The false romance of Che Guevara
The NYT's A.O. Scott reports from Cannes that the much-anticipated Steven Soderbergh film "Che" has some glaring omissions: There is a lot, however, that the audience will not learn from this big movie, which has some big problems as well...
THe Left IS a cold blooded killing machine. Always has been and always will be. That is why Che and abortionists and all Marxists are celebrated as heroes. Karl Marx has his disciples and they do not believe in loving their enemies. It is hate unstoppable that drives Leftist ideologues. And a love of weapons to spread their message of death or subjugation.
The lefty hero Che HATED homosexuals (had them sent to camps) and had prisoners (including children) executed for their politics. What do you bet Soderberg is against the death penalty and in favor of gay marraige? These people disgust me. There is no limit to barbarism they will support, even if it contradicts their alleged beliefs.
You mentioned a Catholic priest who was horrified by the executions. Good for him! But the fact is that many, many Catholic priests and nuns lined up to praise Castro, Che, and the Sandinistas as "champions of the poor," with VERY LITTLE criticism from their Bishops. This continued even after the mass graves of Mosquito Indians was found in Nicaragua [Mosquito Indians are the Indians whose oppression you don't read about in school].
I recently saw a Stations of the Cross from the Maryknoll Nuns. Each station featured (in addition to Christ's suffering) a depiction of suffering from around the globe throughout history. Victims of Pinochet were prominently featured. Nothing from any communist country (and no Jews, of course). Some things never change.
Congratulations for helping bring this brutal man's monstrous actions to the light, Rod. The same passage of his diaries you quote says in full: "maddened by rage, I shall dye my rifle red while I tear up every foe that falls into my hands; I gorge on the smell of gunpowder and blood; the deaths of my enemies prepares me for the sacred struggle and I become one with the triumphant proletariat with a savage cry" [my translation]. He also claims, elsewhere, the will to create "one, ten, a hundred Vietnams" in America.
All socialism and marxism has ever brought Latin America are rivers and rivers of blood.
Come, come, Rod. What's all the fuss and bluster about? No doubt Che broke a few eggs in making his omelet, but what are the lives of a few reactionary kulaks when measured against the hip frisson Che brings to the t-shirt-wearing, dorm-room-poster-hanging masses all the way from Williamsburg, NY to Cambridge, Mass. Oh yes, San Francisco, too.
Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can!
Viva la Revolucion!
Peace-out!
People use the image of Che in exactly the same way that others in the U.S. use the Confederate battle flag. It's just a sexy symbol of rebellion and there's no intent to emulate any historical reality. You're not a monster or morally perverse if you have a rebel flag on your truck, and ditto for the Che shirt. Lighten up.
When my wife and I watched The Motorcycle Diaries, she asked why some people didn't like this good humanitarian.
The Motorcycle Diaries was a good flick, but again, it only told part of the story.
Monster is a good word.
People use the image of Che in exactly the same way that others in the U.S. use the Confederate battle flag. It's just a sexy symbol of rebellion and there's no intent to emulate any historical reality. You're not a monster or morally perverse if you have a rebel flag on your truck, and ditto for the Che shirt. Lighten up.
So, presumably, if one has a T-shirt with Adolf Eichmann or William Calley, and a flag of apartheid South Africa on one's truck, then it could conceivably just be a "sexy symbol of rebellion."
The willful blindness is staggering. Lord, have mercy.
"So, presumably, if one has a T-shirt with Adolf Eichmann or William Calley, and a flag of apartheid South Africa on one's truck, then it could conceivably just be a "sexy symbol of rebellion."
Nazis and pro-Apartheid folks weren't rebels. Your analogy fails.
Nazis and pro-Apartheid folks weren't rebels. Your analogy fails.
No, it doesn't. They, like Che, were murderers, which was the point--and your failure to grasp this illustrates what I find distasteful about your point of view.
Rebellion excuses nothing. Can you hear the drums, Fernando?
Actually, when I see someone in this day and age with a Confederate flag on their truck, I assume that person is a redneck racist, or at the very least someone who doesn't care much for how that image appears to their black or Northern countrymen, so that analogy fails also. From where I'm sitting, if you are walking around with Che Guevara on your t-shirt or a Confederate flag on your pickup truck, you are either a moron with no sense or knowledge of history, or a moral bankrupt (i.e.: Communist in one circumstance, neo-Confederate racist in the other).
Communists have murdered a whole lot of people. I get that. It's horrible. And, nobody wears a Stalin shirt. I personally wouldn't put up a Che poster or have a Confederate Flag on my car.
My original "lighten up" comment was directed at conservative-leaning Americans because there are at least as many confederate flag stickers as there are Che shirts. I reacted because all the comments here were of the "see how morally perverse people on the left are" variety.
Everyone can now continue their brave denunciations of Stalinism.
Not sure the Conf. flag issue equates entirely here. The Duke boys were Southerners not slave owners. If they had run around with Che on the top of their car I would have thought them Marxists. Now if the Duke boys took the Charger up to NYC they would have been wise to stop in Newark and put Lincoln on the roof, for he was the sort of murderer that commanded the respect in them parts. If you ask me, we need to blame Warhol. It it wasn't for his soup can people wouldn't be walking around putting Che and Conf. flags on purses in the first place, and may I remind you Warhol was a Northerner.
