Crunchy Con

Michael Crichton vindicated

Friday May 30, 2008

Categories: Media
Jack Shafer revisits novelist Michael Crichton's 1993 prediction that the mainstream media would be extinct by 2002 -- and concludes that Crichton, though his timing was off a bit, has been substantially vindicated. Crichton says the news biz still awaits...
Advertisement
Comments
Other Jim
May 30, 2008 1:51 PM

Flying is the safest way to travel.

The U.S. environment is cleaner than it's been in more than 100 years, and if we look only at where humans live, it's probably the cleanest it has ever been in the history of America.

The biggest problem with education is parents and their children and no amount of money or education reform can fix that.

Smoking is not as dangerous as you believe.

Irenaeus
May 30, 2008 2:18 PM

I think your comments are getting all jacked up.

Franklin Evans
May 30, 2008 2:33 PM

A strong community that promotes and supports individual engagement is the most effective means of reducing crime.

Political bosses use polls and surveys to control voter turnout.

Driving behavior is the biggest single reason for vehicular accidents. With that, in many places speed limits are taken as advisory because local law enforcement has stopped trying to enforce speed limits; they set up speed traps as sources of revenue, not as deterents.

Maximos
May 30, 2008 2:58 PM

A legion of trends in our society, ranging from the increasing dependence upon private contractors and mercenaries to perform military functions, to the revolving doors between corporate America and political offices, to the formulation of monetary policy largely for the benefit of a financial sector both profligate and wedded to lurid forms of speculation, to the logic of globalization itself, all involve the de facto privatization of some aspects of politics and governance. And as the Roman Republic died, definitively, when its powers came to be vested in the person of Caesar, so our Republic is dying as its powers ebb away to various private factions, the representative institutions of our government existing, increasingly, to enforce the legal regimes that benefit these interests. The Republic, that is, no longer concerns the public things, but the public enforcement of private rule.

Globalization will, in the long term, make the average American appreciably worse off, and a select handful unfathomably wealthy and powerful.

The Man From K Street
May 30, 2008 3:07 PM

Stories that No One Knows But Which Are True Nonetheless:

1) Large-scale conversion to Christianity in China is underway. But particularly since it is mostly conversion to brands of evangelical and pentecostal Protestantism with strong links to their equivalents here in the US, the MSM won't touch it. They will ignore it until, given a continuation of present trends, we wake up one morning circa 2030 and realize a) China is up to 33% Christian and b) China's closest ties to North America are in and through places like Colorado Springs and Nashville rather than New York or Los Angeles.

2) Most of the increased rate of infertility in the US is due to complications from greater numbers of sexual partners over the course of a woman's life than from environmental factors or higher age of first attempts at pregnancy. E.g., cumulative fallopian scarring from "minor" STDs is an utterly taboo subject to discuss.

3) The arguments for decentralizing and privatizing security and military activities are now beginning to outweigh the arguments against.

4) The deep, systematic confusion between reality and entertainment. When net-enabled VR (or even RSS feeds directly to the brain) gets going as reality rather than hype, addiction will be a major plague. Of course, Ray Bradbury predicted that in "Farenheit 451" but don't expect media conglomerates to self-criticize what they expect to be a major profit stream for them.

gregorbo
May 30, 2008 3:24 PM

New technologies are not merely different ways of doing old things: they change consciousness. The concept of linear time post-dates the invention of the (phonetic) alphabet. Print issues in the democratization of the word in a way that leads to a whole scale shift in culture and politics and is the real forebearer of the Enlightenment. The 20th Century shift from the industrial age to the technological was also a shift in metaphors: The Industrial age extended what humans could do with their bodies; the technological age extended the nervous system. Ong predicted in 1982 that the Internet would give rise to a new Orality--and this is being borne out right now. Socrates worried that writing would lead to the loss of human memory--the Internet is bringing that loss to completion, as the next generation has already outsourced great portions of the brain to the computer and the net. Writing is regarded as temporary rather than permanent in the electronic age. What comes next is a new form of rootless tribalism as "self" becomes increasingly "place-less."

I_Like_Dragyn
May 30, 2008 3:25 PM

There is a far greater number of people doing good things in the world than there are people doing bad things. Perhaps even just one channel dedicated to the good things people do - every day, biographies of young men and women doing good things for people, being caught doing random acts of kindness for complete strangers.

mdavid
May 30, 2008 3:52 PM

Stories that No One Knows But Which Are True Nonetheless:

The Man From K Street:

1) conversion to Christianity in China
2) increased rate of infertility [from sexual dysfunction]
3) decentralizing and privatizing security and military
4) The deep, systematic confusion between reality and entertainment.

