Crunchy Con

Girls

Wednesday March 26, 2008

Categories: Family
I'm sorry, but you will never, ever convince me that femininity is socially constructed. Not after the 20 minutes I spent earlier this evening. I was sitting at the table talking to Julie when Nora, who is 17 months old,...
Advertisement
Comments
Don Altabello
March 26, 2008 11:36 PM

Don't you know Rod, that even at that age, from the moment of birth even, the parents are suggesting every one of these actions to their baby daughters:) lol.

Karl Thienes
March 27, 2008 12:52 AM

My daughter does the same thing. Of course, now that she is 3, she thinks daddy is going to also buy her new clothes all the time.

Kevin Divine
March 27, 2008 1:01 AM

Just wait till she starts to "match" outfits on her own. That's a real hoot.

David
March 27, 2008 1:21 AM

I treat my baby daughter rather differently than what I did for my son - put her baby doll in front of her and say "kiss?" and she kisses the doll and I smile. Started very early like that. Maybe she learned fast that if she kissed the doll it would make me happy, things like that.

gadje
March 27, 2008 3:52 AM

God forbid dreher and his wife ever have a tomboy, or a boy who likes to play dress-up.

Karen
March 27, 2008 4:08 AM

All I know is, I had a little boy. At no point did I, or anyone I know, ever use 'pretty' to describe him, or any outfits we put on him, from the time he was born. It was cute, or such a 'big boy', etc.

On the other hand, my niece was cooed over and told she was such a 'pretty thing' from birth. And almost everything she was given, words like 'pretty' or 'precious' or 'sweet'. *chuckle*

Now, if other people were different and were talking about your 'big, strapping girl' and your 'precious little sweetie' of a boy, then that'd be pretty unusual.

Salamander
March 27, 2008 7:15 AM

Karen, my 2nd daughter was a big, sturdy, rambunctious baby and toddler, and she had almost no hair until age 2 so people always assumed she was a boy...I used to hear "What a little linebacker you have there!" and "He's all boy!" from people. She hated clothes and always wore as little as possible, preferably old, worn things that people gave us, so perhaps that accounted for some of the confusion.

Anyway, my "tomboy" did indeed love mud, sticks, climbing and wrestling, and she to this day she can take on any boy her age and win, but from the time she could walk she LOVED shoes (in fact, she used to rip off all of her clothes, but insisted on wearing shoes - the fancier the better!) and she never went anywhere without putting on her beads, tiara and handbag.

She's 5 now and gets VERY insulted if anyone calls her a tomboy, in spite of her pronounced tomboy tendencies.

(My mother tells me I was much the same way, and insisted on wearing party dresses and patent-leather Mary Janes when I went in the woods to play Mud War with the boys. I'm still a girly tomboy, myself!).

My oldest girl is SUCH a girly-girl it's ridiculous (despite my efforts to form her into a tomboy) and my littlest one's first word, I kid you not, was "shoe."

Daniel
March 27, 2008 7:51 AM

Oh, I think femininity and masculinity are both socially constructed. Still, it is amazing how early they pick up the cues about their gender cues and how they play out. As my daughters get older (both are in high school), it's interesting to see how they wrestle with those gender cues and decide what clothes they will wear, how much make-up (if any), how they cut their hair, how they interact with men.

DeeAnn
March 27, 2008 8:01 AM

I think there are elements of both what I would call "born-in" gender traits and cues. My church teaches the following and I believe it is very true:

All human beings—male and female—are created in the image of God. Each is a beloved spirit son or daughter of heavenly parents, and, as such, each has a divine nature and destiny. Gender is an essential characteristic of individual premortal, mortal, and eternal identity and purpose.

Adam
March 27, 2008 8:46 AM

("Pwitty")

Awesome. My daughter just turned three. This past Easter after church she was wearing her new pink Easter dress, white shoes, bows in hair, the works, playing with her brother's Tonka bulldozer in the sandbox out back, driving it back and forth over a Batman action figure.

"Squish!" she said. "God help me!" said I.

Once again, awesome.

Rod Dreher
March 27, 2008 9:09 AM

Both our boys, from very, very early, played with "guns." We didn't expose them to cowboys and Indians TV, or military TV, but I swear, they could make a gun out of anything. And would. It was amusingly stereotypical. It kind of freaks Julie out to hear them talking about guns and explosions and stuff, but I tell her that's just boys. It's bred in the bone.

