Crunchy Con

Barack Obama's Jeremiah Wright problem

Thursday March 13, 2008

Categories: Democrats

"Hillary ain't never been called a n---er!" So says the buffoonish Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Barack Obama's spiritual father, in this pretty startling video clip of a sermon. You really have to see this to believe it:

I said that Jeremiah Wright was going to become a big issue for Barack Obama, but I didn't think it would happen so soon. With the release of this video, that time has probably arrived.

Politico describes Wright in this video as "deeply racially confrontational." Which might be an understatement. He rants and rails against "rich white people who run this country," demonizes white people, calls Jesus a "poor black man" oppressed by "Italians," says that Barack Obama "ain't privileged" -- this, even though Barack and Michelle Obama are Ivy-league grads in the top two percent of Americans in income. And so forth. This Wright is a clown.

This is a moment of testing for Barack Obama. He has either got to repudiate this Rev. Wright clearly and unambiguously, or he's going to suffer for it at the polls. His previous stance, in which he said that he doesn't agree with everything Wright stands for, won't cut it this time.

To be clear, I don't believe it's fair to hold presidential candidates responsible for everything their supporters say. This is a big country, and we have a lot of religious leaders that say bizarre and objectionable things. I don't like a lot of what the fundamentalist John Hagee stands for and preaches, but I don't believe John McCain, who gratefully accepted Hagee's endorsement, is responsible for Hagee's sermons. Nor do I believe that Obama should be held responsible for what any far-out left-wing minister who supports him preaches.

But Jeremiah Wright is not just any far-out left-wing minister. He is Obama's spiritual mentor, and has been for a long time. As we've learned from Obama's biographical details, young Obama was lost and searching for an identity. His father had abandoned him, and he wasn't sure where and how he fit in to the black community. He found a father figure in Wright and a connection to the black community in Wright's church. The degree of separation between Obama and Wright, versus McCain and Hagee, is far less.

Given what Wright stands for, I believe voters are entitled to wonder what Obama sees in him that he would have a) gone to his church, and b) made him into a surrogate father. Obama no doubt has an explanation for this, and he's going to have to give it, simply as a matter of political reality.

Here's the drama, though: if Obama pulls a "Sister Souljah moment" on Wright, it's going to come across as some sort of symbolic patricide. It will be deeply painful to Obama, and uncomfortable to watch. If he attacks Wright directly, some Wright supporters are going to call him Judas. But if Obama wants to be president, what choice does he have? Obama supporters who think he can finesse this or avoid a direct confrontation with the Wright problem are deluding themselves if they think this isn't going to come back to haunt him in the fall, should he get the nomination.

True, Hillary ain't never been called a n---er, but she also ain't got a racialist, Farrakhan-loving, crypto-Marxist goof as her closest spiritual advisor. That's some baggage to carry into the fall election. Obama has this reputation of being a conciliator, an irenic figure who can move us past the divisive politics of the past. The rap on him is that beneath that 1000-megawatt smile and his massive charisma is a politician who holds views on the hard left of the mainstream US political spectrum. Fair or not, Rev. Wright's big mouth, and the paramount importance he plays in Obama's spiritual life, serve to validate that criticism.

This is a test for Obama. Let's see how he does with it.

UPDATE: A cleric has just e-mailed to agree, but adds, "Of course, if Obama really is the Messiah, we'll all look dumb."

Filed Under: Barack Obama, casting stones, Jeremiah Wright

Comments

Didn't Jesus condemn the money-lenders in the temple? Anger is not racist, and in this case is appropriate.

I am a Democrat. I found it comical, how the liberal media fell all over themselves buying a magnificent bait and switch speech from Mr. O'Bama. Instead of addressing the real question, "Why as a person, as a father much less a sitting Senator would you, could you sit in the pews for twenty years with a minister you had to know preached hate. The real question was not about how he would handle a tough question, it was more about judgement.Instead, everyone bought into this huge race relations issue. Jerrimiah Wright can preach whatever he wants to even though it disturbs me a great deal. I do think I am entitled to know if my Presidential nominee subscribes to that kind of thinkiing or if he is even comfortable sitting in the pews regardless of when the ranting takes or took place. I know I am only one voice, but this is a huge obstacle for me.

Unfortunately, only we Whites can make waves about this government or it's people. We have White preachers who have the president's ear, who preach for the destruction of other leaders of other countries. Do we feel aggrieved because of it? We have White preachers who say that we should bomb and destroy the CIA. Does our blood pressure rise? Do we talk for days and days on end about it? We have White preachers who talk racial dirty talk when speaking of Jews. We say that we worship and honor a God and His Son who settled for Jewish people as a beacon of hope. Yet we disparage them everyday.

It's simple: Whites have the right to disparage anyone and anything that they see fit. While Blacks, Browns and other have no rights that the White man is bound to respect.

The problem isn't Obama. It never was. Yes, you can point to the color of his skin and his ancestry. But, so what? How does that threaten you?

Why does it "shock" you that a Black man has fighting words for the shoddy treatment of citizens by this country?

How come that is out of bounds when an "undesirable" speaks it?

Yes, we are still all bigots. Just bigots with newer and cooler toys.

I understand all of this "White" anger.

Blacks and others should be quiet and stay in the background.

Speaking truth to power is something availed only for Whites.

Being like by White people is acceptable.

But running the country and with the Big Boys is not.

We could not find anything to dislike the kindly and intelligent Obama about.

So, we find someone he knows and runs their words over and over again through the wringer.

Yet, we won't touch Bush and Bush-lite McCain who make death and dying close and up front.

We'd rather switch the channel and change the conversation.

Real White men have bombs and propaganda.

But yet in still, we must keep those darkies down.

It's a psychological disease that we Whites have yet to tackle within ourselves.

Why are we afraid of people who have different ancestory or look to their skin?

Are we to always rise up and snuff them out one way or the other?

Even when we have our own living White monsters amongst us?

Hitler and his people too, would have preferred to snuffing those "others" than listen or have them among us or see them rise up and shine for all to see.


I am not from the U.S. but having gone through the educational system in the UK we tend to look at things a lot differently from most Americans. I have tried to gain a perspective on the Jeremiah Wright situation and came across these posts http://dymaxionq.wordpress.com/2008/06/06/reframing-african-slave-insolence-jeremiah-wright-us-presidential-politics-and-the-legacy-of-race-in-america/,http://dymaxionq.wordpress.com/2008/05/15/martin-luther-king-jr-and-jeremiah-wright-clergymen-speaking-truth-to-power/ on the blogosphere that seem to contextualize the entire row about Obama and Wright from a historical perspective.

As I said, I am not from the U.S. but we Europeans have a different perspective that goes beyond sound bite news.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?


(won't be made public)



Ad tag

Advertisement

Search

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con
Enter your email address below.