This from Richard, in a Palin combox thread below. Lots to consider in this balanced consideration:
As a former Alaskan, my first reaction is purely and simply tribal. Wow. Some random thoughts.I have met Sarah Palin (n.b. Alaska is a small state, so evereyone meets everyone else, ultimately). In a small setting, she comes across as informed, charming, and very good looking. Did I tell you she is good looking. The big question, shortly to be answered, is whether she can play in Minneapolis as well as she played in Wasilla. This is a big, big, question, and McCain has bet big on red, and is now watching the little silver ball roll around the roulette wheel. She is a walk the talk Christian, not a political Christian. Of all the various things that have been written or said about the Palin's fifth child, the one that says the most to me about their "values" (I hate the term, but it will have to serve) as a family is the quote from the Palin's oldest of four, and only son, Track, now serving in Iraq, who said simply: "I'm thrilled. I always wanted a brother".
The Palins are definitely Sam's Club Republicans. Wasilla is exurban Anchorage, the sort of place where one finds F-150s and hardly any Volvos, and where people shop at Costco and Target, and eat at Chepo's Fiesta -- when they're not barbecuing salmon they've caught themselves. The Palins fished in Bristol Bay for heaven's sake, which involves a three to four day trip around the Alaska Peninisula from a Homer or Seward home port, out of radio range, where your two or three crewmates are who you have to depend on if things go wrong. And they can go very wrong. The Bristol Bay red run is not quite "deadliest catch", but it's no walk in the park, either. And Todd Palin has won a couple of Iron Dog snowmachine races back and forth between Wasilla and Nome. McCain may have just locked away NASCAR country's votes.
The big question I have, having watched Sarah Palin's career, is can she function as a key contributor in a major and sustained political effort that is not about her? She is not an organization Republican nor, is it yet clear, an organization person necessarily ready to adapt to someone else's organization. Now, given the state of things in the republican party in Alaska, not being an organization Republican is probably a good thing. But this is now a ticket with two mavericks, one of whom will need to serve as VICE president. How will she contribute, and will she possess the management chops to take on whatever portfolio is shared with her, and add value?
Big questions. Huge learning curve ahead.
In the intimate environment Alaska presents, Sarah Palin has most usually been among the most clever people in the room. We will shortly see how she performs when she moves from Alaska Class 4A to her debate with Joe Biden. The potential for a Dan Quayle moment is not infinitesimal. On the other hand, her selection sets up the possibility of an interesting one-on-one with Barack Obama. He's had the gym floor all to himself the past few months, three point shots and all. Unlike Barack, Sarah has a championship ring, as a former Wasilla Lady Warrior.
Do not assume that because Sarah Palin has been picked, that John McCain has gone all soft on the oil industry. Spend some time googling "Palin", "Gas Line", "ExxonMobil", and "Point Thompson", and you will quicky discover enough information to squelch any thought that Gov. Palin is in any way cordial toward Big Oil. The question is whether her Administration's thumb on the scales to favor a Canadian company for the gas line project -- a company whose capital and management chops for a project of that magnitude remain uncertain -- will blow up some time during the next four years will be very interesting to watch.
For the next 48 hour news cycle, this is an inspired political pick. For the next 60 days and beyond, that little silver ball keeps rolling around the roulette wheel. I have this funny hunch that when that little ball stops, we will instantly know what McCain has risked with this pick. It's the kind of Hail Mary pass that I suppose one ought to expect from a guy who once flew jets off of carriers. McCain fans might just want to pur themselves a double before they sit down and watch CNN/Fox the next few weeks.

Add to Newsvine
Add to StumbleUpon
Let me try to restate my case:
If I had any faith in the Republicans I would celebrate all the good qualities of "Marge", a more pragmatic than ideological approach, a reformist streak, her apparent connection with the land, her genuine middle class roots, honest morality. I buy most of the good traits of Palin that have been pointed out here.
But I do not have faith in Rove's Republicans.
Instead I have a familiar sickening feeling. I suspect that Palin will be once again used as a "salt of the earth American" to bludgeon the more visibly educated and urbane Obama/Biden. The campaign will point at Palin and scream "real american" and then at people such as myself and scream "traitorous effete elites."
Hey if she ends up not turning into the newest incarnation of the usual vicious and simplistic Rove Identity Politics, I'll be very happy. But excuse me for not being optimistic.
If you conservatives really want to make enemies of the educated urban class, if you want to keep pretending that America is a white straight christian country... well, good look not getting steam-rolled by China. Us educated urban heathens... we're mobile, we know multiple languages, we have skills that are in demand all over the world, don't you worry about us we won't go down with the ship. But all you patriotic "real americans" have fun doing that.
Your insipid arrogance and your ignorant folly demonstrated in your choices of politicians and policies not only turned us off from you, but led to your being discounted as "serious" in the first place. But it's not us that made you our enemy. In your arrogant ignorance, you made US your enemy, by declaring your puffed up self importance and your supposed "skill" at playing games at shifting money to flow your way. Like most liberals I know, they tend to measure their worth by dollar signs.
You can be as mobile and "urbane" as you wish. Most of us just wish you'd "mobile" yourself off to some place your silly pseudo-intellectual crap can't and won't damage our nation.
fbc,
If that works for you, maybe you should consider where America would be without the "educated urban class." High tech? Finance? Believe me, Google's offices are not populated by the "salt of the earth."
Nor were a whole host of dot-com failures that came and went and all but wiped out the private venture capital in this country. You've had your way. We've seen it. Clintonistas, short sighted, centralized control freaks, and "live by politics" PC-blinded half-wits. Yeah, none were "salt of the earth." They're still back provdiing you the necessities they were before the boom and still there doing it after the bust.
America contains many distinct cultures, and going to war with the culture that drives the information economy (the only kind of industry that we've really got left) is suicidal. If you don't learn to live beside us NYC heathens and to tolerate our differences, this country will never get back to business.
I'm going to war with myself? I am the epitome of the information economy. Cutting edge technology bridging the digital divide without government money, grants, debt, or venture capital.
I'm going to guess that my real world experience is worth at least 10 of your fancy "urban educations".
Watcher,
Now that I realize how easy it is to get some people on this forum to turn red and blow steam out of their ears, a lesser human being than myself would by now have gone full-bore-anon-troll.
But I won't do that. Because I value civil discourse.
*Ah-hem*
Watcher, the first five letters of "patriot" are not j-i-n-g-o. Please, look it up.
I have no doubt you are a patriot. But with a post like that, you brand yourself an enemy of patriotism.
Sorry, Mike, but I don't believe this person is actually interested in civil discourse. He/she is right, anyone who disagrees is wrong... and may his God help you if you get the least bit snippy with him/her.
(Yes, Watcher, I do remember you referring to having a wife. Considering your consistent choices in rhetoric, you may consider that a backhanded expression of distrust.)
How about a nice game of Parcheesi?
Post a Comment
By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.