Sarah in Maryland
March 27, 2008 9:51 AM

My niece, who is 4, is extremely girly and only wears pink and only wears skirts. She tells me, "You'd look pretty if you wore a skirt, too!" At the same time, she is rough and tumble and tomboyish outdoors. Her mom, on the other hand, is a total tomboy. Her mom never wears pink. I was the same way as a girl, a "girly tomboy" as some other commenter pointed out.

Boys and girls, men and women *are* different. We have science to prove it as well as a lot of parents who'd weigh in on the matter. Why is it so terrible?

Irenaeus
March 27, 2008 9:52 AM

Good thing you're not president of Harvard.

Sally
March 27, 2008 9:53 AM

I had the first child--a girl-- one my side of the family. My sisters were determined to make her 'gender nuetral'. They gave her trucks as toys, primary colored outfits, etc. She couldn't have cared less. She too loved shoes, would only wear dresses, and played with dolls. Her brother also wasn't too into trucks, cars etc. Of course he also only has girl cousins and a sister, but he's always had plenty of neighborhood boys to hang with. They would all build a fort, but they'd let the girls in. So I agree that it is partly inherent, but also some socialization. Personality plays a big part too. Not all boys are "hale fellow, well met" types and not all girls want to talk on the phone all day.

Steve
March 27, 2008 9:54 AM

It is amazing how people can not see what is right in front of them. If you really watch your kids and other people's kids its clear that boys and girls are different, even when parents try to force them down the opposite path. I think that the bulk of science through the recent past supports that there are differences in the way the female and male brains tend to function. These are not absolutes and do not imply absolute superiority in one area over another. I too, spent years trying to get my daughter to not worry about how she looked and not use makeup. I gave up and now we are both happier.

Steve

Anne
March 27, 2008 9:56 AM

My only daughter has always been a rough and tumble sort, from the time she was very little. I was never a girly girl myself, so I gladly encouraged her to be herself, dressed her in pants rather than frilly dresses, etc.

The one exception to this was that she loved to wear hats (the fancier/frillier/girlier the better) and loved purses and any kinds of bags. I can remember her, younger than 2, "packing" up an old purse of mine with her stuff (rocks, toys, balls), putting on a hat, and pointing at the door like she was ready to go.

She just turned 10 and she's still like this. Rough houses with her younger brothers, likes to play in the mud, is as graceful as an elephant, yet every Sunday morning before Mass she puts on her fanciest little girl dress, frilliest hat, and packs her little purse with coins for the collection, chapstick, some of her favorite sea shells, and yes, sometimes a rock or two still!

I do not know what to make of this, but I find it endearing that she's still doing the same things she did at 2 years old. Only she's a lot bigger now. :)

watsy
March 27, 2008 10:05 AM

I think that a person is born with a unique personality and temperament, and as long as our child meets our socially constructed expectations, we're all happy.

I'm glad that my boy is a boy's boy. His first words were "ball and truck." I gave him a doll to play with once. He looked at it and tossed it over his shoulder.

My girls LOVE clothes, shoes, jewelry, & animals. They've never liked baby dolls. They prefer stuffed animals to be the babies. They can't throw or catch a ball like my son despite quite a bit of practice, nor do they really care.

Why does this make me so happy? Because I want my children to have things easy in life. I don't want kids teasing my son and saying that he's gay. I want the other little girls to be nice and like my little girls. I want them to have friends.

I was a tomboy when I was little. I could catch and hit a ball with the best of those little boys. I loved playing sports with my brothers. I never really, truly, understood why I didn't have many friends in elementary school until I became a parent of the girly girls. I had a couple of pretty painful years in elementary school. I don't let my mind go back there too often.

Yes, I'm glad that my kids are smart. I'm glad that they fit our stereotypical expectations. Those things I can't control, and if I try to control that, I'll damage their being. I focus my energy in areas where I think that I can make a difference by directing my conversation in a way that makes them more aware of others, and hopefully, kinder and more caring people. It doesn't always work. My boy's boy doesn't like the boy who he thinks might be gay. My girly girls prefer to be around the girls who can do the cartwheels. I'm sure that they'll have painful times in their life, but they'll always be accepted by society.

Then there's my brother-in-law who's been out of the closet for 30 some years. He's in group therapy. He's starting to work through his pain.

Kimberly
March 27, 2008 10:22 AM

That is a cute story about Nora :) I used to absolutely hate girly things - never wore pink, never wore jewelry (still don't have pierced ears or wear any jewelry other than my wedding ring), and never liked to cheerlead on the playground. My sisters, on the other hand, LOVED plastic jewelry and dressing up, got their ears pierced as soon as the parents would allow it, always wore dresses, and so forth. I'm convinced I'm going to be stuck with that if I have a girl, just as God's joke on me. Well, I can deal with it, but I will draw the line at dolls. Stuffed animals are great, but I don't want tons of naked, creepy-eye dolls laying around the house!