Great points. I agree with every one, and I think #3 is quite subtle. Yet I think on #1 Africa would need to be considered along with China as well.


I would add a few:

5) Computational genomics has already made human differences nearly impossible to obfuscate.

6) Knowledge of genetics has completely changed the study of social sciences and the study of human evolution; everyone needs to go back to school.

7) Discussion of taboo topics is no longer contained due to the web, hence persecution/and or legal control of information is the only option left for society to stop this discussion from becoming mainstream, is is making a comeback.

8) Genetic modification is further along than the public realizes and we have no venue or even moral language for discussing it.

9) Division in American culture (the Bowling Alone effect) is firmly set due to homeschooling and libertarianism lifestyles, and after the boomers die, there will be little cultural "glue" remaining.

10) Demographics, Demographics, Demographics. The current population shifts are unique in human history, and yet nobody seems to be noticing.

SiliconValleySteve
May 30, 2008 4:28 PM

The Man From K Street:

1) conversion to Christianity in China

Good catch and let me add to that the number of Asian students at elite Colleges and Universities in the US who are involved in Campus Christian missions.

Rod Dreher
May 30, 2008 4:51 PM

I'm loving this thread. K Street, I think you are exactly right about the reason the US MSM doesn't see, or want to see, the China conversion phenomenon. MDavid, I had been thinking too about how we Americans simply don't discuss genetic research and its implications, except in a completely stupid "if you question it, you're a torch-carrying troglodyte who hates science" way.

Major Wootton
May 30, 2008 5:06 PM

I suspect, but don't know, that "Traditionalism" is more influential in high places in Britain, and perhaps Europe, than Americans or many of the residents themselves realize. Prince Charles, for example, has Traditionalist leanings.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/main.jhtml?xml=/opinion/2007/06/09/do0910.xml

http://www.johnreilly.info/atmw.htm

lancelot lamar
May 30, 2008 6:19 PM

The number of teen girls who have abortions who are the victims of statutory rape, never reported.

The incidence of malpractice in the abortion industry, and abortion- caused infertility.

California teacher
May 30, 2008 7:27 PM

The high degree of mental retardation among America's young, the actual *inability* of large numbers of children to learn. Linked to lead poisoning? Maybe from cheap Chinese imports?

Erin Manning
May 30, 2008 7:41 PM

The downside of modern medicine, especially a) the blind faith people have in medical science's abilities, b) the increased tendency to think that everyone should be "managing" his/her health by ingesting some kind of pharmaceutical product (over half of all insured Americans are taking at least one prescription medication daily), and c) the problem of ethics, particularly the problem of thinking that whatever medicine theoretically *can* do it *must* do, regardless of ethical considerations.

Simon
May 30, 2008 10:15 PM

1. Multitasking, whether at work or home, is inefficient and makes you stupid. One study has shown that continuous distractions from emailing, text messaging, web surfing, television and phone calls causes twice as large a drop in IQ as marijuana smoking.

There is a wonderful article on this by Christine Rosen in the current issue of The New Atlantis, but for the most part the media prefers to keep telling us the fib that "interactive" and "multimedia" activities build brain power rather than reduce it.

2. Related to item 1: The "epidemic" of attention deficit disorder among children is fast spreading among adults, especially young adults. It's sole cause is the home environment that fails to build habits of concentration at a early age. This is simply a species of mental weakness, and the career prospects of most of those who have it are not good.

3. Technology is largely useless in education at the lower grade levels. Schools that boast of computers in every classroom are wasting taxpayer or tuition dollars.

4. There is no such thing as "educational television." Staring into space is better for the mind of a child than even the best television program. By constantly presenting images that change faster than the human eye can even track them, TV inhibits focus. There is some evidence that it inhibits brain development in young children for the same reason. In short, television literally makes you stupid, just like multitasking does.

Simon
May 30, 2008 10:28 PM

Another one: Genuine friendship is disappearing, especially among married men, often replaced with "networking." A growing number of men now focus entirely on their work and their families. This is far less true for women, who still find ways to build intimate friendships with each other in non-professional and non-family settings.

The increased emphasis on family, and especially the modern notion that a man's wife should be his best friend, are extremely positive developments, in my humble opinion. Still, one has to wonder what the side effects will be for a world in which friendship is sharply devalued, as I don't think it's ever been tried.

