Crunchy Con

The Black Swan & the Benedict Option

Saturday April 12, 2008

Categories: Decline and fall

Just finished lunch, and am about to go bake some bread for the fambly before settling down to write a lecture I have to deliver tomorrow. Boys in backyard, Julie and Nora sleeping. I tell you all this so y'all don't fuss at me for blogging when I ought to be doing other stuff! ;-D

But I did want to tell you this. As Elizabeth noted in the "Hitting the wall" thread, it's my job to survey the world for trends that portend the End of Civilization, and let you know about it. Yesterday I read in "Wealth, War and Wisdom," the new book by the ex-Morgan Stanley investment wizard Barton Biggs, his advice that one of the best ways to get through really hard times (e.g., war, economic collapse) is to have a farm. Not a large farm, a small farm. Excerpt:


If wars and apocalypses are recurring and inevitable, what should the person with wealth do? Experience suggests, that for in-country wealth, land and properties in your own country are the safest havens in a chaos-prone, vulnerable world. An unostentatious farm or farmland, not a great estate, is probably best. Bricks-and-mortar real estate can be expropriated or bombed, but the land is always there. It can't be plundered or shipped off to somewhere else. During World War II in most of the occupied countries, if you had a self-sufficient farm, you could hunker down on it and with luck wait out the disaster. At the very least you were sure of food in a starving country.

He says that for people who have the money to do so, now would be a good time to acquire a farm "somewhere off the beaten track but which you can get to reasonably quickly and easily." He says that people who can should have a "safe haven" that's self-sufficient and capable of growing some kind of food, and with supplies that could get you through should there be some kind of breakdown of law and order. Biggs doesn't come across as an alarmist, but he says that history indicates that apocalypses come swiftly, and that the rich are almost always far too complacent to prepare for them in advance. "Events move much faster than anyone expects, and the barbarians are on top of you before you can escape," he writes.

Biggs advises his readers to look for "Black Swans," a concept discerned by statistician and financial strategist Nassim Taleb, who wrote a bestselling book about it. Taleb's website is here, and well worth exploring. Here, in a Forbes article, Taleb lays out his basic Black Swan argument. It starts like this:

Before the discovery of Australia, Europeans thought that all swans were white, and it would have been considered completely unreasonable to imagine swans of any other color. The first sighting of a black swan in Australia, where black swans are, in fact, rather common, shattered that notion. The moral of this story is that there are exceptions out there, hidden away from our eyes and imagination, waiting to be discovered by complete accident. What I call a "Black Swan" is an exceptional unpredictable event that, unlike the bird, carries a huge impact.

It's impossible for the editors of Forbes.com to predict who will change the world, because major changes are Black Swans, the result of accidents and luck. But we do know who society's winners will be: those who are prepared to face Black Swans, to be exposed to them, to recognize them when they show up and to rigorously exploit them.

In Biggs' view, those who will survive a societal catastrophe (economic collapse, plague, war, a terrorist attack that wipes out the electric grid, etc.) will be those who first identified the Black Swan portending the future, and acted on that knowledge.

Doing things like, I guess, taking the Benedict Option, and establishing some sort of rural, or semi-rural, or even small-town community to help batten down the hatches and keep the family and the community's life and culture together during extraordinarily difficult, chaotic times. Yet as Biggs points out, in talking about investing with crisis in mind, if you move too early, it's no better than having been wrong in the first place. Move too late and, well, you get crushed. Biggs concludes with:

Waiting until the barbarians are at the gates is now good. You have to act in anticipation that some day in the future barbarians in one disguise or another will be at the gates. The difficulty is that the barbarians next time will not look or act the same as the barbarians last time -- but they will be just as confiscatory and rapacious.

Who sees Black Swans today? What are they? Tell us. My candidates: the dying of the bees (portending the weakening of the immune systems of living creatures; the autism and autism-related illness spikes are part of this too) and the strange weather patterns (climate change and its disruptive effects). I should add as well that the failure of the public schools is a Black Swan in this country, it seems to me. Whatever your view is, liberal or conservative, for why public schooling is in trouble in this country -- that is, no matter who you blame for the problem -- the fact that it is in trouble, and for a complicated set of reasons, and because we don't seem to have it within us to pull out of the crisis, says something profound about the deeper cultural currents within America.

