Crunchy Con

Obama schmaltz jumps shark in Berlin

Friday July 25, 2008

Categories: Democrats

David Brooks identifies exactly what put me off about Obama's schmaltzy Berlin speech:


Much of the rest of the speech fed the illusion that we could solve our problems if only people mystically come together. We should help Israelis and Palestinians unite. We should unite to prevent genocide in Darfur. We should unite so the Iranians won't develop nukes. Or as Obama put it: "The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christian and Muslim and Jew cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down."

The great illusion of the 1990s was that we were entering an era of global convergence in which politics and power didn't matter. What Obama offered in Berlin flowed right out of this mind-set. This was the end of history on acid.

Since then, autocracies have arisen, the competition for resources has grown fiercer, Russia has clamped down, Iran is on the march. It will take politics and power to address these challenges, the two factors that dare not speak their name in Obama's lofty peroration.

The odd thing is that Obama doesn't really think this way. When he gets down to specific cases, he can be hard-headed. Last year, he spoke about his affinity for Reinhold Niebuhr, and their shared awareness that history is tragic and ironic and every political choice is tainted in some way.

But he has grown accustomed to putting on this sort of saccharine show for the rock concert masses, and in Berlin his act jumped the shark. His words drift far from reality, and not only when talking about the Senate Banking Committee. His Berlin Victory Column treacle would have made Niebuhr sick to his stomach.

Yes, absolutely. There was no there there, just "We Are The World" vapid uplift. Four years of this messianic claptrap sounds vomitous. This is just a liberal, Mr. van Driessen version of the high-minded, crusading universalism of G.W. Bush's second inaugural address -- and which, as it turned out, was pretty much the moment that this administration jumped the shark.

Obama hasn't jumped the shark yet, obviously. But he's got to figure out a way to speak about optimism without sounding like such a naif. Then again, it's got him this far, why stop now?

UPDATE: Gerard Baker in the Times of London hits it out of the park with this rapturously sarcastic take on Obama Messiah:


And it came to pass, in the eighth year of the reign of the evil Bush the Younger (The Ignorant), when the whole land from the Arabian desert to the shores of the Great Lakes had been laid barren, that a Child appeared in the wilderness.

The Child was blessed in looks and intellect. Scion of a simple family, offspring of a miraculous union, grandson of a typical white person and an African peasant. And yea, as he grew, the Child walked in the path of righteousness, with only the occasional detour into the odd weed and a little blow.

When he was twelve years old, they found him in the temple in the City of Chicago, arguing the finer points of community organisation with the Prophet Jeremiah and the Elders. And the Elders were astonished at what they heard and said among themselves: "Verily, who is this Child that he opens our hearts and minds to the audacity of hope?"

If American comedians can't find their traction on the Obama Messiah theme, they ought to just give up and get a real job.

Advertisement
Comments
The Man From K Street
July 25, 2008 5:34 PM

Regarding the Berlin speech, and Eurorgasms for BHO in general, what really has me curious what the heck the American media and popular reaction will be when, as is inevitable, the first Obama effigy is hanged and burned by a European crowd in some anti-G8 demonstration a year or two from now.

Houghton
July 25, 2008 5:56 PM

This has nothing to do with Barack, and I am really really weary of PZ Myers and his ilk. But I just had to point out that this afternoon he's posted a picture of a communion host with a rusty nail poked through it, along with a banana peel, coffee grounds, a ripped page of the Koran and a page from Richard Dawkins' "The God Delusion" dumped in the trash (it's beyond pathetic that Myers seems to think that by including this last bit, it somehow ameliorates what he has done).

Paul Zachary Myers begins his post with the intentional words, "It is finished." The comments thread on Myers blog is stunning in its volume - as it is in the sheer ferocity of hatred spewing forth from Myers' fellow atheists.

Here's one of the milder comments: "What a hollow god they serve! How delicious a treatment of their sacred relics!"

I don't think I need to expand on this much, except to note how demonic all of this seems. It's gone beyond smarmy atheist "freethinkers" with a bone to pick against faith in general. Now the snarling rage is there for all to see, and it is very focused against one faith, against one figure in history.

I'm not sure I was prepared for the sick feeling in the pit of my stomach I would experience at witnessing Myers photo. As I've noted here before, I'm not a Catholic and I don't believe in transubstantiation. But what Myers has done is far, far beyond that. He seems trapped in his own version of magical thinking; in other words, he seems to believe that the "symbols" of Christianity are what gives the faith its power. And that is precisely what one under the oppression of the prince of this world would believe.

Myers seems unaware of the consequences of so gravely and deliberately sinning within his own heart. As he himself put it, he did this joyfully and with much laughter in his heart - thus he has committed an act of purposeful desolation, distancing himself from God nearly as far as one poor soul can be.

Others will now follow him with far worse, I fear. Myers has crossed a boundary, and the hatred of aggressive atheism has been loosed. It is no longer the province of folk songs, pithy bumper stickers or amusing droll commentary. It is now what it has always been - the domain of pure hatred.

Pray for them, pray for peace, pray that you yourself can simply forgive them for what they do. And pray for the strength to walk in a manner worthy of Christ in the days ahead.

Virgil Caine
July 25, 2008 7:19 PM

@ Heather and other poster re: Takoma Park

It would appear I have libeled that great lover and anthropological X- rayer of flyover country, Le Bobo. He indeed does live in the wealthier part of the wealthiest county outside of Fairfield CT, where he can shoot his backyard skeet, burn his trash in peace if ain't got time to dump it back off some county road, and amble down to the VFW for a cold Rolling Rock with the boys while watching the Nats lose any given evening. Who needs those poseurs in Manassas or Potomac for that matter? Bobo done staked out what's Real Murka.

So I guess he and Sorkin and Borack and Doughpants Goldberg can relocate the pilot episode confab to Clyde's basement under those cute little model English roadsters festooning the ceiling. Goldberg and Rogen should find plenty to their liking on the menu, but I wonder if Bobo knows that Clyde's, despite what might assume based on the name, don't serve no Brunswick stew or Chicken N' Dumplins.

Robin Thomas
July 25, 2008 11:23 PM

I think that BO is going to burn himself out with BS.
That empty suit is becoming see through.

Eric
July 26, 2008 9:10 PM

"Jump the shark"? What does this mean?

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.