Rod Dreher
May 30, 2008 11:37 PM

Genuine friendship is disappearing, especially among married men, often replaced with "networking." A growing number of men now focus entirely on their work and their families.

True.

Sigh.

Lisa M.
May 31, 2008 12:06 AM

Natural family planning really works.

DavidTC
May 31, 2008 12:12 AM

The Man From K Street
2) Most of the increased rate of infertility in the US is due to complications from greater numbers of sexual partners over the course of a woman's life than from environmental factors or higher age of first attempts at pregnancy. E.g., cumulative fallopian scarring from "minor" STDs is an utterly taboo subject to discuss.

Uh, no. Infertility by age group is holding steady in women, and possibly even decreased somewhat. From 1965 to 1988 it decreased from 11% to 8%! Interesting effect of the 'free love' movement and these STDs that are supported to be reducing fertility.

No, it's male infertility that's increasing, that and the fact that women are having children later in life. There are some STDs that effect male sperm production, like chlamydia, but statistically those should be mere background noise.

3) The arguments for decentralizing and privatizing security and military activities are now beginning to outweigh the arguments against.

And these arguments are?

mdavid
May 31, 2008 12:45 AM

gregorbo

New technologies...change consciousness.

Do you have any book recommendations about this idea?

DavidTC
May 31, 2008 1:16 AM

Oh, and as for the original question. I have some things that actually are true and should be talked about more. (As opposed to many of the things here which are, frankly, guesses and personal anecdotes generalized to social trends.)

The fact that the media had 'military experts' that were on the payroll of the Pentagon, and has yet to talk about this in any way, shape, or form. This is, in a way, a double failure of the media.

Because of monopoly cable and telephony companies, we behind the entire rest of the first world in internet connectivity.

Thanks to our invention of a 'health insurance industry', our health care industry has fallen into possibly non-repairable pieces. Not only is this not mentioned by the media, but every single politician, even the ones asserting they which to fix the health care industry, include in their plans the health insurance industry as part of the solution. This is because they have all been essentially bribed by campaign contributions. (Note, before people get all political on me, I didn't say a thing about how to fix health care. But insurance companies are almost the entire problem in the first place, and hence not likely to be any part of the solution.)

With regard to energy and environmental issues, small efforts by a few specific industries would be much much more useful than large efforts by individuals. Talk to me about compact florescent bulbs after businesses stop causing people to spend two hours idling in rush hour to get to work.

Cars are subsidized much more than mass transit. Gasoline would cause nearly three times as much if it wasn't subsidized, directly, indirectly, and with threat of violence back by military spending. And while gas taxes pay for our roads now, they sure as hell didn't pay for building the billions of dollars worth of roads we laid down to create the system, and it is manifestly stupid to expect mass transit to pay for the original capital investment at the very start. Yet for some reason mass transit has to 'make a profit' or we cut funding for it.

Coal causes cancer. Burning coal causes cancer to people nearby. Mining coal causes cancer in the miners. Mining coal causes cancer in random locations because of the atmospheric release of radon, making operating a coal plant, once you include the mining portion, somewhat more radioactive and much more cancer-causing than operating a nuclear power plant.

All police interrogations are not recorded, and various police departments actively resist voluntarily doing this, and resist laws requiring this, and there is absolutely no possible reason for this except that police want to be able to do things and not get called on them.

When purchasing a house, there is no one on your side, as everyone gets paid only if the sale goes through, except the home inspector, who is picked by the bank and is thus encouraged to find as few problems as possible so he will get hired again by that bank. There is no one with any incentive to point out that there is a granite quarry on the other side of the fence in your backyard (I have actually seen those houses.) or the lot next door is going to end up with the back of a gas station facing you or that your porch is untreated wood which will rot in six years or that the vaulted ceiling in the living room means you will not be able to get it warm in the winter without roasting in all other rooms. I've seen such crappy houses get built and sold.

These are all things people should know, and I've never heard the news media mention them.

Steve
May 31, 2008 9:47 AM

"3) The arguments for decentralizing and privatizing security and military activities are now beginning to outweigh the arguments against."

Not sure what you are referring to here. Blackwater has been a travesty for the US in Iraq. Are you referring to food services? On decentralization, I think most serious students of the military would agree that we have many problems caused by maintaining our 4 branches (I will consider the Marines their own branch just for arguments sake) of service. At the 3 star and 4 star level it is all politics and played for keeps. The military needs major overhauls in its promotional structure and better bottom up communications as priorities now. If by decentralization you mean incorporating lessons learned by the O-1 to O-6 group into the policies formed by the guys with the stars then I would concur.

