Quick, observe these daft divines before they fade away five minutes from now:
That triumphal barnburner of an Easter hymn, Jesus Christ Has Risen Today – Hallelujah, this morning will rock the walls of Toronto's West Hill United Church as it will in most Christian churches across the country.But at West Hill on the faith's holiest day, it will be done with a huge difference. The words “Jesus Christ” will be excised from what the congregation sings and replaced with “Glorious hope.”
Thus, it will be hope that is declared to be resurrected – an expression of renewal of optimism and the human spirit – but not Jesus, contrary to Christianity's central tenet about the return to life on Easter morning of the crucified divine son of God.
Generally speaking, no divine anybody makes an appearance in West Hill's Sunday service liturgy.
There is no authoritative Big-Godism, as Rev. Gretta Vosper, West Hill's minister for the past 10 years, puts it. No petitionary prayers (“Dear God, step into the world and do good things about global warming and the poor”). No miracles-performing magic Jesus given birth by a virgin and coming back to life. No references to salvation, Christianity's teaching of the final victory over death through belief in Jesus's death as an atonement for sin and the omnipotent love of God. For that matter, no omnipotent God, or god.
Ms. Vosper has written a book, published this week – With or Without God: Why the Way We Live is More Important than What We Believe – in which she argues that the Christian church, in the form in which it exists today, has outlived its viability and either it sheds its no-longer credible myths, doctrines and dogmas, or it's toast.
How on earth do people persuade themselves of such patent nonsense? The only Christianity truly failing in the world today is the kind of rationalist Christianity favored by liberal Western Christians, whose churches are dying. In fact, Pentecostalism, which is explicitly anti-rational is sweeping the world. No need to feel threatened by the Rev. Gretta and her Spong-y gang. There is no there there. She's just playing church. This is a curiosity, a freakshow ("Come one, come all, see the church where they don't believe in God!") They can't even say what they believe, because that might exclude somebody.
Honestly, what on earth is the point? Wouldn't you rather go to brunch, or stay at home watching Russert? This squirrelly bunch is like an encounter group, or an episode of Dr. Phil, without the rigor. Check in on her and her congregation in 10 years. If there is one.
Her church's slogan is "A Warm Place to Find Yourself." Get that -- yourself, not God. At least they believe in one principle: truth in advertising.
Yeah, I'm judgmental. Suck a lemon.
(Via Shea, who marvels at the knack liberal Protestantism has for making the Gospel "unutterably dull.")
UPDATE: Jesse Cone, a fellow Orthodox convert and friend from my parish, begs to differ with my judgment that the Church of Jesus Without Jesus is not a serious threat. Excerpt:
I would agree with him if West Hill United “Church” was an isolated event. Sadly it is not. Protestantism evolves with every generation, and it has already begun to morph into more subtle forms of this monstrosity. This in turn has left thoughtful Protestants with a choice - and it was this pushed me towards Orthodoxy - do I succumb to “popular monotheism” or find a tradition that is stable? Is it about community or Christ? How did these two options become so distanced?


Add to Newsvine
Comments
gnôsis must be preceded by apokalypsis.
Posted by: Eric W | March 27, 2008 1:10 PM
I agree that the church is an odd one. That said, I must disagree with one thing Mr. D mentioned: the death of the liberal protestant church.
The facts, as presented recently by the Pew study, one of the largest and most comprehensive studies yet looking into religion, says that liberal churches are NOT dying, and the growth of the conservative churches is exaggerated: they lose the same percentage of members as the liberal ones.
It also says two other things: that the fastest growing group in the US are the unafilliated/non-believer, and one of the smallest groups is the Orthodox. :)
Posted by: Maplewood | April 1, 2008 1:49 PM
WHAT MAKES A GROUP OF PEOPLE A CHURCH IS THE PRESENCE OF GOD,JESUS CHRIST AND THE HOLY SPIRIT. WE AS HUMANS MAY NOT HAVE ATTAINED GOD'S STANDARD OF RIGHTEOUSNESS BUT THE STANDARD REMAIN THE SAME.
WE HAVE ALLOWED COMPROMISE IN THE CHURCH TO MAKING IT "YOU CAN STILL BE YOUR SELF EVEN WHEN YOU SERVE GOD": WE SHOULD REMEMBER THAT NO SERVANT CAN DEFINE HIS MISSION STATEMENT TO HIS LORD RATHER THE REVERSE IS THE CASE. AS SERVANTS OF THE MOST HIGH,SERVANTHOOD REQUIRE THAT WE FOLLOW OUR MASTER WTTHOUT QUESTION; HE KNOWS THE WAY IN THE WILDERNESS.
MAY THE LORD HELP US RUN THE RACE THAT IS BEFORE US.
Posted by: ELEOJO OSAYI | April 3, 2008 5:29 AM
I see two areas that stand out: one in which she assumes polarism and one in which you make a similar assumption.
The title of her book presupposes we can divorce how we live from what we believe. One can emphasize one or the other and work in one direction or the other but the two cannot be divorced. How we live will display what we believe and if the two are not in harmony, one will have issues.
You assume when she says to come and find yourself that she's talking about ego. I assume she's talking about a healthy sense of self, that can only be found in connecting with one's Source. Therefore, there is no discrepancy between one's higher self, or spirit, and God. I am not saying we are God; I am saying that God is found within, among other places, and we cannot be true to God without being true to self also. Again, the two sides of a duality go hand-in-hand and harmony is greatly needed. Without it, we have issues.
Posted by: Seekerof1christ | April 5, 2008 12:17 PM
No church is gonna make everyone happy. I go to the Church of Religious Science and I know lots of folks think it's just a bunch of New Age ga-ga. It's not for me, and I find my particular church's Sunday blessing for all religious assemblies taking place across the metro area quite refreshing.
So maybe some people wanna meet that are more rational - GREAT! If you're not rational, then don't worry about it. Go meet with your Pentecostal folks.
My big hang-up with dogmatic Catholics, Evangelicals, and even Tom Cruise is that they're constantly condemning other faiths, other practices, and even Science. Why can't rationalism and faith be complementary?
I find religion to be beautiful whatever the metaphor or logos when it's practiced with the intent of LOVE.
One thing Ernest Holmes, the founder of Religious Science, says I love in particular: 'Tell me what you're for, not what you're against.' I for one support honest inquiry coupled with respect for life and oneself.
If we're promoting decent values, not only through our message; but through daily practice - mental, social, and physical - we can begin to address our own imperfections and make real change.
Condemning other theologies is just a release of a bunch of hot air, straight from the little egoic self. If you don't like somebody's theology, then don't attend their church.
Posted by: Brian Horan | April 8, 2008 7:24 AM
Post a Comment
Are you aware of our Rules of Conduct?