Obama quits Trinity Church
Barack Obama has resigned from Trinity Church. Guess Father Pfleger's ridiculous minstrel show was the final straw. I have no doubt that Obama sat there in the pews for 20 years listening to that kind of garbage, and said nothing....
The key thing for me has always been the reaction of the people at Trinity to the sermons -- whether by Wright, Pfleger or anyone else.
They were cheering and yelling their approval and sometimes even being the loudest and most raucous at the exact lines that were supposedly "taken out of context" and supposedly "didn't represent all the good things the church stands for," etc. These people were not stunned, not surprised, no "wtf is this crazy guy ranting about" reaction. In other words, this was normal and typical, and what they liked about the speaker.
Which means there is no way Obama did not know what was the norm at the Trinity UCC pulpit. Which speaks to (1) his current truthfulness in saying he didn't; and (2) the effect 20 years of that bile has had on his soul and those of his family.
CourageMan, that's the same thing that always strikes me. There's a root of bitterness in that church (however justified some may feel it may be) that permeates all we're seeing, and bitterness, the Apostle Paul often wrote, is contrary to who we are in Christ, and incompatible with His message. I, too, am concerned about how all that vitriol has worn on the Obama family's souls, and how that would affect his governing.
"If you had told him this time last year that within 12 months, he would be estranged from his spiritual father, and would have resigned from the only church he and his family have ever known, he probably wouldn't have believed it."
Politics ain't beanbag.
I guess the heat got too much for him. This is another reason not to vote for BHO. He cannot be trusted to stick to his guns when the going gets tough.
As I have said numerous times. This guy is very dangerous. He cannot be trusted. How do you think he will stand up against the enemies of this country? He has no backbone. He will fold like a cheap lawn chair.
He knows it. His party knows it. We know it. And more importantly, the enemies of this country know it. Why do you think they support him for President?
Obama's new church will be, knowing UCC politics and polity, even money on transfering membership to Bryn Mawr Congregational UCC on Jeffery Blvd. just south of Hyde Park in Chicago.
They're a smaller, quieter, likely to be pathetically thankful for the cachet of the Obamas, solidly UCC congregation, happy to let the denomination be quite liberal while being a cautiously centrist, now largely African-American congregation.
In fairness, there's a couple other safely centrist but strongly UCC churches in the area, but Bryn Mawr is closest to where the Obama family lives. They'll join another UCC congregation to make the PR point that they aren't making a "big jump" (though they are, as Trinity is sui generis), and a smaller congregation where the pastor can be counted on to keep a quiet line through November. Bryn Mawr fits the bill, IMHO.
For what it's worth;
Pax, Jeff
So , if he stays, he's a radical. If he goes, he has no courage of his convictions.
I guess those people who say you can't have it both ways are wrong.
This guy is dangerous and cannot be trusted, you say. But the man who misled this country into war, and his successor wannabe who doesn't know the difference between Sunni and Shia, and doesn't know how many troops we have in Iraq, those people can be trusted to keep you safe.
Really? Do you feel safer?
So , if he stays, he's a radical. If he goes, he has no courage of his convictions. I guess those people who say you can't have it both ways are wrong.
That's not any intellectual bad faith on the part of others, that's the objective dilemma Obama created for himself by associating with a kooky racialist church for 20 years, a point he had to have known (as I argued above; even Oprah knew).
And yes, the timing makes it impossible to look at this now as anything other than politically motivated. And don't tell me that this resignation becoming public (1) on a Saturday night (2) during which the political world is focusing on a decisive Democratic rules panel meeting (3) after two days of Pfleger-celebrity -- that all that is coincidental.
This guy is very dangerous
What has he done that is dangerous? His foreign policy team includes ex-military and one of the people who helped write the new Army Field Manual. Is that dangerous? On domestic issues he will spend more money ad increase taxes. He at least says he will try to avoid deficit spending. Please look at Republican budgets since 1980. Now, who is dangerous?
He cannot be trusted.
Probably not much more than any other pol running for president.
He has no backbone. He will fold like a cheap lawn chair.
Based on what? This is election year politics. Should we assume McCain has no backbone because he now embraces agents of intolerance errr Christian evangelicals? Exactly how will the enemies of this country gain leverage on him? Not like they threaten to run Wright tapes over and over or not vote for him. High level negotiations involve lots of advisers anyway. You really like the current group of advisers? Backbone, sheesh. The Pres sits in an office. He does not go out and fight. Do we really want someone in office who feels he has to demonstrate his toughnes (see current oficeholder)? How about we vote for someone with brains?
