Crunchy Con

[Erin] The seal of the...candidate?

Friday June 20, 2008

Categories: Politics (general)
I honestly don't know what to make of this. It seems more than a little...presumptuous, don't you think?...
Advertisement
Comments
aaron
June 20, 2008 6:36 PM

I'm waiting for tailored vestments.

Christopher Mohr
June 20, 2008 7:21 PM

this is exactly the kind of thing that made me say last year "none of these schmucks is worth voting for". I stand by my thoughts.

allen
June 20, 2008 7:45 PM

I support Sen. Obama. I will almost certainly be voting for him, and I intend to volunteer to help get him elected.

This "seal" is completely inappropriate, however. If Sen. Clinton had used something like this we'd hear endless moanings from the Obama camp about her "sense of entitlement" and "deep narcissism". While I doubt my voice will carry very far, I will be writing to his campaign to let them know this is unacceptable.

mm
June 20, 2008 8:40 PM

Zero Possums. Thanks!

Karen Brown
June 20, 2008 9:38 PM

I agree with that. Inappropriate to use that until actually elected. And I'll be letting them know that too.

Lord Karth
June 20, 2008 9:49 PM

I'm surprised he hasn't appropriated the Crucifix for his personal/political use.

That, however, is probably just a matter of time.

Your servant,

Lord Karth

naturalmom
June 20, 2008 11:11 PM

Yeah -- he should probably loose it. But maybe not right away. Because you know what? Between the chutzpa he shows with this seal and the gobs of money he's going to have to spend, I'm finally getting to experience what it must feel like to be a supporter of Republicans! It's nice! lol! ;o)

Mel
June 21, 2008 6:49 AM

Karen Brown: "I agree with that. Inappropriate to use that until actually elected. And I'll be letting them know that too."


So, you think it is OK to replace the Seal of the United States with this new seal AFTER he is elected ("Inappropriate to use that until actually elected.")

To replace the motto of the US (E Pluribus Unum) with this inane Fuhrerprinzip slogan (Yes We Can) tells us everything we need to know about this guy.

JLF
June 21, 2008 8:43 AM

Actually, this "seal" can be a pretty good litmus test: the more objection, the less likely that person will vote for Obama in November. I guess that identifies me as an Obama voter, because I saw the thing for what I believe it was intended to be, political humor. And if you didn't see it that way, I guess you could say you don't see an Obama victory in November as a laughing matter.

Karen Brown
June 21, 2008 9:56 AM

Inappropriate, Mel, to use the Presidential seal, period, until the president.

That was all. And as political humor, its perfectly fine.


Unsympathetic reader
June 21, 2008 4:42 PM

Lord Karth: "I'm surprised he hasn't appropriated the Crucifix for his personal/political use."

The cleaning bills were considered too expensive after Bush/Cheney/Rove appropriated it for their own use. Look how well it worked for Huckabee.

Phil Ebersole
June 22, 2008 4:19 PM

Isn't it fairly obvious that the so-called Presidential seal was meant humorously? tongue-in-cheek?

Marian Neudel
June 22, 2008 5:52 PM

Not all seals are presidential seals. Back in the Good Old Days, everybody literate enough to sign documents had a seal of some sort.

Marian Neudel
June 22, 2008 5:54 PM

And if I ever get the chance to have a seal (presidential or otherwise), the motto will be "Quidquid circumvadet circumvenit."

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.