A single female reader of "Crunchy Cons" writes:
Your book was recommended to me by a friend recently, and I am nearly finished reading it. I have so enjoyed the way I have seen my views validated and some of them challenged. I was raised "conservative" republican, which basically meant we were anti-gay and pro-life and went to church. Environmentalists, the welfare system, and human rights groups were evil tree huggers and the dregs of society. What's funny to me is that my parents unintentionally raised me to be as crunchy as I am. We lived simply, were homeschooled most of our lives, learned to cook/bake, had dinner together every night, and ate our fresh veggies straight from the garden. My parents always encouraged me to be an artist (I'm a writer and a photographer) and a servant of all (in our community, our church, and the world). As an adult, I have worked in social services and overseas missions for many years, and have come to see that there is something vastly wrong in the way we (Americans? Westerners? People in general?) live our lives. I found that what I read in your book spoke directly to my desire for something else.However, I must say that I was saddened by the fact that the single adult was grossly underrepresented. In your discussion about food and family and faith, rarely did you mention the many young adults who are trying to navigate those waters alone. I am not sure why that is, and I am not faulting you. And yet, I wondered "How are other singles living out these values?" You see, as a single woman (who does long for a family one day), I find that living as a "crunchy con" is uniquely challenging. I do not have built in support systems of a spouse or fellow parents. My "family" is made up of other people who live in other homes. I want to eat fresh and homemade food, but often I find myself eating alone. It's just not as fun to open a bottle of wine and enjoy steamed veggies and broiled chicken served to one person. We singles try to live life together, but, lets be honest, it's much harder than it sounds. And being a single, I often feel that other conservatives are thinking "one day, she'll grow up and get married and then she can join us"; and that's a very degrading feeling.
I personally dream of a community where I do not eat alone and where I participate in the education of my friends children and where I am an aunt and sister in other crunchy con families. I dream of a community where I am free to be a creative adult, bringing restoration to God's world, and have a valid standing as a whole person, with or without a spouse and children of my own. It's not that I choose to be single because I don't value family, but rather I choose not to marry the wrong person because I have so much faith in the value of the family.
Perhaps your other writings have been more conducive to both singles and non-singles. I don't know what I expect out of writing you. I guess I just felt that the single woman (and man) needed to have her (his) voice heard in the "crunchy con" world. Thank you for your writings. Keep up the great work.
I really appreciate the reader's kind words, and it's true that I didn't write about single people in "Crunchy Cons," though the omission wasn't conscious. I'm going to send this reader a link to this post, so perhaps she can join in the discussion in the comboxes. I'm curious to know what readers here have to say about her experiences. For that matter, it's hard to live out these values if you're a married couple, but don't have a community to turn to for support. So everybody, let's hear from you re: your experiences, and your advice.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
I would agree with several of the posters here - I would love to spend some time with your kids in your messy house. I'd even like to help out if I could - even if it was just making them a basic lunch of macaroni and cheese while you sat down for a bit - though I don't think for moment the kids would leave you alone, at least you'd be off your feet. One of the platoon sergeants in my company has invited me to his place a couple of times - he has three adorable little girls and a baby boy, and I just melted being around them. Having a conversation with a little girl especially can right many temporary wrongs I think.
Not all singles would enjoy this. But it seems quite a few would. Doesn't hurt to ask, just keep an eye out for those singles who cast a longing look on your brood as you bundle them up after church for the car ride home. If everyone keeps their sense of humor about them, everything should go off without a hitch!
But on a larger scale, we do really need more community-based set-ups for the good of everyone. One of the pluses of the military is that everyone lives in community. If you are single, you are warehoused in the barracks, which is annoying in some respects (I would kill for a kitchen) But at least you're never alone. Ever...
Unit cohesion dictates regular get-togethers, ranging from the family friendly barbecue where single folks will encounter little ones, to big field days, to informal drinking parties dominated by singles, either at someone's house or at a bar (or series of them of course.)
Among married soldiers there's a real sense of community with people helping each other out with yardwork and child-watching and passing around hand-me-downs and so forth. Everyone in the military system, from school age up, is invested into the military mission. It's a sense of common purpose, and it's enough to bring together fairly different people.
I'm not sure how you'd encourage this kind of behavior in the "real world." Co-housing is one option. Maybe throwing big block parties and volunteer events which require a lot of bodies are others. Living near your parents or relatives is ideal, of course. But there's not always good work to be had there. And even if you did move home, with your luck, your parents would retire to Florida five years later. We really need to rethink things as an entire society, and I have no recipe for that.
Toad, I'm not sure if you or anyone else will read this, now that the post is off the first page (the perils of an excessively active blog, alas), but I'll respond anyhow just in case.
I haven't yet decided whether seeking a wife will necessarily require moving out of my parents' house (as I plan on being chaste, bedroom privacy it isn't an absolute must), but marriage certainly will. I agree with the popular opinion that living by one's self is excellent practice for the responsibilities of marriage, and I'd like to make sure and get it before the big test.
However, I don't tend to think of such things in terms of "self-sufficiency." I think that American culture vastly overvalues that quality. "Responsibility" is a different concept, related to stewardship and duty rather than autonomy and freedom. It's responsibility that I expect to eventually cultivate through independent living, not "self-sufficiency," as I think the latter is a dangerous illusion. It's also, I think one of the main causes of loneliness nowadays.
But, to be frank, the ideals of responsibility and preparation for marriage are taking a back seat right now to economic realities. Living at home, I can save money like nobody's business and get out from under my student loans. Since I enjoy my family's company and my parents rarely impinge on the freedoms I value, I have very little incentive to leave, and a great deal to stay. They don't seem to mind having me about either.
But I've promised to leave as soon as I believe I'm taking advantage of their hospitality. And I swear I won't become another Ignatius J. Reilly. :)
well Ethan, as a single woman, I would say I probably would not date or consider marrying a man who still lived with his parents. At 26, some say I should stop being so picky. However, there are things you learn living on your own-- from bills, to house cleaning, to self discipline, that you just don't learn with your parents. I have actually known many men who have lived with their parents until married, for financial reasons, and frankly they weren't ready for the responsibility of a wife and family when they did get married. I'm not saying you personally, Ethan, will not be ready, but it's something to consider.
However, I don't tend to think of such things in terms of "self-sufficiency." I think that American culture vastly overvalues that quality. "Responsibility" is a different concept, related to stewardship and duty rather than autonomy and freedom. It's responsibility that I expect to eventually cultivate through independent living, not "self-sufficiency," as I think the latter is a dangerous illusion. It's also, I think one of the main causes of loneliness nowadays.
Hello, Ethan. Yes, "responsibility" is a better word for what I mean. Thank you!
Sarah the 'reader' gave a lot of good examples of why it's good for an adult to live on his/her own for a while. I think that the way a person (man or woman) orders his/her household is a really important indicator of compatibility. If I visit you at your parents' house, I'm most likely seeing their comfort level with clutter, their taste in colors and furnishings, their standards of cleanliness. But what I want to know about is how tidy you are, colors that you find comfortable and restful, how clean you keep a kitchen, how your yard looks. These are not trivial things. If a man is going to be the head of his household, he needs to know how to hold house -- and how will he know how if he doesn't do it?
Anyway, none of this is aimed at you personally.
Best regards!
That last was me. -Toad
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.