Crunchy Con

Where is God in the storm?

Thursday May 8, 2008

Categories: Religion (general)

In the wake of the Burmese cyclone, the Orthodox Christian theologian David Hart has republished on the First Things site a theodical reflection he wrote after the Asian tsunami. It is rich, rewarding reading. Here's how it ends:

I do not believe we Christians are obliged — or even allowed — to look upon the devastation visited upon the coasts of the Indian Ocean and to console ourselves with vacuous cant about the mysterious course taken by God’s goodness in this world, or to assure others that some ultimate meaning or purpose resides in so much misery. Ours is, after all, a religion of salvation; our faith is in a God who has come to rescue His creation from the absurdity of sin and the emptiness of death, and so we are permitted to hate these things with a perfect hatred. For while Christ takes the suffering of his creatures up into his own, it is not because he or they had need of suffering, but because he would not abandon his creatures to the grave. And while we know that the victory over evil and death has been won, we know also that it is a victory yet to come, and that creation therefore, as Paul says, groans in expectation of the glory that will one day be revealed. Until then, the world remains a place of struggle between light and darkness, truth and falsehood, life and death; and, in such a world, our portion is charity.

As for comfort, when we seek it, I can imagine none greater than the happy knowledge that when I see the death of a child I do not see the face of God, but the face of His enemy. It is not a faith that would necessarily satisfy Ivan Karamazov, but neither is it one that his arguments can defeat: for it has set us free from optimism, and taught us hope instead. We can rejoice that we are saved not through the immanent mechanisms of history and nature, but by grace; that God will not unite all of history’s many strands in one great synthesis, but will judge much of history false and damnable; that He will not simply reveal the sublime logic of fallen nature, but will strike off the fetters in which creation languishes; and that, rather than showing us how the tears of a small girl suffering in the dark were necessary for the building of the Kingdom, He will instead raise her up and wipe away all tears from her eyes — and there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying, nor any more pain, for the former things will have passed away, and He that sits upon the throne will say, “Behold, I make all things new.”


Comments
MH
May 9, 2008 8:48 PM

Tim don't let those two books touch each other or they might annihilate!

I sort of take the statement that suffering is beyond human reason as the theists "I don't know." It is a good honest answer.

It's what I always say when someone asks me how the universe got here.

Scott Walker
May 9, 2008 11:20 PM

Tim: thanks for engaging. I'm no philosopher, and lack the rhetorical chops to play on that field. A couple of questions: what is the metric by which one determines whether there is "too much freedom"? Who gets to make that call, and what are his or her qualifications? Would that sort of judgement call be left, perhaps to a level of omniscience that even Wittgenstein lacks? And whoever James Wood is, Heaven is a state of ultimate freedom, wherein we are the gods we were created to be. The proper relation of a created being to the Creator is obedience, but a sort of obedience that is much more like a dance than a parade ground. Elizabeth: natural disasters are the inevitable consequence of living planet instead of a stage set. If you have a molten core, you are going to have tectonic plates driven by convection currents that bang into one another. If you have a hot equator and cold poles, there is going to be circulation of air, and occasionally that circulation is going to be violent. It is possible, I suppose, to imagine a god who would suspend the laws of physics every single time a bad consequence would attend their operation, but I cannot then imagine a world where our actions are truly free. Thinking about the disaster in Myanmar, I note that, bad as the storm itself was, the suffering of those poor people is magnified manyfold by the disgusting actions of their paranoid military junta in refusing the aid the rest of the world is trying to offer, and try as one might, it seems hard to blame God for that.

Susan
May 10, 2008 2:04 AM

I sort of take the statement that suffering is beyond human reason as the theists "I don't know." It is a good honest answer.

It's what I always say when someone asks me how the universe got here.

Honest science, real science (as opposed to Sunday newspaper science) is full of "I don't know"s. We theists ought to be permitted a few, I think.

Whether you take a theist or a scientific point of view (of just rely on common sense), it seems obvious that human intelligence is limited. There are things we don't understand, and things we are not smart enough to understand. Both mystics and scientists are always pushing that envelope, an honorable task, but the honest among them admit that there is an envelope.

The position that "I don't understand this, so I will stalk off in a huff" is more worthy of the 4-year-old granddaughter I am presently visiting than of reasonable adults.

AnotherBeliever
May 10, 2008 12:39 PM

Thanks for posting that, I do tire of people trying to convince themselves that death and sickness and decay and war and natural disasters are all somehow part of God's plan. I have seen the death of men I loved, and men who were my sworn enemies, and in both cases my most basic reaction is that death is wrong, death is a waste. (There are a small number of things worse than death of course, but this does not change the fact.)

God works in spite of them, and occasionally through them, but these events do not emanate from him and are in fact diametrically opposed to his Kingdom. Trying to comfort ourselves or others with little platitudes about "God's will" may in the end lead some to a crisis and loss of faith. None of us can truly comprehend God's will, except perhaps, occasionally, in the smallest matters.

meh
May 12, 2008 12:53 AM

"— and there shall be no more death, nor sorrow, nor crying, nor any more pain, for the former things will have passed away, and He that sits upon the throne will say, “Behold, I make all things new.”"

That's not going to happen. There is no God.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement