Crunchy Con

James Hamilton on oil prices

Thursday May 22, 2008

Categories: Peak oil

I found this essay, with charts, by James Hamilton to be helpful in understanding the current oil supply-and-demand situation. Here's his bottom line:

I think we will see some net production gains this year, and expect this to bring some relief for oil prices. But I cannot imagine that the projected path for China [daily oil consumption by 2030 twice current U.S. consumption rate -- RD] above will ever become a reality. Oil prices have to rise to whatever value it takes to prevent that from happening.

So yes, I do believe that speculation has played a role in the oil price increases, particularly what we've observed the last few months. But it's a big mistake to conclude that speculation is the most important part of the longer run trend we've been seeing.

Advertisement
Comments
pyrrho
May 23, 2008 9:58 AM

From the article:

"Now consider the situation today in oil markets: the Gulf, according to Mr Rothman [Mike Rothman, of ISI, a leading New York consulting group], is crammed with supertankers chartered by oil-producing governments to hold the inventories of oil they are pumping but cannot sell. That physical oil is in excess supply at today's prices does not mean that producers are somehow cheating by storing their oil in tankers or keeping it in the ground. All it suggests is that there are few buyers for physical oil cargoes at today's prices, but there are plenty of buyers for pieces of paper linked to the price of oil next month and next year. This situation is exactly analogous to the bubble in credit markets a year ago, where nobody wanted to buy sub-prime mortgage bonds, but there was plenty of demand for 'financial derivatives' that allowed investors to bet on the future value of these bonds."

Even I learned something new. We were told by Paul Krugman that growing physical inventories of oil did not exist so I just assumed the oil producers were keeping the oil in the ground at these prices. He appears to be wrong.

Mhoram
May 23, 2008 12:14 PM

Hey Pyrrho, where do you typically go to get such reasonable commentary on commodities?

About Peak Oil, I spotted this in an interview with F. William Engdahl in the latest Acres USA:

The whole peak oil theory rests on the idea that oil is a fossil fuel, which is accepted as religious dogma by almost every geology department in the world. The problem is, oil is not a fossil fuel; it's not from the detritus of dead dinosaurs or from algae from under the ocean or bird fossils or whatever fossils you want to take. It's not a biological product.....oil is a hydrocarbon, and Russian scientists have synthetically reproduced oil hydrocarbons in the laboratory at a hundred times the atmospheric pressure at sea level. Oil is constantly being produced, at least from all indications, deep down in the Earth, and rather than saying it comes from dead animals that are pressed down in the earth from above, we should start training our geologists to look deeper at some of the fields such as Ghawar in Saudi Arabia, some of these fault structures in the Middle East that gave them such riches of oil.

Now, I don't know if he's onto something here, or is competely crackers, but I always thought the dinosaur bones explanation was odd. When plants and animals die, their bodies decompose gradually, returning to the earth from whence they came. Why would there be a huge pile of dead plants and animals in the first place? It's an interesting theory, anyway. Unfortunately, he goes on to claim (essentially) that we aren't pumping all this oil because of a world-wide conspiracy to keep oil prices up, and I have a harder time buying that.

pyrrho
May 23, 2008 12:36 PM

Mhoram: "[W]here do you typically go to get such reasonable commentary on commodities?"

That's precisely the problem! I usually have to piece things together out of scraps taken from various articles and reports. This is what you do when you're ahead of the curve ;-)

Let me make two things clear:

[1] I am convinced adherent of the Peak Oil theory, but

[2] I believe there is a more "parsimonious" explanation for recent events in the oil market: financial speculation.

The peak may well be nigh.

mdavid
May 23, 2008 5:05 PM

Mhoram, yep, Engdahl is competely crackers.

Greg Hyatt
May 24, 2008 12:29 PM

I personally do not see any relief in the near future for the spike in the price we pay at the pump as long as we have politician's who are premitted to gain in the sale of gas and almost a form of racketeering in its utmost defined status.

Until America wakes up to the truth's of who is making the money and demand's an immediate hault to such practices...the only thing we are going to be able to count on is the price of gas continuing to rise!

Join with me in some of my politically incorrect rants and writings. Visit With Me

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.