Oh yes, my brothers just liked to wrestle, do sports, fight, and everything else. I always used to be their partner to throw the football around. I did eventually decide I can like dresses all right, though :)

Loudon is a Fool
March 27, 2008 10:29 AM

I'm with Daniel, empirical evidence notwithstanding. If you're not oppressing your daughter with your outdated concepts of femininity and giving secret cues to your sons to break and destroy, it can only mean that Harvey Mansfield is sneaking into your home at night to whisper subliminal messages to your children: "Hats are pretty . . . don't wear white after Labor Day." I mean, what else could it be? There's really no other explanation. Is there?

Joseph
March 27, 2008 11:11 AM

Do you think there any aspect to masculinity or femininity that is socially constructed?

Ed J
March 27, 2008 11:13 AM

Whatever gender-specific cues we give our babies (pink or blue clothes, dolls or truck toys) we give because our history and experience have taught us the ways in which girls and boys tend to differ.

This is not a social construction of femininity or masculinity, but a respectful and considerate acknowledgment of them.

TGScott
March 27, 2008 11:14 AM

That's adorable, Ron. My husband and I don't have children, but he admits he'd be a sucker for a baby girl. He thinks little girls can do no wrong. I told him, "Yeah, actually we do. We're just more devious about it." One case in point: A little girl asked her daddy as they were going down the road, "Daddy, can I write on my hand with the ink pen?" He said, "No, you may not." She said, "But I was going to write, "I love Daddy."" See what I mean? She was using her feminine wiles to try to bend him to her way of thinking. LOL

Daniel
March 27, 2008 11:24 AM

we give because our history and experience have taught us the ways in which girls and boys tend to differ.

It's a chicken or egg argument. Arguably, transgender people support the notion that gender isn't socially constructed but that at it innate. OTOH, are girls/women more nurturing because it is innate and biological, or because they are constantly thrust into that role? Are men natural hunters/gatherers or is it because they are usually thrust into that rule.

I'm fascinated by the number of self-professed "tomboys" who tried to discourage traditional femininity in their daughters and who view "girly" as negative. That's arguably as fascinating as why little girls are drawn to frilly clothes that they want to show off to dad.

Max Schadenfreude
March 27, 2008 11:44 AM

All I know is that if I'm subjected to more that 15 minutes of Good Morning America or The Oprah Show, I want to pluck my eyes out and shove pencils into my ears to relieve the pain.

Karen Brown
March 27, 2008 11:48 AM

Or it could be that parents tend to introduce children to things they like, and not introduce things they do not like. After all, we have to buy the toys and often have to play with them, so why deliberately make sure you're playing with stuff you aren't interested in? The children will insist when they really like it anyway.

Myself, good thing I had a boy. Out of four girls, my mother, who was not trying to be gender neutral in the slightest, ended up with only one girly girl. The other choice isn't always a tomboy.

My oldest sister just wasn't into dolls. She liked to read and LOTS of talking, and music. The second, she was the 'tomboy'. I was the bookworm, and only the last girl was the type who wanted to play dressup, and dolls and such. Just the way it worked out.

I remember that my mom tried to give each of us Barbie dolls. And how each reacted. My oldest sister? She played a little, but mostly ignored it. The tomboy? She was insulted, and had wanted something to do with sports. (Oddly, she only liked to play, she never was big on watching them. My mom, on the other hand, was a HUGE football fan, far more than my dad was.) My youngest sister? She was the only one who played with it properly.

As for me? I apparently actually asked my mom 'What do you DO with them?' She tried to explain (which, if you have to do that, makes it sound monumentally uninteresting. 'Uh.. you dress them up in different outfits and.. umm.. pretend they're doing things.)

I took Barbie and Ken and yes, I played them. I popped off and switched their heads, then I dissected their joints to see how they worked. That was the last set of dolls my mother gave me. *grin*

The next year, she asked, and I got the chemistry set I wanted.

Karen Brown
March 27, 2008 11:50 AM

Oh, and by the way, last I checked, all four of us are straight. And the tomboy? She's a mom with four kids and Betty Crocker. *laugh* Still not girly in the classic sense. She's more jeans and t-shirts than heels and hats. But she bakes cookies and works as a teacher for disabled children.

Barbie
March 27, 2008 11:56 AM

Math is hard.