I agree Rod. I read a biography of Che a couple of years ago after watching the Motorcycle Diaries (very nice film). I can't look at the 'romantic' image of Che the same way any longer. The man was a cold blooded killer. I'll be interested in the biopic, but I'm always bothered when a biopic leaves out information. It's critical to the understanding of a person that you see a full examination, warts and all. I did come away with an admiration for Che's commitment. We could all learn something about dedication at least.
Wingless Crow's comments show a regrettable lack of perspective. Certainly Nazi's weren't rebels when they were running the German government, but neither was Che when he was Castro's henchman in the new communist government of Cuba. But the Nazi's were definitely rebels of a sort - against the bourgeois Weimar Republic - for most of the 1920s. Doesn't that make them just as effective symbols of rebellion as Che?
Ouch. Repeating the same horrible apostrophe mistake in the same post! Please excuse my barbarism - merely the result of haste and not, I promise, of illiteracy.
The uncritical adoration of this monster gives me similar pause.
A more critical view of Che is well presented in the Cuban-American, Andy Garcia movie, "Lost City," which depicts Che at his best cold-blooded viciousness. The movie set off howls of protest from Che's adoring fans.
It's odd hearing the declamations against Che for executing so many people, and for refusing to commute any sentences. We execute more people than almost any other country. And George Bush, as governer of Texas, had a reputation for never commuting sentences, which he largely continued into the White House.
I can see the right hating Che for many reasons, but a strictly enforced death penalty, with little hope for appeal hardly seems one of them. Nor for running brutal prisons or torturing the innocent, which we seem to have taken up as well. Decry his love of violence, his venom, his ideology all you want, but whining about his correctional institutions and capital punishment policies seems like the pot calling the kettle black.
JPLs ridiculous comment reminds me of perusing an Amnesty International annual report from the late 70s where the human rights abuses of each country of the world were treated. The abuses present in America had their own chapter with pages upon pages of reports of prison guards using racial slurs, a county court judge in East Boogerpatch who referred to a prosecuting attorney as "honey," and similar violations of human dignity. The entry for Cambodia was a single sentence: "Numerous extra-judicial executions."
I second Lost City as an excellent corrective to the bloodlust of white middle class capitalist crypto-fascist revolutionaries. Che was a monster and the excuse of "conservatives kill people too" is, in addition to being mostly a fabrication, not a defense.
"The uncritical adoration of this monster gives me similar pause."
Surely you jest, oh please tell me you jest. I suppose I am the fool for even approaching you. Good heavens, sometimes reading some of the writers on here makes one look for the hills.
Does anyone else remember the Church of England ad campaign in the late 1990s which depicted Jesus in the manner of Che?
http://www.rejesus.co.uk/expressions/faces_jesus/gallery/che.html
http://www.indianexpress.com/res/web/pIe/ie/daily/19990107/00750715.html
Nazis and pro-Apartheid folks weren't rebels. Your analogy fails.
Actually, they were -- against the liberal Weimar Republic in the former example; first against British colonialism and later against decolonization in the latter example.
In fact, the very argument being made is exactly why Guevara has been so blindly lionized: "rebellion" being cited (implicitly) as a good thing; plus and relatedly "rebellion" being inevitably constructed as a feature of the left (the goodies) and never the right (the baddies).
Loudon ... JPL is cribbing from a long-standing tactic dating from the Cold War, and hardly even believed by the people who did it then. It was called the And You Are Lynching Negroes line, and it's entered the languages of most of the ex-commie countries in ironic use.
When "The Motorcycle Diaries" came out, Paul Berman posted the following review on the cult of Che in SLATE magazine: http://www.slate.com/id/2107100/
BTW, this new "Che" movie is supposed to be almost unwatcheable. "The Motorcycle Diaries" movie is at least entertaining.
There are some people on the Left who I think are deluded enough to hero worship murderers and anti-American dictators such as Che, Fidel, Hugo Chavez, Osama, or Qadafi. They should consider the case of the former Black Panther the late Eldridge Cleaver, who was permanently cured of his infatuation with dictators after living in exile for several years in Libya. He returned to the U.S. and spent his remaining years advocating right-wing positions.
Read Paco Tiabo's book "Guevara, Also Known As Che" for one of the few truthful depictions of Che and the Cuban Revolution.
The overthrow of Arbenz in 1954 (by the usual supsects)is what really set Che off on the road to violence.
Whoever abuses Che is an enemy of the human spirit of struggle. Those whom Che executed were not innocent kids. They were rapists, counter revolutionary rascals and traitors. Why doesn't anyone think that punishing a traitor, irrespective of his age is a great service to any nation? Che Guevara was a hero and no one, not even the lord in heaven can deny this. Ask us, the oppressed people, about Che Guevara's real legacy...
Maybe Che was a purest in his ideology, and the Castro regime let him down, and he didn't live long enough to see such a system enforced that could perfect a "worker's utopia." Actually, he would have never lived long enough or killed enough people, because such ideals don't exist in the real world, left or right; if you have to kill em to control em, you have lost before you have even started.
All you Che admirers, please take a trip to Cuba and give your return ticket to a Che distracter so he may enjoy your wisdom and happiness. Drop a note every once in a while. If you live in Cuba presently and are a Che groupie, then by default, you must be a party member and are enjoying all the benefits of a "class" society, so don't waste our time with your comments.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.