1) Large-scale conversion to Christianity in China is underway. But particularly since it is mostly conversion to brands of evangelical and pentecostal Protestantism with strong links to their equivalents here in the US, the MSM won't touch it. They will ignore it until, given a continuation of present trends, we wake up one morning circa 2030 and realize a) China is up to 33% Christian and b) China's closest ties to North America are in and through places like Colorado Springs and Nashville rather than New York or Los Angeles.

The Economist had a special features section on this several months ago. It is farther along in South Korea. I cannot think of any media, MSM or otherwise, that really "reports" on international religious activities other than couple of religious oriented blogs and they are either reporting just specific activities most of the time.

Steve

John S.
May 31, 2008 9:48 AM

The mainstream media ran us into war in Iraq by carrying water for the Bush Administration and its cronies, keeping strongly antiwar voices off the air, and refusing to contest the misleading drivel that was constantly coming from the White House and Capitol Hill.

gregorbo
May 31, 2008 9:55 AM

mdavid--

Well, I'm writing one right now. But that will have to wait. For starters, however, I'd recommend Walter Ong's Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word.

That's where I first ran across the notion. Marshall Mcluhan's The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man and The Mechanical Bride are pioneering works in a similar vein--but Mcluhan's mosaic style is off-putting to some. Ong is much less idiocyncratic (more prosaic) in style and predictions, but I also think he's turning out to be more accurate.

mdavid
May 31, 2008 11:06 AM

gregorbo, thank you. I've read some Mcluhan on this, but never those texts. I'll hit Ong for sure.

If you know what your book is going to be called, let me know and I'll make a note on my to-read list.

gregorbo
May 31, 2008 11:14 AM

It's growing out of a paper with the working title: "Hamlet and the Rise of the New Orality." I'll try to hurry up!

Cheers.

Other Jim
May 31, 2008 12:02 PM

The arguments for decentralizing and privatizing security and military activities are now beginning to outweigh the arguments against.

Al-Qaeda, Russian bot nets, Chinese hackers. It isn't as much an argument for decentralization as it is an argument against centralization. Small bands of actors will be able to inflict large damage without triggering inter-state conflict; countries that do not have decentralized security will be stuck with the same problem the U.S. has with Al-Qaeda: treat military attacks as a police action or be drawn into a war far larger that you want or need.

Jillian
May 31, 2008 1:30 PM

1) Large-scale conversion to Christianity in China is underway. But particularly since it is mostly conversion to brands of evangelical and pentecostal Protestantism with strong links to their equivalents here in the US, the MSM won't touch it. They will ignore it until, given a continuation of present trends, we wake up one morning circa 2030 and realize a) China is up to 33% Christian and b) China's closest ties to North America are in and through places like Colorado Springs and Nashville rather than New York or Los Angeles.

What I've heard intelligent Chinese people say is not to forget that Chinese society is historically pluralistic and multi-religious, i.e. people will join multiple groups and ignore the exclusivist claims. And that Confucian attitudes- particularly to judge even religion from a socially utilitarian point of view- remain fundamental.

These same American missionizing groups thought they had incredible success on their hands in Africa, Latin America, and the USSR. Maybe in a way that was more transient and transitional than planned....

scarshapedstar
May 31, 2008 2:55 PM

Al Gore never said he invented the internet, and nobody batted an eyelash at the interview until the RNC mocked him in a press release over a week later. Then, retroactively, jaws dropped across America.

scarshapedstar
May 31, 2008 2:59 PM

"5) Computational genomics has already made human differences nearly impossible to obfuscate."

Can someone explain what this coded message is supposed to mean? If anything, genetic analysis reveals that humans are far more alike than anyone would have ever guessed by our appearances.

Jillian
May 31, 2008 3:54 PM

Computational genomics has already made human differences nearly impossible to obfuscate

I'm not sure either, and it's a field quite close to mine. I think it means that he thinks it will prove the genetic determinisms he likes, and disprove the social and cultural anthropology that he doesn't.

Lord Karth
May 31, 2008 4:04 PM

Social Security (including Medicare and Medicaid) is neither.

Your servant,

Lord Karth

mdavid
May 31, 2008 5:31 PM

Genomics is the study of genomes, long strings of chemicals (for example A, G, C, T) found in the nuclei of living cells. They encode the inherited physical properties of living organisms. The human genome is about 3 billon base pairs of these chemicals. Put together, they make a pattern that encodes our biological makup.