Karen Brown
March 27, 2008 12:29 PM

Hey, I suck at math. Of course, my youngest sister, the GIRLY one, she's good at it.

Are there activities girls seem to tend to like, and same with boys?

Sure.

Are there variations?

Tons.

And not being classically girly or manly is not necessarily indicative of anything. If a girl wants to play with a doll, I'd give her one to play with. Same with a boy and a truck. I agree with the nanny shows about toy swords. Let them make their own. Buying them a toy sword, there's only really one way to play with it. Whacking each other. They can do that on their own, and likely will. But I'm not endorsing it.

MI
March 27, 2008 12:40 PM

are girls/women more nurturing because it is innate and biological, or because they are constantly thrust into that role? Are men natural hunters/gatherers or is it because they are usually thrust into that rule.

My SWAG: a bit of both. As to the relative balance between nature & nurture - I doubt that'll be definitively resolved until we know a _lot_ more about the human genome.

Another thought: even if gender differences _are_ socially constructed, they may remain intractable on anything less than multi-generational timescales - at least in a free society unwilling to micromanage pregnancy & parenting.

Scott Walker
March 27, 2008 1:10 PM

My wife's dear friend D emerged from grad school convinced that gender is a social construction. Period. She changed her mind when she discovered her three-year-old daughter kissing her fire truck and tucking it in at night. And having raised three boys, I can agree with our host that, for most of us, guns and explosions and stuff are hardwired. Independence Day is the best holiday, after Pascha, especially if one lives close to an Indian reservation and can therefore smuggle the good stuff across the border. Happy detonations to all.

bd_rucker
March 27, 2008 1:29 PM

Sweet story.

Just wait until she hits her "pink" phase, round about age 3 to 5. It's a trip. She'll want pink tights, pink dresses, pink barrettes, pink magic markers, pink stickers, you name it.

Loudon is a Fool
March 27, 2008 1:47 PM

It might be that the particulars are socially constructed (shoes, hats, purses and barbies vs. trucks, mud, overalls, and loogies), but whatever the possibly socially constructed cue, the fact apparently remains that little boys and little girls interact with their environment differently. Little boys shoot their father with stick guns, or stab him with a stick sword. Little girls model their newest outfit. Evolutionary biologists seem to desire to attribute this selection for caring traits in women and aggressive traits in men. Maybe. Whatever the reason it appears little girls, like big girls, have a firmer grasp of social context, and how best to fit within that context, and that little boys, like big boys, lack an appreciation for context and tend towards abstraction. We might expect big girls to rationally put their assets to the best use, and big boys to do the same. But why the difference in children if there is not something innate at work?

Franklin Evans
March 27, 2008 2:33 PM

Then there's...

All three of our children went through a phase where "mommy" and "daddy" as vocalized labels were interchangeable as a reference to that large person from whom they received care. After a time, they made the cognitive distinction between "mommy" being the short large person with the higher, lighter voice and "daddy" being the tall large person with the deep voice (and glasses that were their proprietary plaything when picked up by "daddy"; my optometrist made a tidy profit without ever seeing my kids as patients).

I love talking about kids. My thanks to all who has shared their thoughts and opinions here. :-)

Erin Manning
March 27, 2008 2:35 PM

"All I know is that if I'm subjected to more that 15 minutes of Good Morning America or The Oprah Show, I want to pluck my eyes out and shove pencils into my ears to relieve the pain."

Well, Max, that's not an indication of gender--merely intelligence. ;)

Rod, I loved your story--Nora sounds adorable! My mother, who raised five girls and four boys, would absolutely agree that gender traits are innate. She likes to share the story of one of my younger brothers who had never yet even seen a toy gun and who couldn't talk yet forming his thumb and index finger into the shape of a gun and "shooting" her (complete with sound effects) when he was in his high chair and mad about something.

Speaking of sound effects, that's one rather large difference I've noticed between my daughters and their boy cousins. The boys, from the earliest, tiniest ages, will create a kind of soundtrack for their lives that is way more colorful than anything the girls would do--the sounds of explosions and car-crashes in particular would be vivid, creative, and loud.

maria
March 27, 2008 3:24 PM

I think positive feminine traits should be cherished in children, they are very easily lost. Possibly femininity can be constructed to some extent by attempts of both parents, but it wouldn't be as charming as born femininity, there is something finical about indoctrinated femininity,
And from my perspective positive feminine traits in men are very attractive. Tenderness, sensitivity, care about anything alive, graceful movements, isn't it wonderful in man?

