Gen. Petraeus tells the Decider that we're going to have to keep troop levels in Iraq just about as high as they've ever been.
Um, weren't we all told last year that the Army was going to have to start drawing down significantly this spring, because it simply didn't have the manpower to keep these numbers up any longer? What happened to that? Are we putting an even greater burden on our soldiers and their families? How much is this costing us in strictly financial terms? In terms of readiness? Violence is down, but have there been any strategic gains?
I'm so confused. Quick, let's get back to talking about Obama's crazypants preacher!
Add to Del.icio.us
Add to Technorati
Add to Digg
Add to Newsvine
Add to Facebook
Add to StumbleUpon
Subscribe
"Are you suggesting that our presence in the UAE, Dubai, and the rest of the Gulf is in any way similar to our occupation of Iraq?"
Yes. Our presence in the ME is an attempt to keep the oil - from all these countries - out of the control of extremists, be they Shia, Sunni, Iranian, Chinese, Russian or stateless. That's why we're there, and that's why we'll stay, regardless of who wins the election scheduled for November.
MI, that link and the subsequent discussion under the essay should be named a National Treasure. Many thanks.
A little aside. AnotherBeliever stated Not everyone can or chooses to foot the bill for college, and some people join up out of sheer patriotism.
But the fact is, even serving isn't going to pay for the full costs of college, and that is a disgrace, IMO. After WWII, the original GI bill paid for vets to go to college - all the way to PH.D, if they wished. Because of this, we as a country saw prosperity and amazing technological growth. The rational for it was to NOT let our vets become homeless and destitute (which happened after WWI and is happening now) - but to give back to our Vets a small portion of what they gave for us. It was the sensible and moral thing to do.
And it still is. IMO, if we can bail out corporations to rescue them from the consequences of their own greed, surely we can give our Vets (and I'm talking anyone who serves, whether it be national guard, reserves, of full time forces) the opportunity to get an education to what ever level they wish to receive it. And frankly, the will probably do more with that education than most others.
I know that there are many who don't believe the government should subsidize anything - education or health care or food - but don't you think that we owe our vets something?
Sen. James Webb of Virgina has authored some legislation that would revamp the GI bill to cover the full cost of the most expensive public institution in any given state. So here's a advertisement - contact your senator and let him or her know that you support this effort.
On a different note - AnotherBeliever, you are in my prayers.
Franklin Evans - I agree with a lot of what you say.
I now return you to your regularly schedule discussion.
Anonymous, thanks, and for what you posted above in the context of ...don't you think that we owe our vets something?: damn right.
Oops! Sorry about that, I posted from a different computer and forgot to put my name in. :-)
For those interested, the senate bill is S.22 - "Post 9/11 Veterans Educational Assistance Act." The bill before the house is H.R. 2702.
Charity
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.