We have discovered what these actual patterns are in many kinds of organisms (mainly because of computers). However, this doesn't tell us squat until we know what these combinations and sequences mean. Enter "computational" genomics, the deciphering of biology from known genome sequences using computational analysis. We are slowly building massive biological datasets, leading to new biological discovery daily.

The reason for all the gnashing of teeth is that there is no single human genome. Nobody's genome is the same, and if a population has been breeding mostly among themselves for even less than a thousand years, you can see the genetic differences merely by comparing the genomes to each other, and project forward the physical consequences of those genetics. That is, you can eventually figure what genetics cause red hair or blue eyes, intelligence, emotional states, and whatnot. Then we can cross reference this against all the other bell curves datasets out there - say crime rates, IQ, divorce rates, whatever. This is valuable because if you have a particular race with a known skill set (West Africans at sprinting, Chinese at ping pong, Kalenjin at distance running, Jews at chess) you have hints at possible genes to look, and start building your databases accordingly.

This research cannot be stopped. First because it is too valuable to humanity, if only for genetically adverse reactions to drugs, inherited diseases, and whatnot. Secondly, it's too valuable to companies wanting to make money off it. Third, it's bigger than any one government. But we don't want to know the truth, so the knowledge is piling up in research institutes worldwide, rolling forward with little or no public knowledge, and most people have no idea how much is really known.

Jillian
May 31, 2008 9:19 PM

you can see the genetic differences merely by comparing the genomes to each other, and project forward the physical consequences of those genetics.

It's not that easy, it turns out. You might want to look up "somatic mosaicism" or "nucleotide repeat expansion". Or just how many recessive gene defects the average person carries- at least 6-7 just to account for gross birth defects and miscarriages in pregnancies resulting from father-daughter incest.

That is, you can eventually figure what genetics cause red hair or blue eyes,

Which are already long known.

intelligence, emotional states, and whatnot.

Not really gonna happen, because these are composed of learned emphases and attributes of consciousness.

Then we can cross reference this against all the other bell curves datasets out there - say crime rates, IQ, divorce rates, whatever.

It's been tried for crime rates, since that ought to be easy- violent criminality links very strongly to male gender, after all. No such luck.

Of course, if you really look at it intelligently, crime per se is not very objectively distinguishable from non-crime. It's convention, i.e. a learned attribute. Software, not hardwired. But if you'd bothered with the results of social anthropological inquiry, or moderately rigorous books like "Why They Kill" by Richard Rhodes, you'd know that.

This is valuable because if you have a particular race with a known skill set (West Africans at sprinting, Chinese at ping pong, Kalenjin at distance running, Jews at chess) you have hints at possible genes to look, and start building your databases accordingly.

Well, physiological study knows perfectly well about fast and slow twitch muscle, the basis in myosin isoforms, et cetera as the basis of ability in track and field. As for the others, I'm sorry to say that you're silly. If Jewish abilities are so genetic, the uncreative and messy state the state of Israel is in, its well known lack of Nobel Prize winners and high art and even chess champions, is obvious disproof.

I'd say that between Hannah Arendt's work and Thorlief Boman ("Hebrew Thought Compared to Greek") you can assemble a far more convincing explanation for the possibilities, extents, and varieties of Jewish creativity and success- and limitations on it- in Indoeuropean Gentile environments. It might also take a little cultural anthropology.

mdavid
May 31, 2008 11:53 PM

Jillian, I think it means that he thinks it will prove the genetic determinisms he likes, and disprove the social and cultural anthropology that he doesn't.

Do you realize you're pretty much confessing to zero intellectual honesty with comments like this? Clearly ideology is your game. Best of luck.

sigaliris
June 1, 2008 9:47 AM

If mdavid can prove Jillian wrong with facts known to him, I am surprised he does not immediately dispatch her errors for all to see, rather than falling back on the stale tactic of insulting her character.

GB
June 2, 2008 3:33 PM

The extraordinarily high rate of C-section births and other medical intervention in births in the US.

When my wife was pregnant with our first, we read a bit about this. I don't remember the exact numbers, but the natural occurrence of a medical need requiring special intervention in birth is something like 4-5% worldwide. In most countries, especially Scandinavia, the actual rate of intervention is about that or a little higher. In the US it is 50% or higher. Yet, our rate of infant-death is worse than most other developed countries.

Reasons for it range from Americans wanting the convenience of "scheduling" a birth to a doctor's need to avoid litigation to successful sales jobs by pharmaceutical companies.

As a result, we all pay higher insurance premiums and baby and mother health suffers.

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.