Bill
March 27, 2008 3:59 PM

Lots of interesting posts here. How about a little side issue of interest: there are reputable studies out there that suggest that nasty stuff in our environment (pesticides, etc) may be skewing the inborn masculine/feminine characteristics of kids. My recollection is that one study from the Netherlands noted significant shifts in kindergarten behavior (increased number of boys playing with traditionally "girly" things, increased number of girls playing with traditionally "boysy" things) in farm communities that were heavily doused with pesticides just before the kids were born. I think that Gordon Durnil may have mentioned similar studies in his book The Making of a Conservative Environmentalist. I'm just sayin' that this is yet another place where crunchiness and conservatism (properly understood) naturally intersect. To paraphrase Durnil: if we as conservatives think that in general boys should act like boys and girls like girls, shouldn't we raise hell about chemicals that are artificially affecting that natural tendency?

Salamander
March 27, 2008 4:38 PM

Someone posted about their daughter kissing her truck and tucking it in...I had to laugh, I remember my oldest girl LOVED dinosaurs when she was about 3 (she still likes them a lot, but now in a scientific way), and I bought her a big set. Now, for some reason, all her little playmates were boys -- so we'd get the kids together to play dinosaurs and the boys would all go "RAAAWR!" and make the dinosaurs eat each other...and Naomi would be in the midst of all this testosterone-fueled dinosaur violence going "Here's the mommy dinosaur, and the daddy dinosaur, and the baby one...and they're all going SHOPPING!"

My secondborn (the girly tomboy) drew a picture recently of herself dressed as a princess, complete with crown, standing in a river of "red-hot lava," while wearing "special boots" to protect her feet, and brandishing a pistol in one hand and a sword in another. There were strange zigzags emanating from her, which I was told were her "special powers." That's my girl, my lava-boot-wearing, pistol-packin' princess with special powers.

My third daughter loves Matchbox cars, but she also plays with them in a very girly way. They always seem to be car families, and the baby car cries for its mommy, etc.. She does, however, do the "vroom! vroom!" which my other girls never did.

I guess I tried to push tomboy-ism on my girls because I was (and still am) a tomboy myself. It's just more fun being a tomboy! But, I do like clothes and shoes and accessories a lot -- they just have to be cute, practical, and sporty clothes, shoes and accessories! I have a closet filled with running shoes and sport sandals in cute colors (including pink!), quite an extensive array of cute hiking ensembles, and I'm a total sucker for stylish and overpriced bike clothing. I was never one of those tomboys who dressed like boys, at least not voluntarily!

Rod Dreher
March 27, 2008 5:05 PM

My sister was a country-girl tomboy. She was a cheerleader, a high school athlete, a homecoming queen and a deer hunter. She's now the mother of three girls, aged 14 to 5. I talked to her today and told her about Nora's fashion show last night. She laughed, and said, "Oh, just you wait. It's just starting."

As regular readers know, Julie and I have two boys as well. Nora is our youngest, and it's so interesting watching the differences between her and the boys. She is far more precise and "girly" in her movements than the boys were at that age. She loves clothes and purses and all that stuff. Yet she also loves to roughhouse with her brothers. And by some freak of nature, she also likes to -- wait for it -- clean up messes! Ain't no male person in my household ever done that by nature, and that includes Your Working Boy!

Caroline
March 27, 2008 5:24 PM

I must have had a freakish childhood in the 1940's. When our mother took us, myself and my one year older brother, shopping for necessary clothing, we always modeled it for Papa. Mama wanted his approval for her worthwhile use of his slim earnings and we children, boy and girl, used the opportunity, as she taught us, to thank Papa for what he had provided. He approved how we looked in the new clothes according to our genders and Mama was gratified that he had approved her choices and budget management. A different world.

Sarah in AK
March 27, 2008 7:26 PM

Hmm, I'm noticing a bunch of tom boy comments. What about affectionate boys?

My younger brothers are 9 and 15 years younger than me. When John was three he found a baby doll, diaper bag and stroller. He dressed up the doll and took her for a jog down the street in the stroller. Six years later when Adam was three he found another baby doll, same diaper bag and stroller and did the same thing. Yes, they could make a gun out of anything and sang about explosions and gun fire, but today we can still count on them to play with and take care of their neices and nephews.

I believe many qualities are inborn - I want to make sure to emphasize the positive ones in my children.

Joey
March 27, 2008 9:38 PM

Aw...I remember when Rod did the birth announcement here on the blog, and now she's already talking and walking! When did that happen?

God bless!

Sarah in Maryland
March 28, 2008 9:10 AM

Nora is my mother's name. I've never met any other Noras! Cute :-)

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.