I see this as an attempt to get the campaign back to one of issues. McCain is a good enough candidate that he can win on issues if he presents them correctly and coherently. I would also be happier if he got rid of people like Gramm, who just happen to be around the epicenter of too many financial meltdowns. More people are seeing through the smear tactics guys. Lets try winning on merit for a change.
Steve
This church business had made for one very bizarre election year.
Obama and the "I Survived Jonestown and went to Trinity" tee shirt
Romney with the funny underwear, green jellow, and the robotic missionaries.
The various loons that have sort of attracted themselves to McCain like ants at a picnic
And we can't forget Huckleberry with the baptistry in the back of the mobile home.
We can only hope that next election cycle, both parties will come to their senses and only permit certified atheists to run.
The irony in this is, the African American community has some of the finest Gospel-preaching pastors and churches you'll find anywhere. Why oh why didn't Obama join such a church, instead of Wright's?
"The irony in this is, the African American community has some of the finest Gospel-preaching pastors and churches you'll find anywhere."
Because what you hear there is not that far removed from what you heard at Trinity. Trinity's Black Liberation Theology is standard fare in most Black churches, especially the "Gospel-preaching" ones. Because, of course, what is being preached at Trinity is the Gospel, just not the Gopsel in a way White people are used to hearing it.
"Because, of course, what is being preached at Trinity is the Gospel, just not the Gopsel in a way White people are used to hearing it."
Because, of course, Daniel, white people aren't used to having the Gospel flung at them as a weapon as if they're the cause of all the evil in the world and told that it's just fine, from a biblical, Christian sense, for everyone else to hate them; that hating white people is not only justified but pretty much mandated by the Gospel. Which is at least a part of what is being preached at Trinity, as we've all seen.
"We can only hope that next election cycle, both parties will come to their senses and only permit certified atheists to run."
Interesting, Charles. How will we know they are "certified" atheists, though? Will they have actual certificates to show us (and who issues those, anyway?)? Or will we have to accept their atheist creds on....faith?
This Trinity UCC story reminds me of a joke:
A solitary man was stranded on a deserted island for twenty years until one day he caught the attention of a passing ship and was rescued. Once on board, the Captain asked him about the three buildings on the beach.
"What's the one on the left?"
"That's my house", the man replied.
"What's the one on the right?", asked the Captain.
"That's my church."
What's the one in the middle?"
"Oh, that's the church I used to go to."
"Trinity's Black Liberation Theology is standard fare in most Black churches, especially the "Gospel-preaching" ones."
Comments like these really make me wonder whether you aren't merely a troll, Daniel. Firstly you somehow make a distinction between "gospel-preaching" churches and churches that...well, you tell me - what kind of Christian church doesn't preach the gospel?
Secondly, your assertion that most black churches are similar in substance to Wright's is absurd. Do you honestly believe that the average black church preaches that "theologically, Malcolm X was not far wrong when he called the white man 'the devil'"? Do you honestly believe such garbage is looked down upon not because it is blatantly un-Christian and heretical but because it's not what "white people" are used to hearing? Do you really believe such nonsense is in the spirit of the Christian Gospel and that it is only not recognized as such because of white racism? Really? Come on. You're a caricature.
I take it as truthful that Obama had some sort of conversion experience and now holds a some sort of Christian faith (no, I don't want to hear more details - at least not as part of a Presidential campaign). But anyone in the UCC has put up with a lot at the denominational level if not in his own congregation. That Obama remained in that denomination at all tells me that he's not My Kind of Christian any more than Mitt Romney was. In neither case would that be a disqualifier in itself, since the country is full of skewed faith.
That Obama exposed his children to the kind of spiritual formation they'd get at Trinity suggests that the thoughtfulness he projects is to some degree a pose. He clearly is not a guy who has thought out the consequences of all his actions. We don't need another president with a good heart who thinks meaning well is doing well.
"Secondly, your assertion that most black churches are similar in substance to Wright's is absurd."
Have you paid any attention to the coverage of this story. When African Americans are interviewed, they aren't surprised by what is being preached at TUCC because they hear similar things in their own churches. Maybe not the exact same quotes or the same levels of prophetic teaching, but the sentiment of much of the preaching at TUCC is common in a majority of Black churches in the U.S.
