a retired AF general) accompanied Obama when this photo was taken in Kenya in 2006 and has explained that donning this costume was merely a courtesy to local custom. If the Clinton people really were serious about making this photo a campaign issue, then it shows just how desperate they truly ARE :-( Don't expect John McCain to traffic in this filth.
Let's hope the fall campaign focuses primarily on the governing philosophies of McCain and Obama and on their "track records." It may not be the surest way to win an election, but it is the only way for either side to win a mandate.
What is the proof Clinton staffers have anything to do with this beyond the drudgereport?
If this is really an election of "change" which all three candidates seem to be preaching, then let's hope that this picture isn't smeared at Obama by either Clinton or McCain. I think the one thing that the young people don't like to see (me being one of them) is the smear campaigns. It makes the population apathetic. Personally, i'd rather see someone win because of their ideas, rather than lack of integrity.
p.s. Plus Kenya is largely Christian and has the largest Quaker population of any country. Only 10% of the population is Muslim. People will be pretty stupid if they don't check the facts before claiming something about a picture.
Ho hum. Yawn. American politics as usual...
Maclin's and Rod's comments, anecdotal as they are, point to the primary issue: there are enough Americans voters who will be swayed by this nonsense. It's not about getting them to vote for your platform, it's about getting them to vote against the bogeyman.
[They are] interested in two things and two things only: making you afraid of it and telling you who's to blame for it. That, ladies and gentlemen, is how you win elections.
-- "The American President", Aaron Sorkin
Chance:
Agree that there is no place for smears like this Obama-as-Muslim photo. Do you feel the same way about the way the NY Times tried to smear McCain last week with the "lady lobbyist" story?
Daniel-
As opposed to change and hope and all that high-minded substance Obama offers? And stuff which he mostly lifted whole cloth form The Man From Hope's 1992 campaign. Which as to be extra galling to the Clintons-they know it, but cannot say it, because it would acknowledge how empty and hollow that "agent for change" campaign was.The Clintons are getting ebat with their own 16-year old empty slogans and focus group-tested nonsense.
Obama as a candidate offers nothing more than happytalk and fluff. When you point that out, you're called a racist. Got it!
I know-how uncouth and uncool to expect the president to respect and honor this country, it'a flag and it's anthem.
I am certainly not a supporter of B. Hussein Obama but this is a non-starter. I mean it's not as if he'd kissed the Koran or prayed facing Mecca. Then again he's not running for pope....
Were his name O'Bama, I'd expect to see him in a kilt playing the uillean pipes.
His crypto-mohammedanism is not so much to be feared as the strident anti-Americanism in which he was raised. (see today's Spengler at Asia Times).
the Clintons are beginning to remind me of Napoleon at Waterloo. Saddled with doubts, age, etc, supporters beginning to tire of them, I think they may have finally met their Wellington, in the form of Obama. Too many political wars, scandels, ruthlessness behavior, etc. I just wish there was a St Helena to keep both of these to Machiavellian schemers locked away from the rest of us.
"See, the Clintons really will do just about anything to win"
But with your re=posting of the photo and your just happening to mention that Obama's middle name is the same as the last name of the late Iraqi dictator, can it not be said that Rod Dreher "will do just about anything to" perpetuate the myth?
Yup, no "fearmongering GOP attacks this fall" there, eh?
Who knew all the Quakers were in Kenya?!
Sowing their wild oats. Bwahahahahahaha!
Stick a fork in the Clinton campaign. It's done. When this is all they have left, turn out the lights.
As to the Obama-is-a-secret-Muslim hoax, my own experience is that can crop up in very surprising places. I've had to rebut it in my conversations with an otherwise strongly-liberal Democrat, of all things.
Wow. So now a Kenyan kikoi = "Muslim" clothes? Obama is actually dressed almost exactly the same as an Ethiopian Orthodox Christian priest...
But I know (and am ashamed) that seventy-plus per cent of Americans would look at this photo and think that Obama is wearing "Muslim" clothing. Why are we so willfully ignorant?
Though to be fair, there are plenty of Middle Easterners out there who think that suit + tie = "Christian" clothes.
