Crunchy Con

Take the Autism Quotient quiz

Friday July 18, 2008

Categories: Varia

A friend whose grandson is autistic tells me that this 50-question assessment devised by Cambridge University is considered by those in the autism community to be a pretty accurate assessment of where one falls on the autism spectrum. It'll take you only a few minutes to complete it, but the results might startle you. It certainly did startle several readers in a thread below, which is why I'm giving it its own entry.

Most adult males score at or around 17 (out of 50); most adult females score at or around 15. A score of 35 or thereabouts is associated with Asperger's Syndrome, the mildest form of autism. The lower your score, the more empathetic you are (this is not a moral judgment, but one that describes the way you interact with the world and process experience emotionally and psychologically).

I know someone who took it and got a 38; this guy I'd already figured was at least borderline Asperger's. He's pretty communicative, and fairly brilliant, but he's not terribly interested in what others have to say. As long as I've known him, I've been surprised at his lack of empathy for others. Seeing his result from the quiz made me actually more sympathetic to the guy. I'd thought he was kind of a jerk, actually, but now I think the poor fellow suffers from a mild form of autism, and simply doesn't understand how he comes across to others. It was a reminder of me to be careful about judging others, because I had a harsher opinion of this guy until it was revealed through this quiz that he might be struggling with something he's not even aware of.

Anyway, I got a 9 on the quiz. Mr. Empath, that's me. Heh. INFP on the Myers-Briggs, too. FWIW.

Advertisement
Comments
Chris
November 12, 2008 10:37 PM

I got a 40... guess that explains my fascination with dates and math as well as my social awakwardness and inabillity to make eye contact... kinda pissed my parrents missed this...

N.E.R.D.
December 26, 2008 5:43 PM

By the way, the AQ Test is not an autism test, it is a personality test that measures where someone fits on a Bell Curve of normal variants of human personality types from reserved to outgoing..

Autism is a developmental disorder caused by a disruption in early brain development, it is not a psychopathological personality disorder as the test implies.

The idea has been promulgated by polygenic theorists who have redefined the nature of autism, beginning with the publication of the new diagnostic criteria introduced in 1987. The new criteria is so vague, ambigous and subjective that this new conceptualization of what autism is enough to explain the so-called ‘autism epidemic’.

N.E.R.D.
December 26, 2008 5:50 PM

"Mild autism" does not exist!

N.E.R.D.
December 27, 2008 10:00 AM

Autism is a pervasive developmental disorder caused by a disruption in early brain development. That is about the only fact that there is universal agreement on. Theorists like Baron-Cohen are responsible for the autism epidemic because they have redefined the nature of autism from what it is, a disruption in early brain development to what it is not, a personality disorder.

Andrew
October 3, 2009 9:30 PM

I tend to agree with the commenters here. I think this is a personality test more than a diagnostics test for autism. While I scored a 38 I don't lack for empathy at all.

I feel my score in fact is the collision between my natural gregariousness and empathy and the cold, indifferent, and predatory nature of industrial culture. My reaction to such pervasive treatment is natually to withdraw in order to protect myself from such attitudes.

In fact, I would think someone who was gregarious in a culture such as this must be oblivious to the social cues they are receiving and might more likely be lacking empathy than an extremely reserved person. I think our instincts have yet to catch up with what industrialization has wrought. Witness Ted Bundy and other such serial menaces.

I am certainly not indifferent to the fate of others nor do I wish to go on a witch hunt to find what faults I can in others as it seems most people are today; their claims to the contrary not withstanding.

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam. You have a limited time to type - you may wish to compose your comment in a separate document and paste it here upon completion.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

Advertisement

Advertisement


About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.