White people are stunned to find out that Black people are angry. Under all the gospel music and pretty hats, there are angry people sitting in the pews of those Black churches and that the sermons they hear often focus on that anger, on racism, and on oppression. Liberation theology is designed to help people understand that they are God's chosen, that God understands their anger and oppression and rage, and that the Scriptures can liberate them.
I think you should spend time in Black churches Grigory, talk to some African Americans about their church life, read the sermons of the Black Church--including MLK, who was just as radical as what you'd hear in TUCC--and then decide who is the troll.
BO joined TUCC twenty years ago for political reasons. He quit yesterday for political reasons. Give him credit for a perverse kind of consistency: a phony then and a phony now.
What does BO really believe in? What do any us really know about this man? Beware the political messiahs -- the ones who promise to relieve us of whatever plagues us at the moment. Which for voters this year appears to be little more than fatigue with the Clintons and the Bushies. For the benefit of relieving us of our collective fatigue, we are willing to turn over the keys to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to this brilliant and attractive and well-spoken young man whom we really know less about now than we did six months ago.
Daniel,
I'll save Grigory some time. I've spent time in black churches, I've talked to African-Americans about their church life, I've read sermons from the black church, including those by MLK. In addition, I am African-American myself. On the basis of all these facts, I can say with certainty that you are indeed a troll. Have a nice day.
quote: "We can only hope that next election cycle, both parties will come to their senses and only permit certified atheists to run."
It might be a good idea to keep the certified people (atheist or otherwise) in mental facilities instead of running for public office. That would be a first step to solving many of our problems.
rr
So, you "have no doubt that Obama sat there in the pews for 20 years listening to that kind of garbage, and said nothing." Do you have any knowledge of that?
Rod,
How in the world can you claim Obama heard Rev Wright's incendiary rhetoric for 20 years and said nothing? Are you God? Can you look inside the souls of other people?
It's incredibly arrogant and irresponsible of you to assume anything about what Obama knew and when he knew it.
Your guy McCain is so weak on the issues, that you're grasping at straws with this Rev. Wright nonsense. You should be ashamed of yourself for trivializing the campaign by writing about this garbage.
He's a creep. Obama.
But he's not as big a creep as the other guy, who supports this lunatic war. And who has no idea whatever what ordinary people are suffering in the current economic climate, and could care less. (Like most Republicans. Hey, does the noise of the suffering of the masses penetrate my walled compound? Call security, and turn up the sound system. They don't have access to health care? What's that to me, I have a SUPER insurance plan. Turn the sound system up another notch, Jeeves.) And who is over 70 (I'm back to McCain now), and until you're in your 60's you have no concept of what that means in terms of energy levels. NO GO.
As usual in these contests, one votes the lesser of two evils.
Love the bumper sticker I saw here in Berkeley though. CTHULU FOR PRESIDENT, WHY SETTLE FOR THE LESSER EVIL?
(Non-Lovecraft fans, do a google.)
If I sat in a church for 20 years there would have to be something there that would sustain me to be that faithful. And I am sure the teachings were not void either that would enter one's mind.
And, once again I will go to back was the real issue and the real message that the Reverend was giving to the people. And, even if Obama did not say anything he still remained a faithful member of the flock.
I am sure Obama remained because that is where he wanted to be. If I am in a situation I do not like and know there are things wrong I remove myself from the situation. What more is there to say...
Another mystery for the mystery man...
My sense is that it's a lot of wishful thinking for squirmy Republicans. Obama? At least one can say he goes to church. Quick, anybody: what church does W attend every Sunday? Bueller? Bueller?
People leave their churches all the time, and most voters do too. If Obama detractors aren't satisfied not voting for him because he's not a Republican, who cares what reason #2 or reason #10,000 is?
Obama's critics here weren't going to vote for him anyway, so all your bellyachin' is no more than a bunch of spit. Your candidate has had two wives since his return from Vietnam. Tell me, friends, what is more telling of a man's character: his number of wives or his number of churches?
"what church does W attend every Sunday?"
I do not know but I do know that W is not running for President in 2008.
As far as I know, it's St. John's Episcopal Church, Lafayette Square.
More commentariat ADD, I guess.
Let me focus the question, people:
What is more telling of a man's character: his number of wives or his number of churches?
I guess the Oval Office is worth the mass.
Obama is very, very intelligent. You get onto the Harvard Law Review based solely on merit, and it's a very high bar.
