It's been a couple of weeks since I checked in with James Howard Kunstler's site. He's got some new stuff up. Here's an excerpt of an interview he did with the Russell Kirk Center's University Bookman:
3. What is your opinion of the legacy of the baby boomers? Will they be remembered as a generation that brought idealism to public life again, or a generation that could not see beyond its own interests in light of the looming oil problem?The boomers managed to degrade all the standards and norms of behavior necessary to keep our civilization going, and to respond to changing circumstances effectively. A simple example is Boomer finance. Boomer lending practices, especially in the realm of mortgages, has led to a credit fiasco so exorbitant that it may destroy the legitimacy of capital as a general proposition far into the future (the way the "Mississippi Bubble" discredited banking in France for more than a century). Boomer greed and narcissism has led us into an economy based on the expectation of unearned riches. I agree with the authors Strauss and Howe who say, in their excellent book, The Fourth Turning, that Boomers will be harshly punished in their old age by their children and grandchildren by the withdrawal of support. I hasten to add that the pre-Boomer generation (my parents' generation) was just as bad, though in a different way--they thought they deserved to live in a technological heaven-on-earth as a reward for having fought and survived the Second World War.
4. Is there any political figure you see who recognizes or is addressing the natural resource problem?
Well, Al Gore is an obvious choice, but more for his very public campaign about climate change, which is the flip side of the resource problem. The rest of the scene is sort of like the 1850s--you have two major parties (back then, the Whigs and Democrats) losing legitimacy and credibility, and the whole nation paralyzed over the issue of slavery. Today it's a paralysis over looming fossil fuel scarcities and the flip side of climate change. Both the Republicans and Democrats are preoccupied with idiotic distractions like the issues arising out of gender confusion. I'm a dissatisfied registered Democrat. I would like to see my party become less preoccupied with homosexual issues and more active on restoring the U.S. passenger rail system. The time has come for those suffering from gender confusion to take their problems out of the political arena and work them out in private. The Republicans, on the other hand, face even more acute problems regarding loss-of-legitimacy as a result of the Iraq war fiasco and the impressive body of scandal generated by its members the past decade. We're in for some big political changes, in my opinion, but my crystal ball is pretty cloudy for the moment.
And, as ever, his "Cluster**ck Nation Chronicle" available on his site's main page is a real rip. Excerpt from the latest:
What's happening is that American society is sliding into a greater depression than the one Grandma lived through. On the technical side, there has been unending controversy as to whether we're gripped by inflation or deflation. It's certainly deceptive. Food and gasoline prices are rising faster than the rivers of Iowa. But the prices of assets, like houses, stocks, jet-skis, GMC Yukons and pre-owned Hummel figurines are cratering as America turns into Yard Sale Nation.We're a very different country than we were in 1932. In that earlier crisis of capital, few people had any money but our society still possessed fantastic resources. We had plenty of everything that our land could provide: a treasure trove of mineral ores and the equipment to refine it all, a wealth of oil and gas still in the ground, and all the rigs needed to get at it, manpower galore (and of a highly disciplined, regimented kind), with fine-tuned factories waiting for orders. We had a railroad system that was the envy of the world and millions of family farms (even despite the dust bowl) owned by people who retained age-old skills not yet degraded by agribusiness. We had fully-functional cities with operating waterfronts and ten thousand small towns with local economies, local newspapers, and local culture.
... Our debt problems today are of a magnitude so extreme that astronomers would be hard pressed to calculate them.
For people who like this sort of thing, this is the sort of thing they like.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
However, his other comments are straight from the anti-gay playbook.
Hey, you got any idea where I can get one of those? I seem to have misplaced my copy.
Kunstler simply seems to be saying that homosexual issues have been driving politics more than is warranted, relative to what he feels are other more pressing concerns. Agree or disagree, it certainly should be considered a reasonable point of view.
It has drive politics. Republican politics.
Repeatably attacking a single point causes that point to be defended more than other places. It's not rocket science.
In fact, Republicans have spent a good deal more time fighting homosexual issues than Democrats have spent pushing them. The 'Democratic' pushes have almost always been single lawsuits by one or two people, unsupported by the party and not part of some plan to get people elected, whereas the Republicans force stupid constitutional amendments on the the ballot and run ads against gay marriage and all sorts of things.
But, like I always say, whenever Republicans claim the Democrats are doing something, that might be true...but it's almost certain that the Republicans are doing it more. It's you guys who are focused on teh gay, not us. Compare this blog to any left-blog not specifically aimed towards homosexual issues.
And I would bet that at least 80% of Democrats would agree in general with his sentiment.
I certainly would. I don't really give a damn about gay people. They're nothing special. I don't understand why the Democrats don't just give them full marriage rights and move on. They'll be happy, us Democrats can concentrate on other things so people pushing those issues are happy (Me, I want health care reform.), everyone is happy.
If only I could remember why we hadn't done that...
Like Kunstler was saying...
Call me a homophobe, I don't care. The economic meltdown/mortgage mess/peak oil/inflation/budget deficit problem is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay more important than gay rights. I think that there is something very accurate in the observation that Democrats have become the party of gay rights to the exclusion of more important issues. And of course, gays themselves have to take some of the blame for thinking that they are the center of the universe.
First, it's not called "gender confusion", the clinical term is Gender Identity Disorder, the common term is transgenderism. And I don't "suffer" from it, I am a 100% happy, healthy transgender woman who continues to contribute to society in positive ways.
Second, I very much took my "issues" and dealt with them privately, although the local media wouldn't permit a completely private transition (and just how many of us have had our stories told in the media?).
Third, what issues I have taken into the political arena are solely those that need political recourse (i.e. employment discrimination) or have been thrust upon me by the political realm (i.e. the Real ID Act).
The vast majority of us would love nothing more than to live our lives in quiet, peace and privacy - but the government and society won't let us. For me, neither party is offering comfort, I shall not be voting for either Presidential candidate.
And for those that would play the Bible card, try reading my blog essays at:
http://chrysalismission.blogspot.com/2007/08/overview.html
Learn something for a change instead of retreating into your presumptions about who I am and what the Bible says.
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.