Reminds me of those junior high year book photos : P
The Willie Horton story originally came from the Gore campaign
That itself is a myth. Bob Somerby has discussed that GOP falsehood many times. Go over to dailyhowler.com and do a site search. For example, Somerby covered it on 11/1/02 as follows:
In one of 45 Dem debates that year, Candidate Gore challenged Candidate Dukakis to defend a Massachusetts furlough program under which convicts serving life sentences without hope of parole were released on weekend passes. In particular, Gore noted that two furloughed prisoners had committed new murders while on weekend leave. (Willie Horton was not one of these convicts.) The program was almost impossible to defend. But Gore only mentioned the program once, and he never mentioned any prisoner’s name; never mentioned any prisoner’s race; never ran any TV ads on the topic; and never used any visuals. More specifically, he never named Willie Horton, or mentioned his specific crime (Horton committed a brutal rape while on leave). In the Bush-Dukakis general election, the Bush campaign—and an independent, pro-Bush group—made extensive use of the Horton incident. In particular, the independent group used visuals of Horton which seemed to emphasize his race (he was black).
Jay Leno just tagged this item in his monologue, noting that in response, the Obama campaign released one of Senator Clinton, in *her* traditional garb:
www.esoterically.net/weblog/wp-content/uploads/2006/11/wicked-witch.jpg
Um, sj, I'm not sure you made the point you wanted to.
So Willie Horton was not the worst case of all the convicts leaving on weekend furloughs and committing crimes? You mean there were others who committed murder, and not "just" a brutal rape?
Are you aware of how many families of murder victims tried to talk Dukakis out of allowing this, and he gave them a cold (but liberal) shoulder?
Tell me, sj, do you agree that this furlough program was a bad idea? Do you think there was something wrong with the Republicans using it as an issue? And are they only allowed to make an issue of this if the convict happens to be white, because anything else is racism?
"And are they only allowed to make an issue of this if the convict happens to be white, because anything else is racism?"
How about using it--and even using the specific case of this convict--*without* showing see-the-scary-looking-black-guy videos?
"How about using it--and even using the specific case of this convict--*without* showing see-the-scary-looking-black-guy videos?"
Because its TELEVISION! The Horton story was not one of abstracts. It was THAT scary guy that the the gov. let out again.
To call the Horton ad racist is to say that we can't look at the particulars of violent crime in the USA if the criminal is black.
Dukakis let Horton out...
Horton raped again...
The GOP pointed this out...
And in the liberal cosmos, the GOP is the bad guy here!
ROFL!
James hit this right on the head. This is no different than the cretins who went beating up and shooting Sikhs right after 9/11 because they **thought** they were Muslims.
And Scott Lahti hits it right on the head with the ever-so-enlightened, ever-so-tolerant, ever-so-wanting-to-help-people Hillary Clinton using this as a desperate campaign tactic.
Wow, great of the author to post little elliptical note in his article that conservative voters *shouldn't* let a total falsehood get in the way of using fear to motivate voters. Wow, that's so big of you! You're one of the good guys. Oh, wait, you're not.
Thanks for showing us a tiny bit of the inherent racism in the GOP. Christians don't judge others. Unless they're poor and black!
This is total b.s. and a waste of energy. How is it different from the pictures of Hillary and Chelsea wearing saris during their trip to India, except that they looked pretty good in the saris? How is it different from W in his perennial cowboy hat? By the same token, I was disimpressed by Obama's response to the hoohah. Why couldn't he just say "I was honored to wear the costume of my ancestors" and let it go at that?
It's over for Hillary. I take comfort in the fact that this is a "change" election no matter who wins. I like McCain, and I am willing to give Obama a chance and plan to check out his positions carefully before making a final decision. I'm sad for Hillary, though.
Your objection to the likely reaction of conservative voters is weak, as though you're happy about the probable result (that they will be mobilized against Obama), yet wish to maintain a congenial Christian opposition to bigotry. Conservatives have been playing the "Hussein" anti-Muslim card for months. But the fact that this appears to have surfaced from the Clinton camp makes it newsworthy for you. I would have hoped for a more prophetic stand explaining the principles of your opposition, noted only in passing, to this kind of reaction which is antithetic of the Gospel.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.