Obama's intelligence makes the assertion that he didn't know or didn't understand the theology and the ethos of Trinity untenable.
I'm actually not sure how much the dislocations of the past year have cost him personally. The more I see of him, the more strongly he seems to be dispassionate, detached, cool, and calculating. I have very little confidence that I understand what he really thinks about a whole host of issues, and that makes me uncomfortable.
Barack Obama's handling of this issue has me hoping that Hillary, not he, gets the nomination. Better the liar you know than the one you don't know, right?
On the other hand, I guess it would be more entertaining to see/hear Michelle Obama on the campaign trail than Bill Clinton, who every day looks more and more like Dorian Gray's picture.
Just a sidenote to the discussion of Obama and Trinity: we need to recognize that even though the UCC has become an incredibly liberal denomination (with some members passing through Christianity into some kind of post-Christian belief system), there is still an evangelical renewal movement within the denomination. The renewal movement is often found in rural churches, and the UCC even has a pro-life caucus. As one who attended a UCC church in the 1970s, I just wanted to make this point for the record.
I am as alarmed as anyone else about Trinity church and pastor Wright, and Obama's relationship to them. But in fairness, I wanted folk to realize that not all UCC members can be tarred with the same brush. Although I chose to leave the UCC, I have a huge amount of respect for my theologically conservative brethren who chose to stay and work for renewal within the denomination. I wish Obama was one of those folks working for renewal, but I see no indication of that.
Okay, so now that I've tried to defend the honor of theological conservatives within the UCC, you can go ahead with the debate concerning Obama and Trinity.
BO joined TUCC twenty years ago for political reasons. He quit yesterday for political reasons. Give him credit for a perverse kind of consistency: a phony then and a phony now.
Mel is being brutally honest here.
Does BO believe in God even? Who can tell. He believes in power, that much is clear. Especially in HIS power. (Please not to tell me that McCain is any different!)
Not that this quality distinguishes them from any of our other candidates for high political office.
"I've spent time in black churches, I've talked to African-Americans about their church life, I've read sermons from the black church, including those by MLK. In addition, I am African-American myself. On the basis of all these facts, I can say with certainty that you are indeed a troll."
Nonsense. MLK preached sermons on US foreign policy that were every bit as radical as those of Jeremiah Wright. If MLK were alive today and had been Obama's pastor, Obama would have to feign shock and outrage over his statements. Obama himself referred to the radical nature of some of King's sermons in his interview with Fox News about a month ago.
I don't have much respect for Obama, but I have even less for his opponents and the people who are shocked by Wright. Wright said some really stupid things (mainly the HIV conspiracy theory), but he's right that the US government used black people as lab rats in medical experiments, and he's right that the US has been guilty of terror.
What's wrong with Obama is not that he went to Wright's church. What's wrong with him is his desire to be President. You can't worship both God and political power. Politicians have to pander to people's worst instincts-- especially their unwillingness to think badly of themselves. You can't go to a church like Wright's and listen to harsh criticism of US policy and then expect to run for President and not have this come back to haunt you. He had to have known he can't have it both ways. You can't listen to radical prophetic criticism of US culture (not that all of it is accurate, btw) and then expect to win an election for President without rejecting those same criticisms.
It's a great day for Christians when both presidential contenders have to disassociate themselves from their clergy pals!
I thought I was going to read comments that reflected people with some measure of spirituality. Instead I was shocked. Where was the comapssion, forgiveness, understanding...one would expect of people connecting with Belief Net!
First of all, I do not believe Mr. Obama sat in the pews of that church every Sunday for 20 years. Given he and his wifes professional stature and what they do for a living it isn't even feasible they were there weekly.
Secondly, I can understand people being upset about Rev. Wrights statements and expecting Mr. Obama to respond...and he did without slamming him personally and totally...which I think is very Christian as well honorable of him.
And finally, I think it is ridiculous of people to expect him to have to respond to a guest speaker at his church. How is he responsible for this mans RANT let alone the RANTS of Rev. Wright.
I think it would be helpful if folks would read Obama's words himself to find out where he stands spiritually (read his books)and better yet check out his record. I think as Christians or otherwise the good book says judge a person by their fruits if you are going to judge...which of course the good book says also, Thow shalt not judge lest ye be judged...etc. I think in any case we all should be in prayer that the next president is a peace maker in all areas.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.