You know me, I strongly believe that we should show more respect and stewardship (versus exploitation) for the natural world. But the Swiss government bioethics panel arguing in favor of "plant rights" is asinine. Wesley J. Smith writes that the plant rights sentiment funny, but not ha-ha funny.
What is clear, however, is that Switzerland's enshrining of "plant dignity" is a symptom of a cultural disease that has infected Western civilization, causing us to lose the ability to think critically and distinguish serious from frivolous ethical concerns. It also reflects the triumph of a radical anthropomorphism that views elements of the natural world as morally equivalent to people.Why is this happening? Our accelerating rejection of the Judeo-Christian world view, which upholds the unique dignity and moral worth of human beings, is driving us crazy. Once we knocked our species off its pedestal, it was only logical that we would come to see fauna and flora as entitled to rights.
The intellectual elites were the first to accept the notion of "species-ism," which condemns as invidious discrimination treating people differently from animals simply because they are human beings. Then ethical criteria were needed for assigning moral worth to individuals, be they human, animal, or now vegetable.
Rising to the task, leading bioethicists argue that for a human, value comes from possessing sufficient cognitive abilities to be deemed a "person." This excludes the unborn, the newborn, and those with significant cognitive impairments, who, personhood theorists believe, do not possess the right to life or bodily integrity. This thinking has led to the advocacy in prestigious medical and bioethical journals of using profoundly brain impaired patients in medical experimentation or as sources of organs.
In Switzerland, you can help your yodeling partner kill himself legally. You may, of course, abort your unborn child. But what you may not be able to do, one of these days, is harvest greens without facing government sanction. First they came for the chard, and because I was not a chard plant, I remained silent...

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Sounds like Manichæism may be making a comeback...
Don't ya know killing plants is not allowed? (I didn't mean to kill my chervil plant. Really!)
BTW, your list sounds like you've confused the current crop of Republicans in national office with conservatives. Why would you make that glaring mistake?
No, the 'conservatives' you mention are the very ones who put the current crop of Republicans into those national offices. But your confusion speaks to my point; it's hard to know who's 'conservative' without a program.
"the 'conservatives' you mention are the very ones who put the current crop of Republicans into those national offices. But your confusion speaks to my point; it's hard to know who's 'conservative' without a program."
Many real conservatives were skeptical of this bunch from the beginning. Unfortunately, the media mouthpieces for 'conservatism' are almost all of the neocon variety, so one seldom hears the other side unless you read political journals or conservative websites. Rod's book was a very good thing in this regard, because it prompted many talk-radio/Fox news 'conservatives' to go back and look at the older, more consistent conservativism of folks such as Russell Kirk.
In fact, many Fox/talk conservatives don't even know that an alternative exists. Thus, when paleocons/tradcons talk about environmental stewardship, ecology, etc., they're called liberals. If you don't believe me, call in to a conservative talk show and try questioning factory farming, unlimited free trade, or the wisdom of attempting to spread American democracy worldwide.
Drats. It looks as if somebody already purchased petp.org
Well, plant rights make as much (or as little, if you prefer) sense to me as foetus rights.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.