Advertisement
Comments
Trey
April 14, 2008 3:54 PM

Some of you guys really need to read Damian Thompson's book!!!

This post is fast becoming a prime example of: Counterknowledge: How we surrendered to conspiracy theories, quack medicine, bogus science and fake history.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/ukcorrespondents/holysmoke/

astorian
April 14, 2008 4:04 PM

Pyrrho- I'm the anonymous guy who doesn't know what he's talking about.

I remain baffled by the sheer excitement and enthusiasm many posters here are showing for the collapse they're sure is coming.

Frankly, I find much of it laughable. NOT because I think everything is hunky-dory, but because the "solution" to the alleged problems are always the same: a return to the land, and an embrace of blessed simplicity.

If that's the life you want, I wish you well. Go stake out a claim and build the organic Sunnybrook Farm of your dreams. Have an Amish-style barn raising with your neighbors. I admire that spirit.

But of course, posters here are rarely content with changing their own lives. Rather, they insist that the sky is falling unless ALL of us choose the life they idealize.

They insist current levels of Western prosperity are "unsustainable." But humor me- what if it isn't? Suppose, just SUPPOSE, that reserves found in the Gulf of Mexico and in the Dakotas turn out to be everything Chevron and Conoco hope. What if our current levels of consumption ARE sustainable!

I strongly suspect THAT prospect would horrify many Crunchy Cons!


Rod Dreher
April 14, 2008 5:03 PM

I suspect you're right, Astorian.

But the "unsustainability" argument is not one that depends solely on the end of cheap oil. Let's say we could ride all this out without a crash of some sort for another 40 years. Is that "sustainable" in spiritual and moral terms? That's a question.

I was talking to a friend yesterday, a fellow parent, who said she and her family are hitting the wall too, in a big way. We talked about how we're all at the edge of burnout, and looking for some kind of escape. She said, "In five years, I bet none of us" -- meaning our circle of Christian friends and parents -- "are going to be doing what we're doing now." Her point was that we can't sustain the kind of life we know is worth living in this kind of environment.

But we don't have a solution. Yet.

Anyway, I *definitely* don't want a crash, and everyone to have to simplify or starve to death. As I posted not long ago, those romanticizing the possibility of simplicity and Godliness brought on by mass economic suffering are ignoring history. Look how well hyperinflation and the chaos of economic collapse worked out for Weimar Germany, and in turn for the rest of Europe after the summer of 1939.

pyrrho
April 14, 2008 7:23 PM

Astorian:

You're attributing a lot of things to me that I never said. These are assumptions on your part.

Look, I'm an Ivy League-trained economist. If I'm a quack, then tell me who isn't?

Trey:

I don't know if you're referring to me, but I'm a contrarian and not a practitioner of "counterknowledge". My kind of contrarian economics has made me a lot of money in the past two decades. Can you say that about the legions of jackasses who lost money in the stock and real estate markets recently? It is they who have been practitioners of "counterknowledge" in recent years.

Lisa
April 15, 2008 7:34 AM

I have not read this particular book.
I will NOT be disappointed if we were to to have a "normal" recession followed by a period of growth.
Who in their right minds wants people to suffer?
Consumer spending accounts for an enormous amount of the economy's health,
Consumers are not buying the reasons are numerous: unemployment, loss of vocation forever due to outsourcing, underemployment is a real biggie, people working 2 to 3 low paying jobs to put food on the table,
Personal debt is enormous banks are not going to lend anymore to these people understandably so. Jobs are scarce and getting scarcer.
Gone are the days of frivilous shopping that helped pump this nation into what it was but it will no longer be sustained and it will fall

We have no cash behind our dollar. Are we going to print this illusion money forever well it has caught up with us. As a nation and as an average consumer debt will weigh us down like an anchor and the loss of jobs and consumer spending will spiral us into either A economic depression or B total collapse. I hope for A but the more they try to "fix" it the more I see B occuring. If left alone no more bailouts we would have a better chance at depression as opposed to collapse but tell that to bush and his cronies. I don't like what i am seeing but to hide my face in the sand is just irresponsible. those of you who think people like myself WANT this fall and the subsequent suffering must be in denial so deep it defiles common sense. god be with all of us and god bless us all as we see these problems and assume resonsibility for them.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.