I had a good breakfast meeting this morning with David Berlinski, the mathematician and author (most recently) of "The Devil's Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions" -- reviewed here. David is a secular Jew and a born iconoclast. He argues in his new book that Richard Dawkins (for whom he has a lot of respect) and other New Atheists (for which he has a lot less respect) badly overstate what science can know. His book is not an apologetic for faith, but an attempt to remind scientific materialists that they are claiming too much, that science (and atheism) can't explain all they say it can.
I'm going to turn our interview into a piece for hte newspaper, so I won't quote any of it here. But I want to mention one part of our conversation that's lingered with me all day. Berlinski -- and I'm going to quote from memory here, because I haven't yet transcribed the recording -- anyway, Berlinski lives in Paris, and said that there's no question that Europe is thoroughly secularized -- and that this is killing them.
"Have you seen the birthrates?" he said. "None of them can replace themselves. None of them. There's even discussion that Italy is going to vanish. Russia? It's goodbye. You can look at the demographic tables and see what's going to happen, and in fact is happening right now!"
I asked Berlinski if he thought there was a connection between religion and fecundity. Of course there is, he said. But it's more complicated than that.
"Look at the Muslims," he said. "All around the world, they have decided to reject Western values as materialistic, disruptive and an affront to the deity. And yet, whenever they have real contact with modernity, they fall for it just like we do. In France, the second and third generations of Muslims have a birth rate just like all the other French."
Berlinski said nobody really understands why fertility falls off a cliff when people fully embrace modernity. But it does, and that is going to be fatal for entire cultures. As for Europe, he said, "We are living through the endgame of a grand experiment to see if scientific materialism is a good organizing principle for society. You want the answer? Look at the birth rates. That's a definitive answer, and the answer is no."
So what is the answer? I asked. How can we turn this around? Berlinski shrugged.
"Nobody knows," he said. "We are all caught in vast and deep currents of history that we can't really understand, much less control. All I do is write articles here and there pointing things out, doing what I can."

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
"Any culture that oppresses any of its members to assure the birth of the next generation does not deserve to HAVE a next generation."
You know I wouldn't have any problem with that sentence except that I strongly suspect that by "oppresses...members to assure...ect." refers to pro-life activists. In that case it becomes little more than culturally genocidal agitprop.
Sig, sorry I've been away here. I must, and will, reply to your last post to me as time allows. Rest assured I want to give your comments full consideration.
Oh, sorry, Max, I thought you'd moved on already. Okay, I'll be back for more. Real life intervenes at times. ; )
"Okay, I'll be back for more. Real life intervenes at times. ; )"
Haha! [actually laughing] That's a good one Sig.
I'll post later tonight. You've forced me to dust off some texts for review.
Sig, Max, your audience is at least one more... me. ;-)
About Marian's bons mots: the operant term that it provides is any. On that basis, it would be valid to assert that it applies to some pro-life activists.
David Berlinski writes about "The Scientific Embrace of Atheism"
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/the-scientific-embrace-of-atheism/
John Derbyshire responds with "Getting It Wrong about Atheism and Science".
http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/getting-it-wrong-about-atheism-and-science/
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.